- Moderator
- #301
Yes, I'm sure the lack of invitations to the Obamas, the Bushes, and the Clintons is all about snubbing your sect leader.Of course they're just making excuses and not inviting former presidents helps back up their claims.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, I'm sure the lack of invitations to the Obamas, the Bushes, and the Clintons is all about snubbing your sect leader.Of course they're just making excuses and not inviting former presidents helps back up their claims.
i did provide the links repeatedly
hahah the links literally say otherwise…they voted he was held in contempt. The links literally say thatWho said you didn't post the links? What I did say, and you confirm, is that they don't indicate there was a vote on that.
hahah the links literally say otherwise…they voted he was held in contempt. The links literally say that
LOL
If the link stated they voted on that, you would have been able to quote that here. You can't because it doesn't say that.i
i quoted it when i posted the links
i’m on my phone.now, not sure how cut and pasture using my obj was…but you can go back to the prior post…they were repeated posted…and you know that
you are just a troll…the reality is xiden is behaves in a contemptuous manner, because that’s what demafasict do…like you
haha yes it doesYou quoted was the headline, which doesn't say it was voted on.
haha yes it does
haha he was held in contempt…how do you think parliament held him in contempt if they didn’t vote on it yoj dumb fuck?"UK’s Parliament Holds Biden in Contempt as France and Britain Forced to Rescue Citizens Trapped in Kabul"
Nope, the word, "vote," is not in there.
haha he was held in contempt…how do you think parliament held him in contempt if they didn’t vote on it yoj dumb fuck?
Congress votes to hold people in Contempt of Congress….so yes, i agree, when xiden was held in contempt of it’s the sameSame as our Congress when members voice their opinions on matters.
Congress votes to hold people in Contempt of Congress….so yes, i agree, when xiden was held in contempt of it’s the same
a person can’t be held in contempt by a member voicing an opinion…you are wrongYes, the same as members entering their opinion into the record. Not necessarily a vote.
Of course they're just making excuses and not inviting former presidents helps back up their claims. The true reason is with all of the current allegations that probably aren't even true.
Does your TV not have an "off" button?I'm watching a nightly news show right now and they're talking about the freaking queen again. Seems like it's never going to end.
PLEASE...let it be over with. Drop the old bag in a hole and cover her up already. If I never again hear about "The Royal Family" it'll be too soon.
Present?first time in history we weren’t allowed a delegation…why? because xiden is the first present to be held in contempt of the united kingdom. The Crown, who used to be our closest ally, is simply disgusted by xiden contemptuous behavior.
this admin has been a black eye to our country
a delagation was invited…not just the head of state as we are limited to now because of xiden’s contemptuous behavior