mamooth
Diamond Member
You're too stupid and crazy to pull off the condescending act. You just sound shrill when you try.
Back to the simple question you keep avoiding. There's no missile damage, no missile shrapnel. A logical person would conclude that meant no missile. You, however, think differently. Is it your contention that all the investigators are lying about the lack of missile damage? That would make your theory non-disprovable, a major indicator of the presence of some fine steaming BS.
And have you ever considered some self-examination as to why you so easily get snookered by so many conspiracy theories?
Back to the simple question you keep avoiding. There's no missile damage, no missile shrapnel. A logical person would conclude that meant no missile. You, however, think differently. Is it your contention that all the investigators are lying about the lack of missile damage? That would make your theory non-disprovable, a major indicator of the presence of some fine steaming BS.
And have you ever considered some self-examination as to why you so easily get snookered by so many conspiracy theories?