Trump under investigation for Obstruction of Justice.

The Amazon Post? Really? There's no Russian connection so how can he obstruct what didn't happen?
17 intelligence agencies call you a liar... but I'm sure you still think you know best.
Your life of denial is pathological.
You're the liar. It could be 98 agencies but they were all repeating the original Obama administration report that was a conclusion. No facts of collusion. No wonder you believe what you do, they have you totally in the dark.
 
Do you have any evidence he covered anything up? Or even obstructed justice in the first place?

How can he cover up something he never did?
Trying to stop a federal investigation is obstruction of justice.Duh.
When did that happen? Oh, and the president has the authority to stop or start investigations anyway as head of the executive branch so it's just another dead end road for the frustrated left.
 
The Washington Post says that the Special Prosecutor is investigating Trump for Obstruction of Justice.

It's never the crime that goes these guys in. Always the coverup.
Another illegal leak to prosecute later. Remember...Democrats are not going to win the House in 2018. So no matter how long you drag this out hoping to win the House and impeach Trump...it's not going to happen. Give it up. There was no obstruction of justice. If it turns upon Comey v. Trump...it's "he said v. he said." Going nowhere.
 
You remain rightarded as I did no such thing.
That is YOUR OPINION, but everyone can see for themselves that is exactly what you just did.

YOU posted Comey's OPINION: "I had understood the President to be ..."

It is clear Comey is NPOT saying 'TRUMP ORDERED ME TO DROP THE INVESTIGATION' - He clearly states "THIS IS WHAT I INTERPRETED / UNDERSTOOD TRUMP TO BE SAYING."

If you can't tell the difference between what someone ACTUALLY says and someone giving their opinion / interpretation of what they thought they thought they heard the person say, no wonder you are having so much trouble with this.

:p
let's all remember the sweet irony here.
Now that Mueller has taken over......at the demands of the LIBs he is going to have to PROVE President Trump is legally guilty of obstructing justice.
Based on Comey's 'opinion'?????
Sorry all you LIB morons. He's going to need a LOT more than one man's 'opinion' to stand in front of the Supreme Court and convince them.
Now the LIBs can't claim their 'boy' and his DEM buddies were 'colluding' with or were 'bought off' by President Trump.
President Trump has the LIBs by the 'short hairs'. He knows it and he knows they know it.
 
The Amazon Post? Really? There's no Russian connection so how can he obstruct what didn't happen?

Obstruction of Justice is a separate crime... It doesn't matter if there is a Russian Connection or not...

The message is simple, don't fuck with the FBI...
All intelligence services disagree with you. You're either stupid or lying.

You are wrong yet again. Russia may have tried to influence the election, but there was no collusion.

Why didn't Lynch or anyone else in the DOJ prosecute Obama for interfering with the Israelis election?

The best case Mueller has for obstruction of justice is against Loretta Lynch for her meeting with Bill Clinton.


Why didn't Lynch or anyone else in the DOJ prosecute Obama for interfering with the Israelis election?

drum rollllll.....

BECAUSE it didn't happen....why don't you fact check it? It was just another one of the many right wing lies...
I did fact check it.

U.S. Embassy Met With Group Trying to Influence Israeli Elections
February 9, 2015 2:30 pm

Top officials at the U.S. embassy in Tel Aviv met in late January with one of the main progressive groups working to tip the upcoming Israeli elections against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and helped facilitate the organization’s visit to the United States this week to learn political organizing techniques.

The State Department helped the nonprofit group Givat Haviva secure last-minute visas for a delegation of Arab-Israeli mayors, which is in the United States this week meeting with civic leaders and attending discussions on voter outreach and community organizing. The delegation arrived on Feb. 4 and is in Washington, D.C., through Wednesday.

Givat Haviva is part of a coalition of U.S.-funded progressive groups working to influence the Israeli elections, the Washington Free Beacon reported last week. The organization, which has chapters in both the United States and Israel, is leading an effort to increase voter turnout among Arab Israelis, who traditionally oppose right-leaning parties such as Netanyahu’s Likud.

