Trump's Ku Klux Klan planning a retaliatory hit?

Anyone care to go through this AGAIN can see the 200 or so posts at the hyperlink below, while this deranged little woman, continues to OCD on being bitch slapped over 2 years ago!

you-can-thank-the-democratic-party-for-the-kkk.jpg
4939248945_d801a65800_z.jpg
998761006564e537c8d9c75ce7c8f809.jpg
kkk-founded-by-democrats.jpg
kkk.png
KKK-DemocratStart.png


But PLEASE continue with your BULLSHIT.... Someone MIGHT actually believe that you ALTERED HISTORY!

OOoooOOOOooh, Googly Image memes. Well ain't that an unimpeachable source. :eusa_dance:

>> The Ku Klux Klan was organized—if one can use that term—in Pulaski, Tennessee on December 24th, 1866 by six former Confederate veterans. It has been suggested that originally it had been meant as simply another fraternal order, one of many being founded around that time—sort of a Southern Masonry. But if this was the intent, it failed dismally. It did not build orphanages or Old Klansman's Homes—and for that matter, even lodge halls. It did not provide its members with low cost life insurance as was becoming common with fraternal orders at that time. In fact, there is little evidence it ever did anything for its members other than provide an outlet for their racial hatreds.

Though a failure at fraternalism, it did enjoy quite a bit of success as a terrorist organization. Given the founders, there is little reason to think it was ever meant to be anything else. From the beginning, it did everything it could to conduct guerrilla warfare against the occupying Northern forces and the Republican Party. The newly freed slaves would be ruthlessly suppressed. Murder was frequently the means toward this end.

....
The Historian Elane Frantz Parsons sums up Klan membership which, ironically, is a shining example of diversity:

Lifting the Klan masks revealed a chaotic multitude of anti-black vigilante groups, disgruntled poor white farmers, war-time guerrilla bands, displaced democratic politicians, illegal whiskey distillers, coercive moral reformers, sadists, rapists, white workmen fearful of black competition, employers trying to enforce labor discipline, common thieves, neighbors with decades old grudges, and even a few freedmen and Republicans who allied with Democratic whites or had criminal agendas of their own. Indeed, all they had in common besides being overwhelmingly white, southern, and Democratic, were that they called themselves, or were called, Klansmen.

.... Probably everything commonly known about the Klan comes from its second incarnation, starting in 1915. The white robes, the burning crosses, the incendiary rhetoric directed at Catholics and Jews, the Kludds, Kleagles, and Klaverns , all were originated by the Klan in its second advent. It was during this era that the Klan achieved its greatest membership and spread to numerous northern and western states.

... But if the aim of the second Klan was to become a respectable fraternal order, it failed just as miserably as the first. The failure of the first was in large part economic—most early Klansmen were dead broke—and due to government suppression. The failure of the second was its inability to reconcile a political movement and a fraternal order's need to take care of its members—that and the fact that the entire enterprise was nothing more than an elaborate con job.

In spite of laudable acts of charity, fraternal orders are not altogether altruistic. The main purpose of any fraternal order is to look after the interests of its members. This second KKK, in addition to being a vigorous backer of Prohibition, was so busy hating Blacks, liberals, Catholics, Jews, and, later, Communists, that it neglected to do anything for its members.

.... The Great Depression, beginning in 1929, deprived the Klan of virtually all its dues paying members. It proved equally devastating to legitimate fraternal orders as well and many did not survive. After 1930, the Klan was no longer a money making enterprise and as a consequence interest declined even further—the fact that there was easy money to be made was always at the heart of the Klan. In 1939, Hiram Evans, Imperial Wizard and successor to Simmons, saw the writing on the wall and sold the organization to James Colescott and Samuel Green—the Klan had been incorporated as a business. In 1944, the IRS slapped a lien of $685,000 for back taxes against the organization which bankrupted it. This was effectively the end of the second Klan. << --- Phoenixmasonry
The link does go into, as many historians do, the resurgence of Klan activity in the '50s-'60s around the Civil Rights push, but these were again, decentralized local groups, not a unified organization as existed under Evans, and Simmons before him.

Which is what I've already said, in greater detail.

Say --- blacks... liberals... Catholics... Jews..... and they didn't mention, labor unions.... those are all Republican Party constituents, right?

Oh wait....


And in your deranged little pea sized mind those SIX CONFEDERATES were all REPUBLICANS that formed to stop REPUBLICANS from gaining political office in the South...is that what you are trying to say in your disjointed way.....:lmao::lmao:


What part of "they had no known political affiliation" somehow translates to "they were Republicans" in a land where the Republican Party didn't even exist yet, Flasher-boi? Are you fucking stupid?

Actually they were simply bored; they had no agenda, neither political nor racial. Pre-existing elements called "night patrols" took over after that point. It was that element that brought in the violence.

=> In fact, the beginning of the Klan involved nothing so sinister, subversive or ancient as the theories supposed. It was the boredom of small-town life that led six young Confederate veterans to gather around a fireplace one December evening in 1865 and form a social club. the place was Pulaski, Tenn., near the Alabama border. when they reassembled a week later, the six young men were full of ideas for their new society. it would be secret, to heighten the amusement of the thing, and the titles for the various offices were to have names as preposterous-sounding as possible, partly for the fun of it and partly to avoid any military or political implications. <= --- The Unusual Origins of the Ku Klux Klan, p. 9, compiled by Klanwatch

That about it?


