Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Trump has committed all manner of impeachable offenses – offenses that warrant his removal from office consistent with Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution.
Impeachment is a political – not legal – process; a president can be removed from office via the impeachment process absent alleged criminal wrongdoing; because he's doing a poor job as president, such as Trump.
But that will never happen.
Democrats don’t want Pence as president.
A conviction in the Republican Senate would be impossible.
And the American people would never support removing a president from office absent alleged criminal wrongdoing, as most Americans incorrectly believe that a president must have committed a crime to be impeached.
Indeed, Trump benefits from Americans’ ignorance.
I have read COTUS many times, and have taken ConLaw. No where doe it state, imply or even suggest that the President cannot be served a subpoena and be forced to testify under oath.
We are a nation of laws, if the President refuses the subpoena, we would face a Constitutional crisis. If in fact the Supreme Court decides the President is above the law, for any reason, and their decision is to not force him to testify under oath we will be known as the last free generation.
Most US citizens have lost FAITH in the FBI. Since 9/11 many people have died by Muslims and radical Liberals, when the FBI background check failed over and over.Trump cannot offer the shambling semblance of an Article II excuse for what is, on its face, deeply problematic conduct—like firing Comey and publicly conceding that the firing was related to the Russia investigation—and then claim Congress is constitutionally obliged to leave him be.
tick TICK ..
Fort Hood Suspect Communicated With Radical Cleric, Authorities SaySources tell ABCNEWS that senior FBI officials were 95 percent to 98 percent certain that an attack was coming, but did not believe it would occur in the United States.
San Bernardino shooters under FBI surveillance leading up to the attacksntelligence agencies intercepted communications last year and this year between the military psychiatrist accused of shooting to death 13 people at Fort Hood, Tex., and a radical cleric in Yemen known for his incendiary anti-American teachings.
The FBI investigated the Orlando mass shooter for 10 months — and found nothing. Here's whyollowing the Nov. 13 ISIS-led massacre in Paris that slaughtered 130 people, it was revealed that US and European intelligence officials were very much familiar with the mastermind behind the attacks: 27-year-old Abdelhamid Abaaoud.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/articl...as-warned-about-a-school-shooting-threat-fromThey deployed two confidential informants more than a dozen times to secretly record his conversations. They interviewed him twice and convinced him to provide a written statement — in which he admitted he previously had lied to agents.
Last fall, a Mississippi bail bondsman and frequent YouTube vlogger noticed an alarming comment left on one of his videos. "I'm going to be a professional school shooter," said a user named Nikolas Cruz.
Trump is a thug
He was a thug when he was a real estate developer and used local authorities to muscle people out of their homes
Now he looks to use the Justice Dept to attack his political enemies
/——/ Yet you said nothing when Obozo weaponized the IRS and DOJ
WASHINGTON — President Trump told the White House counsel in the spring that he wanted to order the Justice Department to prosecute two of his political adversaries: his 2016 challenger, Hillary Clinton, and the former F.B.I. director James B. Comey, according to two people familiar with the conversation.
The lawyer, Donald F. McGahn II, rebuffed the president, saying that he had no authority to order a prosecution. Mr. McGahn said that while he could request an investigation, that too could prompt accusations of abuse of power. To underscore his point, Mr. McGahn had White House lawyers write a memo for Mr. Trump warning that if he asked law enforcement to investigate his rivals, he could face a range of consequences, including possible impeachment.
The encounter was one of the most blatant examples yet of how Mr. Trump views the typically independent Justice Department as a tool to be wielded against his political enemies. It took on additional significance in recent weeks when Mr. McGahn left the White House and Mr. Trump appointed a relatively inexperienced political loyalist, Matthew G. Whitaker, as the acting attorney general.
More: Trump Wanted to Order Justice Dept. to Prosecute Comey and Clinton
This is what third-world dictators do. Is that where we are? What do you think?
/——/ Yet you said nothing when Obozo weaponized the IRS and DOJ
WASHINGTON — President Trump told the White House counsel in the spring that he wanted to order the Justice Department to prosecute two of his political adversaries: his 2016 challenger, Hillary Clinton, and the former F.B.I. director James B. Comey, according to two people familiar with the conversation.
The lawyer, Donald F. McGahn II, rebuffed the president, saying that he had no authority to order a prosecution. Mr. McGahn said that while he could request an investigation, that too could prompt accusations of abuse of power. To underscore his point, Mr. McGahn had White House lawyers write a memo for Mr. Trump warning that if he asked law enforcement to investigate his rivals, he could face a range of consequences, including possible impeachment.
