Trump states that he is the MOST picked on president in US history...Really?

Let me guess...you poor little snowflakes are buying into the notion that Trump is going to be impeached? Too funny...

When you're finished "laughing".......Let me tell you that republicans in congress lack the balls to impeachment the orange clown.....Much more likely, the charlatan will resign and go back to screwing people who go into business with him.

(Note that NO US banks will lend this bankruptcy "king" any money for his scams....)

Trump will serve at least one term. Him resigning is nothing more than you deluding yourself, Nat. He's got four years to establish his legacy and that's all he's concerned with.

Rather than dreaming about a Trump resignation...you'd be better served trying to figure out who's going to be the Democratic nominee the next time around. Right now it's looking like Elizabeth Warren and SHE would be the final nail in the coffin for the progressive movement! Then again...who else do you have? Joe Biden? Bernie Sanders? You've turned into the party of old white liberals, Nat! Where's the new blood?
 
Nat! Where's the new blood?


Keep watching FOX and you'll NEVER see the new Dem. blood.......Your Trumpster is actually destroying the old farts in the GOP.....even Ryan is turning out to be a flop and a stooge.
 
Trump learned at an early age that by crying and whining, his servants would give him anything he wanted. Now his servants are the GOP and the ignorant rubes of the GOP base. They will give him whatever he wants when he starts to fuss.
I doubt he had any servants in military school, asshole.
 
That kind of statement (which shows how truly ignorant the orange clown really is) is uttered by someone who:

1. Called Obama a Kenyan for YEARS
2. Refused to release his tax returns as all other candidates have done since Nixon
3. Refused to place his business interests into a BLIND trust as any decent candidate who became president would have done.
4. Fires the very same person entrusted to investigate his shady dealings with Russian oligarchs.
5. Someone who rudely maligns the Courts, the media, democrats and even his own former opponents with childish name-calling.

Yeah, Trumpster you're being picked on because you're a charlatan/demagogue who should never have infected the oval office.

  1. I suppose you have a quote of him saying that?
  2. So? How does that justify attacking him? Where is the law that says he has to release his tax returns?
  3. Right, He's not a fucking fool. Your belief that such a demand is reasonable proves that you're a fucking moron.
  4. Even the Democrats demanded he be fired, until Trump fired him, that is.
  5. He doesn't "malign" the courts, the media and Democrats. He tells the truth about them.
 
Trump states that he is the MOST picked on president in US history.

I wonder how JFK's descendents and relatives feel about that assertion. I suspect they feel his by an assassin's bullet having his brains splattered across the trunk of a car constitutes being vastly more "picked on" than anything Trump's encountered.

Really? You think getting assassinated is equivalent to being attacked by the press?

You're a moron.
 
Trumpster you're being picked on because you're a charlatan/demagogue who should never have infected the oval office.
"Picking on" someone is what individuals do when they have no, or won't develop and present, sound criticisms. AFAIC, Trump has not been picked on at all. He's merely, probably as never before in his life, being daily/hourly told, bidden by him or not, what are his flaws and those found in his ideas and his policies.

A large amount of input will be offered for and about anyone who holds high elected office; it's just part of the territory. Trump's receiving an abundance of constructive criticism because, quite frankly, nobody must think long and hard to identify the nature, extent and manifestations of his inadequacies.
I was actually thinking about Lincoln. Talk about guys who were pilloried, he would have to be number one. The entire South thought he was essentially the antichrist. John Adams caught a ton of flack from opponents and the press of the time, including their version of the tweet --- the pamphleteers. Gerry Ford, a smart and nice guy, was painted as a buffoon and never recovered. Contrast that to Ronald Reagan, who, like President Trump, was painted as a buffoon, but he rose above it and never stooped to the level of his critics, thus emboldening them. And, frankly, Richard Nixon was a guy with a target on his back ever since he lost the governorship in 1962 ("you won't have Dick Nixon to kick around any more."). On the Democratic side, LBJ decided not to run in 1968 because of constant criticism ("If I've lost Walter Conkrite I've lost the nation") over the war ("hey, hey, LBJ, how many kids did you kill today?") And frankly, you are correct, it goes with the POTUS territory now. Clinton and Obama were pilloried by other news sources that are now mainstream but won't call themselves mainstream.

My point is the same as yours: You're under the microscope as POTUS, stop reading the clippings and pursue the policies you want. Responding to the critics emboldens them and puts you on their level. Rise above it.

Lincoln was a tyrant, and everything Southerners said about him was true.
 
