Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, if they could only explain more clearly that they are our betters they might win an elelction and continue in their endeavour to make America a shit hole, for our good.Wow. A bunch of leftists skews a study showing those they oppose aren't as well educated.
Color Me shocked. Shocked I tell you!
Yes, if they could only explain more clearly that they are our betters they might win an elelction and continue in their endeavour to make America a shit hole, for our good.Wow. A bunch of leftists skews a study showing those they oppose aren't as well educated.
Color Me shocked. Shocked I tell you!
Huffpo again? Are you irony impaired?Yes, if they could only explain more clearly that they are our betters they might win an elelction and continue in their endeavour to make America a shit hole, for our good.Wow. A bunch of leftists skews a study showing those they oppose aren't as well educated.
Color Me shocked. Shocked I tell you!
Speaking of elections...
NEW UPSET IN TRUMP COUNTRY
I don't get the Twitter thing. Who goes there and Facebook, etc. for news? Fake News is MSNBC, CNN and the WaPo, HuffPo, NYT, etc.
Fake news.Fifty-five percent of all junk news traffic on Twitter can be linked to Trump supporters, researchers said.
Trump supporters and extreme conservatives consume and share more “junk news” on social media than every other political group combined, a University of Oxford study has found.
The three-month study, published Tuesday as part of the school’s Computational Propaganda Research Project, scrutinized the habits of 13,477 politically active U.S. Twitter users and 47,719 public Facebook pages in the months leading up to the State of the Union address late last month.
The authors then mapped how links to junk news sources flowed through the social media networks. Based on the links users shared and other factors, researchers separated them into distinct (yet often overlapping) cohorts, which they labeled “Hard Conservative,” “Women’s Rights,” “Conspiracy,” “Libertarian,” “Trump Support,” “Democratic Party,” etc.
The study linked a full 55 percent of all junk news traffic on Twitter to the “Trump Support” group. “On Twitter, a network of Trump supporters shares the widest range of known junk news sources and circulates more junk news than all the other groups put together,” the authors noted.
For comparison, the “Democratic Party” and “Progressive Movement” groups together accounted for 1 percent of junk news traffic on Twitter, according to the study.
And on Facebook, the study found that “extreme hard right pages—distinct from Republican pages—share the widest range of known junk news sources and circulate more junk news than all the other audiences put together.” The “Hard Conservative” group accounted for 58 percent of junk news traffic on Facebook. (The “Democratic Party” group accounted for 12 percent.)
More: Trump Supporters Consume And Share The Most Fake News, Oxford Study Finds
This should come as no surprise to most honorable and sane people. We see it 24/7 right here on USMB.
BINGO!I suppose that depends on how you define fake news doesn't it?
Fifty-five percent of all junk news traffic on Twitter can be linked to Trump supporters, researchers said.
Trump supporters and extreme conservatives consume and share more “junk news” on social media than every other political group combined, a University of Oxford study has found.
The three-month study, published Tuesday as part of the school’s Computational Propaganda Research Project, scrutinized the habits of 13,477 politically active U.S. Twitter users and 47,719 public Facebook pages in the months leading up to the State of the Union address late last month.
The authors then mapped how links to junk news sources flowed through the social media networks. Based on the links users shared and other factors, researchers separated them into distinct (yet often overlapping) cohorts, which they labeled “Hard Conservative,” “Women’s Rights,” “Conspiracy,” “Libertarian,” “Trump Support,” “Democratic Party,” etc.
The study linked a full 55 percent of all junk news traffic on Twitter to the “Trump Support” group. “On Twitter, a network of Trump supporters shares the widest range of known junk news sources and circulates more junk news than all the other groups put together,” the authors noted.
For comparison, the “Democratic Party” and “Progressive Movement” groups together accounted for 1 percent of junk news traffic on Twitter, according to the study.
And on Facebook, the study found that “extreme hard right pages—distinct from Republican pages—share the widest range of known junk news sources and circulate more junk news than all the other audiences put together.” The “Hard Conservative” group accounted for 58 percent of junk news traffic on Facebook. (The “Democratic Party” group accounted for 12 percent.)
