Trump's Address on Iran On Now

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

40s give or take. but the wind is the killer. i gave up any pretenses of setting up a tripod for pictures with the wind going on usually. when it wasn't, there was usually a herd of japanese tourists with a line of tripods on the walkway or bridge getting in peoples way.

but the scenery coming out of the Reykjavik airport was the surreal part. broken up ground that was in fact more or less lava w/moss on them to give a green appearance.

we stayed on the south of the island and went to the most southern point for a drive. at that point the weather was freaking insane. wind, rain, and just power of it all. drove out of that town 5 minutes and it was back to just a summer rain.

did some of the VIKINGS waterfalls tours.

my first real attempt to photoshop out people and "man-made" stuff.

Did you go to see this?

That looks exactly like a video game I used to play in the early 90's. I suppose those graphics start somewhere, don't they.

The canyon is newly exposed since they built a damn and lowered the water level downstream.

Do you remember what kind of rock they said that was? I've never seen anything weather like that before. Anyone would think the Giants had carved it, wouldn't they?

likely a lot of lava formations, or at least heated up by that.

reading over the link he gave and it is fascinating.

Indeed. Very cool.

 

[jc456]

What did he say? Are we retaliating

• The Iran attack was a non-starter. We knew it was coming and totally repulsed it.
• Soleimani was a far worse dude than was generally known.
  
• Trump is cranking up new sanctions on Iran even higher.
• Life just got much worse for the Iranian leaders.
  
• They continue to look at their options.
• We will never let Iran have a nuke.
• Trump invited all NATO countries to get more involved in settling the Iran problem once and for all.
• Trump failed to live up to all of the horror stories and dire predictions of the Democrats, Hollywood, and all of the Trump-haters.

Repulsed it? How many missiles were shot down before they reached their mark?

I'm wondering if one took down the Boeing Jet that took off from Tehran.

 

[iceberg]

What did he say? Are we retaliating

• The Iran attack was a non-starter. We knew it was coming and totally repulsed it.
• Soleimani was a far worse dude than was generally known.
  
• Trump is cranking up new sanctions on Iran even higher.
• Life just got much worse for the Iranian leaders.
  
• They continue to look at their options.
• We will never let Iran have a nuke.
• Trump invited all NATO countries to get more involved in settling the Iran problem once and for all.
• Trump failed to live up to all of the horror stories and dire predictions of the Democrats, Hollywood, and all of the Trump-haters.

Repulsed it? How many missiles were shot down before they reached their mark?

was anyone killed? if not then you have to question either their technology (and from what i understand it is pretty solid) or their aim. so what would their mark be in this instance?

looks more like a PR move on Irans part to say they did something back yet not enough for a counter-attack.

 

[bodecea]

What did he say? Are we retaliating

Nope.

Wow!, I can't believe a 'warmonger' like Trump is restraining himself
I mean, just yesterday we heard from the media how Trump is going to escalate it into a war with Iran.

You think this is over? After 40 years?

 

[jc456]

What did he say? Are we retaliating

• The Iran attack was a non-starter. We knew it was coming and totally repulsed it.
• Soleimani was a far worse dude than was generally known.
  
• Trump is cranking up new sanctions on Iran even higher.
• Life just got much worse for the Iranian leaders.
  
• They continue to look at their options.
• We will never let Iran have a nuke.
• Trump invited all NATO countries to get more involved in settling the Iran problem once and for all.
• Trump failed to live up to all of the horror stories and dire predictions of the Democrats, Hollywood, and all of the Trump-haters.

Repulsed it? How many missiles were shot down before they reached their mark?

was anyone killed? if not then you have to question either their technology (and from what i understand it is pretty solid) or their aim. so what would their mark be in this instance?

looks more like a PR move on Irans part to say they did something back yet not enough for a counter-attack.

Andrea Mitchell thinks they have highly precise missiles and missed on purpose. (which they did)

Iran ‘deliberately missed’: MSNBC issues initial battle damage assessment

“That they have such highly precise missiles — we know they do, they were able to take out the major Aramco oil field in September in Saudi Arabia — we know that they can do this if they really want to, and they apparently, according to this early report, they may have hit a not populated part of the al-Asad base and, in Arbil, landed in a field,” she reported.

She thinks they have highly precise missiles. haahahahahahahaha she is as clueless as anyone I know. And she's a fking journalist? can't make it up.

