Turley Explains Why An Impeachment Inquiry is Warranted

[bigrebnc1775]

No. The evidence was sufficient that we agreed on the facts of his obstruction.

Republicans decided that obstruction is not impeachable.

Trump didn't obstruct
Hillary did.
Holder did

 

[Marener]

Banks hire people to assess property values

They require statements of financial condition for a reason.

Those aren’t optional.

 

[Marener]

Trump didn't obstruct
Hillary did.
Holder did

Sure he did. He completely ignored congressional subpoenas.

Sounds like obstruction to me.

Republicans didn’t care.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

They require statements of financial condition for a reason.

Those aren’t optional.

Whose the victim?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Sure he did. He completely ignored congressional subpoenas.

Sounds like obstruction to me.

Republicans didn’t care.

How be sprcific

 

[Marener]

Who’s the victim?

The good people of the state of New York.

The government is tasked with making sure business operate honestly within their borders.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

The good people of the state of New York.

The government is tasked with making sure business operate honestly within their borders.

The people of new York? Did Trump try to get a loan from the people of new York?

 

[Marener]

How be sprcific

The Trump administration directed employees of their administration not to respond to Congressional subpoenas.

You can see the specific subpoenas here if you’re curious.

Trump impeachment tracker: Following all the action in Congress

CNN is tracking the requests and subpoenas from House Democrats as they collect documents and testimony and move toward drafting articles of impeachment against Trump.

www.cnn.com

Expect the same from the Biden administration

 

[Marener]

The people of new York? Did Trump try to get a loan from the people of new York?

He operated business fraudulently in New York.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

He operated business fraudulently in New York.

That's not what's he was indicted for.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

The Trump administration directed employees of their administration not to respond to Congressional subpoenas.

You can see the specific subpoenas here if you’re curious.

Trump impeachment tracker: Following all the action in Congress

CNN is tracking the requests and subpoenas from House Democrats as they collect documents and testimony and move toward drafting articles of impeachment against Trump.

www.cnn.com

Expect the same from the Biden administration

Fake news CNN

 

[Marener]

That's not what's he was indicted for.

It’s a civil suit. Not an indictment.

But he also has been indicted for fraudulent business practices in New York, just not in this specific case.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

It’s a civil suit. Not an indictment.

But he also has been indicted for fraudulent business practices in New York, just not in this specific case.

That's not what he's being sued for

 

[Marener]

Fake news CNN

It’s a really good documentation of the impeachment inquiry and process.

Too bad your masters won’t let you read it.

 

[Marener]

That's not what he's being sued for

It is.

How do you not know this?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

It is.

How do you not know this?

And again no victim

 

[Marener]

And again no victim

So if a crime has no victim, it shouldn’t be prosecuted?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

So if a crime has no victim, it shouldn’t be prosecuted?

No victim plus no crime

 

[Marener]

No victim plus no crime

Bank fraud is the crime.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Let’s put on our thinking caps, if possible. We know for a fact that Hunter was receiving large sums of money from various countries and at least one member of the CCP. Agree? Let’s assume that he was just selling the “illusion of access”, which is the latest talking point from the left. How would even an illusion be possible in 2017 if his dad had no power? Why was Hunter wired a large sum of money from Jonathan Li, a member of the CCP, in 2019? This is an indisputable fact. Was it for Hunter’s art work? Did they think they could gain something from a has-been politician? You can’t have it both ways. Either Joe had power or Joe didn’t have power. If he didn’t, the illusion narrative fails and we are left with why is Hunter being paid a large sum of money to a member of the CCP?

Back to ole’ clean as a whistle Joe, lets assume he didn’t get money from all these dealings from his brilliant, drug-addicted son. He was on numerous phone calls and in person meetings with Hunter’s business partners. That we know and we also know that he lied about these meetings. Facts, yet again. A reasonable conclusion would be that Joe knew why he was there, thus why he lied, but lets assume Joe didn’t receive any money from these dealings. Is it wrong to enrich the rest of his family by assisting his son in influence peddling to adversaries? We do know for a fact that much money flowed to other family members. Maybe this was Joe’s way of keeping them all afloat, including Hunter, who had an expensive drug habit. There is little difference in taking the money directly and then writing a check to a family member vs just letting them have the money directly. The end result is the same.

Just some more info. And before you bash the source, you quoted from the Washington Post.

The ‘no evidence’ claim about Biden corruption is looking increasingly ridiculous

Asking Marener to think is equivalent to asking a blind man to be a sniper. Even if they have direct evidence, Marener will ignore it. To everyone who are logical people, they can see that the Bidens are dirty.