More: Trump Supporters Consume And Share The Most Fake News, Oxford Study Finds
This should come as no surprise to most honorable and sane people. We see it 24/7 right here on USMB.
I mean this is something all but the koolaid conservatives know. All of the media outlets for conservatives are built on innuendo, half-lies, and outright full lies. And the base repeat these lies as if they are gospel truth.
It is the same as watching tv evangelists. They lie and manipulate their audience into sending in their last $100 dollars for no return.
Both of these are sad to watch but both of these groups are so invested in believing the lies it is almost impossible to separate them from the lies.
I suppose that depends on how you define fake news doesn't it?
.
So ...
The Brits at The University of Oxford found it necessary to study Americans' consumption of news ...
The fact that they find it to be worthy of study says more than you need to know ...
And the nit-wits on the left pretend to be worried about Russia meddling in our elections.
.
The nitwits on the right seem to be pretending as well...
Russians already meddling in US midterms, Tillerson says
The nitwits on the right seem to be pretending as well...
Russians already meddling in US midterms, Tillerson says
Read the article ... The quotes Tillerson made ... And remove the editorial bullshit.
Tillerson wasn't quoted suggesting what the article or title does.
He said some things the commentator pretending to be a journalist then elaborated on.
Why am I not surprised you could not identify the fake news ...
.
The nitwits on the right seem to be pretending as well...
Russians already meddling in US midterms, Tillerson says
Read the article ... The quotes Tillerson made ... And remove the editorial bullshit.
Tillerson wasn't quoted suggesting what the article or title does.
He said some things the commentator pretending to be a journalist then elaborated on.
Why am I not surprised you could not identify the fake news ...
.
Did you bother to actually listen to the video? There is no ambiguity in his words if you took the time to listen to the video
Sec. of State are not usually chosen by the President, not really. Do some research into the CFR.The nitwits on the right seem to be pretending as well...
Russians already meddling in US midterms, Tillerson says
Read the article ... The quotes Tillerson made ... And remove the editorial bullshit.
Tillerson wasn't quoted suggesting what the article or title does.
He said some things the commentator pretending to be a journalist then elaborated on.
Why am I not surprised you could not identify the fake news ...
.
Did you bother to actually listen to the video? There is no ambiguity in his words if you took the time to listen to the video
The nitwits on the right seem to be pretending as well...
Russians already meddling in US midterms, Tillerson says
Read the article ... The quotes Tillerson made ... And remove the editorial bullshit.
Tillerson wasn't quoted suggesting what the article or title does.
He said some things the commentator pretending to be a journalist then elaborated on.
Why am I not surprised you could not identify the fake news ...
.
Did you bother to actually listen to the video? There is no ambiguity in his words if you took the time to listen to the video
Uh, yeah I watched the video ... Tillerson didn't say what the title suggests.
He said something along the lines that if Russia wanted to meddle in the elections there is little we could do to preempt it.
He indicated that if they want to ... They could.
A-Rod could cave your skull in with a baseball bat ... It doesn't mean I think he is going to.
.
Sec. of State are not usually chosen by the President, not really. Do some research into the CFR.The nitwits on the right seem to be pretending as well...
Russians already meddling in US midterms, Tillerson says
Read the article ... The quotes Tillerson made ... And remove the editorial bullshit.
Tillerson wasn't quoted suggesting what the article or title does.
He said some things the commentator pretending to be a journalist then elaborated on.
Why am I not surprised you could not identify the fake news ...
.
Did you bother to actually listen to the video? There is no ambiguity in his words if you took the time to listen to the video
They are chosen by the establishment. It is the establishment and the military-industrial complex that is pushing this narrative, and if Trump wants to remain POTUS, he has to go along. It is pretty much bogus. You can safely just ignore it.
Tillerson was just playing along to appease Richard Haas and establishment goons like Mueller. There is no "hacking," just attempts to influence, just like the US attempts to influence every other nation's elections.
Get over it already.