Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Amazon Post? Really? There's no Russian connection so how can he obstruct what didn't happen?
Oh! Lemme guess! "Anonymous sources say" amirite?
lemme guess ... youre an idiot
anonymous source this derpboi ..
Special counsel is investigating President Trump for obstruction of justice, new report says
Fox ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Special counsel is investigating Trump for possible obstruction of justice, officials say
^Source of Fox article
"Five people briefed on the requests, speaking on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly, "said that Daniel Coats, the current director of national intelligence, Mike Rogers, head of the National Security Agency, and Rogers’s recently departed deputy, Richard Ledgett, agreed to be interviewed by Mueller’s investigators as early as this week. The investigation has been cloaked in secrecy,
Onnnnnnnnk! FAIL!
Wrong answer, cupcake!
Survey says? Five anonymous!
Why don't you mind Trump's anonymous sources?
- Trump retweets report based on anonymous source after blasting ...
http://thehill.com / homenews / administration / 335598-trump-retweets-st... - 320k - similar pages
May 30, 2017 ... President Trump on Tuesday retweeted a Fox News report citing ananonymous source that pushes back on another report that White House ...- Trump Condemns Anonymous Sources Despite Staff's Anonymous ...
Trump Condemns Anonymous Sources Despite Staff's Anonymous Briefings - similar pages
Feb 25, 2017 ... President Donald Trump has unloaded on the news media for using anonymoussources — just hours after members of his own staff insisted ...- Trump hates anonymous sources, unless they're in stories favorable ...
https://www.usatoday.com / story / news / politics / onpolitics / 2017 / 05 / 30 / trump-hates-anonymous-so / 102309400 / - 395k - similar pages
May 30, 2017 ... President Trump says he doesn't like anonymous sources, but retweeted one Tuesday.
Oh! Lemme guess! "Anonymous sources say" amirite?
lemme guess ... youre an idiot
anonymous source this derpboi ..
Special counsel is investigating President Trump for obstruction of justice, new report says
Fox ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Special counsel is investigating Trump for possible obstruction of justice, officials say
^Source of Fox article
"Five people briefed on the requests, speaking on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly, "said that Daniel Coats, the current director of national intelligence, Mike Rogers, head of the National Security Agency, and Rogers’s recently departed deputy, Richard Ledgett, agreed to be interviewed by Mueller’s investigators as early as this week. The investigation has been cloaked in secrecy,
Onnnnnnnnk! FAIL!
Wrong answer, cupcake!
Survey says? Five anonymous!
fail on that one...because...
Trump's lawyer's statement said the leaks were ILLEGAL...
if the leaks were not true, just gossip or made up crapola, then they would not be illegal...
Link to that, please?
I do see your point.
Oh! Lemme guess! "Anonymous sources say" amirite?
lemme guess ... youre an idiot
anonymous source this derpboi ..
Special counsel is investigating President Trump for obstruction of justice, new report says
Fox ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Special counsel is investigating Trump for possible obstruction of justice, officials say
^Source of Fox article
"Five people briefed on the requests, speaking on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly, "said that Daniel Coats, the current director of national intelligence, Mike Rogers, head of the National Security Agency, and Rogers’s recently departed deputy, Richard Ledgett, agreed to be interviewed by Mueller’s investigators as early as this week. The investigation has been cloaked in secrecy,
Onnnnnnnnk! FAIL!
Wrong answer, cupcake!
Survey says? Five anonymous!
Why don't you mind Trump's anonymous sources?
- Trump retweets report based on anonymous source after blasting ...
http://thehill.com / homenews / administration / 335598-trump-retweets-st... - 320k - similar pages
May 30, 2017 ... President Trump on Tuesday retweeted a Fox News report citing ananonymous source that pushes back on another report that White House ...- Trump Condemns Anonymous Sources Despite Staff's Anonymous ...
Trump Condemns Anonymous Sources Despite Staff's Anonymous Briefings - similar pages
Feb 25, 2017 ... President Donald Trump has unloaded on the news media for using anonymoussources — just hours after members of his own staff insisted ...- Trump hates anonymous sources, unless they're in stories favorable ...
https://www.usatoday.com / story / news / politics / onpolitics / 2017 / 05 / 30 / trump-hates-anonymous-so / 102309400 / - 395k - similar pages
May 30, 2017 ... President Trump says he doesn't like anonymous sources, but retweeted one Tuesday.
Because Trump has access to classified information the press does not.
Furthermore, if there are 5 sources leaking to the press like that, expect them to be exposed in short order.
"because they were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly"
Fuctards! It says a possible obstruction of justice! That translates into they have nothing so Comey the Coward is going to cook something up with his buddy Mueller.