Top American diplomats met with Givat Haviva and the Arab-Israeli mayors at the U.S. embassy in Tel Aviv on Jan. 29, where they discussed the plans for this week’s visit. U.S. officials at the meeting included the deputy mission chief, the CIA station chief, and the cultural attaché, according to an attendee.

The Givat Haviva Institute’s co-executive director Mohammad Darawshe, the main organizer of the delegation, told the Free Beacon that the meeting was just a "farewell greeting from the embassy staff after they helped with getting the visas."

The State Department said it would provide a summary of the meeting to the Free Beacon last Wednesday, but as of Monday afternoon had not provided one.
you gave a PERFECT EXAMPLE of the ''right wing'' lying media promoting discourse and LIES.

Affiliates OneVoice Israel got $233,500 from the State Department to spend in Israel and OneVoice Palestine got another $115,776 to spend in the Palestinian Territories. That adds up to a little more than $349,000.

The question is: Do those contributions amount to funding "anti-Likud, anti-Netanyahu groups in Israel for tomorrow’s election"?

How OneVoice says the money was spent

Given that residents of the Palestinian Territories can’t vote in national Israeli elections, it’s hard to see how money spent there would influence voters in Israel. That leave us to account for $233,500.

Payton Knopf, senior director of global communications for OneVoice, said the money helped fund a series of "town-hall style meetings on university campuses and provided support to the Knesset Caucus for the Two-State Solution in organizing a meeting with 300 Israeli students and (Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud) Abbas in February 2014."

Knopf told us the State Department money was spent by November 2014 -- nearly four months ago. OneVoice, he said, never "spent any U.S. government funds in connection with the recent elections in Israel. Claims to the contrary are simply wrong."

There are two important points to unpack there. If OneVoice says it spent the money by November 2014, that would be before the Israeli elections were even scheduled. That happened in December after Netanyahu called for early elections.

The State Department said in a briefing that "no payment was made to OneVoice after November 2014."

That would contradict the way the claim in the blog was phrased. "Has been sending" says the money continues to flow. In this case the money was spent and disbursed months ago.

Second, while Netanyahu waffled on the notion of a two-state solution in the run-up to the Israeli elections, the prime minister had been on record supporting a two-state strategy in November and the months before it.

Blog claims U.S. funded anti-Netanyahu election effort in Israel

the right wing takes a little bit of truth and spins it in to a web of lies.
 
Obstruction of Justice is a separate crime... It doesn't matter if there is a Russian Connection or not...

The message is simple, don't fuck with the FBI...
All intelligence services disagree with you. You're either stupid or lying.

You are wrong yet again. Russia may have tried to influence the election, but there was no collusion.

Why didn't Lynch or anyone else in the DOJ prosecute Obama for interfering with the Israelis election?

The best case Mueller has for obstruction of justice is against Loretta Lynch for her meeting with Bill Clinton.


Why didn't Lynch or anyone else in the DOJ prosecute Obama for interfering with the Israelis election?

drum rollllll.....

BECAUSE it didn't happen....why don't you fact check it? It was just another one of the many right wing lies...
I did fact check it.

U.S. Embassy Met With Group Trying to Influence Israeli Elections
February 9, 2015 2:30 pm

Top officials at the U.S. embassy in Tel Aviv met in late January with one of the main progressive groups working to tip the upcoming Israeli elections against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and helped facilitate the organization’s visit to the United States this week to learn political organizing techniques.

The State Department helped the nonprofit group Givat Haviva secure last-minute visas for a delegation of Arab-Israeli mayors, which is in the United States this week meeting with civic leaders and attending discussions on voter outreach and community organizing. The delegation arrived on Feb. 4 and is in Washington, D.C., through Wednesday.

Givat Haviva is part of a coalition of U.S.-funded progressive groups working to influence the Israeli elections, the Washington Free Beacon reported last week. The organization, which has chapters in both the United States and Israel, is leading an effort to increase voter turnout among Arab Israelis, who traditionally oppose right-leaning parties such as Netanyahu’s Likud.

Top American diplomats met with Givat Haviva and the Arab-Israeli mayors at the U.S. embassy in Tel Aviv on Jan. 29, where they discussed the plans for this week’s visit. U.S. officials at the meeting included the deputy mission chief, the CIA station chief, and the cultural attaché, according to an attendee.

