Trump takes the 5th 400 times...

[buckeye45_73]

Not if your innocent. That's what Trump said.

Don't care, you guys have tried to get him for 6 straight years, invading his privacy, invading his home, so fuck you.......I hope he laughs his ass off as much as he did when you guys made him into an Action Star!

 

[buckeye45_73]

Yes, those sneaky "yes/no" questions are tough for morons like Trump and his cultists.

Anything's tough for the guy that said humans are good and getting better....lol

 

[Skylar]

You take the lies very seriously. You do know most of what you are hearing is a lie?

Says the election denier and conspiracy theorist who is still snivelling about Kari's loss in Arizona.

You insist anything that doesn't ape your conspiracies are 'lying'.

I'm so happy to disappoint you.

 

[buckeye45_73]

Says the election denier and conspiracy theorist who is still snivelling about Kari's loss in Arizona.

You insist anything that doesn't ape your conspiracies are 'lying'.

I'm so happy to disappoint you.

Bush won in 2000, tell all the OG election deniers like Al Gore and Hitlery Clinton.

 

[Skylar]

Don't care, you guys have tried to get him for 6 straight years, invading his privacy, invading his home, so fuck you.......I hope he laughs his ass off as much as he did when you guys made him into an Action Star!

When you defy a subpoena, that's what happens. It didn't need to. Look at Biden. There was no raid with him because he didn't defy a subpoena. One wasn't even necessary with Biden, with Biden's people coming to the feds themselves.

Trump fucked around for 18 months, lying about the documents in his possession and refusing to return what he took, ignoring a subpoena for 60 days.

What the fuck did he think was gonna happen?

 

[buckeye45_73]

When you defy a subpoena, that's what happens. It didn't need to. Look at Biden. There was no raid with him because he didn't defy a subpoena. One wasn't even necessary with Biden, with Biden's people coming to the feds themselves.

Trump fucked around for 18 months, lying about the documents in his possession and refusing to return what he took, ignoring a subpoena for 60 days.

What the fuck did he think was gonna happen?

Bullshit, you guys kept subpoening him his entire Presidency and after. It's nauseating, no one cares if you find something now. When you spring that many hoaxes, waste that much taxpwyer money, ruin that many peoples lives and reputations, all for a political agenda, you can go to Hell.

 

[BackAgain]

Yes, those sneaky "yes/no" questions are tough for morons like Trump and his cultists.

That you are completely and forever too stupid to understand how such questions can lead even the most scrupulously honest folks astray is testament to just how shallow and ignorant you always are, Farty.

Besides which, who says the questions are simple dichtomies line “yes” or “no?”

See: Excerpts of Donald Trump's Deposition in New York Attorney General's Fraud Investigation Transcript

In fact, many were not. But of course, as was his right and as was perfectly intelligent, he invoked the fifth as to those non “yes/no” questions, too.

 

[Skylar]

Bullshit, you guys kept subpoening him his entire Presidency and after. It's nauseating, no one cares if you find something now. When you spring that many hoaxes, waste that much taxpwyer money, ruin that many peoples lives and reputations, all for a political agenda, you can go to Hell.

Again, Trump defied a subpoena. You may assume Trump is above the law and can ignore any subpoena issued to him. Trump may even believe it.

But the DOJ can and did disabuse him of your ilk's misconception that Trump is immune to the law of the land.

 

[Lastamender]

Says the election denier and conspiracy theorist who is still snivelling about Kari's loss in Arizona.

You insist anything that doesn't ape your conspiracies are 'lying'.

I'm so happy to disappoint you.

Better than gloating about the destruction of the country. That is what you are doing. So you know.

 

[Skylar]

Better than gloating about the destruction of the country. That is what you are doing. So you know.

I simply consider the actual election results a better source than your endless parade of mindless conspiracy batshit.

As would any rational person.

 

[BackAgain]

Again, Trump defied a subpoena. You may assume Trump is above the law and can ignore any subpoena issued to him. Trump may even believe it.

But the DOJ can and did disabuse him of your ilk's misconception that Trump is immune to the law of the land.

Neither Trump nor any of us had or shared the silly position you ascribe to him and to us.

Perhaps you don’t quite grasp that not all subpoenas are created equal. And they can get properly challenged from time to time.

