Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well Trump and his lawyers should care.Then who cares besides your lame ass?
It kinda does. If you only talk tough around your homies it's because you're pussy.A distinction that doesn't matter.
Read the article, for a change.So...when will your orange godlet say he'll testify?
It kinda does. If you only talk tough around your homies it's because you're pussy.
They would either have to have the ability to cut his mic, or get the President to come in and ask him "Will you shut up man?"He doesn't look so tough now. He's a coward, and can't stand up to questioning by the committee.
Basically how we all feel when Trump tries to whisper to us through his associates how tough he is.
No one in USAMaybe not but I think they will. The investigation is an investigation, biased or not. Just having one person up there bloviating how innocent he is with no proof or other witnesses to his side (which the left won't allow), it would open Trump up to exactly what they want out of him. They'd actually be stupid not to let Trump do that and Trump should have never offered. It was probably a bluff but a bad bluff.you just stated that he would be no bating yo prove his innicence
you just made the classic mistaken commie comment that you don’t want him bovating to prove his innocenceMaybe not but I think they will. The investigation is an investigation, biased or not. Just having one person up there bloviating how innocent he is with no proof or other witnesses to his side (which the left won't allow), it would open Trump up to exactly what they want out of him. They'd actually be stupid not to let Trump do that and Trump should have never offered. It was probably a bluff but a bad bluff.
Mac1958 votes for biden who is ruining the country worse than trump was ever accused of and he just wants to continue his vendetta against trumpUnder oath, live, in public, purely extemporaneous, and maybe toss in the promise of no Fifth Amendment. That would be nice, but not a deal breaker.
Let's get this done.
I’m am reading his words correctly verbiage denier and he made an offer to meet with themNo he didn't. It's been reported that he told aids that he might testify if it were on live TV. That isn't an offer of any kind.
I dont know if its good or bad but libs are not playing with a full deck if the underestimate trump againOf course it's an excellent idea. Get him live.
Could beI think they would jump on that offer with both feet.
Nothing Trump would say at the time is proof of anything, just bloviating accusations and the committee would not allow others on Trump's side to testify with Trump against the committee. The committee was designed to be biased and one sided and Trump getting up there and proclaiming his innocence isn't legal proof of anything.No one in USA
you just made the classic mistaken commie comment that you don’t want him bovating to prove his innocence
In the USA No one has to do that. In anything other than a fake, witch hunting make pretend committee there would be charges filed. They have no charges and basically want trump to talk himself into some; or else.
Thinkers see through that and lib loons want censored, edited and controlled “hearing” and don’t want to run the risk of being exposed as the vindictive, childish, unlawful asswipes that they are.
Well the accused gets to say what he wishes. He does not have to follow Nazi wishes to convict himselfNothing Trump would say at the time is proof of anything, just bloviating accusations and the committee would not allow others on Trump's side to testify with Trump against the committee. The committee was designed to be biased and one sided and Trump getting up there and proclaiming his innocence isn't legal proof of anything.
In fact, through his 14 page response, he would probably get up there and spout off a good deal about the election being stolen, actually irrelevant to the Jan 6th investigation because, even if he provided proof the election was stolen, that's not an excuse to do what the actual rioters did on Jan 6th. You don't take the law into your own hands. And, if he bloviated about the committee wasn't investigating the stolen election, they can claim that Trump had and lost several court cases regarding that matter so, it was investigated.
Trump can spout off pretty much anything because he doesn't think before he talks and the dems want to use that against him, hoping that he will say something that they can get him for, even if he misspoke.
??????????? That's exactly what the left wants. Trump is not an eloquent speaker and spurts out whatever comes to his mind, without thinking - exactly why the left want him to testify so that the Nazi's will get him to convict himself. Do you actually think the kangaroo court is going to let him win if Trump testifies?Well the accused gets to say what he wishes. He does not have to follow Nazi wishes to convict himself
I watch Trump a lot and he's a darn good speaker when he's not insulting one or more people.??????????? That's exactly what the left wants. Trump is not an eloquent speaker and spurts out whatever comes to his mind, without thinking - exactly why the left want him to testify so that the Nazi's will get him to convict himself. Do you actually think the kangaroo court is going to let him win if Trump testifies?
Wrong. He will have to answer the committee's questions or plead the fifth, and if he starts blathering they'll shut him up.Well the accused gets to say what he wishes. He does not have to follow Nazi wishes to convict himself