The Givat Haviva Institute’s co-executive director Mohammad Darawshe, the main organizer of the delegation, told the Free Beacon that the meeting was just a "farewell greeting from the embassy staff after they helped with getting the visas."

The State Department said it would provide a summary of the meeting to the Free Beacon last Wednesday, but as of Monday afternoon had not provided one.
you gave a PERFECT EXAMPLE of the ''right wing'' lying media promoting discourse and LIES.

Affiliates OneVoice Israel got $233,500 from the State Department to spend in Israel and OneVoice Palestine got another $115,776 to spend in the Palestinian Territories. That adds up to a little more than $349,000.

The question is: Do those contributions amount to funding "anti-Likud, anti-Netanyahu groups in Israel for tomorrow’s election"?

How OneVoice says the money was spent

Given that residents of the Palestinian Territories can’t vote in national Israeli elections, it’s hard to see how money spent there would influence voters in Israel. That leave us to account for $233,500.

Payton Knopf, senior director of global communications for OneVoice, said the money helped fund a series of "town-hall style meetings on university campuses and provided support to the Knesset Caucus for the Two-State Solution in organizing a meeting with 300 Israeli students and (Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud) Abbas in February 2014."

Knopf told us the State Department money was spent by November 2014 -- nearly four months ago. OneVoice, he said, never "spent any U.S. government funds in connection with the recent elections in Israel. Claims to the contrary are simply wrong."

There are two important points to unpack there. If OneVoice says it spent the money by November 2014, that would be before the Israeli elections were even scheduled. That happened in December after Netanyahu called for early elections.

The State Department said in a briefing that "no payment was made to OneVoice after November 2014."

That would contradict the way the claim in the blog was phrased. "Has been sending" says the money continues to flow. In this case the money was spent and disbursed months ago.

Second, while Netanyahu waffled on the notion of a two-state solution in the run-up to the Israeli elections, the prime minister had been on record supporting a two-state strategy in November and the months before it.

Blog claims U.S. funded anti-Netanyahu election effort in Israel

the right wing takes a little bit of truth and spins it in to a web of lies.
Huh? What lies?
 
Hillary Clinton was a good Secretary of State.


Rampant Sex Crimes and Cover-Ups During her Tenure:

"Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton issued a statement through a spokesman Tuesday that claimed total ignorance of rampant sex crimes and cover-ups occurring on her watch that were alleged in an Inspector General’s memo reported by CBS News and the New York Post.


The IG memo, dated October 23, 2012,
contains shocking allegations of overseas criminal conduct by State Department officials including sexual assault , ‘endemic’ procurement of prostitutes (including children), and drugs–all of which were alleged to have been covered-up by various officials at the highest levels of the State Department including Clinton’s chief of staff Cheryl Mills.

CNN reported Clinton spokesman Nicholas Merrill issued a written statement saying, “We learned of it from the media and don’t know anything beyond what’s been reported.”

Hillary Clinton Denies Knowledge of State Department Scandals, Cover-Ups - Breitbart

State Department memo reveals possible cover-ups, halted investigations


Having Bill Clinton as a husband and years of covering up his sex crimes / deviancy prepared her well to cover these up...

Influence Peddling

"Hillary Clinton and current Secretary of State John Kerry used their positions to enrich members of their own families -- at taxpayer expense."

Scandals At State: How Clinton, Kerry Used Office To Enrich Their Families

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...ssed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0

Juan Williams: Foreign Donations to Clinton Foundation 'Unethical,' 'Rank Influence Peddling'

Justice Department officials pushed for Clinton Foundation probe

A short list of Hillary’s policies that have jeopardized American national security include:

- Undermining the service and sacrifice of thousands of men and women in uniform by reaching out to the Taliban in Afghanistan while they were killing American troops...

- Supporting the withdrawal of American troops in Iraq which led to the creation of Islamic State...

- Supporting the terrorist Muslim Brotherhood (a designated terrorist organization in Egypt, UAE and Saudi Arabia) throughout the Middle East and in the United States which undermined America’s Muslim allies while putting terrorists in charge of the govt of our ally Egypt...