 

[Skylar]

Neither Trump nor any of us had or shared the silly position you ascribe to him and to us.

Perhaps you don’t quite grasp that not all subpoenas are created equal. And they can get properly challenged from time to time.

Then why all the sniveling, the whining, about a lawful warrant being served on someone who had ignored a subpoena for 60 days, lied about the documents they'd taken, and refused to give them back for a year and half?

Its all very.....cucky. Another distasteful example of the conservative fetishization of failure.

 

[ABikerSailor]

No, the crush is on top of you. And it's Skylar who is crushing the shit out of you, and your losing ass ain't said shit to fight it. Face it bud, we could can you up like dog food, and no one would know the difference.

Some of us would know the difference. Alpo is useful. OhPleaseJustQuit isn't.

 

[BackAgain]

Then why all the sniveling, the whining, about a lawful warrant being served on someone who had ignored a subpoena for 60 days, lied about the documents they'd taken, and refused to give them back for a year and half?

I am unfamiliar with what you creatively attempt to call sniveling and whining.

But when a subpoena is challenged (especially during ongoing negotiations), the proper resort isn’t to secure a search warrant from your craven politically partisan and corrupted DOJ and some magistrate judge. Especially for use against the immediately preceding President.

 

[buckeye45_73]

Again, Trump defied a subpoena. You may assume Trump is above the law and can ignore any subpoena issued to him. Trump may even believe it.

But the DOJ can and did disabuse him of your ilk's misconception that Trump is immune to the law of the land.

He should have defied the 1/6 committee, it was a witch hunt where the witnesses did nothing but report 2nd hand heresy

 

[Skylar]

I am unfamiliar with what you creatively attempt to call sniveling and whining.

Ricky Shiffer would be a great place to start.

But when a subpoena is challenged (especially during ongoing negotiations), the proper resort isn’t to secure a search warrant form you craven politically partisan and corrupted DOJ and some magistrate judge. Especially from the immediately preceding President.

Says who? Who says that the 'proper resort' when someone doesn't want to honor a subpoena isn't to secure a warrant?

 

[Skylar]

He should have defied the 1/6 committee, it was a witch hunt where the witnesses did nothing but report 2nd hand heresy

2nd hand heresy? Yeah, I think you mean hearsay. Recounting what you actually heard isn't 'hearsay'. Its eye witness testimony.

 

[BackAgain]

Ricky Shiffer would be a great place to start.

Would he? How do you figure?

Says who? Who says that the 'proper resort' when someone doesn't want to honor a subpoena isn't to secure a warrant?

Well, since they had been engaged in negotiations (which wasn’t unusual for Presidential papers) and since he was within his rights to challenge some subpoenas, and since the government was dealing with the immediately preceding president, their resort to a “criminal” process was unseemly and it was partisan politics undermining the integrity of the DOJ in the process.

Could they do it? Obviously. But it was a dick move and is a threat to our Republic. We don’t wanna be a “republic” preceded by the term “banana.”

The good news is this: that dumbass, Brandon, may very well lose this war. And payback is gonna be a bitch.

 

[Skylar]

Would he? How do you figure?

Well, since they had been engaged in negotiations (which wasn’t unusual for Presidential papers) and since he was within his rights to challenge some subpoenas, and since the government was dealing with the immediately preceding president, their resort to a “criminal” process was unseemly and it was partisan politics undermining the integrity of the DOJ in the process.

Could they do it? Obviously. But it was a dick move and is a threat to our Republic. We don’t wanna be a “republic” preceded by the term “banana.”

The good news is this: that dumbass, Brandon, may very well lose this war. And payback is gonna be a bitch.

Was Trump able to get an injunction on the subpoena? No. Of course not.

Given that the courts didn't issue an injunction, the subpoena was fully enforceable. And given there was probable cause that Trump STILL had classified documents in his possession, given that there was probable cause that Trump had LIED about turning over said documents, and given that classified documents were in an unsecured location...

Who says that the 'proper resort' when someone doesn't want to honor a subpoena isn't to secure a warrant?

So far, your only source is you. And you don't know what you're talking about.

 

[The Banker]

We're a nation of laws.
Law and Order

But trump gets to break any law he wants, and pardon serious criminals.
And if you don't like it, then its TDS.