Trump will cost millions of jobs before the end of the first year. And then what?

[easyt65]

'Trump will cost millions of jobs before the end of the first year. And then what?'

Sort of like snowflakes driving McDonalds into replacing people with Kiosks?

 

[ColonelAngus]

If Trump's moves are so awful, why did the PESO take a SHIT and the American Stock market skyrocket?

We're only 12 days in. Let's see how the DOW is doing in April.

No. I won't do it.

What an odd answer. You won't consider how the DOW is doing in April as a means to help judge President Trump's performance yet you'll judge him to now with the false claim the stock market is skyrocketing?

April's very busy for me. I'm not going to have time to look at the stock market in April. My schedule clears up in late May. Can I do it then?

 

[AntonToo]

You've been destroying jobs for 8 years and now you care????

Oh the merciless 8 years of DESTRUCTION! How can anyone forget

 

[Divine Wind]

...Sort of like snowflakes driving McDonalds into replacing people with Kiosks?

LOL....or like they are driving Starbucks to automate.

The Future of Coffee: Robot Baristas

FWIW, the RW really needs to reconsider their stance on abortion. Wouldn't the "snowflake" problem eventually be resolved with abortions on demand (up to 24 weeks) and a free tubal ligation after ten abortions? RWers could have as many babies as they like and the snowflakes would attrite themselves out of existence.

 

[Divine Wind]

April's very busy for me. I'm not going to have time to look at the stock market in April. My schedule clears up in late May. Can I do it then?

So you won't be logging on here in April? Interesting. If you do log in at any time in April, I will call you on it since it takes longer to log in here and review messages than to click on this link: Dow Jones Industrial Average: INDEXDJX:.DJI quotes & news - Google Finance

BTW, contrary to your assertion the stock market is "skyrocketing", it's down.

 

[danielpalos]

Looks like Trump's on a tear.

Millions of American jobs depend on the half trillion in trade between the US and Mexico. Now Mexico is looking to China to deepen trade. They are talking to Argentina for corn:

Argentina's Macri scraps corn and wheat export quotas

They are targeting cheese imports:

http://www.agweb.com/assets/import/files/mexicoretaliationtargetsdetailedinformation.pdf

Guajardo noted that Mexico had good relations with China and said Beijing was a "big concern" for the Trump administration.

Mexico issued an ultimatum to the Trump administration

Nearly 5 Million U.S. Jobs Depend on Trade With Mexico

New research from the Mexico Institute at the Wilson Center, a nonpartisan think tank based in Washington, D.C., found that trade with Mexico creates approximately 4.9 million jobs in the United States. In other words, one out of 29 American jobs depends on preserving an economic relationship with the U.S.’s southern neighbor. Researchers came up with this 4.9 million figure by calculating three economic shifts that would likely occur if trade with Mexico ended: the number of American jobs that are involved in producing exports to Mexico, which would be lost; the number of jobs that would return to the United States to produce the previously imported goods; and the number of jobs that would disappear if the money American consumers and companies saved from buying lower-cost imports were gone.

As US pulls back from Pacific trade deal, countries look to China

“The United States isn’t an island. It can’t just sit there and say it’s not going to trade with the rest of the world,” a “disappointed” prime minister, John Key, told reporters Tuesday. “At some point they’re going to have to give some consideration to that.”

---------------------------------------------------

No study. No data. No understanding. Just throwing it all out there and seeing what blows up.

If Trump destroys millions of jobs in his first year, what will he do in his next three?

Now we know what Mr. Trump means by the, "Art of the Deal".

Trump "puts pressure in an almost extortionist manner ... to get as many concessions as possible," de la Calle told AFP.

 

[ColonelAngus]

April's very busy for me. I'm not going to have time to look at the stock market in April. My schedule clears up in late May. Can I do it then?

