Trump Wanted to Order Justice Dept. to Prosecute Comey and Clinton

Trump has committed all manner of impeachable offenses – offenses that warrant his removal from office consistent with Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution.

Impeachment is a political – not legal – process; a president can be removed from office via the impeachment process absent alleged criminal wrongdoing; because he's doing a poor job as president, such as Trump.

But that will never happen.

Democrats don’t want Pence as president.

A conviction in the Republican Senate would be impossible.

And the American people would never support removing a president from office absent alleged criminal wrongdoing, as most Americans incorrectly believe that a president must have committed a crime to be impeached.

Indeed, Trump benefits from Americans’ ignorance.

I have read COTUS many times, and have taken ConLaw. No where doe it state, imply or even suggest that the President cannot be served a subpoena and be forced to testify under oath.

We are a nation of laws, if the President refuses the subpoena, we would face a Constitutional crisis. If in fact the Supreme Court decides the President is above the law, for any reason, and their decision is to not force him to testify under oath we will be known as the last free generation.

SecState refused a subpoena and destroyed evidence. What say you to that?

BTW, Mr. "ConLaw"; Who does the Justice Dept serve at the whim of?

That's right! The President. Fact.

Your faggot ass is no Constitutional scholar and you're not fooling anyone with your lies.

My guess is you had Advanced English in high school, that's about it.

First of all, your compliment of my ability to convey to others in proper English my opinions, built on factual evidence is appreciated.

Q.: "Who does the Justice Dept serve at the whim of? "That's right! The President." "Fact."

A. There is no whim; the AG and US Attorneys follow the law and the polices of their agency.

My "faggot ass"? You're a piece of shit, foul mouthed and a coward.

I never claimed to be a Scholar, Constitutional or in any other academic discipline. Though in contrast to you, I am in every matter which requires sagacious thought.
 
It is not a democracy it has never been one and hopefully never will be. It is a Representative Republic. Just as it was when the Constitution formed it. Dimshits want it to be socialist dictatorship.

You really are an idiot. Democracy has come a long way since the Constitution was ratified.


And the Constitution is still the supreme law of the land. Time doesn't change that.

.


But Eric holder is trying like hell to outsmart it..they are using the 9th to bypass it..read these news articles..


Holder is another on that should have gone to jail, first AG to be held in contempt of congress and then he abused his power and refused to follow the law on such contempt.

.

42 days until the new Congress is seated.

Let’s see how that contempt thing works out for you then.


No reason it should be any different than under your dear leader.

.
 
Trump has committed all manner of impeachable offenses – offenses that warrant his removal from office consistent with Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution.

Impeachment is a political – not legal – process; a president can be removed from office via the impeachment process absent alleged criminal wrongdoing; because he's doing a poor job as president, such as Trump.

But that will never happen.

Democrats don’t want Pence as president.

A conviction in the Republican Senate would be impossible.

And the American people would never support removing a president from office absent alleged criminal wrongdoing, as most Americans incorrectly believe that a president must have committed a crime to be impeached.

Indeed, Trump benefits from Americans’ ignorance.

I have read COTUS many times, and have taken ConLaw. No where doe it state, imply or even suggest that the President cannot be served a subpoena and be forced to testify under oath.

We are a nation of laws, if the President refuses the subpoena, we would face a Constitutional crisis. If in fact the Supreme Court decides the President is above the law, for any reason, and their decision is to not force him to testify under oath we will be known as the last free generation.

SecState refused a subpoena and destroyed evidence. What say you to that?

BTW, Mr. "ConLaw"; Who does the Justice Dept serve at the whim of?

That's right! The President. Fact.

Your faggot ass is no Constitutional scholar and you're not fooling anyone with your lies.

My guess is you had Advanced English in high school, that's about it.

First of all, your compliment of my ability to convey to others in proper English my opinions, built on factual evidence is appreciated.

Q.: "Who does the Justice Dept serve at the whim of? "That's right! The President." "Fact."

A. There is no whim; the AG and US Attorneys follow the law and the polices of their agency.

My "faggot ass"? You're a piece of shit, foul mouthed and a coward.

I never claimed to be a Scholar, Constitutional or in any other academic discipline. Though in contrast to you, I am in every matter which requires sagacious thought.

Apparently you forget the lies you tell from one minute to the next as well.

"I have read COTUS many times, and have taken ConLaw."
 
The SOS...a supposed devote Christian stood there and said...."Who cares if the guy was murdered...it happens in the middle east. The money is more important." That is a proud Christian...he drools for the Liar in Chief.

So now you're demanding decisions be made as though we were a theocracy, REALLY??????????????

You'll be reminded of this one LMAO.

.
 
Only a total Trump buttlicker would not find this news disturbing. Trump, taking a page from third world dictators and his friend and mentor V. Putin, wanted, or rather wants, to use the power of the state to prosecute his enemies. Trump is turning this nation into a banana republic. Trumpers like the political and mental eunuchs they have become will follow Trump and gladly trash and burn the Constitution for their Trumpian God.

