Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Should abortions be made illegal was not the question asked.
The question asked, to put it simply, is if something was illegal should the person who broke the law be punished - Trump's answer was appropriately 'Yes'.
The problem liberals are having is the word 'abortion'. Replace 'abortions' with ANY other act - If 'X" was made illegal should the person who still does it be punished? Ummm....YEAH, because they would have broken the law. It doesn't matter what 'X' is!
The opposition to Trump's answer is due, in part, to Obama brainwashing liberals into believing the law does not have to be followed if you don't agree with it and because it specifically involved the act of having an abortion.
God, I can NOT wait until we have a new President, when the Rule of Law will be enforced once again!
Are you saying kids 16 - 25 are too stupid to understand the law and make good decisions? Then maybe people from 16 - 25 should not be allowed to vote? Maybe parents should do a better job of educating their kids?
What would I do if someone broke the law? I would hold them accountable. 'Ignorance is no excuse for breaking the law'...not even Obama's / Liberals'.
It was definitely a gotcha question and it worked like a charm... But it does bring to light some confusion with the point of view. I agree with you, If you think Abortions should be illegal then I would assume you would support punishments for people who break the laws. So why did he walk it back? Why are Cruz and other pro life conservatives all over the airwaves demonizing Trump for his answer? Please explain...Let's look at this unhinged term a bit....Who is really unhinged here.Libs maybe.
First of all I doubt that anyone anytime soon is going to stop abortions.
So we know how much Libs love it so but calm down no one is taking anything away from you anytime soon.
As for the Trump question how else do you answer that type of hypothetical question....
If something becomes illegal as Mathews suggested and someone breaks the law and does it what else can the answer be?
Trump should have known better going on Chris Mathews show....He walked right into the set up.
Let's look at this unhinged term a bit....Who is really unhinged here.Libs maybe.
First of all I doubt that anyone anytime soon is going to stop abortions.
So we know how much Libs love it so but calm down no one is taking anything away from you anytime soon.
As for the Trump question how else do you answer that type of hypothetical question....
If something becomes illegal as Mathews suggested and someone breaks the law and does it what else can the answer be?
Trump should have known better going on Chris Mathews show....He walked right into the set up.
Nice B$ strawman. I don't know of 1 single Conservative who believes a woman who has been raped should not be able to have an abortion, even thought the 'morning after' pill should prevent the need for an abortion - IF the woman raped comes forward.
So Trump states he believes that a person who violates an existing law should be held accountable and Liberals immediately attack him and opine that he must want to lose by saying such a thing.
So you want abortions to be illegal but you don't want to punish women for breaking the law. I don't understand, please explain?Should abortions be made illegal was not the question asked.
The question asked, to put it simply, is if something was illegal should the person who broke the law be punished - Trump's answer was appropriately 'Yes'.
The problem liberals are having is the word 'abortion'. Replace 'abortions' with ANY other act - If 'X" was made illegal should the person who still does it be punished? Ummm....YEAH, because they would have broken the law. It doesn't matter what 'X' is!
The opposition to Trump's answer is due, in part, to Obama brainwashing liberals into believing the law does not have to be followed if you don't agree with it and because it specifically involved the act of having an abortion.
God, I can NOT wait until we have a new President, when the Rule of Law will be enforced once again!
Bullshit. There are plenty of laws you Wingnuts would like to ignore, like most of the gun laws and those laws saying Christians have to serve gay people.
Guy, the thing is, no one wants to see women punished for having abortions. Not only did every other republican denounce him, but Trump walked this statement back almost immediately So it isn't just Democrats who thought this was a stupid idea.
No, Trump's real sin is exposing the MISOGYNY of the "Pro-Life" bullshit. Deep down, the people who would snatch a school lunch from a hungry child's mouth do not give fuck one about "the children". This about you guys and how you hate that women are fucking with no consequences.
Trumpster just blew the cover off the scam...