- Refusing to designate the Boko Haram as a foreign terrorist organization in Nigeria...

- Undermining the democratic Iranian Green Revolution in 2009...

- Supporting the Iran Nuclear deal

- The Un-Constitutional, Un-Authorized wars to help terrorists in Libya (which helped establish a safe haven for Al Qaeda and ISIS) and in Syria...
--- Hillary's / Obama's Libyan War: "Libyan intelligence worked with the CIA and the US intelligence during the Iraq war to arrest members of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) who had pledged allegiance to Al Qaeda. The LIFG has been a U.S. designated terrorist organization since 2004. According to a West Point study conducted in 2007, Libya contributed far more foreign fighters in Iraq to fight American troops per capita than any other country." Obama / Hillary used our military to help LIFG overthrow / murder Gadaffi and take over Libya."

--- "It was Hillary Clinton’s State Department that gave a contract to the February 17th Martyrs Brigade in Libya to protect America’s Consulate, who were known sympathizers to Al Qaeda and are main suspects in the Benghazi attack on the U.S. consulate that killed U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens, Sean Smith, Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty."

- The Russian invasion of the Ukraine and seizure of Crimea, the US failing to honor it's vow to help the Ukraine protect it's sovereign borders...

- The Syrian RED Line disaster

- Failure to take the 9/11/12 terrorist threat serious, failing to adequately protect the 22 US embassies and compounds throughout the Middle East from promised terrorist attacks, resulting in 2 embassies / compounds being over-run and 4 Americans needlessly murdered.

- Committed crimes and endangered US national security through the use of unauthorized, unencrypted, unsecured server and e-mail in order to avoid obeying the FOIA and Federal Records Act


Oh yeah, Hillary was one helluva Sect of State....

Hillary Clinton's Foreign Policy Failures: A Recent History
,
,
,


 
Again, there's more than just that. And again, Comey was in the room with Trump, you weren't. Comey witnessed Trump's mannerisms, you didn't. And best of all, Mueller is listening to Comey's opinion, not yours.

Interpretations of comments, interpretations of 'mannerisms'...NO SOLID EVIDENCE, JUST OPINION!

You keep proving my point. Thank you.

And of course Mueller is listening to Comey - they are buds...thus the Conflict of interest.
 
Hillary Clinton was a good Secretary of State.


Rampant Sex Crimes and Cover-Ups During her Tenure:

"Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton issued a statement through a spokesman Tuesday that claimed total ignorance of rampant sex crimes and cover-ups occurring on her watch that were alleged in an Inspector General’s memo reported by CBS News and the New York Post.


The IG memo, dated October 23, 2012,
contains shocking allegations of overseas criminal conduct by State Department officials including sexual assault , ‘endemic’ procurement of prostitutes (including children), and drugs–all of which were alleged to have been covered-up by various officials at the highest levels of the State Department including Clinton’s chief of staff Cheryl Mills.

CNN reported Clinton spokesman Nicholas Merrill issued a written statement saying, “We learned of it from the media and don’t know anything beyond what’s been reported.”

Hillary Clinton Denies Knowledge of State Department Scandals, Cover-Ups - Breitbart

State Department memo reveals possible cover-ups, halted investigations


Having Bill Clinton as a husband and years of covering up his sex crimes / deviancy prepared her well to cover these up...

Influence Peddling

"Hillary Clinton and current Secretary of State John Kerry used their positions to enrich members of their own families -- at taxpayer expense."

Scandals At State: How Clinton, Kerry Used Office To Enrich Their Families

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...ssed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=0

Juan Williams: Foreign Donations to Clinton Foundation 'Unethical,' 'Rank Influence Peddling'

Justice Department officials pushed for Clinton Foundation probe

A short list of Hillary’s policies that have jeopardized American national security include:

- Undermining the service and sacrifice of thousands of men and women in uniform by reaching out to the Taliban in Afghanistan while they were killing American troops...

- Supporting the withdrawal of American troops in Iraq which led to the creation of Islamic State...

