Trumps home raided by fbi

[Lisa558]

No one is above the law. Not even Trump.

Apparently Biden is.

 

[lantern2814]

Capitol offense!!! Hang him!!!

They forget the feds went through those documents a couple of months ago with full cooperation from Trump. If they were scared they’d be destroyed, why didn’t they take them then? Something doesn’t add up here.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Because if the FBI raid was about those documents Trump supposedly took home, Hillary Clinton did the same thing, and was not prosecuted for it. What we're seeing is a weaponized two-tier justice system.

Past practices by the FBI….using false information to get FISA warrants from Federal Judges……knowing the information was false and directly from the Clinton campaign….

There is a signed warrant by a federal judge. Given what a brazen move this is it stands to reason he was provided enough evidence to feel the search was warranted. Something like this could be a career ender or worse if not taken seriously.

 

[meaner gene]

Projecting now. Just pathetic. Oh that’s normal for you dumbfuck.



That’s from tonight before you start lying.

Dershowitz is talking about a portable safe. One they can take with them. Trump probably had a walk in safe, like a bank vault.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

And those zombies will vote again and again and again. Just like they did in the 2020 election.

I know. Elections are so unfair to magaturds.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

There is a signed warrant by a federal judge. Given what a brazen move this is it stands to reason he was provided enough evidence to feel the search was warranted. Something like this could be a career ender or worse if not taken seriously.

Yep.

It also indicates this isn't just about mishandling classified materials. Despite what has been reported.

 

[MarcATL]

Start a thread on it in the proper forum, marc.
This isn't the thread for it.

On what exactly?

 

[Calypso Jones]

They don’t even want a lawful, warranted investigation to be conducted into Trump’s likely crimes.

how many times you wanna do that baby? Maybe his gin rummy cards are marked. He's taking steroids for his golf game? HE USES A SECRET DICTIONARY UP HIS SLEEVE In SCABBLE????

 

[Lesh]

Trump stole classified documents


Oh well

 

[Meister]

No. They not only believe that evidence of a specific crime is at Mar a Lago RIGHT NOW (not a month ago, right now), they convinced a judge this is the case.

Gee, let me guess, a liberal bought and paid for judge?
Now it's a wait and see what they have.....once again.

 

[Lisa558]

Choke on it....this is not political. The FBI is looking for evidence of a Federal Crime.

Don't be stupid. No judge is going to sign off on a warrant that is politically motivated. There is evidence of a federal crime at this location.

They did that with the FISA warrant, based on fabricated “evidence.”

 

[Unkotare]

Funny that the democrats imagine they can "argue" their way out of what their antics are going to do to them in the midterms.

 

[Calypso Jones]

Yep.

It also indicates this isn't just about mishandling classified materials. Despite what has been reported.

oh good. our resident expert..on the scene/behind the scene. LOLOLOLOLOL

 

[Orangecat]

These cry babies never utter a word over the abuse of power enacted on black American citizens every day in this country.

 

[Hossfly]

Meister is flexing his Mod MAGA muscles

Rache!

 

[Meister]

There is a signed warrant by a federal judge. Given what a brazen move this is it stands to reason he was provided enough evidence to feel the search was warranted. Something like this could be a career ender or worse if not taken seriously.

You would think, but it's Trump.

 

[ColonelAngus]

You’re a truly sad case! SMH

Link to a post you have made that has any actual facts. I sure have not seen it here.

 

[Billy000]

I didn't really want to raid this thread, but does anybody know why this happened as I just heard about it about an hour ago.




How are you so sure that he is?

Because a judge signed off on it.

 

[Lisa558]

On what exactly?

You interjected some ridiculous crap about “abuse of black people” on thread. Post your victimhood nonsense in the race forum. This thread is about the corrupt FBI and how low Dems will go to prevent the man whom 74 million Americans wanted for president from running for the office.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Buddy I'm sorry but you're wrong. I practice constitutional law in federal court here in Florida. The thing you cited was about Section 1983, which applies to constitutional violations by state agencies, not the federal government. It says as much in the part you posted here FFS. You should know this from civics class, but if you're not going to use your own eyes or your ability to read and think, I'm not going to keep wasting time arguing with you.

Oh. It's a Bivens action I'm looking for.

Bivens action

www.law.cornell.edu

Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971)

Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents: While there is no explicit right to file a civil lawsuit against federal government officials who have violated the Fourth Amendment, this right can be inferred. This is because a constitutional protection would not be meaningful if there were no way...

supreme.justia.com

So, my argument stands. I unlike you, am not a constitutional scholar, so I learn as I go.