 

[jc456]

I truly hope your joking because he's the dumbest idiotic president ever.

That should be "you're," not "your," you fucking idiot.

You know nothing about politics you piece of shit!.

At least I can read and write English properly.

I would rather have problems writing then have a life of being brain washed a person's IQ about politics is very low.

I truly hope your joking because he's the dumbest idiotic president ever.

That should be "you're," not "your," you fucking idiot.

You know nothing about politics you piece of shit!.

At least I can read and write English properly.

I would rather have bad English then have a low IQ and being brain washed aka Trump tard supporter.

gaslighting.

 

[jc456]

What did he say? Are we retaliating

Nope.

Wow!, I can't believe a 'warmonger' like Trump is restraining himself
I mean, just yesterday we heard from the media how Trump is going to escalate it into a war with Iran.

You think this is over? After 40 years?

hahahahahaha but he started the war after 40 years being at war. my balls are sore from all the laughing at that.

 

[iceberg]

What did he say? Are we retaliating

• The Iran attack was a non-starter. We knew it was coming and totally repulsed it.
• Soleimani was a far worse dude than was generally known.
  
• Trump is cranking up new sanctions on Iran even higher.
• Life just got much worse for the Iranian leaders.
  
• They continue to look at their options.
• We will never let Iran have a nuke.
• Trump invited all NATO countries to get more involved in settling the Iran problem once and for all.
• Trump failed to live up to all of the horror stories and dire predictions of the Democrats, Hollywood, and all of the Trump-haters.

Repulsed it? How many missiles were shot down before they reached their mark?

was anyone killed? if not then you have to question either their technology (and from what i understand it is pretty solid) or their aim. so what would their mark be in this instance?

looks more like a PR move on Irans part to say they did something back yet not enough for a counter-attack.

Andrea Mitchell thinks they have highly precise missiles and missed on purpose. (which they did)

Iran ‘deliberately missed’: MSNBC issues initial battle damage assessment

“That they have such highly precise missiles — we know they do, they were able to take out the major Aramco oil field in September in Saudi Arabia — we know that they can do this if they really want to, and they apparently, according to this early report, they may have hit a not populated part of the al-Asad base and, in Arbil, landed in a field,” she reported.

She thinks they have highly precise missiles. haahahahahahahaha she is as clueless as anyone I know. And she's a fking journalist? can't make it up.

i really have zero idea what they are using. but i would think that if they fired 20+ times and didn't hit anything, they didn't want to. if that is the case then Trumps warnings took root and they simply fired back to show their people they were not afraid of us. what i did hear last night is they (Iran) was reporting 80 people killed.

i was watching this on FOX last night and they were pretty annoying also with the constant insults to Iran and glowing praise of Trump. kinda the same as praising Iran to a large degree as it's simply catering to their target audience. i just want the news. that was it.

just hard to find "just the news" anymore.

any idea what missles they were using and where they were from?

 

[Slade3200]

I support accuracy and honesty. Two things you seem to have a disdain for.

Would it not be easier to just admit you made a mistake?

Hahah honesty hahah that’s funny haha

Not surprised you find honesty funny...it is something you lack

Your peers on here don’t think you’re honest

I have very few peers on here. You Trump worshipers do not count as my peers. And coming from a guy that said he was on the ground in Baghdad heading to the airport last Friday...you have no room to talk about honesty.

My comment stands. No one here thinks you’re honest.. Only you can change that

I think Gator is honest. Sorry jizz you’re wrong again

 

[Jitss617]

Hahah honesty hahah that’s funny haha

Not surprised you find honesty funny...it is something you lack

Your peers on here don’t think you’re honest

I have very few peers on here. You Trump worshipers do not count as my peers. And coming from a guy that said he was on the ground in Baghdad heading to the airport last Friday...you have no room to talk about honesty.

My comment stands. No one here thinks you’re honest.. Only you can change that

I think Gator is honest. Sorry jizz you’re wrong again

You represent the minority , hehe

 

[jc456]

What did he say? Are we retaliating

• The Iran attack was a non-starter. We knew it was coming and totally repulsed it.
• Soleimani was a far worse dude than was generally known.
  
• Trump is cranking up new sanctions on Iran even higher.
• Life just got much worse for the Iranian leaders.
  