Trumpster you're being picked on because you're a charlatan/demagogue who should never have infected the oval office.
"Picking on" someone is what individuals do when they have no, or won't develop and present, sound criticisms. AFAIC, Trump has not been picked on at all. He's merely, probably as never before in his life, being daily/hourly told, bidden by him or not, what are his flaws and those found in his ideas and his policies.

A large amount of input will be offered for and about anyone who holds high elected office; it's just part of the territory. Trump's receiving an abundance of constructive criticism because, quite frankly, nobody must think long and hard to identify the nature, extent and manifestations of his inadequacies.

Thanks for the spew of horseshit. Now we know why Dims lost the election. Apparently they believe their own bull.
 
Have you not watched CNN lately? I've never seen anything like it. It's literally around the clock attack mode against Trump!

Once again...Trump is simply pointing out what's obvious to everyone but you and your ilk, Nat!
Ever since you inbred, brain-dead rubes starting crying about CNN, it's become my favorite news channel.

That started at least 30 years ago, chump.
 
That kind of statement (which shows how truly ignorant the orange clown really is) is uttered by someone who:

1. Called Obama a Kenyan for YEARS
2. Refused to release his tax returns as all other candidates have done since Nixon
3. Refused to place his business interests into a BLIND trust as any decent candidate who became president would have done.
4. Fires the very same person entrusted to investigate his shady dealings with Russian oligarchs.
5. Someone who rudely maligns the Courts, the media, democrats and even his own former opponents with childish name-calling.

Yeah, Trumpster you're being picked on because you're a charlatan/demagogue who should never have infected the oval office.
He likes hyperbole, so he'll like this one: He is the biggest fucking asshole in the history of US politics.
 
Trumpster you're being picked on because you're a charlatan/demagogue who should never have infected the oval office.
"Picking on" someone is what individuals do when they have no, or won't develop and present, sound criticisms. AFAIC, Trump has not been picked on at all. He's merely, probably as never before in his life, being daily/hourly told, bidden by him or not, what are his flaws and those found in his ideas and his policies.

A large amount of input will be offered for and about anyone who holds high elected office; it's just part of the territory. Trump's receiving an abundance of constructive criticism because, quite frankly, nobody must think long and hard to identify the nature, extent and manifestations of his inadequacies.
I was actually thinking about Lincoln. Talk about guys who were pilloried, he would have to be number one. The entire South thought he was essentially the antichrist. John Adams caught a ton of flack from opponents and the press of the time, including their version of the tweet --- the pamphleteers. Gerry Ford, a smart and nice guy, was painted as a buffoon and never recovered. Contrast that to Ronald Reagan, who, like President Trump, was painted as a buffoon, but he rose above it and never stooped to the level of his critics, thus emboldening them. And, frankly, Richard Nixon was a guy with a target on his back ever since he lost the governorship in 1962 ("you won't have Dick Nixon to kick around any more."). On the Democratic side, LBJ decided not to run in 1968 because of constant criticism ("If I've lost Walter Conkrite I've lost the nation") over the war ("hey, hey, LBJ, how many kids did you kill today?") And frankly, you are correct, it goes with the POTUS territory now. Clinton and Obama were pilloried by other news sources that are now mainstream but won't call themselves mainstream.

My point is the same as yours: You're under the microscope as POTUS, stop reading the clippings and pursue the policies you want. Responding to the critics emboldens them and puts you on their level. Rise above it.
Comparing Trump to Lincoln and even Reagan is about as asinine as you can possibly be.
 
That kind of statement (which shows how truly ignorant the orange clown really is) is uttered by someone who:

1. Called Obama a Kenyan for YEARS
2. Refused to release his tax returns as all other candidates have done since Nixon
3. Refused to place his business interests into a BLIND trust as any decent candidate who became president would have done.
4. Fires the very same person entrusted to investigate his shady dealings with Russian oligarchs.
5. Someone who rudely maligns the Courts, the media, democrats and even his own former opponents with childish name-calling.

Yeah, Trumpster you're being picked on because you're a charlatan/demagogue who should never have infected the oval office.
Funny that Harvard, which is normally a totally liberal biased university, to their credit even found after doing a study, most media outlets are basically a collective bunch of rabid dogs that are frothing at the mouth to bash Trump. But then again that was already blatantly obvious to anyone with even a low degree of intelligence. Only brain dead liberals seem to be unable to distinguish fact from what's become an everyday/hourly barrage of fake news. And disturbingly while continuing to sing the praises of Hillary Rotten Clinton!

