Rigby5
Diamond Member
Well at least the moustache is gone in this image.
The moustache was really gross.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
The republicans are choosing their leaders, despite their character or suitability. They learned they can win if they run a complete grifter like George Santos.Not at all.
Both halves of the country have a right to try to elect their choice of candidate.
The republicans are not trying to deprive the democrats of their candidate, as the democrats are trying to do.
You campaign and get votes.
You do not illegally impeach or indict in order to prevent voting.
Former President Donald Trump on Friday promised that if he is convicted of a crime and sentenced to prison, he will continue to run for president.
John Fredericks, the host of a pro-Trump talk show, asked the 2024 candidate whether a conviction resulting in a prison sentence would “stop” his bid for a second term.
“Not at all. There’s nothing in the Constitution to say that it could,” Trump replied. “Even the radical left crazies are saying, ‘No, that wouldn’t stop!’ And it wouldn’t stop me either.”
Legally speaking, Trump is correct. The most famous example of an incarcerated person running for president is Socialist Party nominee Eugene V. Debs. Debs received nearly 1 million votes in 1920 while he was imprisoned for his opposition to World War I.
It is unclear what would happen if Trump won while incarcerated, however, since there is no precedent for that occurring in a major federal election. Some scholars have suggested that he could pardon himself immediately upon taking office.
More at the link below...
Trump Vows To Run For President From Prison If Convicted
“There's nothing in the Constitution" to bar his campaign from proceeding, Trump noted.www.huffpost.com
Wow, wouldn't that be something - a convicted criminal running for president. I can't imagine what the rest of the world must think of us. I think that Trump must know that he will be convicted. The founding fathers never anticipated a Donald Trump. What do you think?
I believe our enemies will go all out to interfere in the election through social media and forums like this one, to help Trump, and through that bring about utter chaos, and even civil war in America.
After all, I can't believe that many loyal Americans would think it's a good idea to divide the nation.
Where do you get such stupid ideas?An impeachment that does not then get validated by a conviction, is itself a crime.
The republicans are choosing their leaders, despite their character or suitability. They learned they can win if they run a complete grifter like George Santos.
As bad at Trump is, Biden is about 100 times worse.
Biden was party to the illegal Maidan takeover and illegal war started by us in the Ukraine.
Where do you get such stupid ideas?
Biden was a party?
Here we go with claiming the VP is really in charge of American policy.
So how's Vice President Harris doing with the economy, and the expansion of NATO?
Your problem is that your accusations have no basis in any actual evidence. You declare democrats guilty of crimes they haven't even been charged or indicted for.Does not matter.
What the democrats are doing by lying about crimes, is 100 times worse.
There is not a single crime Trump is actually guilty of.
The state chooses who they prosecute. Ninety percent of DC could be jailed by the standards being applied to Trump.Obviously the bagman in the 2014 Ukraine was Hunter, so then obviously Joe Biden was very likely guilty, since he was the one who also made the illegal extortion demands in order to protect Hunter.
You really love Putin that much. Someone who murders his political opponents in order to stay in power?
And sacrifices his own people like cannon fodder.
An impeachment that does not then get validated by a conviction, is itself a crime.
Where do you get such stupid ideas?
Then you believe it was wrong to bring O.J. Simpson to trial?That is an obvious fact.
If you claim something is true, and put everyone through the trial, then if it can't be proven, it was wrong to bring it up in the first place.
Your problem is that your accusations have no basis in any actual evidence. You declare democrats guilty of crimes they haven't even been charged or indicted for.
Meanwhile you ignore republicans charged, indicted, and even convicted of serious crimes, and claim it doesn't matter.
This very thread is all about Trump being convicted of multiple felonies, and continuing to run for president.
And republicans supporting that idea.
Then you believe it was wrong to bring O.J. Simpson to trial?
Start with that.
You are out right lyngAs bad at Trump is, Biden is about 100 times worse.
Biden was party to the illegal Maidan takeover and illegal war started by us in the Ukraine.
there was massive evidence and the time line was EASY to be accomplishedYes, absolutely it was wrong to bring OJ to trial.
There was zero evidence, and it would likely have been impossible for him to have moved that quickly to meet the actual timeline we know happened.
Those involved in the OJ prosecution should be fired and likely prosecuted for their obvious misconduct.
If things go like they might with his Cult Followers going insane, Supermax can take care of it.
Does that mean that you still won't take the Rumpster charges seriously when they start convicting him?When the democrats start taking the serious charges against Potato and Crackboy serious... I'll start taking charges against Trump seriously