The encounter was one of the most blatant examples yet of how Mr. Trump views the typically independent Justice Department as a tool to be wielded against his political enemies. It took on additional significance in recent weeks when Mr. McGahn left the White House and Mr. Trump appointed a relatively inexperienced political loyalist, Matthew G. Whitaker, as the acting attorney general.
More: Trump Wanted to Order Justice Dept. to Prosecute Comey and Clinton
This is what third-world dictators do. Is that where we are? What do you think?
And the right wingers worshipped him....Can America, and the world, survive Trump until 2020? We are living in dangerous and scary times.
Building a wall, to keep invaders out, is not what Hitler is remember for, you, godwinning fool.
Hitler took the guns, got Jesus out of the schools, and took over the healthcare system.
And the right wingers worshipped him....Can America, and the world, survive Trump until 2020? We are living in dangerous and scary times.
Building a wall, to keep invaders out, is not what Hitler is remember for, you, godwinning fool.
Hitler took the guns, got Jesus out of the schools, and took over the healthcare system.
Then why would Leftists pursue the same path?
Because it doesn't just lead to naziism, and can be good for society. Got any other softball questions?And the right wingers worshipped him....Can America, and the world, survive Trump until 2020? We are living in dangerous and scary times.
Building a wall, to keep invaders out, is not what Hitler is remember for, you, godwinning fool.
Hitler took the guns, got Jesus out of the schools, and took over the healthcare system.
Then why would Leftists pursue the same path?
No, Comey didnt have balls enough to go up against the Clinton Machine. He would end up dead like all the others who crossed the Clintons.So? Hillary broke the law and lied repeatedly.
So you have proof of that? So I'll save you the time, yes I have proof fox, info wars, breitbart and gateway pundit said so. Yep that's enough to prosecute.
How about Comey's testimony before congress?
He spelled it out in no uncertain terms laws were broke, but he didn't think he could find a prosecutor to charge her.
He didn't bother looking.
THE CLINTON DEATH LISTYou know what, I can start seeing a pattern with all the liberal who visit this site. They MUST say good things about Hillary(Even though she stole the election from Bernie) because if they dont,(they are registered and can be found out by the Clintons) they too can end up like Seth and Shawn...Recent deaths involving Hillary's 2016 presidential run:
Shawn Lucas – Aug. 2, 2016. On July 3, attorney Shawn Lucas, 38, helped serve the DNC with a lawsuit claiming then-DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz “rigged the primary for Hillary Clinton.” The complaint was served before Wasserman Schultz resigned amid the Wikileaks email scandal on July 24. Less than one month after he helped serve the lawsuit, Lucas’ girlfriend found him dead in his bathroom.
Seth Rich – July 10, 2016. WND reported DNC staffer Seth Rich was murdered near his affluent neighborhood in Washington, D.C. Rich was shot in the back at 4:15 a.m. while he walked home from his girlfriend’s apartment. In an interview, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange suggested that Rich, 27, was the source of the WikiLeaks-exposed DNC emails.
View attachment 229986
Trump is a thug
He was a thug when he was a real estate developer and used local authorities to muscle people out of their homes
Now he looks to use the Justice Dept to attack his political enemies
Because it doesn't just lead to naziism, and can be good for society. Got any other softball questions?
You just defended Hitler and his actions.
Consider how you would respond if a con did that.
Mr. McGahn is an establishment douchebag. Trump should have fired his ass.Mr. McGahn had White House lawyers write a memo for Mr. Trump warning that if he asked law enforcement to investigate his rivals, he could face a range of consequences, including possible impeachment.
/----/ Where is your fake outrage over the murders in Iran?The SOS...a supposed devote Christian stood there and said...."Who cares if the guy was murdered...it happens in the middle east. The money is more important." That is a proud Christian...he drools for the Liar in Chief.
He didn't need any excuse to fire Comey. The Constitution gives him the authority to fire anyone in the entire administration for any reason. Comey was a douchebag who was trying to blackmail Trump.Trump cannot offer the shambling semblance of an Article II excuse for what is, on its face, deeply problematic conduct—like firing Comey and publicly conceding that the firing was related to the Russia investigation—and then claim Congress is constitutionally obliged to leave him be.
tick TICK ..