Relief will come to the nation one January 1, 2019, but the nation will only reclaim sanity when Trump is flushed down the friggin drain, and we elect a real president who respects and loves the USA, the Constitution and the rule of law.

View attachment 229996

I find these greymen interesting. It is all about projecting. Trumpers act like mindless lemmings. They bow to Trump. They condone any action that Trump does even as it humiliates the US and undermines the US constitution.

You people are like those marchers in Kim's North Korea or the old Soviet Union, where they march in lock step and where the cult of personality rules.


You are sorely misguided.


It's called fully indoctrinated.

.
 
21dc-investigate1-articleLarge.jpg


WASHINGTON — President Trump told the White House counsel in the spring that he wanted to order the Justice Department to prosecute two of his political adversaries: his 2016 challenger, Hillary Clinton, and the former F.B.I. director James B. Comey, according to two people familiar with the conversation.

The lawyer, Donald F. McGahn II, rebuffed the president, saying that he had no authority to order a prosecution. Mr. McGahn said that while he could request an investigation, that too could prompt accusations of abuse of power. To underscore his point, Mr. McGahn had White House lawyers write a memo for Mr. Trump warning that if he asked law enforcement to investigate his rivals, he could face a range of consequences, including possible impeachment.

The encounter was one of the most blatant examples yet of how Mr. Trump views the typically independent Justice Department as a tool to be wielded against his political enemies. It took on additional significance in recent weeks when Mr. McGahn left the White House and Mr. Trump appointed a relatively inexperienced political loyalist, Matthew G. Whitaker, as the acting attorney general.

More: Trump Wanted to Order Justice Dept. to Prosecute Comey and Clinton

This is what third-world dictators do. Is that where we are? What do you think?
THEY SHOULD BE PROSECUTED...
ALONG WITH HOLDER, LYNCH, CLAPPER, BRENNAN, MCCABE, STRZOK, OHER, MUELLER, & ROSENSTEIN...

Sounds like Trey Gowdy should be prosecuted for trying to frame Hillary.

In a bombshell revelation, the Central Intelligence Agency reached out to Democrats serving on the Select Committee on Benghazi on Saturday, October 17, 2015 to confirm that Chairman Trey Gowdy had altered documents provided to the committee by Hillary Clinton.

CIA: Trey Gowdy Altered Documents To Frame Hillary Clinton
Bwuhahahaha

Comey testified that Hillary Lied, that she had emailed/ received classified data, that there were official docs, etc....

...and you are still trying to spew bullshit.

Bwuhahahaha.....

Comey DID not testify that Hillary lied. Not even close. In fact, when Trey Gordy was weasel wording his questions on Hillary’s email Comey made a point of saying she DID NOT LIE. In his press conference Comey said he found her truthful throughout her interview.

Stupid Russians.
 
21dc-investigate1-articleLarge.jpg


WASHINGTON — President Trump told the White House counsel in the spring that he wanted to order the Justice Department to prosecute two of his political adversaries: his 2016 challenger, Hillary Clinton, and the former F.B.I. director James B. Comey, according to two people familiar with the conversation.

The lawyer, Donald F. McGahn II, rebuffed the president, saying that he had no authority to order a prosecution. Mr. McGahn said that while he could request an investigation, that too could prompt accusations of abuse of power. To underscore his point, Mr. McGahn had White House lawyers write a memo for Mr. Trump warning that if he asked law enforcement to investigate his rivals, he could face a range of consequences, including possible impeachment.

The encounter was one of the most blatant examples yet of how Mr. Trump views the typically independent Justice Department as a tool to be wielded against his political enemies. It took on additional significance in recent weeks when Mr. McGahn left the White House and Mr. Trump appointed a relatively inexperienced political loyalist, Matthew G. Whitaker, as the acting attorney general.

More: Trump Wanted to Order Justice Dept. to Prosecute Comey and Clinton

This is what third-world dictators do. Is that where we are? What do you think?
THEY SHOULD BE PROSECUTED...
ALONG WITH HOLDER, LYNCH, CLAPPER, BRENNAN, MCCABE, STRZOK, OHER, MUELLER, & ROSENSTEIN...

Sounds like Trey Gowdy should be prosecuted for trying to frame Hillary.

In a bombshell revelation, the Central Intelligence Agency reached out to Democrats serving on the Select Committee on Benghazi on Saturday, October 17, 2015 to confirm that Chairman Trey Gowdy had altered documents provided to the committee by Hillary Clinton.

CIA: Trey Gowdy Altered Documents To Frame Hillary Clinton
Bwuhahahaha

Comey testified that Hillary Lied, that she had emailed/ received classified data, that there were official docs, etc....

...and you are still trying to spew bullshit.

Bwuhahahaha.....

Comey DID not testify that Hillary lied. Not even close. In fact, when Trey Gordy was weasel wording his questions on Hillary’s email Comey made a point of saying she DID NOT LIE. In his press conference Comey said he found her truthful throughout her interview.

Stupid Russians.