So you won't be logging on here in April? Interesting. If you do log in at any time in April, I will call you on it since it takes longer to log in here and review messages than to click on this link: Dow Jones Industrial Average: INDEXDJX:.DJI quotes & news - Google Finance

BTW, contrary to your assertion the stock market is "skyrocketing", it's down.

It has nothing to do with logging into this site.

I won't be able to glance at a Dow number for the entire month of April. I will likely be posting here, but I can't take the time to examine stock market levels during that month. I offered late May. Can I pencil you in for late May? After that I am booked until after the summer solstice.

 

[danielpalos]

Looks like Trump's on a tear.

Millions of American jobs depend on the half trillion in trade between the US and Mexico. Now Mexico is looking to China to deepen trade. They are talking to Argentina for corn:

Argentina's Macri scraps corn and wheat export quotas

They are targeting cheese imports:

http://www.agweb.com/assets/import/files/mexicoretaliationtargetsdetailedinformation.pdf

Guajardo noted that Mexico had good relations with China and said Beijing was a "big concern" for the Trump administration.

Mexico issued an ultimatum to the Trump administration

Nearly 5 Million U.S. Jobs Depend on Trade With Mexico

New research from the Mexico Institute at the Wilson Center, a nonpartisan think tank based in Washington, D.C., found that trade with Mexico creates approximately 4.9 million jobs in the United States. In other words, one out of 29 American jobs depends on preserving an economic relationship with the U.S.’s southern neighbor. Researchers came up with this 4.9 million figure by calculating three economic shifts that would likely occur if trade with Mexico ended: the number of American jobs that are involved in producing exports to Mexico, which would be lost; the number of jobs that would return to the United States to produce the previously imported goods; and the number of jobs that would disappear if the money American consumers and companies saved from buying lower-cost imports were gone.

As US pulls back from Pacific trade deal, countries look to China

“The United States isn’t an island. It can’t just sit there and say it’s not going to trade with the rest of the world,” a “disappointed” prime minister, John Key, told reporters Tuesday. “At some point they’re going to have to give some consideration to that.”

---------------------------------------------------

No study. No data. No understanding. Just throwing it all out there and seeing what blows up.

If Trump destroys millions of jobs in his first year, what will he do in his next three?

Do you even read your own links?

The first one didnt mention the us of Mexico and said too much soy was planted.....uhhhhh

Soy sorry. Did I mention soy?

Do you read your own links?
You just post shit with a title and don't even read it, it's hilarious.

Ps
Soy is short for soy beans

I read this part:

Nearly a third of Louisiana Republicans think President Obama is to blame for the federal government’s notorious response to Hurricane Katrina, a new poll revealed.

 

[danielpalos]

Trump said they can enter if they are Christians. This is un-American and illegal.

They will have to go through proper channels regardless of their religion but those countries citizens on that ban are banned.

The travel ban exempts Christians which is un-American and illegal.

If it is written as such prove your claim or continue with your dishonesty but I will not waste my time responding to you further.

Only Muslim-majority countries where President Trump has no business interests are on the travel ban list but exceptions are made for "minority" religions. This is means non-Muslims. The EO states:
"(b) Upon the resumption of USRAP admissions, the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, is further directed to make changes, to the extent permitted by law, to prioritize refugee claims made by individuals on the basis of religious-based persecution, provided that the religion of the individual is a minority religion in the individual's country of nationality. ...

"(e) Notwithstanding the temporary suspension imposed pursuant to subsection (a) of this section, the Secretaries of State and Homeland Security may jointly determine to admit individuals to the United States as refugees on a case-by-case basis, in their discretion, but only so long as they determine that the admission of such individuals as refugees is in the national interest -- including when the person is a religious minority in his country of nationality facing religious persecution ..."

Muslims will not qualify.

So you have a problem with our elected officials (BTW the people voted into office) setting the stage to help those who are being persecuted for their religious preferences. Along with what is determined to be in our best national interest.

That religious exemption if made for well vetted individuals and the ban from certain countries are two different issues that you think you can combine to bitch about.

