Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 96,271
- 71,786
Not one Penny went in her pocket, though. So that's why nobody is acting on this fantasy.Did the $145 million Hillary got for approving the uranium deal
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not one Penny went in her pocket, though. So that's why nobody is acting on this fantasy.Did the $145 million Hillary got for approving the uranium deal
Here’s the law Trump broke.
Prohibition, It shall be unlawful for—foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make—
(A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;
52 U.S. Code § 30121 - Contributions and donations by foreign nationals
The cool thing is, that an exchange of information didn’t have to happen. Whether they got dirt or not is irrelevant. Just the intent or “implied promise” to provide such information is enough to convict and Trumpies.... is there any doubt Mueller has exactly that in Don Jr.s emails about getting dirt on Hillary.
He’s screwed.
lol![]()
So what does that law say about volunteer services by foreign nationals to campaigns?
.
If their services can be determined to have value, that is also illegal.
What cover up dipstick? All the emails related to the meeting were released long ago. All involved have testified about it. If there was a cover up it had to be the worse one in history. LMAO
Did the $145 million Hillary got for approving the uranium deal "of value?"
Either Steele made up ALL of his shit...which I find to be the most believable scenario...or he was fed that information by RUSSIANS in an attempt to sway our election! Pick your poison, son!
Well first, Donnie lied about the meeting. Then Trump and said he knew nothing about it. Then we learned Trump dictated a lie as an explanation. Then Trump lied about the purpose of the meeting. And now we know Trump is probably lying about not having foreknowledge of the meeting..What cover up
Ffs, is there anything they didn't do to cover it up?
Of course there is. Trump now admits he lied about the intent of the meeting. We also now have reports from varied sources that Trump had foreknowledge of the meeting.Like I said, all that was released over a year ago, there's nothing new.
What cover up dipstick? All the emails related to the meeting were released long ago. All involved have testified about it. If there was a cover up it had to be the worse one in history. LMAO
So, Tigger.....ALL IS WELL.....what the fuck are you worried about then..... LOL
Here’s the law Trump broke.
Prohibition, It shall be unlawful for—foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make—
(A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;
52 U.S. Code § 30121 - Contributions and donations by foreign nationals
The cool thing is, that an exchange of information didn’t have to happen. Whether they got dirt or not is irrelevant. Just the intent or “implied promise” to provide such information is enough to convict and Trumpies.... is there any doubt Mueller has exactly that in Don Jr.s emails about getting dirt on Hillary.
He’s screwed.
lol![]()
So what does that law say about volunteer services by foreign nationals to campaigns?
.
If their services can be determined to have value, that is also illegal.
You might want to do some reading on the topic before opening your mouth.
Foreign nationals - FEC.gov
.
The question of whether or not the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians is answered. Of course they did.Inevitably, Trump "defenders" will attempt to address the criticism of the [possibly criminal] meeting by Junior, Kushner and Manafort and Russian operatives, with a typical, "what about Clinton paying Steele for a dossier on Trump"???
Objectively, there is some lop-sided "logic" to this divertive defense........BUT, two factors must also be considered:
First, Steele is from a nation that is our closest ALLY, versus the attempt to gather opposition research by a country that is a long time ADVERSARY to the U.S.
Second, as we have long learned from the Watergate scandal, the initial wrong-doing PALES in comparison to the attempt to cover up the mistake......Trump has flip-flopped several times in his attempt to covering up the fiasco....directly implicating himself and his family.
Like most ANTI Trump threads on this forum, I expect this one to soon disappear....so, give it a shot in addressing it before the inevitable.
Of course there is. Trump now admits he lied about the intent of the meeting. We also now have reports from varied sources that Trump had foreknowledge of the meeting.Like I said, all that was released over a year ago, there's nothing new.
But I am sure his white house aides, in full panic mode, would love to hear your consoling words
Of course, that ia not the same as admitting he lied about both the intent and about knowing the intent. And yes, the reports from people close to him that he had foreknowledge are also new development.sTrump himself tweeted 17 July 2017 that most politicians would have taken that meeting. So there were no major revaluations about anything this weekend
Here’s the law Trump broke.
Prohibition, It shall be unlawful for—foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make—
(A) a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or to make an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or local election;
52 U.S. Code § 30121 - Contributions and donations by foreign nationals
The cool thing is, that an exchange of information didn’t have to happen. Whether they got dirt or not is irrelevant. Just the intent or “implied promise” to provide such information is enough to convict and Trumpies.... is there any doubt Mueller has exactly that in Don Jr.s emails about getting dirt on Hillary.
He’s screwed.
lol![]()
So what does that law say about volunteer services by foreign nationals to campaigns?
.
If their services can be determined to have value, that is also illegal.
You might want to do some reading on the topic before opening your mouth.
Foreign nationals - FEC.gov
.
There are very strict rules for volunteer services performed by foreign nationals. I read your link, and guess what? They don't qualify for the volunteer exemptions, because the foreign nationals were helping in the decision process.
Of course, both can be true.Oh and reports have been saying Kelly has one foot out the door for months, yet he just agreed to serve another 2.5 years
Of course, that ia not the same as admitting he lied about both the intent and about knowing the intent. And yes, the reports from people close to him that he had foreknowledge are also new development.sTrump himself tweeted 17 July 2017 that most politicians would have taken that meeting. So there were no major revaluations about anything this weekend
Go ahead , throw your little hissy. But when you are done, I suggest you send your assurances to the trump aides in the white house. They sure could use the soothing words!
Of course, that ia not the same as admitting he lied about both the intent and about knowing the intent. And yes, the reports from people close to him that he had foreknowledge are also new development.sTrump himself tweeted 17 July 2017 that most politicians would have taken that meeting. So there were no major revaluations about anything this weekend
Go ahead , throw your little hissy. But when you are done, I suggest you send your assurances to the trump aides in the white house. They sure could use the soothing words!
Cohen, Bannon, Nunberg.Of course, that ia not the same as admitting he lied about both the intent and about knowing the intent. And yes, the reports from people close to him that he had foreknowledge are also new development.sTrump himself tweeted 17 July 2017 that most politicians would have taken that meeting. So there were no major revaluations about anything this weekend
Go ahead , throw your little hissy. But when you are done, I suggest you send your assurances to the trump aides in the white house. They sure could use the soothing words!
Name the people that said Trump had this foreknowledge. Where's your links?
.
The question on the Trump campaign’s collusion with the Russians is answered.
Of course they did.