- Supporting the terrorist Muslim Brotherhood (a designated terrorist organization in Egypt, UAE and Saudi Arabia) throughout the Middle East and in the United States which undermined America’s Muslim allies while putting terrorists in charge of the govt of our ally Egypt...

- Refusing to designate the Boko Haram as a foreign terrorist organization in Nigeria...

- Undermining the democratic Iranian Green Revolution in 2009...

- Supporting the Iran Nuclear deal

- The Un-Constitutional, Un-Authorized wars to help terrorists in Libya (which helped establish a safe haven for Al Qaeda and ISIS) and in Syria...
--- Hillary's / Obama's Libyan War: "Libyan intelligence worked with the CIA and the US intelligence during the Iraq war to arrest members of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) who had pledged allegiance to Al Qaeda. The LIFG has been a U.S. designated terrorist organization since 2004. According to a West Point study conducted in 2007, Libya contributed far more foreign fighters in Iraq to fight American troops per capita than any other country." Obama / Hillary used our military to help LIFG overthrow / murder Gadaffi and take over Libya."

--- "It was Hillary Clinton’s State Department that gave a contract to the February 17th Martyrs Brigade in Libya to protect America’s Consulate, who were known sympathizers to Al Qaeda and are main suspects in the Benghazi attack on the U.S. consulate that killed U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens, Sean Smith, Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty."

- The Russian invasion of the Ukraine and seizure of Crimea, the US failing to honor it's vow to help the Ukraine protect it's sovereign borders...

- The Syrian RED Line disaster

- Failure to take the 9/11/12 terrorist threat serious, failing to adequately protect the 22 US embassies and compounds throughout the Middle East from promised terrorist attacks, resulting in 2 embassies / compounds being over-run and 4 Americans needlessly murdered.

- Committed crimes and endangered US national security through the use of unauthorized, unencrypted, unsecured server and e-mail in order to avoid obeying the FOIA and Federal Records Act


Oh yeah, Hillary was one helluva Sect of State....

Hillary Clinton's Foreign Policy Failures: A Recent History
,
,
,


Oh yeah, Hillary was one helluva Sect of State....

Hillary is nothing more than a garden variety sociopathic bitch. She's never ben good at ANYTHING. Without Bill she a never would have been.
 
You remain rightarded as I did no such thing.
That is YOUR OPINION, but everyone can see for themselves that is exactly what you just did.

YOU posted Comey's OPINION: "I had understood the President to be ..."

It is clear Comey is NPOT saying 'TRUMP ORDERED ME TO DROP THE INVESTIGATION' - He clearly states "THIS IS WHAT I INTERPRETED / UNDERSTOOD TRUMP TO BE SAYING."

If you can't tell the difference between what someone ACTUALLY says and someone giving their opinion / interpretation of what they thought they thought they heard the person say, no wonder you are having so much trouble with this.

:p
let's all remember the sweet irony here.
Now that Mueller has taken over......at the demands of the LIBs he is going to have to PROVE President Trump is legally guilty of obstructing justice.
Based on Comey's 'opinion'?????
Sorry all you LIB morons. He's going to need a LOT more than one man's 'opinion' to stand in front of the Supreme Court and convince them.
Now the LIBs can't claim their 'boy' and his DEM buddies were 'colluding' with or were 'bought off' by President Trump.
President Trump has the LIBs by the 'short hairs'. He knows it and he knows they know it.
Fortunately for Mueller, he has more than just that.
 
The Washington Post says that the Special Prosecutor is investigating Trump for Obstruction of Justice.

It's never the crime that goes these guys in. Always the coverup.
Another illegal leak to prosecute later. Remember...Democrats are not going to win the House in 2018. So no matter how long you drag this out hoping to win the House and impeach Trump...it's not going to happen. Give it up. There was no obstruction of justice. If it turns upon Comey v. Trump...it's "he said v. he said." Going nowhere.
Except for the fact that trump admitted in a broadcast news interview that he based his firing of Comey on the Russian investigation. That is the foundation of the obstruction allegation. What part of the President admitting that he fired the top investigator for his administration's wrongdoing because he didn't like the way the investigation was going confuses you?
 
