okfine
Diamond Member
Ummm, tell that loon he was in Kentucky today doing what real Presidents do when disasters occur.The Trump appointee?
That's right, everyone is conspiring against you.
No, that doesn't make you sound crazy at all.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ummm, tell that loon he was in Kentucky today doing what real Presidents do when disasters occur.The Trump appointee?
That's right, everyone is conspiring against you.
No, that doesn't make you sound crazy at all.
Yes, yes, yes.
I said I have not seen where he stated that a special warrant was needed to access a safe.
Presidents don't have clearance. They have the right to view because of the job. It's implicit with the job, and only with the job. Can you imagine if they needed explicit clearance and the background check denied it?Yes he does still have a security clearance.
Then stop trying to impeach himTrump is not the president of the USA.
RUSSIA type evidence?There is a signed warrant by a federal judge. Given what a brazen move this is it stands to reason he was provided enough evidence to feel the search was warranted. Something like this could be a career ender or worse if not taken seriously.
LoL!!!Gee, let me guess, a liberal bought and paid for judge?
Now it's a wait and see what they have.....once again.![]()
NO!Link to a post you have made that has any actual facts. I sure have not seen it here.
There is no assumption of guilt. If there were he would have been arrested. A search warrant is not an assumption of guilt.
If you are serious, that is so desperate and sad. If you are mocking the predictable, idiotic things Trump cultists will say... that's funny.Gee, let me guess, a liberal bought and paid for judge?
I actually heard him mention "special warrant" on Hannity earlier. Clear as day, with one functioning ear.
We have another NOSTRADAMUS among us guys. WoW!!!Wait for it, soon Dems will announce they 'accidently' found evidence of something completed unrelated to the search warrant. WITCH HUNT!!
No doubt!But it also requires a very TIGHT LEGAL predicate for raiding the home of an ex-President and seizing his 4th amendment stuff and breaking into his safe -- FOR THE FIRST TIME in the history of America.
Like this?Come November, when the REAL investigations of wrong doing and impeachments begin, I will be dancing with glee watching you communists fucks back track.
A former President has clearance as long as he lives. He is kept up to date on everything pertaining to national security. Plus, even if he had classified documents today that the FBI took, he can announce he has declassified them. He has that right as a former president.Presidents don't have clearance. They have the right to view because of the job. It's implicit with the job, and only with the job. Can you imagine if they needed explicit clearance and the background check denied it?
And clearance or not doe snot equal access.
No. But it also requires a very TIGHT LEGAL predicate for raiding the home of an ex-President and seizing his 4th amendment stuff and breaking into his safe -- FOR THE FIRST TIME in the history of America.
The J6th Inquisition is failing because of the incompetent KNOWN LYING morons running it. We're into the dark areas of a tyrannical stage with these TDS dementia people. You push this hard and bad shit is gonna happen. Tomorrow or when the Dems lose this power that's corrupting them.