Trump under investigation for Obstruction of Justice.

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Oh! Lemme guess! "Anonymous sources say" amirite?

lemme guess ... youre an idiot

anonymous source this derpboi ..

Special counsel is investigating President Trump for obstruction of justice, new report says


Fox ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Special counsel is investigating Trump for possible obstruction of justice, officials say

^Source of Fox article


"Five people briefed on the requests, speaking on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly, "said that Daniel Coats, the current director of national intelligence, Mike Rogers, head of the National Security Agency, and Rogers’s recently departed deputy, Richard Ledgett, agreed to be interviewed by Mueller’s investigators as early as this week. The investigation has been cloaked in secrecy,


Onnnnnnnnk! FAIL!

Wrong answer, cupcake!

Survey says? Five anonymous!

fail on that one...because...

Trump's lawyer's statement said the leaks were ILLEGAL...

if the leaks were not true, just gossip or made up crapola, then they would not be illegal...

I don't think this will win stupid post of the day, but it would sure be in the running.

Who? Me or Care4all?

She's not that bad. We aren't going to see eye-to-eye on many things, though.

I've seen the stupidest thread of the year today.

Did you write the red text?

 

[WillowTree]

Fuctards! It says a possible obstruction of justice! That translates into they have nothing so Comey the Coward is going to cook something up with his buddy Mueller.

The article says he is being investigated for possible obstruction of justice, NOT THAT he's being CHARGED with obstruction of justice...won't know if he'd ever be charged or not charged, without an investigation.

Comey is not running the show, Mueller is, and he has always been, respected as an honorable man, by the right wing, and left wing...a rarity...

He should recuse himself! Comedy's best bud!

 

[rightwinger]

Oh! Lemme guess! "Anonymous sources say" amirite?

FIVE CUPCAKE

Oh! Lemme guess! "Anonymous sources say" amirite?

FIVE CUPCAKE


Five people briefed on the requests, speaking on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly, said that Daniel Coats, the current director of national intelligence, Mike Rogers, head of the National Security Agency, and Rogers’s recently departed deputy, Richard Ledgett, agreed to be interviewed by Mueller’s investigators as early as this week. The investigation has been cloaked in secrecy, and it is unclear how many others have been questioned by the FBI.



...The obstruction-of-justice investigation of the president began days after Comey was fired on May 9, according to people familiar with the matter. Mueller’s office has taken up that work, and the preliminary interviews scheduled with intelligence officials indicate that his team is actively pursuing potential witnesses inside and outside the government.



WAPO


Special counsel is investigating Trump for possible obstruction of justice, officials say

So, all five sources came clean at the same time?

it's been suspected, since the president fired Comey and said it was due to the Russian/trump team investigation, that Trump would come under investigation for possible obstruction of Justice, so it's been a good 3 weeks since then...plenty of time to gather information and sources to confirm such, imo.

p.s.

The only way we get news, other than only what our govt wants us to know, or the big corporations want us to know, is through leaks...

It's been that way forever...

and a day!

So, will you answer this question: What crime has been committed and by whom and how did Trump obstruct justice?

You cannot possibly answer that, can you?


Also: Don't say firing Comey because that dog won't hunt. Just because libs are stupid doesn't make Trump a criminal.

Crime ....RUSSIAN hacking of DNC servers
Crime .....Flynn meeting with Russians about lifting sanctions on Russia and failing to disclose the meeting

Crime..Crooked Donny trying to block the FBI investigation into Flynn

 

[Care4all]

...another fake news thread on the same subject. The Russian thing didn't stick, this can't so they will go back to voter fraud.

Oh no, the COLLUSION shtick didn't find any foothold, so now the LibTards have moved onto Gambit #2: Obstruction.

Mueller is a lifelong republican first appointed by Reagan and later by H.W. Bush and George W. Bush. I doubt he takes any pleasure in opening an investigation that may end the current republican president's term in office.

Trump might well survive charges that his campaign colluded with the Russians, but not Obstruction of Justice. Unless Mueller finds no evidence of obstruction, Trump will be hurt political just as Clinton was. Republican congressmen must be questioning whether Trump is becoming more of a liability than an asset.

Let me explain this to you one more time. There has to have been a crime for an obstruction of justice charge.

Please tell me what the crime is!

You cannot have the latter without the former.