Nah. He did say she was stupid. I agree.
 
lets cut to the chase -

Goldilocks could shit on his drones birthday cake and they would fight to the death to lick the icing.

morals
ethics
saluting communist bastards
lying every breath
pissing on the 10 commandments
etc etc etc

BE DAMNED ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

THEY SIMPLY DONT F'N CARE what the old lard ass sob does.
 
lets cut to the chase -

Goldilocks could shit on his drones birthday cake and they would fight to the death to lick the icing.

morals
ethics
saluting communist bastards
lying every breath
pissing on the 10 commandments
etc etc etc

BE DAMNED ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

THEY SIMPLY DONT F'N CARE what the old lard ass sob does.
You just identified Barrack Hussain Obama during his 8 years of 1/2 white faggot presidency. Funny how you liberals buried your heads way up your asses, then when you dont get your way, you tell falsehoods over and over, and deny, deny, deny.
 
lets cut to the chase -

Goldilocks could shit on his drones birthday cake and they would fight to the death to lick the icing.

morals
ethics
saluting communist bastards
lying every breath
pissing on the 10 commandments
etc etc etc

BE DAMNED ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

THEY SIMPLY DONT F'N CARE what the old lard ass sob does.
You just identified Barrack Hussain Obama during his 8 years of 1/2 white faggot presidency. Funny how you liberals buried your heads way up your asses, then when you dont get your way, you tell falsehoods over and over, and deny, deny, deny.
^^ reflexive whataboutism

I don't think the Trump cultists understand how serious this is.
 
A. You have to assume the story is completely accurate. It's likely not.
B. She and Comey probably deserve to be prosecuted.

Trump's a big mouth, exaggerates and somewhat a child. Based on most things reasonable, I'll take him anyway.
 
We know the story is true because the White House Counsel wrote a memo warning Trump that were he to continue in this way it would likely be impeachable
 
We know the story is true because the White House Counsel wrote a memo warning Trump that were he to continue in this way it would likely be impeachable

Yep, it's all documented. Plus, McGahn spent 30+ hours with Mueller. I'm sure Mueller knows all...
 
21dc-investigate1-articleLarge.jpg


WASHINGTON — President Trump told the White House counsel in the spring that he wanted to order the Justice Department to prosecute two of his political adversaries: his 2016 challenger, Hillary Clinton, and the former F.B.I. director James B. Comey, according to two people familiar with the conversation.

The lawyer, Donald F. McGahn II, rebuffed the president, saying that he had no authority to order a prosecution. Mr. McGahn said that while he could request an investigation, that too could prompt accusations of abuse of power. To underscore his point, Mr. McGahn had White House lawyers write a memo for Mr. Trump warning that if he asked law enforcement to investigate his rivals, he could face a range of consequences, including possible impeachment.

The encounter was one of the most blatant examples yet of how Mr. Trump views the typically independent Justice Department as a tool to be wielded against his political enemies. It took on additional significance in recent weeks when Mr. McGahn left the White House and Mr. Trump appointed a relatively inexperienced political loyalist, Matthew G. Whitaker, as the acting attorney general.

More: Trump Wanted to Order Justice Dept. to Prosecute Comey and Clinton

This is what third-world dictators do. Is that where we are? What do you think?

This is an impeachable offense. Mueller undoubtedly knows this, and the Democrats are going after him on this one next year. This story isn't going away.
Trump is already bracing for next year when Democrats take control of the House.
 
An objective non-partisan person who looks at the evidence against both Trump and Hillary should conclude that the DOJ and FBI were in the tank for Hillary. H was given a pass instead of a grand jury. Trump was given a special counsel on zero evidence of collusion, which isn't even a crime.

Now Trump is pissed that he is under investigation instead of the real criminals. I'd be mad too. The DOJ and FBI must be stacked with Leftist lawyers who run interference for the dems.
 
An objective non-partisan person who looks at the evidence against both Trump and Hillary should conclude that the DOJ and FBI were in the tank for Hillary. H was given a pass instead of a grand jury. Trump was given a special counsel on zero evidence of collusion, which isn't even a crime.

Now Trump is pissed that he is under investigation instead of the real criminals. I'd be mad too. The DOJ and FBI must be stacked with Leftist lawyers who run interference for the dems.

Yeah, and I bet you have lots of "credible" proof. Funny...
 
An objective non-partisan person who looks at the evidence against both Trump and Hillary should conclude that the DOJ and FBI were in the tank for Hillary. H was given a pass instead of a grand jury. Trump was given a special counsel on zero evidence of collusion, which isn't even a crime.

Now Trump is pissed that he is under investigation instead of the real criminals. I'd be mad too. The DOJ and FBI must be stacked with Leftist lawyers who run interference for the dems.

Yeah, and I bet you have lots of "credible" proof. Funny...
Even when it is presented over and over, you deny, deny, deny.
immutable-truth-head-up-ass-buried-rectal-cranial-inversion-politics-1314793503.jpg
 

Forum List

Back
Top