Nathan Bedford Forrest was a flaming racist slave owner bub, and the "social club" ruse is what every meth distributing biker gang claims.


It's a matter of record. Has been for a long time. The racial and terror element was brought in from outside by "night patrols", which predated the Klan. See my Klanwatch link for more on them. They infiltrated what was originally just a lark. The six founders when they rode with masks went not to the homes of black folk but to those of their mothers and girlfriends, just to see if they could do it without anyone recognizing them.

Not sure about your characterization of Forrest. He was known to abhor mistreatment of slaves, and in fact freed his own. But he was not a founder anyway --- he was brought in as a figurehead after it was running amok so they'd look "legitimate". After less than two years he said "this group is fucked up" (paraphrasing) and issued an order disbanding the whole operation.


Sure pard, sure, there have always been vast efforts to white wash american history. Just some good ole boys never meanin' no harm, kinda like halloween for grown ups. Don't be asacred Maybell, it's me, in a sheet.
 
Trump is getting the race war he has been hoping for. Everyone knows that the Klan is backing Trump.....he can't even pretend he doesn't know David Duke.

Marshal Law before the election? Clinton indicted for lying to congress before the election?

Cops have created more terrorists than they can kill.

Will blaming Obama really work?

Being black in the south right now is really a scary thought.

Will blacks be buying thousands of guns now? Will Trump call for a ban on selling guns to blacks now?

More copycats tonight?

People do crazy stuff when they feel life is hopeless.

Crazies do even crazier stuff to elevate the hate.

More on the next episode of "Killing and Hate in America."
Where do all you retards come from.
Hate hate hate yelling lies for the top of their collective lungs.the OP IS the problem not the solution

Actually the problem is american society.
 
Trump is getting the race war he has been hoping for. Everyone knows that the Klan is backing Trump.....he can't even pretend he doesn't know David Duke.

Marshal Law before the election? Clinton indicted for lying to congress before the election?

Cops have created more terrorists than they can kill.

Will blaming Obama really work?

Being black in the south right now is really a scary thought.

Will blacks be buying thousands of guns now? Will Trump call for a ban on selling guns to blacks now?

More copycats tonight?

People do crazy stuff when they feel life is hopeless.

Crazies do even crazier stuff to elevate the hate.

More on the next episode of "Killing and Hate in America."
Sockgirl getting paid time and a half, she brought out most of her account. Waiting for Zona and Puckered Pete to chime in
 
Anyone care to go through this AGAIN can see the 200 or so posts at the hyperlink below, while this deranged little woman, continues to OCD on being bitch slapped over 2 years ago!

you-can-thank-the-democratic-party-for-the-kkk.jpg
4939248945_d801a65800_z.jpg
998761006564e537c8d9c75ce7c8f809.jpg
kkk-founded-by-democrats.jpg
kkk.png
KKK-DemocratStart.png


But PLEASE continue with your BULLSHIT.... Someone MIGHT actually believe that you ALTERED HISTORY!

OOoooOOOOooh, Googly Image memes. Well ain't that an unimpeachable source. :eusa_dance:

>> The Ku Klux Klan was organized—if one can use that term—in Pulaski, Tennessee on December 24th, 1866 by six former Confederate veterans. It has been suggested that originally it had been meant as simply another fraternal order, one of many being founded around that time—sort of a Southern Masonry. But if this was the intent, it failed dismally. It did not build orphanages or Old Klansman's Homes—and for that matter, even lodge halls. It did not provide its members with low cost life insurance as was becoming common with fraternal orders at that time. In fact, there is little evidence it ever did anything for its members other than provide an outlet for their racial hatreds.

Though a failure at fraternalism, it did enjoy quite a bit of success as a terrorist organization. Given the founders, there is little reason to think it was ever meant to be anything else. From the beginning, it did everything it could to conduct guerrilla warfare against the occupying Northern forces and the Republican Party. The newly freed slaves would be ruthlessly suppressed. Murder was frequently the means toward this end.

....
The Historian Elane Frantz Parsons sums up Klan membership which, ironically, is a shining example of diversity:

Lifting the Klan masks revealed a chaotic multitude of anti-black vigilante groups, disgruntled poor white farmers, war-time guerrilla bands, displaced democratic politicians, illegal whiskey distillers, coercive moral reformers, sadists, rapists, white workmen fearful of black competition, employers trying to enforce labor discipline, common thieves, neighbors with decades old grudges, and even a few freedmen and Republicans who allied with Democratic whites or had criminal agendas of their own. Indeed, all they had in common besides being overwhelmingly white, southern, and Democratic, were that they called themselves, or were called, Klansmen.

.... Probably everything commonly known about the Klan comes from its second incarnation, starting in 1915. The white robes, the burning crosses, the incendiary rhetoric directed at Catholics and Jews, the Kludds, Kleagles, and Klaverns , all were originated by the Klan in its second advent. It was during this era that the Klan achieved its greatest membership and spread to numerous northern and western states.