It's all part of the game. But it was a total gotcha... Mathews pushed trumped with like 12 questions to pull that statement out of him.It was definitely a gotcha question and it worked like a charm... But it does bring to light some confusion with the point of view. I agree with you, If you think Abortions should be illegal then I would assume you would support punishments for people who break the laws. So why did he walk it back? Why are Cruz and other pro life conservatives all over the airwaves demonizing Trump for his answer? Please explain...Let's look at this unhinged term a bit....Who is really unhinged here.Libs maybe.
First of all I doubt that anyone anytime soon is going to stop abortions.
So we know how much Libs love it so but calm down no one is taking anything away from you anytime soon.
As for the Trump question how else do you answer that type of hypothetical question....
If something becomes illegal as Mathews suggested and someone breaks the law and does it what else can the answer be?
Trump should have known better going on Chris Mathews show....He walked right into the set up.
How can u have a "gotcha " question on a major platform of the party.?
I can't get one pro lifer to answer my question... If they want abortions to be illegal because they are murder then why wouldn't they punish women? II heard some interesting conversations this evening about how many anti-abortion zealots think:
1. They were offended that Trump dared to speak the truth - about "punishing" women who have abortions.
2. They don't really want Roe v. Wade to be repealed because of all the backlash it would bring.
3. They just want to undermine Roe v. Wade by making it extremely difficult and restrictive to obtain abortions.
4. Hence, Roe v. Wade would still exist - but good luck getting a "legal" abortion.
There is no doubt that they want women punished - but they don't want to say that. They want to seem compassionate toward the woman. FACT: Women "are" already being punished in several ways
Good News, Donald Trump! Women Are Already Punished for Seeking Abortions.
Donald Trump Said Women Should Be Punished For Getting Abortions. They Already Are.
It's all part of the game. But it was a total gotcha... Mathews pushed trumped with like 12 questions to pull that statement out of him.It was definitely a gotcha question and it worked like a charm... But it does bring to light some confusion with the point of view. I agree with you, If you think Abortions should be illegal then I would assume you would support punishments for people who break the laws. So why did he walk it back? Why are Cruz and other pro life conservatives all over the airwaves demonizing Trump for his answer? Please explain...Let's look at this unhinged term a bit....Who is really unhinged here.Libs maybe.
First of all I doubt that anyone anytime soon is going to stop abortions.
So we know how much Libs love it so but calm down no one is taking anything away from you anytime soon.
As for the Trump question how else do you answer that type of hypothetical question....
If something becomes illegal as Mathews suggested and someone breaks the law and does it what else can the answer be?
Trump should have known better going on Chris Mathews show....He walked right into the set up.
How can u have a "gotcha " question on a major platform of the party.?
That's the irony, all the conservatives are demonizing trump for suggesting that women who break the hypothetical law be punished. Why?Consequences for lawlessness isn't something a libtard can embrace; in fact, they even scoff at such notions.
Consequences for lawlessness isn't something a libtard can embrace; in fact, they even scoff at such notions.
It's all part of the game. But it was a total gotcha... Mathews pushed trumped with like 12 questions to pull that statement out of him.It was definitely a gotcha question and it worked like a charm... But it does bring to light some confusion with the point of view. I agree with you, If you think Abortions should be illegal then I would assume you would support punishments for people who break the laws. So why did he walk it back? Why are Cruz and other pro life conservatives all over the airwaves demonizing Trump for his answer? Please explain...Let's look at this unhinged term a bit....Who is really unhinged here.Libs maybe.
First of all I doubt that anyone anytime soon is going to stop abortions.
So we know how much Libs love it so but calm down no one is taking anything away from you anytime soon.
As for the Trump question how else do you answer that type of hypothetical question....
If something becomes illegal as Mathews suggested and someone breaks the law and does it what else can the answer be?
Trump should have known better going on Chris Mathews show....He walked right into the set up.
How can u have a "gotcha " question on a major platform of the party.?
If Trump can't even handle Chris Matthews - Putin would really fuck him up. Trump can't handle pressure. He's a choker.
Then why are the pro-lifers saying it isn't, now, all over the media?
Call it what you will, make up all the excuses you need, you wouldn't be here if your mother chose to end her pregnancy with an abortion, so are you alive or is this your spirit typing on the internet?
What excuses? Is this board the only thing you read and see?