elektra
Platinum Member
so? we were not arguing who owns and operates the librariesPresidential libraries are owned and operated by NARA.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
so? we were not arguing who owns and operates the librariesPresidential libraries are owned and operated by NARA.
we were never once discussing who owns the libraries, dumbassRead the rest of your link, idiot.
They are owned and operated by NARA.
Nothing in post 111 states what you infer unless this is the point you are makingBZZZZZZ! Wrong.
See post 111.
Trump had ZERO authority to take government property with him to Mar-A-Lago.
Once completed, the private organization turned over the libraries to the National Archives and Records Administration to operate and maintain.
There isn’t.There sure is. You know it too.
Well, NARA certainly doesn’t own Trump’s basement.so? we were not arguing who owns and operates the libraries
No evidence is lacking concerning Clinton and Comey. Why are you lying? They are above the law.There isn’t.
The thing you lack is evidence of a crime.
We have a lot of that for Trump.
Easy to say, but it’s impossible for you to back it up.No evidence is lacking concerning Clinton and Comey. Why are you lying? They are above the law.
Talk about sounding stupid.TardLogic at its very best.
A Biden voter would say it was the same as voting for Trump.
And you really don't realize how stupid you sound when you say that voting for the party which believes in the smallest government possible is the same as voting for Biden. BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA!
Oh, man. That's priceless.
As for the Libertarians, I have always considered them propellerheads. However, the organization formerly known as the Republican Party has bulleted so far off the conservative reservation, they actually make the Libertarians look good!
Not if the judge is a liberal.Easy to say, but it’s impossible for you to back it up.
A court requires actual evidence, not ramblings from internet posters who have a tenuous grasp on reality.
What does Clinton have to do with this indictment?And all the tards can say at this point is, "Nuh-uh!"
You are arguing from total ignorance, kid. This is what happens when you don't read the indictment and just come armed with your dim wits and your gaslighting propagandists' talking points.
What do you mean impossible? You are an idiot with the memory of a goldfish.Easy to say, but it’s impossible for you to back it up.
A court requires actual evidence, not ramblings from internet posters who have a tenuous grasp on reality.
Trump can decide where the records are kept. The Archivists, can agree or disagree.Well, NARA certainly doesn’t own Trump’s basement.
The point is that the records are always in custody of the archives.
Trump can’t decide to store them anywhere he wants.
It is impossible to provide evidence which doesn’t exist.What do you mean impossible? You are an idiot with the memory of a goldfish.
No, Trump cannot decide where the records are kept.Trump can decide where the records are kept. The Archivists, can agree or disagree.
1. No, not everyone agrees.Everyone agrees that the president has soul authority to declassify... look at the archives folks today... refusing to turn over evidence of Biden's fake names and emails... so we now can see where those clowns align themselves.... they set Trump up big time....
Read. The. Indictment.
The indictment has nothing to do with the PRARead. The. PRA.
Trump is toast.
This is true, but supposedly Trump is going to rely on an interpretation of the PRA for his defense so it probably will be relevant eventually.The indictment has nothing to do with the PRA
wrong, presidents decide where they keep the recordsNo, Trump cannot decide where the records are kept.
The records are in possession and controlled by the National Archives which means the archivist decides where the records are kept.