... But if the aim of the second Klan was to become a respectable fraternal order, it failed just as miserably as the first. The failure of the first was in large part economic—most early Klansmen were dead broke—and due to government suppression. The failure of the second was its inability to reconcile a political movement and a fraternal order's need to take care of its members—that and the fact that the entire enterprise was nothing more than an elaborate con job.

In spite of laudable acts of charity, fraternal orders are not altogether altruistic. The main purpose of any fraternal order is to look after the interests of its members. This second KKK, in addition to being a vigorous backer of Prohibition, was so busy hating Blacks, liberals, Catholics, Jews, and, later, Communists, that it neglected to do anything for its members.

.... The Great Depression, beginning in 1929, deprived the Klan of virtually all its dues paying members. It proved equally devastating to legitimate fraternal orders as well and many did not survive. After 1930, the Klan was no longer a money making enterprise and as a consequence interest declined even further—the fact that there was easy money to be made was always at the heart of the Klan. In 1939, Hiram Evans, Imperial Wizard and successor to Simmons, saw the writing on the wall and sold the organization to James Colescott and Samuel Green—the Klan had been incorporated as a business. In 1944, the IRS slapped a lien of $685,000 for back taxes against the organization which bankrupted it. This was effectively the end of the second Klan. << --- Phoenixmasonry
The link does go into, as many historians do, the resurgence of Klan activity in the '50s-'60s around the Civil Rights push, but these were again, decentralized local groups, not a unified organization as existed under Evans, and Simmons before him.

Which is what I've already said, in greater detail.

Say --- blacks... liberals... Catholics... Jews..... and they didn't mention, labor unions.... those are all Republican Party constituents, right?

Oh wait....


And in your deranged little pea sized mind those SIX CONFEDERATES were all REPUBLICANS that formed to stop REPUBLICANS from gaining political office in the South...is that what you are trying to say in your disjointed way.....:lmao::lmao:


What part of "they had no known political affiliation" somehow translates to "they were Republicans" in a land where the Republican Party didn't even exist yet, Flasher-boi? Are you fucking stupid?

THIS JUST IN ---- not everybody everywhere has a political party. WHO KNEW. :eusa_doh:

Actually they were simply bored; they had no agenda, neither political nor racial. Pre-existing elements called "night patrols" took over after that point. It was that element that brought in the violence.

=> In fact, the beginning of the Klan involved nothing so sinister, subversive or ancient as the theories supposed. It was the boredom of small-town life that led six young Confederate veterans to gather around a fireplace one December evening in 1865 and form a social club. the place was Pulaski, Tenn., near the Alabama border. when they reassembled a week later, the six young men were full of ideas for their new society. it would be secret, to heighten the amusement of the thing, and the titles for the various offices were to have names as preposterous-sounding as possible, partly for the fun of it and partly to avoid any military or political implications. <= --- The Unusual Origins of the Ku Klux Klan, p. 9, compiled by Klanwatch

That about it?

BUT OCDGirl if you click the LINK in my signature for the PBS STORY, they plainly say they were DEMONRATS...just like you!....I even HIGHLIGHTED IT for anyone to see!


Uh --- no, it doesn't. STILL waiting for any evidence at all that McCord, Crowe, Kennedy, Jones, Reed or Lester had any political affiliation at all, in a conquered land where the right to vote had been taken away by the Federal government anyway. DUMBASS.

Then there's Simmons. STILL waiting for any evidence there either.

I can't help you being in denial that you got your FAGERAL ASS beat again! PBS says the KKK was founded by DemoRATS, Wiki does also, Fucktard, give it up. you are starting to look dumber than usual!
 
OOoooOOOOooh, Googly Image memes. Well ain't that an unimpeachable source. :eusa_dance:

>> The Ku Klux Klan was organized—if one can use that term—in Pulaski, Tennessee on December 24th, 1866 by six former Confederate veterans. It has been suggested that originally it had been meant as simply another fraternal order, one of many being founded around that time—sort of a Southern Masonry. But if this was the intent, it failed dismally. It did not build orphanages or Old Klansman's Homes—and for that matter, even lodge halls. It did not provide its members with low cost life insurance as was becoming common with fraternal orders at that time. In fact, there is little evidence it ever did anything for its members other than provide an outlet for their racial hatreds.

Though a failure at fraternalism, it did enjoy quite a bit of success as a terrorist organization. Given the founders, there is little reason to think it was ever meant to be anything else. From the beginning, it did everything it could to conduct guerrilla warfare against the occupying Northern forces and the Republican Party. The newly freed slaves would be ruthlessly suppressed. Murder was frequently the means toward this end.

....
The Historian Elane Frantz Parsons sums up Klan membership which, ironically, is a shining example of diversity:

Lifting the Klan masks revealed a chaotic multitude of anti-black vigilante groups, disgruntled poor white farmers, war-time guerrilla bands, displaced democratic politicians, illegal whiskey distillers, coercive moral reformers, sadists, rapists, white workmen fearful of black competition, employers trying to enforce labor discipline, common thieves, neighbors with decades old grudges, and even a few freedmen and Republicans who allied with Democratic whites or had criminal agendas of their own. Indeed, all they had in common besides being overwhelmingly white, southern, and Democratic, were that they called themselves, or were called, Klansmen.