• They continue to look at their options.
• We will never let Iran have a nuke.
• Trump invited all NATO countries to get more involved in settling the Iran problem once and for all.
• Trump failed to live up to all of the horror stories and dire predictions of the Democrats, Hollywood, and all of the Trump-haters.

Repulsed it? How many missiles were shot down before they reached their mark?

was anyone killed? if not then you have to question either their technology (and from what i understand it is pretty solid) or their aim. so what would their mark be in this instance?

looks more like a PR move on Irans part to say they did something back yet not enough for a counter-attack.

Andrea Mitchell thinks they have highly precise missiles and missed on purpose. (which they did)

Iran ‘deliberately missed’: MSNBC issues initial battle damage assessment

“That they have such highly precise missiles — we know they do, they were able to take out the major Aramco oil field in September in Saudi Arabia — we know that they can do this if they really want to, and they apparently, according to this early report, they may have hit a not populated part of the al-Asad base and, in Arbil, landed in a field,” she reported.

She thinks they have highly precise missiles. haahahahahahahaha she is as clueless as anyone I know. And she's a fking journalist? can't make it up.

i really have zero idea what they are using. but i would think that if they fired 20+ times and didn't hit anything, they didn't want to. if that is the case then Trumps warnings took root and they simply fired back to show their people they were not afraid of us. what i did hear last night is they (Iran) was reporting 80 people killed.

i was watching this on FOX last night and they were pretty annoying also with the constant insults to Iran and glowing praise of Trump. kinda the same as praising Iran to a large degree as it's simply catering to their target audience. i just want the news. that was it.

just hard to find "just the news" anymore.

any idea what missles they were using and where they were from?

no I don't. I heard last night Fox guests didn't think they were ballistic missiles because of the trajectory they took from the video given. Now that video could've been pure bullshit.

 

[Markle]

the speech was fine if you agree with Trumps hhandling of the situation. I think the whole thing has been mishandled bigly so I shake my head at it. Especially when he reaches out to NATO for help after reeming them for years. And then promising Iran riches with the world market if they play ball, immediately after accusing Obama’s lifted sanctions as funding terrorism. The irony was very rich.

Your desperation is duly noted!

Of course, you think President Trump has handled this badly. You believe we should ignore terrorists murdering tens of thousands, torturing millions, and a real threat to the world with nuclear destruction should be sent billions of dollars in cash on pallets secretly in the night. Then hope they'll publicly agree to your terms and kick the can down the road to the next president while continuing to whatever they please while thumbing their nose at us.

President Trump doesn't believe in kicking the can down the road. He has proven that he faces problems and solves them, not dodging them.

Yes, President Trump badgered other NATO members for not keeping their word regarding their contributions. As a result, they have greatly increased their spending for defense and thusly, Trump is asking for their help in solving a mutual problem. What is your point?

 

[jc456]

Hahah honesty hahah that’s funny haha

Not surprised you find honesty funny...it is something you lack

Your peers on here don’t think you’re honest

I have very few peers on here. You Trump worshipers do not count as my peers. And coming from a guy that said he was on the ground in Baghdad heading to the airport last Friday...you have no room to talk about honesty.

My comment stands. No one here thinks you’re honest.. Only you can change that

I think Gator is honest. Sorry jizz you’re wrong again

of course you do.

 

[iceberg]

• The Iran attack was a non-starter. We knew it was coming and totally repulsed it.
• Soleimani was a far worse dude than was generally known.
  
• Trump is cranking up new sanctions on Iran even higher.
• Life just got much worse for the Iranian leaders.
  
• They continue to look at their options.
• We will never let Iran have a nuke.
• Trump invited all NATO countries to get more involved in settling the Iran problem once and for all.
• Trump failed to live up to all of the horror stories and dire predictions of the Democrats, Hollywood, and all of the Trump-haters.

Repulsed it? How many missiles were shot down before they reached their mark?

was anyone killed? if not then you have to question either their technology (and from what i understand it is pretty solid) or their aim. so what would their mark be in this instance?

looks more like a PR move on Irans part to say they did something back yet not enough for a counter-attack.