I just hope all of you libs remembered to get your fishing licenses renewed!

obstruction of justice IS THE CRIME.... Obstructing an official investigation is also the crime of obstructing justice. This is what the pres is being investigated for....trying to obstruct, an official investigation by the FBI.

Whether there turns out to be a crime or not, by the investigation, matters naught!

 

[Lakhota]

Oh! Lemme guess! "Anonymous sources say" amirite?

FIVE CUPCAKE

Oh! Lemme guess! "Anonymous sources say" amirite?

FIVE CUPCAKE


Five people briefed on the requests, speaking on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly, said that Daniel Coats, the current director of national intelligence, Mike Rogers, head of the National Security Agency, and Rogers’s recently departed deputy, Richard Ledgett, agreed to be interviewed by Mueller’s investigators as early as this week. The investigation has been cloaked in secrecy, and it is unclear how many others have been questioned by the FBI.



...The obstruction-of-justice investigation of the president began days after Comey was fired on May 9, according to people familiar with the matter. Mueller’s office has taken up that work, and the preliminary interviews scheduled with intelligence officials indicate that his team is actively pursuing potential witnesses inside and outside the government.



WAPO


Special counsel is investigating Trump for possible obstruction of justice, officials say

So, all five sources came clean at the same time?

it's been suspected, since the president fired Comey and said it was due to the Russian/trump team investigation, that Trump would come under investigation for possible obstruction of Justice, so it's been a good 3 weeks since then...plenty of time to gather information and sources to confirm such, imo.

p.s.

The only way we get news, other than only what our govt wants us to know, or the big corporations want us to know, is through leaks...

It's been that way forever...

and a day!

So, will you answer this question: What crime has been committed and by whom and how did Trump obstruct justice?

You cannot possibly answer that, can you?


Also: Don't say firing Comey because that dog won't hunt. Just because libs are stupid doesn't make Trump a criminal.

You're not only dumb - you're hilariously dumb. Don't you follow the news? Firing Comey was the tipping point for Mueller. Coates and Rogers are providing the icing on the cake.

 

[Marion Morrison]

lemme guess ... youre an idiot

anonymous source this derpboi ..

Special counsel is investigating President Trump for obstruction of justice, new report says


Fox ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Special counsel is investigating Trump for possible obstruction of justice, officials say

^Source of Fox article


"Five people briefed on the requests, speaking on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly, "said that Daniel Coats, the current director of national intelligence, Mike Rogers, head of the National Security Agency, and Rogers’s recently departed deputy, Richard Ledgett, agreed to be interviewed by Mueller’s investigators as early as this week. The investigation has been cloaked in secrecy,


Onnnnnnnnk! FAIL!

Wrong answer, cupcake!

Survey says? Five anonymous!

fail on that one...because...

Trump's lawyer's statement said the leaks were ILLEGAL...

if the leaks were not true, just gossip or made up crapola, then they would not be illegal...

I don't think this will win stupid post of the day, but it would sure be in the running.

Who? Me or Care4all?

She's not that bad. We aren't going to see eye-to-eye on many things, though.

I've seen the stupidest thread of the year today.

Did you write the red text?

No sir!

 

[Dale Smith]

Mueller is a lifelong republican first appointed by Reagan and later by H.W. Bush and George W. Bush. I doubt he takes any pleasure in opening an investigation that may end the current republican president's term in office.

Trump might well survive charges that his campaign colluded with the Russians, but not Obstruction of Justice. Unless Mueller finds no evidence of obstruction, Trump will be hurt political just as Clinton was. Republican congressmen must be questioning whether Trump is becoming more of a liability than an asset.

Mueller is a neocon that was complicit in the cover-up of 9/11/01 that has surrounded himself with DNC backers........this is really bad theater and it is disgusting to me and only reinforces my contention that we live in a banana republic ran by international banking elites......and leftards are giddy over it.

He's also good buddies with Comey.

Yeah, Republicans stick together.

Comey is a Clinton shill, dumb ass.......SMH........

Credible proof? Credible link?

There is this cool little tool that is a search engine called "Google".......type in "Clinton, Comey ties" and be amazed to not only Comey's ties to the Clintons but to BCCI, a CIA asset that is used to launder their black ops money and has for a few decades...how his ability to run a cooked financial facility rated him as "FBI" material much less lead it is known only to those like myself. Feel free to ask more questions...


(snicker)

 

[WillowTree]

Fuctards! It says a possible obstruction of justice! That translates into they have nothing so Comey the Coward is going to cook something up with his buddy Mueller.