.... Probably everything commonly known about the Klan comes from its second incarnation, starting in 1915. The white robes, the burning crosses, the incendiary rhetoric directed at Catholics and Jews, the Kludds, Kleagles, and Klaverns , all were originated by the Klan in its second advent. It was during this era that the Klan achieved its greatest membership and spread to numerous northern and western states.

... But if the aim of the second Klan was to become a respectable fraternal order, it failed just as miserably as the first. The failure of the first was in large part economic—most early Klansmen were dead broke—and due to government suppression. The failure of the second was its inability to reconcile a political movement and a fraternal order's need to take care of its members—that and the fact that the entire enterprise was nothing more than an elaborate con job.

In spite of laudable acts of charity, fraternal orders are not altogether altruistic. The main purpose of any fraternal order is to look after the interests of its members. This second KKK, in addition to being a vigorous backer of Prohibition, was so busy hating Blacks, liberals, Catholics, Jews, and, later, Communists, that it neglected to do anything for its members.

.... The Great Depression, beginning in 1929, deprived the Klan of virtually all its dues paying members. It proved equally devastating to legitimate fraternal orders as well and many did not survive. After 1930, the Klan was no longer a money making enterprise and as a consequence interest declined even further—the fact that there was easy money to be made was always at the heart of the Klan. In 1939, Hiram Evans, Imperial Wizard and successor to Simmons, saw the writing on the wall and sold the organization to James Colescott and Samuel Green—the Klan had been incorporated as a business. In 1944, the IRS slapped a lien of $685,000 for back taxes against the organization which bankrupted it. This was effectively the end of the second Klan. << --- Phoenixmasonry
The link does go into, as many historians do, the resurgence of Klan activity in the '50s-'60s around the Civil Rights push, but these were again, decentralized local groups, not a unified organization as existed under Evans, and Simmons before him.

Which is what I've already said, in greater detail.

Say --- blacks... liberals... Catholics... Jews..... and they didn't mention, labor unions.... those are all Republican Party constituents, right?

Oh wait....


And in your deranged little pea sized mind those SIX CONFEDERATES were all REPUBLICANS that formed to stop REPUBLICANS from gaining political office in the South...is that what you are trying to say in your disjointed way.....:lmao::lmao:


What part of "they had no known political affiliation" somehow translates to "they were Republicans" in a land where the Republican Party didn't even exist yet, Flasher-boi? Are you fucking stupid?

THIS JUST IN ---- not everybody everywhere has a political party. WHO KNEW. :eusa_doh:

Actually they were simply bored; they had no agenda, neither political nor racial. Pre-existing elements called "night patrols" took over after that point. It was that element that brought in the violence.

=> In fact, the beginning of the Klan involved nothing so sinister, subversive or ancient as the theories supposed. It was the boredom of small-town life that led six young Confederate veterans to gather around a fireplace one December evening in 1865 and form a social club. the place was Pulaski, Tenn., near the Alabama border. when they reassembled a week later, the six young men were full of ideas for their new society. it would be secret, to heighten the amusement of the thing, and the titles for the various offices were to have names as preposterous-sounding as possible, partly for the fun of it and partly to avoid any military or political implications. <= --- The Unusual Origins of the Ku Klux Klan, p. 9, compiled by Klanwatch

That about it?

BUT OCDGirl if you click the LINK in my signature for the PBS STORY, they plainly say they were DEMONRATS...just like you!....I even HIGHLIGHTED IT for anyone to see!


Uh --- no, it doesn't. STILL waiting for any evidence at all that McCord, Crowe, Kennedy, Jones, Reed or Lester had any political affiliation at all, in a conquered land where the right to vote had been taken away by the Federal government anyway. DUMBASS.

Then there's Simmons. STILL waiting for any evidence there either.

I can't help you being in denial that you got your FAGERAL ASS beat again! PBS says the KKK was founded by DemoRATS, Wiki does also, Fucktard, give it up. you are starting to look dumber than usual!

I think it is fucking hilarious how democrats are clueless they belong to the party of the kkk....they have no fucking clue...and they are often shocked to learn the truth....
 
And in your deranged little pea sized mind those SIX CONFEDERATES were all REPUBLICANS that formed to stop REPUBLICANS from gaining political office in the South...is that what you are trying to say in your disjointed way.....:lmao::lmao:

What part of "they had no known political affiliation" somehow translates to "they were Republicans" in a land where the Republican Party didn't even exist yet, Flasher-boi? Are you fucking stupid?

THIS JUST IN ---- not everybody everywhere has a political party. WHO KNEW. :eusa_doh:

Actually they were simply bored; they had no agenda, neither political nor racial. Pre-existing elements called "night patrols" took over after that point. It was that element that brought in the violence.

=> In fact, the beginning of the Klan involved nothing so sinister, subversive or ancient as the theories supposed. It was the boredom of small-town life that led six young Confederate veterans to gather around a fireplace one December evening in 1865 and form a social club. the place was Pulaski, Tenn., near the Alabama border. when they reassembled a week later, the six young men were full of ideas for their new society. it would be secret, to heighten the amusement of the thing, and the titles for the various offices were to have names as preposterous-sounding as possible, partly for the fun of it and partly to avoid any military or political implications. <= --- The Unusual Origins of the Ku Klux Klan, p. 9, compiled by Klanwatch

That about it?
BUT OCDGirl if you click the LINK in my signature for the PBS STORY, they plainly say they were DEMONRATS...just like you!....I even HIGHLIGHTED IT for anyone to see!

