So it'd be ok to eliminate that block of voters?We don’t like dictator wannabes.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So it'd be ok to eliminate that block of voters?We don’t like dictator wannabes.
GG I’m not following your every post, typically you don’t take that directionYes, I know he will. I have said that like 100 times now.
Are you already drunk?
How would it eliminate them? Would there be no other wannabe dictators to vote for.So it'd be ok to eliminate that block of voters?
You’re wasting my time .. moving along..No.
I am fine here.
However YOU may be more cofortable in some country where autocrats are able to hang onto power despite loosing elections.
Russia maybe?
China?
North Korea?
GG I’m not following your every post, typically you don’t take that direction
You are lost in false equivalencies.Then they can use their own due process opinion and remove Biden.
SECTION 3 OF THE 14th AMENDMENTHey Golfing Gator I'm still waiting for you to tell us which Maine election law the SOS used to keep Trump off the ballot.
Which qualification did he not meet? Funny how none of you clowns can come up with one, huh?
Except they have no reason or evidence, so no they really can't. Bummer for your fantasy.Then they can use their own due process opinion and remove Biden.
That you’re a asshole is not my fault either…yeah, I do. Your ignorance of my positions is not really my fault.
There's an app for that!I‘ll be sure to remember next time that you’re a asshole…
Biden is guilty of not upholding the Constitution which he swore to uphold and protect.Trump is guilty of actual crimes against democracy...and against American voters.
CNN Senior legal analyst, Elie Honig claimed that SCOTUS most likely would not make a ruling based on whether or not Trump committed insurrection, but said they would more than likely rule on whether states removing Him from their ballots was legal. You have to realize, these states would have to have standing to be heard. Virginia Dem Judge already tossed the ballot removal effort in that state, claiming the plaintiffs didn't show they had legal standing. That means they failed to show anyone was one was hurt or would be by Trump being on the ballot.SECTION 3 OF THE 14th AMENDMENT
Evidence is at the border and all those sanctuary cities in swing states full of dems and indies who are totally pissed off at the dems for what they have done to their cities.Except they have no reason or evidence, so no they really can't.
You obviously need to learn the difference between statements like "Biden is guilty of" and "we who hate Biden accuse him of" because the two statements are not necessarily interchangeable yet you seem to confuse the latter to mean the former.Biden is guilty of not upholding the Constitution which he swore to uphold and protect.
The SCOTUS will probably not rule on the insurrection question....since that isn't even language used in Jack Smith's indictments or Fanni Willis'.CNN Senior legal analyst, Elie Honig claimed that SCOTUS most likely would not make a ruling based on whether or not Trump committed insurrection, but said they would more than likely rule on whether states removing Him from their ballots was legal. You have to realize, these states would have to have standing to be heard. Virginia Dem Judge already tossed the ballot removal effort in that state, claiming the plaintiffs didn't show they had legal standing. That means they failed to show anyone was one was hurt or would be by Trump being on the ballot.
Once again you are confusing "evidence" with MAGAt Trumptard propaganda....which isn't accurate, complete, or even correct.Evidence is at the border and all those sanctuary cities in swing states full of dems and indies who are totally pissed off at the dems for what they have done to their cities.
Name 1Trump is guilty of actual crimes against democracy...and against American voters
The polls say otherwise…Biden is only guilty of not being liked by clueless MAGAt Trumptards.
How about 91?Name 1
Fake polls!The polls say otherwise…
What impeachable offense has President Biden committed?Biden is guilty of not upholding the Constitution which he swore to uphold and protect.
CNN Senior legal analyst, Elie Honig claimed that SCOTUS most likely would not make a ruling based on whether or not Trump committed insurrection, but said they would more than likely rule on whether states removing Him from their ballots was legal. You have to realize, these states would have to have standing to be heard. Virginia Dem Judge already tossed the ballot removal effort in that state, claiming the plaintiffs didn't show they had legal standing. That means they failed to show anyone was one was hurt or would be by Trump being on the ballot.
Evidence is at the border and all those sanctuary cities in swing states full of dems and indies who are totally pissed off at the dems for what they have done to their cities.
Hoo rah...
Link?How about 91?
ConvenientFake polls!
Link?
You obviously need to learn the difference between statements like "Biden is guilty of" and "we who hate Biden accuse him of" because the two statements are not necessarily interchangeable yet you seem to confuse the latter to mean the former.
You most likely got that right.The SCOTUS will probably not rule on the insurrection question.
So you can see the charge of "insurrection" doesn't appear anywhere here. Rather, the insurrection occured as a result of Trump's coordinated, multi-pronged attack on our democracy.
Once again you are confusing "evidence" with MAGAt Trumptard propaganda....which isn't accurate, complete, or even correct.
Might try his oath of office, for openers.What impeachable offense has President Biden committed?