Duh, it's "possible" obstruction of justice until it's "proven" obstruction of justice. Try to keep up...

Correct dipshit. It has never been proven! Doh!

Duh, did the word "investigation" give it away...?

Here is what ewe fuctards did! You made up a story now you are searching blindly for possible evidence!

 

[Lakhota]

May your future ones be in prison!

 

[JonKoch]

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

...another fake news thread on the same subject. The Russian thing didn't stick, this can't so they will go back to voter fraud.

Oh no, the COLLUSION shtick didn't find any foothold, so now the LibTards have moved onto Gambit #2: Obstruction.

Mueller is a lifelong republican first appointed by Reagan and later by H.W. Bush and George W. Bush. I doubt he takes any pleasure in opening an investigation that may end the current republican president's term in office.

Trump might well survive charges that his campaign colluded with the Russians, but not Obstruction of Justice. Unless Mueller finds no evidence of obstruction, Trump will be hurt political just as Clinton was. Republican congressmen must be questioning whether Trump is becoming more of a liability than an asset.

Let me explain this to you one more time. There has to have been a crime for an obstruction of justice charge.

Please tell me what the crime is!

You cannot have the latter without the former.

I just hope all of you libs remembered to get your fishing licenses renewed!

obstruction of justice IS THE CRIME.... Obstructing an official investigation is also the crime of obstructing justice. This is what the pres is being investigated for....trying to obstruct, an official investigation by the FBI.

Whether there turns out to be a crime or not, by the investigation, matters naught!

NOW you win the stupidest post of the day!

Obstruction of justice: Generally, obstruction charges are laid when it is discovered that a person questioned in an investigation, other than a suspect, has lied to the investigating officers.

Obstruction of justice - Wikipedia

How has Trump lied? He has never been investigated nor testified under oath.

We're waiting for for you canary ass to catch up to your alligator mouth!

 

[rightwinger]

 

[Iceweasel]

...another fake news thread on the same subject. The Russian thing didn't stick, this can't so they will go back to voter fraud.

Oh no, the COLLUSION shtick didn't find any foothold, so now the LibTards have moved onto Gambit #2: Obstruction.

Mueller is a lifelong republican first appointed by Reagan and later by H.W. Bush and George W. Bush. I doubt he takes any pleasure in opening an investigation that may end the current republican president's term in office.

Trump might well survive charges that his campaign colluded with the Russians, but not Obstruction of Justice. Unless Mueller finds no evidence of obstruction, Trump will be hurt political just as Clinton was. Republican congressmen must be questioning whether Trump is becoming more of a liability than an asset.

Let me explain this to you one more time. There has to have been a crime for an obstruction of justice charge.

Please tell me what the crime is!

You cannot have the latter without the former.

I just hope all of you libs remembered to get your fishing licenses renewed!

obstruction of justice IS THE CRIME.... Obstructing an official investigation is also the crime of obstructing justice. This is what the pres is being investigated for....trying to obstruct, an official investigation by the FBI.

Whether there turns out to be a crime or not, by the investigation, matters naught!

....but why would he obstruct an investigation for something that didn't happen? Face it, you libs have been painting yourselves in a corner for months and are looking stupider by the day.

 

[Manonthestreet]

I'll take a supersized nothingburger ........

Would you like "a few fries short of a Happy Meal" to go with that?

Ask any liberal for theirs!

I'll take a supersized nothingburger ........

Would you like "a few fries short of a Happy Meal" to go with that?

Ask any liberal for theirs!

Only if they include a Lie Transformer Toy

 

[usmbguest5318]

The Washington Post says that the Special Prosecutor is investigating Trump for Obstruction of Justice.

It's never the crime that goes these guys in. Always the coverup.

Okay...Well that the WaPo says so doesn't exactly make it be so, but it does suggest there's a better chance now than before now that it is so. Did Mueller or one of his team explicitly say that is the case? If so, well, then, it is indeed so.

If they leaked that information, whoever it is, Trump should fire them as they are no better than those they are allegedly investigating for leaks,

That's a different matter than whether Trump is under investigation for possible obstruction of justice.

I don't know the extent to which the general public has a need to know whether Trump is under investigation for possibly having obstructed justice. That is what it is, but as the information has been released, it's moot whether extant be the public's need to know that.