If you like those refugees from any or all of the currently banned countries in Europe you keep them in your house if your country has authorized it but you will not dictate who will come into my house or country.

just right wing national socialism clouding all judgment?

Only Muslim-majority countries where President Trump has no business interests are on the travel ban list but exceptions are made for "minority" religions. This is means non-Muslims.

We have conflicts of interest to consider when a guy with gold gets elected to make rules for us.

 

[Divine Wind]

Now we know what Mr. Trump means by the, "Art of the Deal".

Trump "puts pressure in an almost extortionist manner ... to get as many concessions as possible," de la Calle told AFP.

We're only 13 days into his administration. Wouldn't it be smarter to give him his 100 days and see if it works out better than Obama's Apology Tour and letting Pelosi kick out the Republicans and fashion the ACA in her own image?

FUN FLASHBACK: remember how she chided business leaders for using corporate jets yet she traveled regularly between DC and California on an Air Force C-37 at an average cost of $28K/flight?

Pelosi's Speaker Shuttle: The Inside Story

C-37A > U.S. Air Force > Fact Sheet Display

 

[danielpalos]

They will have to go through proper channels regardless of their religion but those countries citizens on that ban are banned.

The travel ban exempts Christians which is un-American and illegal.

If it is written as such prove your claim or continue with your dishonesty but I will not waste my time responding to you further.

Only Muslim-majority countries where President Trump has no business interests are on the travel ban list but exceptions are made for "minority" religions. This is means non-Muslims. The EO states:
"(b) Upon the resumption of USRAP admissions, the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, is further directed to make changes, to the extent permitted by law, to prioritize refugee claims made by individuals on the basis of religious-based persecution, provided that the religion of the individual is a minority religion in the individual's country of nationality. ...

"(e) Notwithstanding the temporary suspension imposed pursuant to subsection (a) of this section, the Secretaries of State and Homeland Security may jointly determine to admit individuals to the United States as refugees on a case-by-case basis, in their discretion, but only so long as they determine that the admission of such individuals as refugees is in the national interest -- including when the person is a religious minority in his country of nationality facing religious persecution ..."

Muslims will not qualify.

So you have a problem with our elected officials (BTW the people voted into office) setting the stage to help those who are being persecuted for their religious preferences. Along with what is determined to be in our best national interest.

That religious exemption if made for well vetted individuals and the ban from certain countries are two different issues that you think you can combine to bitch about.

If you like those refugees from any or all of the currently banned countries in Europe you keep them in your house if your country has authorized it but you will not dictate who will come into my house or country.

Europe has been taking-in hundreds of thousands of refugees, many from countries which have been destroyed in the Middle East and North Africa by the Americans. The USA has taken very few in comparison. It is the Europeans who are doing all we can to fix the instability created by the Americans. Thanks for nothing.

Yet, the right wing has a problem with financial aid to States so they can improve their economy locally.

 

[Divine Wind]

...I won't be able to glance at a Dow number for the entire month of April. I will likely be posting here, but I can't take the time to examine stock market levels during that month.....

Wow. Okay, fella. Clearly everyone can see what your priorities are in April: factual verification of the President's performance vs. expressing your opinions on an anonymous political forum.

Tell you what, I'll update you when you log in here.

 

[danielpalos]

Meanwhile back in the real world Bank of America CEO says small business and banks are very optimistic over Trump's policies and the direction he's leading America. Pay no attention to libs and their fake news BS.

Good job President Trump

So, things are going to go well for big business and investors.

He added, “Generally we believe the economy at Bank of America, our investment economy’s going to go faster in the U.S. than it grew this year.”

Is there going to be Jobs Boom for the rest of us, for their capital gains preference?

 

[danielpalos]

Meanwhile back in the real world Bank of America CEO says small business and banks are very optimistic over Trump's policies and the direction he's leading America. Pay no attention to libs and their fake news BS.

Good job President Trump

I was watching his looney new executive order signing.