Uh --- no, it doesn't. STILL waiting for any evidence at all that McCord, Crowe, Kennedy, Jones, Reed or Lester had any political affiliation at all, in a conquered land where the right to vote had been taken away by the Federal government anyway. DUMBASS.

Then there's Simmons. STILL waiting for any evidence there either.
I can't help you being in denial that you got your FAGERAL ASS beat again! PBS says the KKK was founded by DemoRATS, Wiki does also, Fucktard, give it up. you are starting to look dumber than usual!
I think it is fucking hilarious how democrats are clueless they belong to the party of the kkk....they have no fucking clue...and they are often shocked to learn the truth....

OCDPogoGirl has been beating this dog with me for over 2 years, gets her ass handed to her each time and TRIES to spin it that if something doesn't have the word DemoRAT in the same sentence as KKK then it doesn't matter, those people were from Mars, and discovered that they can EAT NEGROES and PISS gasoline!

You'll enjoy beating up on her, just about more than anyone else in here, except, perhaps the JakeAss...JakeStarkey, who tries to tell everyone he's a Republican, BUT has NEVER had a good word for any Conservative...he pushed "Kasick" now he champions Pothead johnson!
 
OOoooOOOOooh, Googly Image memes. Well ain't that an unimpeachable source. :eusa_dance:

>> The Ku Klux Klan was organized—if one can use that term—in Pulaski, Tennessee on December 24th, 1866 by six former Confederate veterans. It has been suggested that originally it had been meant as simply another fraternal order, one of many being founded around that time—sort of a Southern Masonry. But if this was the intent, it failed dismally. It did not build orphanages or Old Klansman's Homes—and for that matter, even lodge halls. It did not provide its members with low cost life insurance as was becoming common with fraternal orders at that time. In fact, there is little evidence it ever did anything for its members other than provide an outlet for their racial hatreds.

Though a failure at fraternalism, it did enjoy quite a bit of success as a terrorist organization. Given the founders, there is little reason to think it was ever meant to be anything else. From the beginning, it did everything it could to conduct guerrilla warfare against the occupying Northern forces and the Republican Party. The newly freed slaves would be ruthlessly suppressed. Murder was frequently the means toward this end.

....
The Historian Elane Frantz Parsons sums up Klan membership which, ironically, is a shining example of diversity:

Lifting the Klan masks revealed a chaotic multitude of anti-black vigilante groups, disgruntled poor white farmers, war-time guerrilla bands, displaced democratic politicians, illegal whiskey distillers, coercive moral reformers, sadists, rapists, white workmen fearful of black competition, employers trying to enforce labor discipline, common thieves, neighbors with decades old grudges, and even a few freedmen and Republicans who allied with Democratic whites or had criminal agendas of their own. Indeed, all they had in common besides being overwhelmingly white, southern, and Democratic, were that they called themselves, or were called, Klansmen.

.... Probably everything commonly known about the Klan comes from its second incarnation, starting in 1915. The white robes, the burning crosses, the incendiary rhetoric directed at Catholics and Jews, the Kludds, Kleagles, and Klaverns , all were originated by the Klan in its second advent. It was during this era that the Klan achieved its greatest membership and spread to numerous northern and western states.

... But if the aim of the second Klan was to become a respectable fraternal order, it failed just as miserably as the first. The failure of the first was in large part economic—most early Klansmen were dead broke—and due to government suppression. The failure of the second was its inability to reconcile a political movement and a fraternal order's need to take care of its members—that and the fact that the entire enterprise was nothing more than an elaborate con job.

In spite of laudable acts of charity, fraternal orders are not altogether altruistic. The main purpose of any fraternal order is to look after the interests of its members. This second KKK, in addition to being a vigorous backer of Prohibition, was so busy hating Blacks, liberals, Catholics, Jews, and, later, Communists, that it neglected to do anything for its members.

.... The Great Depression, beginning in 1929, deprived the Klan of virtually all its dues paying members. It proved equally devastating to legitimate fraternal orders as well and many did not survive. After 1930, the Klan was no longer a money making enterprise and as a consequence interest declined even further—the fact that there was easy money to be made was always at the heart of the Klan. In 1939, Hiram Evans, Imperial Wizard and successor to Simmons, saw the writing on the wall and sold the organization to James Colescott and Samuel Green—the Klan had been incorporated as a business. In 1944, the IRS slapped a lien of $685,000 for back taxes against the organization which bankrupted it. This was effectively the end of the second Klan. << --- Phoenixmasonry
The link does go into, as many historians do, the resurgence of Klan activity in the '50s-'60s around the Civil Rights push, but these were again, decentralized local groups, not a unified organization as existed under Evans, and Simmons before him.

Which is what I've already said, in greater detail.

Say --- blacks... liberals... Catholics... Jews..... and they didn't mention, labor unions.... those are all Republican Party constituents, right?

Oh wait....


And in your deranged little pea sized mind those SIX CONFEDERATES were all REPUBLICANS that formed to stop REPUBLICANS from gaining political office in the South...is that what you are trying to say in your disjointed way.....:lmao::lmao:


What part of "they had no known political affiliation" somehow translates to "they were Republicans" in a land where the Republican Party didn't even exist yet, Flasher-boi? Are you fucking stupid?