What I strongly believe is that many of the people -- without regard to their political affinity -- who will attempt to discount the significance of Trump's being under investigation for a felony are the same people who feel that if a liberal is under investigation for something, s/he is guilty of that for which they under investigation, and that's with regard to subjects who don't have a long track record of being shady, actually breaking laws, lying about things great and small, pretending to be someone they literally are not, etc. What will they think about this latest revelation?

I know what has always been my position in such situations, so I don't have a dissensus that compromises my integrity because of what I think about Trump as a result of his being investigated for possibly having committed a (or several) felony and what I think of others whom I knew to be under investigation for possibly having committed felonies. Of course, that only is so because I'm principled, not partisan.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Special counsel is investigating Trump for possible obstruction of justice, officials say

^Source of Fox article


"Five people briefed on the requests, speaking on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly, "said that Daniel Coats, the current director of national intelligence, Mike Rogers, head of the National Security Agency, and Rogers’s recently departed deputy, Richard Ledgett, agreed to be interviewed by Mueller’s investigators as early as this week. The investigation has been cloaked in secrecy,


Onnnnnnnnk! FAIL!

Wrong answer, cupcake!

Survey says? Five anonymous!

fail on that one...because...

Trump's lawyer's statement said the leaks were ILLEGAL...

if the leaks were not true, just gossip or made up crapola, then they would not be illegal...

I don't think this will win stupid post of the day, but it would sure be in the running.

Who? Me or Care4all?

She's not that bad. We aren't going to see eye-to-eye on many things, though.

I've seen the stupidest thread of the year today.

Did you write the red text?

No sir!

The idiot liberal did and that was to whom my comments were addressed!

 

[Iceweasel]

Rachel Maddow is reporting on The Washington Post story - with the author, Adam Entous.

snicker

 

[Camp]

...another fake news thread on the same subject. The Russian thing didn't stick, this can't so they will go back to voter fraud.

Oh no, the COLLUSION shtick didn't find any foothold, so now the LibTards have moved onto Gambit #2: Obstruction.

Mueller is a lifelong republican first appointed by Reagan and later by H.W. Bush and George W. Bush. I doubt he takes any pleasure in opening an investigation that may end the current republican president's term in office.

Trump might well survive charges that his campaign colluded with the Russians, but not Obstruction of Justice. Unless Mueller finds no evidence of obstruction, Trump will be hurt political just as Clinton was. Republican congressmen must be questioning whether Trump is becoming more of a liability than an asset.

Let me explain this to you one more time. There has to have been a crime for an obstruction of justice charge.

Please tell me what the crime is!

You cannot have the latter without the former.

I just hope all of you liIbs remembered to get your fishing licenses renewed!

Multiple potential and suspected crimes were being investigated by the FBI in regards to withholding information about meetings with Russian officials where classified data or inappropriate and illegal business dealing may have been discussed. Also being investigated were allegations of collusion to interfere with elections.
A point of fact is that a crime need not have been committed. The obstruction of investigators to ascertain whether a crime was committed or not is sufficient to bring about an obstruction charge.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

If nothing comes of this, imagine the anger of the already completely unhinged left.

 

[Iceweasel]

...another fake news thread on the same subject. The Russian thing didn't stick, this can't so they will go back to voter fraud.

Oh no, the COLLUSION shtick didn't find any foothold, so now the LibTards have moved onto Gambit #2: Obstruction.

Mueller is a lifelong republican first appointed by Reagan and later by H.W. Bush and George W. Bush. I doubt he takes any pleasure in opening an investigation that may end the current republican president's term in office.

Trump might well survive charges that his campaign colluded with the Russians, but not Obstruction of Justice. Unless Mueller finds no evidence of obstruction, Trump will be hurt political just as Clinton was. Republican congressmen must be questioning whether Trump is becoming more of a liability than an asset.

Let me explain this to you one more time. There has to have been a crime for an obstruction of justice charge.

Please tell me what the crime is!

You cannot have the latter without the former.

I just hope all of you liIbs remembered to get your fishing licenses renewed!

Multiple potential and suspected crimes were being investigated by the FBI in regards to withholding information about meetings with Russian officials where classified data or inappropriate and illegal business dealing may have been discussed. Also being investigated were allegations of collusion to interfere with elections.
A point of fact is that a crime need not have been committed. The obstruction of investigators to ascertain whether a crime was committed or not is sufficient to bring about an obstruction charge.

If they can find no evidence of his misdeeds he will be sent to the Gulag for so cleverly covering it up.