And that, along with firing Comey and warning him about potential tapes, is apparently enough to warrant a potential obstruction of justice case against Trump.
Warning Comey NOT TO LIE is enough to claim 'obstruction'?

Comey himself destroyed his own credibility by self-identifying as a cowardly, rule-breaking, POLITICALLY motivated / biased pro-liberal LEAKER.

By his own words he identified Loreatta Lynch as having obstructed his investigation of Hillary Clinton, declaring he went to her with evidence of her obstruction and she told him to get out of her office, and how he knew she would never allow an indictment of Hillary but never leaked any of this to get an Independent Counsel, never told anyone about this, and folded to her obstruction like a cheap suit by refusing to recommend Hillary's indictment because he knew Lynch would never allow it.

With SOLID evidence of Lynch's Obstruction he blew it off, but Trump uses the words 'I HOPE' and Comey assigns his own interpretation of Obstruction, leaks the info, and gets his biased bud appointed as Special Counsel lead.

Mueller then brings on DONORS and HILLARY LAWYERS as part of his team to go after Trump.

- Comey has no credibility, has proven to be politically biased and a leaker.

- Mueller has no credibility because he is buds with Comey and stacked the Counsel with Trump Haters.

- The Counsel has no credibility because of Mueller's relationship with Comey and because of its composition of donors and Hillary lawyers.

This is the biggest FARCE, biggest OPEN, OBVIOUS politically-motivated witch hunts in our nation's history...and the Democrats are so desperate they no longer give a damn who sees it as long as they bring Trump down.
 
The Washington Post says that the Special Prosecutor is investigating Trump for Obstruction of Justice.

It's never the crime that goes these guys in. Always the coverup.

The fake Russian story didn't work so I guess this is the next BS story from Liberals. Liberals still don't understand why they lost the election.
 
The Washington Post says that the Special Prosecutor is investigating Trump for Obstruction of Justice.

It's never the crime that goes these guys in. Always the coverup.
Another illegal leak to prosecute later. Remember...Democrats are not going to win the House in 2018. So no matter how long you drag this out hoping to win the House and impeach Trump...it's not going to happen. Give it up. There was no obstruction of justice. If it turns upon Comey v. Trump...it's "he said v. he said." Going nowhere.
Except for the fact that trump admitted in a broadcast news interview that he based his firing of Comey on the Russian investigation. That is the foundation of the obstruction allegation. What part of the President admitting that he fired the top investigator for his administration's wrongdoing because he didn't like the way the investigation was going confuses you?
He said he would fire him without a recommendation. Why? Trump found out Comey was a leaker and a spy for liberal media.
 
And that, along with firing Comey and warning him about potential tapes, is apparently enough to warrant a potential obstruction of justice case against Trump.
Warning Comey NOT TO LIE is enough to claim 'obstruction'?

Comey himself destroyed his own credibility by self-identifying as a cowardly, rule-breaking, POLITICALLY motivated / biased pro-liberal LEAKER.

By his own words he identified Loreatta Lynch as having obstructed his investigation of Hillary Clinton, declaring he went to her with evidence of her obstruction and she told him to get out of her office, and how he knew she would never allow an indictment of Hillary but never leaked any of this to get an Independent Counsel, never told anyone about this, and folded to her obstruction like a cheap suit by refusing to recommend Hillary's indictment because he knew Lynch would never allow it.

With SOLID evidence of Lynch's Obstruction he blew it off, but Trump uses the words 'I HOPE' and Comey assigns his own interpretation of Obstruction, leaks the info, and gets his biased bud appointed as Special Counsel lead.

Mueller then brings on DONORS and HILLARY LAWYERS as part of his team to go after Trump.

- Comey has no credibility, has proven to be politically biased and a leaker.

- Mueller has no credibility because he is buds with Comey and stacked the Counsel with Trump Haters.

- The Counsel has no credibility because of Mueller's relationship with Comey and because of its composition of donors and Hillary lawyers.

This is the biggest FARCE, biggest OPEN, OBVIOUS politically-motivated witch hunts in our nation's history...and the Democrats are so desperate they no longer give a damn who sees it as long as they bring Trump down.
Warning him with the possibility of being secretly recorded was a threat designed to shut him up. You can howl all you like about Mueller, he's not going away.
 