Only a total Trump buttlicker would not find this news disturbing. Trump, taking a page from third world dictators and his friend and mentor V. Putin, wanted, or rather wants, to use the power of the state to prosecute his enemies. Trump is turning this nation into a banana republic. Trumpers like the political and mental eunuchs they have become will follow Trump and gladly trash and burn the Constitution for their Trumpian God.
Relief will come to the nation one January 1, 2019, but the nation will only reclaim sanity when Trump is flushed down the friggin drain, and we elect a real president who respects and loves the USA, the Constitution and the rule of law.
View attachment 229996
I find these greymen interesting. It is all about projecting. Trumpers act like mindless lemmings. They bow to Trump. They condone any action that Trump does even as it humiliates the US and undermines the US constitution.
You people are like those marchers in Kim's North Korea or the old Soviet Union, where they march in lock step and where the cult of personality rules.
What a simpleton you are. SMHSo? Hillary broke the law and lied repeatedly.
The best thing Trump opponents can do in my opinion is hold their noses for two years and then vote him out of office. Need to make sure there is a good candidate running against him that has strong messaging and fresh ideas. Most importantly, stop taking the bait that Trump constantly lays out. He is nothing without enemies and fall guys so don’t give him any easy targetsWell until something comes out let’s stick with the real shit like how he is fumbling this Saudi Arabia situation or screwing up the stock market with his trade war. There is plenty of ammo to go after him with. I don’t think him wanting to investigate Clinton or Comey is surprising or significant. But that’s just my opinion.I understand your point but you’re better off going after Trump for the things he actually does that are objectionable. Going after his stupid statements and even his failed attempts to do idiotic things is not going to land in a significant way. He campaigned on locking up Clinton so asking his DOJ or attorneys about it jist isn’t that surprising or that big of a deal. Now if they actually moved on it, then there is reason to voice strong objectionAmong other things it shows his intent - until Don McGahn talked him out of it. There are many angles to this story. Also, Don McGahn said that "to the best of his knowledge" Trump did not ask anyone else to follow through on prosecuting Hillary and Comey. It is currently unknown whether Trump discussed this with Matt Whitaker before making him AG. There is much more to be known. The legal experts think this is a really big deal.
From the OP:
It is unclear whether Mr. Trump read Mr. McGahn’s memo or whether he pursued the prosecutions further. But the president has continued to privately discuss the matter, including the possible appointment of a second special counsel to investigate both Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Comey, according to two people who have spoken to Mr. Trump about the issue. He has also repeatedly expressed disappointment in the F.B.I. director, Christopher A. Wray, for failing to more aggressively investigate Mrs. Clinton, calling him weak, one of the people said.
Mr. Trump repeatedly pressed Justice Department officials about the status of Clinton-related investigations, including Mr. Whitaker when he was the chief of staff to Attorney General Jeff Sessions, according to a person with direct knowledge of the conversations. CNN first reported those discussions.
During the presidential race, Mr. Whitaker, a former United States attorney, also said he would have indicted Mrs. Clinton, contradicting Mr. Comey’s highly unusual public announcement that he would recommend the Justice Department not charge her over her handling of classified information while secretary of state.
“When the facts and evidence show a criminal violation has been committed, the individuals involved should not dictate whether the case is prosecuted,” Mr. Whitaker wrote in an op-ed in USA Today in July 2016.
The following CNN article also adds some background:
Washington (CNN) President Donald Trump on multiple occasions raised with Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and Matt Whitaker, who was then-chief of staff to Jeff Sessions, whether the Justice Department was progressing in investigating Hillary Clinton, according to a source familiar with the matter.
The President also wanted his previous White House counsel, Don McGahn, to ask the Justice Department to prosecute Clinton on numerous occasions, but McGahn rebuffed doing that, the source said.
Anticipating the question about Clinton would be raised, Whitaker came prepared to answer with what Justice was doing on Clinton-related matters, including the Clinton Foundation and Uranium One investigations, the source said. The source added that Whitaker was trying to appease the President, but did not seem to cross any line.
More: Trump raised investigating Clinton with Rosenstein, Whitaker and McGahn - CNNPolitics
We don't yet know what Trump may have actually moved on. With Sessions or Whitaker.
It all falls under abuse of power. I agree that the tangible stuff should take priority.
Well, he is failing badly at being president....Well for a "thug" the mans doing okay.