For every new federal regulation, you have to get rid of two. Well, there goes consumer protections.

After the economic meltdown in 2008, regulations were put into place to keep that from happening again. Now Republicans, who did the deregulation in the first place that led to meltdown, feel those regulations are in the way. Look forward to another meltdown.

getting rid of the drug war counts, for the left.

 

[RodISHI]

The travel ban exempts Christians which is un-American and illegal.

If it is written as such prove your claim or continue with your dishonesty but I will not waste my time responding to you further.

Only Muslim-majority countries where President Trump has no business interests are on the travel ban list but exceptions are made for "minority" religions. This is means non-Muslims. The EO states:
"(b) Upon the resumption of USRAP admissions, the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, is further directed to make changes, to the extent permitted by law, to prioritize refugee claims made by individuals on the basis of religious-based persecution, provided that the religion of the individual is a minority religion in the individual's country of nationality. ...

"(e) Notwithstanding the temporary suspension imposed pursuant to subsection (a) of this section, the Secretaries of State and Homeland Security may jointly determine to admit individuals to the United States as refugees on a case-by-case basis, in their discretion, but only so long as they determine that the admission of such individuals as refugees is in the national interest -- including when the person is a religious minority in his country of nationality facing religious persecution ..."

Muslims will not qualify.

So you have a problem with our elected officials (BTW the people voted into office) setting the stage to help those who are being persecuted for their religious preferences. Along with what is determined to be in our best national interest.

That religious exemption if made for well vetted individuals and the ban from certain countries are two different issues that you think you can combine to bitch about.

If you like those refugees from any or all of the currently banned countries in Europe you keep them in your house if your country has authorized it but you will not dictate who will come into my house or country.

Europe has been taking-in hundreds of thousands of refugees, many from countries which have been destroyed in the Middle East and North Africa by the Americans. The USA has taken very few in comparison. It is the Europeans who are doing all we can to fix the instability created by the Americans. Thanks for nothing.

Yet, the right wing has a problem with financial aid to States so they can improve their economy locally.

more like many of us believe if a city supports illegal aliens we believe they do not need tax payers funding it.

 

[Divine Wind]

Yet, the right wing has a problem with financial aid to States so they can improve their economy locally.

Are you suggesting we cut down welfare and other entitlement programs? I agree, it's raging out of control. Maybe President Trump and the Republican Congress will fix it by November 2018. That'd be a bitch for you, eh? LOL

Washington's Indisputable Crisis: Entitlement Programs Cost 92 Percent of Federal Revenues
The federal government is spending 92 cents out of every dollar it receives on entitlement programs, plus interest on the federal debt. That leaves just 8 cents of every dollar to pay for everything else the federal government does—defense, homeland security, education, government operations and more.

In 2013, the federal government collected $2.77 trillion and spent $3.45 trillion, according to the latest update from the U.S. Treasury Department. Entitlement programs accounted for about $2.34 trillion and interest on the $17 trillion federal debt was $221 billion. Taken together, that figure represented 92% of federal revenues, which means we are borrowing virtually all of the money needed to run and protect the country.

Passing pro-growth economic policies would bring in more revenue to help pay for our entitlement tsunami, but that won’t fix the problem. We need to rethink our federal safety nets to ensure the country can afford what it is promising. Without significant changes, entitlements could soon take every dollar of federal revenue.

 

[Divine Wind]

getting rid of the drug war counts, for the left.

Agreed here. If people want to poison or kill themselves with drugs, let them. The only regulation should be taxation and where they can do it just like we do with alcohol and smoking. Obviously, like alcohol and tobacco, this applies to adults, minors are restricted.

 

[jknowgood]

My fellow americans...we have got to stop white people from voting...so far their record isn't very good.....

I know without them Obama wouldn't of been elected.

 

[Papageorgio]

If it is written as such prove your claim or continue with your dishonesty but I will not waste my time responding to you further.

