Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is like the movie scene where the cop is ordered to turn over all his guns. And he takes one out of his side holster, and his shoulder holster.He clearly wasn't cooperating, otherwise the FBI wouldn't have found documents when they searched Mar a Lago.
Who said they were planted?You mean the documents they planted? Remember, we know the FBI already lied.
No, it's not 'like' that.This is like the movie scene where the cop is ordered to turn over all his guns. And he takes one out of his side holster, and his shoulder holster.
Then they ask him if that's all of them. Before he pulls one from an ankle holster.
Are you sure that's all, and they lift up his other pant leg to show a gun tucked into his boot.
That kind of cooperating.
Trump claimed that, before his lawyers told him the FBI had his security video.Who said they were planted?
How do you know they weren't? We know the FBI lies.Who said they were planted?
What video, where it it?Trump claimed that, before his lawyers told him the FBI had his security video.
So you just make it up?How do you know they weren't? We know the FBI lies.
Actually it was, because each time Trump would say he had no more "guns", and they would look under his pant leg and find another "gun" he didn't turn over.No, it's not 'like' that.
In Jack Smiths hands.What video, where it it?
So the FBI just makes things up which is proven. Why should we trust the ones running the FBI? Oh yeah...'Orange Man Bad.' And 'We have an insurance policy' so Trump won't get elected...So you just make it up?
Just like Trump made it up, and they repeat Trumps liesSo you just make it up?
A video that the biased select committee gave over to a loser lawyer who hates Trump. You sure are brainwashed.In Jack Smiths hands.
Along with the security video of Trumps employees trying to erase security videos.
Yeah, he liedI was looking up the presidential records act and from what I'm reading it looks like the documents are the government's property not his. However, I have a little reading comprehension issues so I could be (and hopefully I am) wrong. I don't know much about legal stuff either I admit. I also wasn't sure if he could testify at his own trial.
Trump: 'I'm Allowed to Do Whatever I Want' With Classified Info
Donald Trump said he "absolutely" plans to testify in the classified documents legal case, telling Hugh Hewitt, "I'm allowed to do everything I did."www.google.com
The Presidential Records Act
Enlarge Boxes of records and memorabilia await transport to Little Rock, AR, in January 2001 for eventual storage in the Clinton Presidential Library. (William J. Clinton Library) Under the Presidential Records Act (PRA), incumbent Presidents have exclusive responsibility for the custody and...www.archives.gov
Just to be clear, you said the documents were planted and have absolutely no basis for that claim.So the FBI just makes things up which is proven. Why should we trust the ones running the FBI? Oh yeah...'Orange Man Bad.' And 'We have an insurance policy' so Trump won't get elected...
There has been one (1) instance where the FBI made something up, and that was years ago, and the perpetrator plead guilty. That in no way proves the FBI has done so since.So the FBI just makes things up which is proven. Why should we trust the ones running the FBI? Oh yeah...'Orange Man Bad.' And 'We have an insurance policy' so Trump won't get elected...
No the video Jack Smith subpoenaed which formed the additional obstruction of justice charges in the superseding indictment.A video that the biased select committee gave over to a loser lawyer who hates Trump. You sure are brainwashed.
LOL How about the Biden analogy. Every time they searched his house - FIVE TIMES - they found more classified docs.Actually it was, because each time Trump would say he had no more "guns", and they would look under his pant leg and find another "gun" he didn't turn over.
Trump was supposed to turn them all over, and instead made the Archves or the FBI search for them.
Yeah, that's like saying the perp only killed one time and that doesn't prove he won't kill again.There has been one (1) instance where the FBI made something up, and that was years ago, and the perpetrator plead guilty. That in no way proves the FBI has done so since.
Which is why FBI statements are backed up by the testimony of republicans.
Trump said it. So it MUST be trueJust to be clear, you said the documents were planted and have absolutely no basis for that claim.
What video? Where is it? Why can't we see it? Post it please.No the video Jack Smith subpoenaed which formed the additional obstruction of justice charges in the superseding indictment.