Andrea Mitchell thinks they have highly precise missiles and missed on purpose. (which they did)

Iran ‘deliberately missed’: MSNBC issues initial battle damage assessment

“That they have such highly precise missiles — we know they do, they were able to take out the major Aramco oil field in September in Saudi Arabia — we know that they can do this if they really want to, and they apparently, according to this early report, they may have hit a not populated part of the al-Asad base and, in Arbil, landed in a field,” she reported.

She thinks they have highly precise missiles. haahahahahahahaha she is as clueless as anyone I know. And she's a fking journalist? can't make it up.

i really have zero idea what they are using. but i would think that if they fired 20+ times and didn't hit anything, they didn't want to. if that is the case then Trumps warnings took root and they simply fired back to show their people they were not afraid of us. what i did hear last night is they (Iran) was reporting 80 people killed.

i was watching this on FOX last night and they were pretty annoying also with the constant insults to Iran and glowing praise of Trump. kinda the same as praising Iran to a large degree as it's simply catering to their target audience. i just want the news. that was it.

just hard to find "just the news" anymore.

any idea what missles they were using and where they were from?

no I don't. I heard last night Fox guests didn't think they were ballistic missiles because of the trajectory they took from the video given. Now that video could've been pure bullshit.

wondering what capabilities they do have and where they buy their military equipment. esp if they are under sanctions. i'll need to do some research when i have time this eve.

 

[bodecea]

He told us once again how amazing he is. That was 75% of of his comments.

I hope not..we already know that.

#Becauseitsacult

 

[DOTR]

Of course your jumping onto Gator's insignificant drivel about the teleprompter. I wouldn't have expected any less.

I haven’t heard Gators analysis but I’m not surprise that others share my view. Do you honestly not cringe just a little while watching him struggle through those speeches? Honestly?

Your a jerk. There was no struggle there. Go back and watch your floppy bastard. That idiot couldn't talk WITHOUT a prompter. Reading off a screen a pre-written thing just isn't Trump's gig, he likes to speak off the cuff his own words. But this was too serious and important a world event to do that.

First off I’m not talking about Obama. Second I’m not talking about off prompter speeches.
Trump is great off prompter. That’s his sweet spot. He used to make fun of the prompter Guys until Conway shoved one up his butt. Maybe that’s why he’s having such a hard time reading it.

Trump is great without a prompter because he knows who he is and doesnt have to hide anything. Rush Limbaugh is the same way..speaks for hours with no prompter and never worries about a contradiction or "being consistent" or offending anyone. The truth is the truth.

Genuineness has its advantages.

Genuineness is a foreign word to democrats. Their every presidential candidate is like a cardboard cutout with a suit draped over it and a poll-tested speech in the wings.

You know, now that you mention that, there is the connection between Hollywood and the Democrats perhaps. They are all actors. Some not very good ones, watch Pocahontas Warren pretend take a planted question on homosexual marriage or pretend to drink beer in her house, but still actors. Everything is a show for them...optics. It even bleeds over into their complaints about Trump "being seen to XXXXX".

 

[iceberg]

the speech was fine if you agree with Trumps hhandling of the situation. I think the whole thing has been mishandled bigly so I shake my head at it. Especially when he reaches out to NATO for help after reeming them for years. And then promising Iran riches with the world market if they play ball, immediately after accusing Obama’s lifted sanctions as funding terrorism. The irony was very rich.

Your desperation is duly noted!

Of course, you think President Trump has handled this badly. You believe we should ignore terrorists murdering tens of thousands, torturing millions, and a real threat to the world with nuclear destruction should be sent billions of dollars in cash on pallets secretly in the night. Then hope they'll publicly agree to your terms and kick the can down the road to the next president while continuing to whatever they please while thumbing their nose at us.

President Trump doesn't believe in kicking the can down the road. He has proven that he faces problems and solves them, not dodging them.

Yes, President Trump badgered other NATO members for not keeping their word regarding their contributions. As a result, they have greatly increased their spending for defense and thusly, Trump is asking for their help in solving a mutual problem. What is your point?

while i agree he's usually going to see what trump does as "bad" - i've yet to see him post that we should ignore terrorists murdering anyone at all.

if i missed that part of his behavior, link me up. otherwise, think you're exaggerating just a wee bit?

 

[Slade3200]

Never been there... got many other places on my travel list above Iran. Think my next adventure is going to be Iceland

So, maybe we send you to Siberia, then?