Actually they were simply bored; they had no agenda, neither political nor racial. Pre-existing elements called "night patrols" took over after that point. It was that element that brought in the violence.

=> In fact, the beginning of the Klan involved nothing so sinister, subversive or ancient as the theories supposed. It was the boredom of small-town life that led six young Confederate veterans to gather around a fireplace one December evening in 1865 and form a social club. the place was Pulaski, Tenn., near the Alabama border. when they reassembled a week later, the six young men were full of ideas for their new society. it would be secret, to heighten the amusement of the thing, and the titles for the various offices were to have names as preposterous-sounding as possible, partly for the fun of it and partly to avoid any military or political implications. <= --- The Unusual Origins of the Ku Klux Klan, p. 9, compiled by Klanwatch

That about it?


Nathan Bedford Forrest was a flaming racist slave owner bub, and the "social club" ruse is what every meth distributing biker gang claims.


It's a matter of record. Has been for a long time. The racial and terror element was brought in from outside by "night patrols", which predated the Klan. See my Klanwatch link for more on them. They infiltrated what was originally just a lark. The six founders when they rode with masks went not to the homes of black folk but to those of their mothers and girlfriends, just to see if they could do it without anyone recognizing them.

Not sure about your characterization of Forrest. He was known to abhor mistreatment of slaves, and in fact freed his own. But he was not a founder anyway --- he was brought in as a figurehead after it was running amok so they'd look "legitimate". After less than two years he said "this group is fucked up" (paraphrasing) and issued an order disbanding the whole operation.


Sure pard, sure, there have always been vast efforts to white wash american history. Just some good ole boys never meanin' no harm, kinda like halloween for grown ups. Don't be asacred Maybell, it's me, in a sheet.


Oh I assure you I've got the whole story right here. Done this many times. I inherited a library.
And I have links, as opposed to "wull gee Wally, it must be".
 
OOoooOOOOooh, Googly Image memes. Well ain't that an unimpeachable source. :eusa_dance:

>> The Ku Klux Klan was organized—if one can use that term—in Pulaski, Tennessee on December 24th, 1866 by six former Confederate veterans. It has been suggested that originally it had been meant as simply another fraternal order, one of many being founded around that time—sort of a Southern Masonry. But if this was the intent, it failed dismally. It did not build orphanages or Old Klansman's Homes—and for that matter, even lodge halls. It did not provide its members with low cost life insurance as was becoming common with fraternal orders at that time. In fact, there is little evidence it ever did anything for its members other than provide an outlet for their racial hatreds.

Though a failure at fraternalism, it did enjoy quite a bit of success as a terrorist organization. Given the founders, there is little reason to think it was ever meant to be anything else. From the beginning, it did everything it could to conduct guerrilla warfare against the occupying Northern forces and the Republican Party. The newly freed slaves would be ruthlessly suppressed. Murder was frequently the means toward this end.

....
The Historian Elane Frantz Parsons sums up Klan membership which, ironically, is a shining example of diversity:

Lifting the Klan masks revealed a chaotic multitude of anti-black vigilante groups, disgruntled poor white farmers, war-time guerrilla bands, displaced democratic politicians, illegal whiskey distillers, coercive moral reformers, sadists, rapists, white workmen fearful of black competition, employers trying to enforce labor discipline, common thieves, neighbors with decades old grudges, and even a few freedmen and Republicans who allied with Democratic whites or had criminal agendas of their own. Indeed, all they had in common besides being overwhelmingly white, southern, and Democratic, were that they called themselves, or were called, Klansmen.

.... Probably everything commonly known about the Klan comes from its second incarnation, starting in 1915. The white robes, the burning crosses, the incendiary rhetoric directed at Catholics and Jews, the Kludds, Kleagles, and Klaverns , all were originated by the Klan in its second advent. It was during this era that the Klan achieved its greatest membership and spread to numerous northern and western states.

... But if the aim of the second Klan was to become a respectable fraternal order, it failed just as miserably as the first. The failure of the first was in large part economic—most early Klansmen were dead broke—and due to government suppression. The failure of the second was its inability to reconcile a political movement and a fraternal order's need to take care of its members—that and the fact that the entire enterprise was nothing more than an elaborate con job.

In spite of laudable acts of charity, fraternal orders are not altogether altruistic. The main purpose of any fraternal order is to look after the interests of its members. This second KKK, in addition to being a vigorous backer of Prohibition, was so busy hating Blacks, liberals, Catholics, Jews, and, later, Communists, that it neglected to do anything for its members.

.... The Great Depression, beginning in 1929, deprived the Klan of virtually all its dues paying members. It proved equally devastating to legitimate fraternal orders as well and many did not survive. After 1930, the Klan was no longer a money making enterprise and as a consequence interest declined even further—the fact that there was easy money to be made was always at the heart of the Klan. In 1939, Hiram Evans, Imperial Wizard and successor to Simmons, saw the writing on the wall and sold the organization to James Colescott and Samuel Green—the Klan had been incorporated as a business. In 1944, the IRS slapped a lien of $685,000 for back taxes against the organization which bankrupted it. This was effectively the end of the second Klan. << --- Phoenixmasonry
The link does go into, as many historians do, the resurgence of Klan activity in the '50s-'60s around the Civil Rights push, but these were again, decentralized local groups, not a unified organization as existed under Evans, and Simmons before him.