How will Trump be hurt? It will be yet another accusation falling on its' face. That hurts the left, not Trump. In your defense though you can't get any lower.Mueller is a lifelong republican first appointed by Reagan and later by H.W. Bush and George W. Bush. I doubt he takes any pleasure in opening an investigation that may end the current republican president's term in office....another fake news thread on the same subject. The Russian thing didn't stick, this can't so they will go back to voter fraud.
Oh no, the COLLUSION shtick didn't find any foothold, so now the LibTards have moved onto Gambit #2: Obstruction.
Trump might well survive charges that his campaign colluded with the Russians, but not Obstruction of Justice. Unless Mueller finds no evidence of obstruction, Trump will be hurt political just as Clinton was. Republican congressmen must be questioning whether Trump is becoming more of a liability than an asset.
Crooked Donny
Why would crookedness be a problem?
Your Bitch and your negro are both as crooked as it gets.
Crooked Donny
Why would crookedness be a problem?
Your Bitch and your negro are both as crooked as it gets.
Looks like it will be Crooked Donny who is going to jail
Lock him up!
Lock him up!
Lock him up!
Hillary is laughing at Crooked Donny
He's been president for 6 months and you're right. The number will keep changing. 1 year, 2, 3 6, 8.It's impossible to separate accusations and facts in the liberal mind.
Ah, the sweet smell of snowflake projection.
They are one and the same.
You poor thing. You're just flailing around helplessly now.
What facts have you got after 6 months of investigations?
That number keeps changing. Tomorrow, you'll declare 18 months. Can all you snowflakes try to settle on a single number?
So, what facts do I have? None. Well, aside from Trump admitting publicly he obstructed justice. That's kind of a biggie.
Now, our intelligence and law enforcement agencies have facts. And those facts have them investigating Trump and his administration.
So that leads us back to your loopy "Intelligence agencies won't reveal the classified info about on ongoing investigation, therefore everyone in the Trump admin is innocent, and Democrats are corrupt" whining. It's hilariously stupid, and it's all you've ever had.
You conservatives didn't use those standards for the various Clinton and Obama investigations. Given that you're such hypocrites, why should we pay attention to you?
The Washington Post says that the Special Prosecutor is investigating Trump for Obstruction of Justice.
It's never the crime that goes these guys in. Always the coverup.
About time.
The guy should be removed and I feel the faster the better for this country.
You know, I don't understand why you find that funny. Indeed, there's nothing about it that I think is humorous.Trump under investigation for Obstruction of Justice.
The sources are all Washington Post writers on LSD.Do NaziCons realize just how serious this is? This will have historical consequences! Reportedly, The Washington Post has FIVE sources on this story.
Who cares - so long as they are reporting facts and truth just like they've been doing. Praise our media!
What does the word " possibly" mean to you?Oh! Lemme guess! "Anonymous sources say" amirite?
lemme guess ... youre an idiot
anonymous source this derpboi ..
Special counsel is investigating President Trump for obstruction of justice, new report says
Fox ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Special counsel is investigating Trump for possible obstruction of justice, officials say
^Source of Fox article
"Five people briefed on the requests, speaking on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly, "said that Daniel Coats, the current director of national intelligence, Mike Rogers, head of the National Security Agency, and Rogers’s recently departed deputy, Richard Ledgett, agreed to be interviewed by Mueller’s investigators as early as this week. The investigation has been cloaked in secrecy,
Onnnnnnnnk! FAIL!
Wrong answer, cupcake!
Survey says? Five anonymous!
Trump's lawyer's statement said the leaks were ILLEGAL...
if the leaks were not true, just gossip or made up crapola, then they would not be illegal...
Link to that, please?
I do see your point.
Trump is reportedly being investigated for obstruction of justice
As part of the probe, Mueller is interviewing senior intelligence officials and looking for proof of any financial crimes possibly committed by Trump's associates, The Post reported, citing US officials.
A spokesman for Trump's lawyer said in a statement that "the FBI leak regarding the President is outrageous, inexcusable, and illegal," but did not dispute the accuracy of the report.
It's not a surprise since he fired Comey, told the Russians he did it to slow down or end the investigation on the Russians, and told us, via Lester Holt, the same.
So now, will the president finally give up this reality show he's been putting on, with his ''stay tuned to next week's show'' for more information yadahdahdah, and now, finally keep his mouth shut and fingers tweet-less and stop interfering with this ongoing Russian investigation?
The sooner President Trump stops his Circus maneuvers, the quicker this investigation can get to its end,
Now we know why Trump wants to fire Mueller.The Washington Post says that the Special Prosecutor is investigating Trump for Obstruction of Justice.
It's never the crime that goes these guys in. Always the coverup.
Fuctards! It says a possible obstruction of justice! That translates into they have nothing so Comey the Coward is going to cook something up with his buddy Mueller.