Only Muslim-majority countries where President Trump has no business interests are on the travel ban list but exceptions are made for "minority" religions. This is means non-Muslims. The EO states:
"(b) Upon the resumption of USRAP admissions, the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, is further directed to make changes, to the extent permitted by law, to prioritize refugee claims made by individuals on the basis of religious-based persecution, provided that the religion of the individual is a minority religion in the individual's country of nationality. ...

"(e) Notwithstanding the temporary suspension imposed pursuant to subsection (a) of this section, the Secretaries of State and Homeland Security may jointly determine to admit individuals to the United States as refugees on a case-by-case basis, in their discretion, but only so long as they determine that the admission of such individuals as refugees is in the national interest -- including when the person is a religious minority in his country of nationality facing religious persecution ..."

Muslims will not qualify.

So you have a problem with our elected officials (BTW the people voted into office) setting the stage to help those who are being persecuted for their religious preferences. Along with what is determined to be in our best national interest.

That religious exemption if made for well vetted individuals and the ban from certain countries are two different issues that you think you can combine to bitch about.

If you like those refugees from any or all of the currently banned countries in Europe you keep them in your house if your country has authorized it but you will not dictate who will come into my house or country.

Europe has been taking-in hundreds of thousands of refugees, many from countries which have been destroyed in the Middle East and North Africa by the Americans. The USA has taken very few in comparison. It is the Europeans who are doing all we can to fix the instability created by the Americans. Thanks for nothing.

Bravo keep up the good work and your bullshit accusations. Your welcome!

Well, it's true the US has taken in very few.

In fact, there were over a million Christians in Iraq when Bush and the GOP attacked and those Christians were refused entry into the United States even with the Pope begging George Bush to protect them. I think there are less than 200,000 left. So where did they go? Republicans don't care about the non rich here. Why would they care about a bunch of Christians?

What a bunch of BS! Do you ever get tired of truth twisting?

 

[jknowgood]

Looks like Trump's on a tear.

Millions of American jobs depend on the half trillion in trade between the US and Mexico. Now Mexico is looking to China to deepen trade. They are talking to Argentina for corn:

Argentina's Macri scraps corn and wheat export quotas

They are targeting cheese imports:

http://www.agweb.com/assets/import/files/mexicoretaliationtargetsdetailedinformation.pdf

Guajardo noted that Mexico had good relations with China and said Beijing was a "big concern" for the Trump administration.

Mexico issued an ultimatum to the Trump administration

Nearly 5 Million U.S. Jobs Depend on Trade With Mexico

New research from the Mexico Institute at the Wilson Center, a nonpartisan think tank based in Washington, D.C., found that trade with Mexico creates approximately 4.9 million jobs in the United States. In other words, one out of 29 American jobs depends on preserving an economic relationship with the U.S.’s southern neighbor. Researchers came up with this 4.9 million figure by calculating three economic shifts that would likely occur if trade with Mexico ended: the number of American jobs that are involved in producing exports to Mexico, which would be lost; the number of jobs that would return to the United States to produce the previously imported goods; and the number of jobs that would disappear if the money American consumers and companies saved from buying lower-cost imports were gone.

As US pulls back from Pacific trade deal, countries look to China

If Trump destroys millions of jobs in his first year, what will he do in his next three?

“The United States isn’t an island. It can’t just sit there and say it’s not going to trade with the rest of the world,” a “disappointed” prime minister, John Key, told reporters Tuesday. “At some point they’re going to have to give some consideration to that.”

---------------------------------------------------

No study. No data. No understanding. Just throwing it all out there and seeing what blows up.

If Trump destroys millions of jobs in his first year, what will he do in his next three?

He will do what Obama did for 8 years. Blame Bush.

I was amazed at how little Obama blamed Bush. He mostly never even mentioned him. Obama was classy. Trump isn't. And his base is deplorable.

WTF? Obama blamed Bush every chance he got. He always called it "the previous administration." Are you really tat fucking stupid?

Yes!