Which is what I've already said, in greater detail.

Say --- blacks... liberals... Catholics... Jews..... and they didn't mention, labor unions.... those are all Republican Party constituents, right?

Oh wait....


And in your deranged little pea sized mind those SIX CONFEDERATES were all REPUBLICANS that formed to stop REPUBLICANS from gaining political office in the South...is that what you are trying to say in your disjointed way.....:lmao::lmao:


What part of "they had no known political affiliation" somehow translates to "they were Republicans" in a land where the Republican Party didn't even exist yet, Flasher-boi? Are you fucking stupid?

THIS JUST IN ---- not everybody everywhere has a political party. WHO KNEW. :eusa_doh:

Actually they were simply bored; they had no agenda, neither political nor racial. Pre-existing elements called "night patrols" took over after that point. It was that element that brought in the violence.

=> In fact, the beginning of the Klan involved nothing so sinister, subversive or ancient as the theories supposed. It was the boredom of small-town life that led six young Confederate veterans to gather around a fireplace one December evening in 1865 and form a social club. the place was Pulaski, Tenn., near the Alabama border. when they reassembled a week later, the six young men were full of ideas for their new society. it would be secret, to heighten the amusement of the thing, and the titles for the various offices were to have names as preposterous-sounding as possible, partly for the fun of it and partly to avoid any military or political implications. <= --- The Unusual Origins of the Ku Klux Klan, p. 9, compiled by Klanwatch

That about it?

BUT OCDGirl if you click the LINK in my signature for the PBS STORY, they plainly say they were DEMONRATS...just like you!....I even HIGHLIGHTED IT for anyone to see!


Uh --- no, it doesn't. STILL waiting for any evidence at all that McCord, Crowe, Kennedy, Jones, Reed or Lester had any political affiliation at all, in a conquered land where the right to vote had been taken away by the Federal government anyway. DUMBASS.

Then there's Simmons. STILL waiting for any evidence there either.

I can't help you being in denial that you got your FAGERAL ASS beat again! PBS says the KKK was founded by DemoRATS, Wiki does also, Fucktard, give it up. you are starting to look dumber than usual!


Bull Fucking Shit. They say no such thing. PBS I already quoted earlier; let's go to Wiki:

>> The first Klan was founded in Pulaski, Tennessee, sometime between December 1865 and August 1866 by six former members of the Confederate army[22] as a fraternal social club inspired at least in part by the then largely defunct Sons of Malta, from which parts of the initiation ceremony were borrowed*, with the same purpose: "ludicrous initiations, the baffling of public curiosity, and the amusement for members were the only objects of the Klan."[23] The name is probably derived from the Greek word kuklos (κύκλος) which means circle.[24] <<

---- which I've already articulated, here and elsewhere in the past.

(* - another source, The Ku Klux Klan: History, Organization, Language, Influence and Activities of America's Most Notorious Secret Society, cites Kuklos Adelphon, a North Carolina fraternity founded 1812, as a model)

But leave us go on:

>> According to The Cyclopædia of Fraternities (1907) "Beginning in April, 1867, there was a gradual transformation... The members had conjured up a veritable Frankenstein. They had played with an engine of power and mystery, though organized on entirely innocent lines, and found themselves overcome by a belief that something must lie behind it all—that there was, after all, a serious purpose, a work for the Klan to do."[23]

Although there was little organizational structure above the local level, similar groups rose across the South and adopted the same name and methods.[25] <<
Indeed Capt. John Lester, writing a history of the Klan in 1894, mentions this dynamic:.

>> During the fall and winter of 1866 the growth of the Klan was rapid. It spread over a wide extent of territory. Sometimes, by a sudden leap, it appeared in localities far distant from any existing "dens."

A stranger from West Tennessee, Mississippi, Alabama or Texas, visiting in a neighborhood where the order prevailed, would be initiated, and on his departure carry with him permission to establish a "den" at home. In fact, it was often done without such permission. The connecting link between these "dens" was very fragile. By a sort of tacit agreement the Pulaski Klan was regarded as the source of power and authority. The Grand Cyclops of this "den" was virtually the ruler of the order, but as he had no method of communicating with subjects or subordinates, and no way in which to enforce his mandates, his authority was more fancy than fact. But so far there had appeared no need for compact organization, rigid rules and close supervision. The leading spirits of the Ku Klux Klan [71]were contemplating nothing more serious than amusement. They enjoyed the baffled curiosity and wild speculations of a mystified public even more than the rude sport afforded by the ludicrous initiations. << (p. 71) <<
Hate to sound like a broken record but I already noted this too.

But again leave us proceed to a passage relevant to the current thread:

>> Outrages were committed by masked men in regions far remote from any Ku Klux organizations. The parties engaged took pains to assert that they were Ku Klux, which the members of the Klan never did. This was evidence that these parties were simply aping Ku Klux disguises. << ibid, p. 105
In other words once the Klan as a concept was widely known, there's nothing stopping some far-flung entity from taking it in whatever direction that entity wished, with or without "orders from central". Needless to say mid-19th century technology did not permit the instant communication we have, but the fact that one wanker in California touts Hillary and another in Sleaziana touts Rump demonstrates that there is no central authority as such.