Last edited:
The Washington Post says that the Special Prosecutor is investigating Trump for Obstruction of Justice.

It's never the crime that goes these guys in. Always the coverup.
Another illegal leak to prosecute later. Remember...Democrats are not going to win the House in 2018. So no matter how long you drag this out hoping to win the House and impeach Trump...it's not going to happen. Give it up. There was no obstruction of justice. If it turns upon Comey v. Trump...it's "he said v. he said." Going nowhere.
Except for the fact that trump admitted in a broadcast news interview that he based his firing of Comey on the Russian investigation. That is the foundation of the obstruction allegation. What part of the President admitting that he fired the top investigator for his administration's wrongdoing because he didn't like the way the investigation was going confuses you?
He said he would fire him without a recommendation. Why? Trump found out Comey was a leaker and a spy for liberal media.
You're in denial. He admitted that the Russian investigation was considered in his decision to fire Comey. You can't put the toothpaste back into the tube.
 
So, based on Comey's assigned INTERPRETATION of what Trump actually said and based on Comey's OPINION, Mueller - Comey's buddy, Donors, and Clinton lawyers could declare it is THEIR BIASED OPINION that Trump Obstructed justice....while the only person who actually did - according to Comey - Loretta Lynch is not held accountable?

Gotta love snowflakes' definition of 'Justice' and 'Independent' Counsel!

Bwuhahahaha......

Jumping the gun again

At first your whine was "Trump is not under investigation"
Well, now he is

Now you are saying...Trump is not guilty

Trump is under investigation. That investigation will determine whether charges are warranted
 
The Washington Post says that the Special Prosecutor is investigating Trump for Obstruction of Justice.

It's never the crime that goes these guys in. Always the coverup.

The fake Russian story didn't work so I guess this is the next BS story from Liberals. Liberals still don't understand why they lost the election.

What does losing the election have to do with the Trump investigation?

Trump is our President. As such, he is responsible for his actions. Guess what?
The investigation is coming from Republicans not Democrats

We lost ...remember?
 
I just wonder--- and I don't disagree with anything you said but ---if the Congress hasn't found a shred of evidence in nearly 11 months, just what will Mueller find?
Benghazi ....8 Investigations dragging over 4 years [2012-2016] nothing whatsoever found...someone like you is still calling for more Benghazi LOL

Nothing found, other than four dead Americans, a destroyed compound, and documented lies by the Obama admin about the cause being a YouTube video.
after 8 Investigations nothing and you still rant impotent...FUCK DONALD TRUMP and also FUCK YOU:badgrin:

Nothing found except a president and Susan Rice the National Security Advisor going around for weeks telling a blatant lie to the public that was proven they knew was totally false, nothing found but a Secretary of State who ignored 600 requests for additional security which she ignored then said she can't be bothered with every little detail that crosses her desk, and what difference does it make now anyway. A woman who always says she takes "full responsibility," but is never actually ever punished or fined or anything for what she does, nothing was found except that during the attack as those men died, Hillary was in bed sleeping. Nothing was found except that Hillary Clinton has been grossly incompetent in every duty she has ever had in this world and was only given the Secretary job as a payoff for losing the election with the promise that she would be president next time.


View attachment 133219


Russian collusion? There it is! Staring you RIGHT IN THE FUCKING FACE.
When the fuck will you asswipes quit usaing the deaths of 4 American to slander & lie? Really, have you no shame?

In the couple days after the attack, the video was given as a possibly reason followed by statements that there was still an ongoing investigation.

The FACT ( like you know or care what one is) is that video was just released in Arabic & broadcast on Arab TV & caused rioting in several Arab cities that very day.

Hillary Clinton was a good Secretary of State.

Those requests for additional security went to the State Security professionals who have to work with the money budgeted to them. Libya was a dangerous place as well know by the Ambassador.

But hey, be a total dick & keep running through the streets screaming " OMG OMG OMG Benghazi"

When every investigation found no fault & prove just how pathetic you are.




Look! Here Come Da Sun!!!


Beach - cute sun.png
 

Forum List

Back
Top