Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I've posted the evidence hundreds of times, and you can watch it just by watching video of the Congressional hearings.And still no actual evidence from Bri. All he has is "BUT MY MASTERS TOLD ME THERE WAS EVIDENCE!".
Bri and all the Trump cult losers on this thread just aren't very bright. They literally can't grasp the difference between "This is true" and "Someone told me this is true". Their masters feed them a line of bull, they BELIEVE. It's not that their BS meters are broken, it's that they never had a BS-meter, which leaves them no defense against right-wing brainwashing.
Yes we do, dumbass. Your problem is that all the evidence shows that Biden is a crook.But you don't have any. That's the problem, that you don't seem to realize that.
...and his sons own words in emails and texts, and i believe 6 unconnected witnesses who have alleged bribery.I've posted the evidence hundreds of times, and you can watch it just by watching video of the Congressional hearings.
Don't be a dumbass. No one is buying the Dim talking point any longer that there isn't any evidence.
What part of 1023 form, 150 SARs, whistleblower testimony, Devon Archer testimony don't you understand?
The only "evidence" they will accept is Joe admitting that he is a crook.I don’t think Democrats know the meaning of the word “evidence.”
Evidence is a text message or email in which Hunter complains that he has to give half his salary to Joe Biden.
Yes, I forgot the laptop. But that's Putin propaganda!...and his sons own words in emails and texts.
This is an example of how stupid Bri is.What part of 1023 form,
Well, yeah. That's why 30 agents pointed out the obvious. It's part of a Russian disinfo campaign.Yes, I forgot the laptop. But that's Putin propaganda!
So who told me about the contents of the 1023 form, dumbass? Who told me what Devon Archer testified to in a Congressional hearing? Is there anything that would qualify a evidence in your reality? Bank records? Eye witness testimony? Anything?And still no actual evidence from Bri. All he has is "BUT MY MASTERS TOLD ME THERE WAS EVIDENCE!".
Bri and all the Trump cult losers on this thread just aren't very bright. They literally can't grasp the difference between "This is true" and "Someone told me this is true". Their masters feed them a line of bull, they BELIEVE. It's not that their BS meters are broken, it's that they never had a BS-meter, which leaves them no defense against right-wing brainwashing.
Every document is a record of what someone says. The 1023 is the result of trusted, credible FBI agents documenting what they know. are you saying we shouldn't trust the FBI? Then when are we going to drop these indictments against Trump?This is an example of how stupid Bri is.
A 1023 is just a record of what someone says. It makes no judgement on whether the info is valid.
In this case, the FBI investigated the secondhand claim, and concluded it was a crock.
Bri, being patholgocially dishonest as well as slow-witted, chooses to leave that part out.
Evidence.If it is proven that Joe was taking bribes from China and others, how are you going to feel about your defense of him? Wouldnt that mean that YOU supported cult over country?
It's not what you believe, it's what you can prove in court....... with documented evidence, which at the moment, team trump has zero documented evidence on Joe Biden.I believe bank records, emails and texts, and i believe Comer. He hasnt lied yet. If he ever does lie, i wont believe him anymore.
You clowns are the ones trying to discredit and defund the FBI.The 1023 is the result of trusted, credible FBI agents documenting what they know. are you saying we shouldn't trust the FBI?
Which 30 agents was that? I think you mean the 50 scumbags who helped Biden get elected by signing the letter saying it was, and now they are all admitting there wasn't a shred of evidence indicating it wasn't genuine.Well, yeah. That's why 30 agents pointed out the obvious. It's part of a Russian disinfo campaign.
And no, we won't ever stop rubbing that in your face, how we were right about that.
He demanded loyal oaths and fired Comey because he wouldn't kiss Donnie Dangerously's Ring of Power.When and how did TRUMP weaponize the justice system?
I should ask you: Trust the FBI or don't trust them? Should we trust the FBI when they claim Trump stole secret documents, or when they say Biden is a crook?You clowns are the ones trying to discredit and defund the FBI.
You remember that ^^^^?
Now somehow you believe this info from the FBI.
Which is it?
Trust the FBI
Don't trust the FBI.
Well. We can hope me means what he says, but he also said he would put Hillary behind bars, but he stopped short of making the attempt. I never know anymore when a person running for office says things to get votes or says them because he/she means it. I guess time will tell.As he should. It's time Biden got a taste of his own medicine. Trump raises a good point, why hasn't a special prosecutor been named yet?
---Trump vows to turn tables on 'Biden crime family' and 'demented prosecutions'---
Trump vows to turn tables on ‘Biden crime family’ and ‘demented prosecutions’ - Washington Examiner
Former President Donald Trump vowed to turn the legal tables on President Joe Biden on Friday night, pledging to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate the “bribes from China and many other foreign countries that go into the coffers of the Biden crime family.”Trump’s freewheeling speech to...www.washingtonexaminer.com
Typical.I should ask you: Trust the FBI or don't trust them? Should we trust the FBI when they claim Trump stole secret documents, or when they say Biden is a crook?
Dimwitted leftard. ^^^Steal what? Trump just wanted to overturn an election he lost.
John Eastman Comes Clean: Hell Yes We Were Trying to Overthrow the Government
I want to return to this revelatory interview with co-conspirator John Eastman, the last portion of which was published Thursday by Tom Klingenstein, the Chairman of the Trumpite Claremont Institute…talkingpointsmemo.com
It's not the weakest. It's the strongest. If you can't answer the same question with regard to your own side, then it was a dumb question. It's self refuting.Typical.
I asked YOU a question, and you use the weakest of ALL rebuttals by answering a question with the same question.
No missy.....you failed to answer the question. FACTIt's not the weakest. It's the strongest. If you can't answer the same question with regard to your own side, then it was a dumb question. It's self refuting.
No. In this case, it was the FBI writing down info from a second-person source who told them about what he heard a third-person source say.Every document is a record of what someone says. The 1023 is the result of trusted, credible FBI agents documenting what they know.