In point of fact the Klan can't organize itself centrally as such even if it wants to; it lost its copyrights three-quarters of a century ago when the IRS nailed 'em. Which also means there's nothing stopping any wanker in California or Sleaziana or Indiana from calling himself "Klan" even though others calling themselves the same thing may know nothing of their existence, or, as has repeatedly happened, may know of them as a competitor.

Anyway, that's the original Klan. The re-formed one, the one that grew far bigger to several millions of members including one-third of the adult male population of Indiana, the one we know by far the most about, was invented by the aforementioned Simmons. Many adjectives have been appended to Simmons, including failed Methodist minister, inveterate club joiner, salesman, huckster, con artist, opportunist, and drunk. An adjective that has never been applied to Simmons is "politician". In fact Simmons himself described the Klan bluntly as "the most powerful, secret, non-political organization in existence". (The Fiery Cross: The Ku Klux Klan in America: Wyn Craig Wade 1987, p. 151)

Add to that the inconvenient fact that that Klan opposed not only blacks but immigrants, labor unions, Catholics and Jews, the emphasis depending on what worked in that area, which were and are all constituents of the Democratic Party, soooo .... anyone who'd care to explain why a political party would be running a hate group that undermines its own support base is cordially invited to go ahead and twist himself into the proverbial pretzel.
 
Last edited:
OCDPogo is still OCDing over something that EVERYONE but HER recognizes as THE TRUTH....Amazing that she continues to REPOST the same USELESS bullshit, BUT as she is now TROLLING me even more than usual, I'll continue to HARASS her with TRUTHS, and laugh at her stupidity....







OCDPogo please provide me with a few YouTubes that say the DemoRATS did NOT start the KKK....Thank you in advance!
 
Get it (pardon the expression ) right lefties. Historically the KKK was the democrat party's muscle to keep Papists and upity Blacks in line. If you could check the wallets of KKK members throughout the 20th century you would find that they were all registered democrats. FDR was the guy who appointed a "former" KKK member to the Supreme Court and he paid FDR back by writing the majority opinion that justified the FDR administration's version of Martial law when Japanese American citizens were placed in American gulags without benefit of due process. Justice Black went a bit further in 1948 when he created the "separation of Church and state" that didn't appear in the Constitution in order to punish Papists..
 
Get it (pardon the expression ) right lefties. Historically the KKK was the democrat party's muscle to keep Papists and upity Blacks in line. If you could check the wallets of KKK members throughout the 20th century you would find that they were all registered democrats. FDR was the guy who appointed a "former" KKK member to the Supreme Court and he paid FDR back by writing the majority opinion that justified the FDR administration's version of Martial law when Japanese American citizens were placed in American gulags without benefit of due process. Justice Black went a bit further in 1948 when he created the "separation of Church and state" that didn't appear in the Constitution in order to punish Papists..

"Papists"??? :rofl:

Are you trying to say "Catholics"?

You know Catholics vote Democratic, right?

You know JFK was the first Catholic POTUS, but do you know who the first Catholic candidate was?
Al Smith, 1928. In that year and in the previous election year 1924 where Smith also was running, the Klan staged demonstrations to oppose his nomination on that basis -- being Catholic. 1924 was what they called the "Klanbake" where they camped in New Jersey across from the convention in New York City, and that protest was also opposing one Senator Oscar Underwood of Alabama, who was the most vociferous opponent of the Klan in his time.

This would be the same time they were getting governors and Senators elected in Colorado and Indiana and Maine, all Republicans, and three years after they chased a Dem governor out of Oklahoma who was trying to drive the Klan out.

Ah, pretzels.
emot-munch.gif


If you could check the wallets of KKK members throughout the 20th century you would find that they were all registered democrats.

um, 'fraid not Sparkles. Not if their name was Rice Means. Or Ed Jackson. Or Clarence Morley. Or Owen Brewster. Or George Baker. I believe they had a Dem governor in Oregon at the same time they were getting Baker in as Republican mayor in Portland. But hey, there was also Charles Bowles, who won, briefly, the mayor's office in Detroit with no political party at all. As a write-in.

As I said --- whatever would work in the local area. Republican ... Democrat .... write-in.... anti-Catholic... anti-Jew.... anti-labor union.... whatever would sell.

>> Kleagles were told to sell the Klan in a way that most appealed to the community. If a town was afraid of labor unions, then Kleagles pushed the Klan's position against alien-inspired strikers. If the Kleagle was working a dry community, he promised that the Klan alone had the guts to deal with deadheads and bootleggers. If a city was being swollen by immigrants, Kleagles proclaimed that the Klan stood for 100 percent Americanism and would never allow the country to be taken over by the radical hyphens. And when neighborhoods expressed fears over the postwar "New Negro," they were quietly reminded that the Klan had always known how to handle *******. In short, Kleagles pandered to every regional prejudice and fear, offering a scapegoat for every local tension. << -- The Fiery Cross, op. cit., p. 156

"One hundred percent Americanism" was a recurring motto of the Klan, reflecting not only its anti-immigrant stance but also demonstrating that if the Klan has a political party forebear at all, it would have been the Know Nothings --- where they got that idea.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top