I’m already booked to Iceland. Go ahead to Siberia without me, let me know how you like it

went to iceland in october. it's surreal in the most of amazing of ways.

Really?! That’s good to hear. How was the weather there in October?

I’m probably gonna go in June/July

40s give or take. but the wind is the killer. i gave up any pretenses of setting up a tripod for pictures with the wind going on usually. when it wasn't, there was usually a herd of japanese tourists with a line of tripods on the walkway or bridge getting in peoples way.

but the scenery coming out of the Reykjavik airport was the surreal part. broken up ground that was in fact more or less lava w/moss on them to give a green appearance.

we stayed on the south of the island and went to the most southern point for a drive. at that point the weather was freaking insane. wind, rain, and just power of it all. drove out of that town 5 minutes and it was back to just a summer rain.

did some of the VIKINGS waterfalls tours.

my first real attempt to photoshop out people and "man-made" stuff.

wow, that is epic. I’m so pumped to check it out. Experience the awe of Mother Nature in a whole new level. Were the Northern lights out?

 

[DOTR]

I haven’t heard Gators analysis but I’m not surprise that others share my view. Do you honestly not cringe just a little while watching him struggle through those speeches? Honestly?

Your a jerk. There was no struggle there. Go back and watch your floppy bastard. That idiot couldn't talk WITHOUT a prompter. Reading off a screen a pre-written thing just isn't Trump's gig, he likes to speak off the cuff his own words. But this was too serious and important a world event to do that.

First off I’m not talking about Obama. Second I’m not talking about off prompter speeches.
Trump is great off prompter. That’s his sweet spot. He used to make fun of the prompter Guys until Conway shoved one up his butt. Maybe that’s why he’s having such a hard time reading it.

Trump is great without a prompter because he knows who he is and doesnt have to hide anything. Rush Limbaugh is the same way..speaks for hours with no prompter and never worries about a contradiction or "being consistent" or offending anyone. The truth is the truth.

Genuineness has its advantages.

Genuineness is a foreign word to democrats. Their every presidential candidate is like a cardboard cutout with a suit draped over it and a poll-tested speech in the wings.

Just because somebody is being blunt, offensive, unPC, and speaking off the cuff does not mean they are being truthful and honest. I can’t think of two individuals that spew more lies and distorted propaganda than Trump and Rush.

Then you arent thinking very hard.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

What did he say? Are we retaliating

• The Iran attack was a non-starter. We knew it was coming and totally repulsed it.
• Soleimani was a far worse dude than was generally known.
  
• Trump is cranking up new sanctions on Iran even higher.
• Life just got much worse for the Iranian leaders.
  
• They continue to look at their options.
• We will never let Iran have a nuke.
• Trump invited all NATO countries to get more involved in settling the Iran problem once and for all.
• Trump failed to live up to all of the horror stories and dire predictions of the Democrats, Hollywood, and all of the Trump-haters.

Repulsed it? How many missiles were shot down before they reached their mark?

was anyone killed? if not then you have to question either their technology (and from what i understand it is pretty solid) or their aim. so what would their mark be in this instance?

looks more like a PR move on Irans part to say they did something back yet not enough for a counter-attack.

Andrea Mitchell thinks they have highly precise missiles and missed on purpose. (which they did)

Iran ‘deliberately missed’: MSNBC issues initial battle damage assessment

“That they have such highly precise missiles — we know they do, they were able to take out the major Aramco oil field in September in Saudi Arabia — we know that they can do this if they really want to, and they apparently, according to this early report, they may have hit a not populated part of the al-Asad base and, in Arbil, landed in a field,” she reported.

She thinks they have highly precise missiles. haahahahahahahaha she is as clueless as anyone I know. And she's a fking journalist? can't make it up.

i really have zero idea what they are using. but i would think that if they fired 20+ times and didn't hit anything, they didn't want to. if that is the case then Trumps warnings took root and they simply fired back to show their people they were not afraid of us. what i did hear last night is they (Iran) was reporting 80 people killed.

i was watching this on FOX last night and they were pretty annoying also with the constant insults to Iran and glowing praise of Trump. kinda the same as praising Iran to a large degree as it's simply catering to their target audience. i just want the news. that was it.

just hard to find "just the news" anymore.

any idea what missles they were using and where they were from?

I can't find too many details on the type of missiles, but the consensus seems to be around a dozen fired.