Harvard Study Confirms: Yes, The Media Is Totally Biased Against Donald Trump ...
Harvard Study Reveals Huge Extent of Anti-Trump Media Bias
 
Last edited:
That kind of statement (which shows how truly ignorant the orange clown really is) is uttered by someone who:

1. Called Obama a Kenyan for YEARS
2. Refused to release his tax returns as all other candidates have done since Nixon
3. Refused to place his business interests into a BLIND trust as any decent candidate who became president would have done.
4. Fires the very same person entrusted to investigate his shady dealings with Russian oligarchs.
5. Someone who rudely maligns the Courts, the media, democrats and even his own former opponents with childish name-calling.

Yeah, Trumpster you're being picked on because you're a charlatan/demagogue who should never have infected the oval office.
/--- Oh grow up and accept defeat, will ya.
seethe rage.jpg
 
Yeah, Trumpster you're being picked on because you're a charlatan/demagogue who should never have infected the oval office.
McMaster Says He Doesn't Remember:dunno: If Trump Told Russians Comey Was 'Nut Job' :deal:
National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster on Sunday said he does not remember:bsflag: whether President Donald Trump told Russian officials

The "amazing" thing about Trump is that he not only makes a fool of himself on a daily basis, but he ALSO manages to make fools of virtually all around him who try to clean up his messes.

Trump tweets something when he gets up in the morning and you liberals wet your pants and run around with your hair on fire for the entire day responding to it. Who's really the fool?
 
Was that supposed to mean something, Tyrone?

You gotta stop with the "wake and bake", Dude! Seriously...
 
80% just reveals how much of the media is part of the rabid liberal left propaganda machine.





...within DAYS of taking his oath of office, Barry openly, publicly declared he was intentionally BREAKING that oath of office by declaring he would NOT enforce the laws of this country by refusing to enforce the DOMA law. El Presidente did not LIKE a law, so HE decided HIS govt would not enforce the LAW. And so Barry's
reign' began....without nearly as much bad press as Trump has been given.
 
That kind of statement (which shows how truly ignorant the orange clown really is) is uttered by someone who:

1. Called Obama a Kenyan for YEARS
2. Refused to release his tax returns as all other candidates have done since Nixon
3. Refused to place his business interests into a BLIND trust as any decent candidate who became president would have done.
4. Fires the very same person entrusted to investigate his shady dealings with Russian oligarchs.
5. Someone who rudely maligns the Courts, the media, democrats and even his own former opponents with childish name-calling.

Yeah, Trumpster you're being picked on because you're a charlatan/demagogue who should never have infected the oval office.


......and, regarding "number one" (above,) I am STILL waiting for those investigators that Trump sent to Hawaii to come back and report on Obama's "false" birth certificate.......those investigators should be well tanned by now, correct right wingers?
 
That kind of statement (which shows how truly ignorant the orange clown really is) is uttered by someone who:

1. Called Obama a Kenyan for YEARS
2. Refused to release his tax returns as all other candidates have done since Nixon
3. Refused to place his business interests into a BLIND trust as any decent candidate who became president would have done.
4. Fires the very same person entrusted to investigate his shady dealings with Russian oligarchs.
5. Someone who rudely maligns the Courts, the media, democrats and even his own former opponents with childish name-calling.

Yeah, Trumpster you're being picked on because you're a charlatan/demagogue who should never have infected the oval office.


Concerning number 3 (above) is the best conjecture that Trump is not only a crooked charlatan, but probably does not intend to finish out even his one term.
 
That kind of statement (which shows how truly ignorant the orange clown really is) is uttered by someone who:

1. Called Obama a Kenyan for YEARS
2. Refused to release his tax returns as all other candidates have done since Nixon
3. Refused to place his business interests into a BLIND trust as any decent candidate who became president would have done.
4. Fires the very same person entrusted to investigate his shady dealings with Russian oligarchs.
5. Someone who rudely maligns the Courts, the media, democrats and even his own former opponents with childish name-calling.

Yeah, Trumpster you're being picked on because you're a charlatan/demagogue who should never have infected the oval office.


......and, regarding "number one" (above,) I am STILL waiting for those investigators that Trump sent to Hawaii to come back and report on Obama's "false" birth certificate.......those investigators should be well tanned by now, correct right wingers?

Who really cares about where Barry was born? That whole "scandal" only came about because Obama lied about where he was born on his college applications because it made him more appealing to liberal administrators. He's no different then the next big thing for you liberals...Elizabeth Warren! She lied about being an American Indian because she thought that would be an advantage in "academia"!
 

Forum List

Back
Top