Turley says the quiet part out loud.

What hoax?

Part of your screwing via information anarchy will include the still-unsolved mystery of the anthrax attacks, which (even though nazi Musk has pre-castrated all non-members from seeing the details of this Twitterist's thread) this document reveals as a Russian truth of biolabs, not a hoax (multiple clicks to enlarge):

'....Metabiota Inc....Battelle....Metchnikov Institute....'

Getting amnesia about the furin cleavage-site links here, will help get the double absurdities, Hunter and his father, off the hook for any links to anthrax furin cleavage sites, let alone SARS2 furin cleavage sites.

Once Pozharsky writes the email that connects Metabiota to Burisma, the virus connections to both Ukraine and China become irreversibly linked to the still-unsolved SARS2 origin investigation.
 
As one of their first witnesses, Republicans called on Jonathan Turley, a conservative legal scholar who previously served as a Justice Department tax attorney. Turley was set to act as a content witness to help analyze the Biden family’s business dealings—but even he admitted there’s not enough evidence.

“I do not believe that the evidence currently meets the standard of a high crime and misdemeanor needed for an article of impeachment,” Turley said in written testimony submitted ahead of the hearing.

Turley also said he did believe it was “warranted” for the House to investigate potential connections between Biden and his son Hunter’s business dealings. But Republicans have been doing just that for months, and they still haven’t found proof linking the president to Hunter Biden’s work.



Was this something they knew he was going to say?
You libturds consistently cherry pick.

What’s the matter, bug? Can’t manage to admit the balance of what Turley said?
 
As long as it takes, unlike Democrats who had no inquiry and impeached on confirmation bias.
House Republicans are kicking off an impeachment inquiry into allegations of corruption against President Biden that are so far not corroborated. House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy says this process is an investigation into whether there was in fact any wrongdoing on Biden's part. McCarthy's approach makes this impeachment inquiry distinct from probes into previous presidents, where there had been some credible evidence of wrongdoing from the outset.



Why McCarthy launched an impeachment inquiry without a vote — and why he can​


 
You libturds consistently cherry pick.

What’s the matter, bug? Can’t manage to admit the balance of what Turley said?
Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) moved to launch an official impeachment inquiry into President Biden on Tuesday — without a vote on the House floor.

It’s perfectly legal and constitutional for McCarthy to start an inquiry without a vote. But it’s a significant reversal for the GOP Speaker, who just 11 days ago said he would not open an official probe without a floor vote.

It also leaves him open to cries of hypocrisy: McCarthy criticized former Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) for kicking off an impeachment inquiry of former President Trump in the same manner in 2019. Pelosi announced an inquiry Sept. 24, but the House did not vote on the matter until Oct. 31.

 
Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) moved to launch an official impeachment inquiry into President Biden on Tuesday — without a vote on the House floor.

It’s perfectly legal and constitutional for McCarthy to start an inquiry without a vote. But it’s a significant reversal for the GOP Speaker, who just 11 days ago said he would not open an official probe without a floor vote.

It also leaves him open to cries of hypocrisy: McCarthy criticized former Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) for kicking off an impeachment inquiry of former President Trump in the same manner in 2019. Pelosi announced an inquiry Sept. 24, but the House did not vote on the matter until Oct. 31.

Irrelevant.
 
Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) moved to launch an official impeachment inquiry into President Biden on Tuesday — without a vote on the House floor.

It’s perfectly legal and constitutional for McCarthy to start an inquiry without a vote. But it’s a significant reversal for the GOP Speaker, who just 11 days ago said he would not open an official probe without a floor vote.

It also leaves him open to cries of hypocrisy: McCarthy criticized former Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) for kicking off an impeachment inquiry of former President Trump in the same manner in 2019. Pelosi announced an inquiry Sept. 24, but the House did not vote on the matter until Oct. 31.

Wow. Russia collusion groupies whining about hypocrisy.
 
They think that judges are as dumb as their client.

No doubt Trump is pushing them to file this shit. They deserve anything they get for going near him. I don't care HOW desperate they are for business.
After so many attorneys have permanently damaged their reputations for acquiescing to Trump's lunatic demands it's a wonder anyone would work for him. Then again, Sidney Powell and Lin Wood prove there are some real nuts in the profession.
 
As one of their first witnesses, Republicans called on Jonathan Turley, a conservative legal scholar who previously served as a Justice Department tax attorney. Turley was set to act as a content witness to help analyze the Biden family’s business dealings—but even he admitted there’s not enough evidence.

“I do not believe that the evidence currently meets the standard of a high crime and misdemeanor needed for an article of impeachment,” Turley said in written testimony submitted ahead of the hearing.

Turley also said he did believe it was “warranted” for the House to investigate potential connections between Biden and his son Hunter’s business dealings. But Republicans have been doing just that for months, and they still haven’t found proof linking the president to Hunter Biden’s work.



Was this something they knew he was going to say?
That waterboy is the Republican's premier legal bootlicker, who's stopped the pretense of being a democrat and accepted his status as their dispensible tool.
 
Part of your screwing via information anarchy will include the still-unsolved mystery of the anthrax attacks, which (even though nazi Musk has pre-castrated all non-members from seeing the details of this Twitterist's thread) this document reveals as a Russian truth of biolabs, not a hoax (multiple clicks to enlarge):

'....Metabiota Inc....Battelle....Metchnikov Institute....'

Getting amnesia about the furin cleavage-site links here, will help get the double absurdities, Hunter and his father, off the hook for any links to anthrax furin cleavage sites, let alone SARS2 furin cleavage sites.

Once Pozharsky writes the email that connects Metabiota to Burisma, the virus connections to both Ukraine and China become irreversibly linked to the still-unsolved SARS2 origin investigation.

Sorry, I'm still trying to get my head around the Italian satellite nonsense.
 
This alone is enough evidence to warrant an investigation...



Biden at the CFR...You have 6 hours to fire the prosecutor (who's investigating my son) or you're not getting the billion dollars
 
That waterboy is the Republican's premier legal bootlicker, who's stopped the pretense of being a democrat and accepted his status as their dispensible tool.
Lots of hurt Dem / Socialist feelings.
 

Forum List

Back
Top