Twitter Attacks Lawyer Representing American Patriot, Kyle Rittenhouse

[Norman]

Now that is funny...

 

[westwall]

[
Look you retard the law has been posted in this forum several times, Kyle was NOT in violation of the LAW. You can disagree all you want Coyote but that is a BALD FACED LIE and you keep repeating it. You are a LYING ASSHOLE.

Again:

948.60  Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18.
(1)  In this section, “dangerous weapon" means any firearm, loaded or unloaded; any electric weapon, as defined in s. 941.295 (1c) (a); metallic knuckles or knuckles of any substance which could be put to the same use with the same or similar effect as metallic knuckles; a nunchaku or any similar weapon consisting of 2 sticks of wood, plastic or metal connected at one end by a length of rope, chain, wire or leather; a cestus or similar material weighted with metal or other substance and worn on the hand; a shuriken or any similar pointed star-like object intended to injure a person when thrown; or a manrikigusari or similar length of chain having weighted ends.
(2) 
(a) Any person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.
(b) Except as provided in par. (c), any person who intentionally sells, loans or gives a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age is guilty of a Class I felony.
(c) Whoever violates par. (b) is guilty of a Class H felony if the person under 18 years of age under par. (b) discharges the firearm and the discharge causes death to himself, herself or another.
(d) A person under 17 years of age who has violated this subsection is subject to the provisions of ch. 938 unless jurisdiction is waived under s. 938.18 or the person is subject to the jurisdiction of a court of criminal jurisdiction under s. 938.183.
(3) 
(a) This section does not apply to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a dangerous weapon when the dangerous weapon is being used in target practice under the supervision of an adult or in a course of instruction in the traditional and proper use of the dangerous weapon under the supervision of an adult. This section does not apply to an adult who transfers a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age for use only in target practice under the adult's supervision or in a course of instruction in the traditional and proper use of the dangerous weapon under the adult's supervision.
(b) This section does not apply to a person under 18 years of age who is a member of the armed forces or national guard and who possesses or is armed with a dangerous weapon in the line of duty. This section does not apply to an adult who is a member of the armed forces or national guard and who transfers a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age in the line of duty.
(c) This section applies only to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the person is in violation of s. 941.28 or is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593. This section applies only to an adult who transfers a firearm to a person under 18 years of age if the person under 18 years of age is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593 or to an adult who is in violation of s. 941.28.
History: 1987 a. 332; 1991 a. 18, 139; 1993 a. 98; 1995 a. 27, 77; 1997 a. 248; 2001 a. 109; 2005 a. 163; 2011 a. 35.
Sub. (2) (b) does not set a standard for civil liability, and a violation of sub. (2) (b) does not constitute negligence per se. Logarto v. Gustafson, 998 F. Supp. 998(1998).

Same with curfew. I think that as well as allowing an illegally armed 17 yr old in are reasonable questions to ask and all you have is a partisan political response?

The streets were filled with anarchy and mayhem thanks to bedwetting liberal democrat mayors

Rittenhouse was only one small part of the insanity

True. But he is tbe one that killed two people and wounded another. That rather elevates it.

I think you are very confused. The law says "Shall not be infringed".

He was using the 2A EXACTLY for the purpose it was intended. If you think that's not going to come up in the trial, you are wrong.

By the way, have you not found any laws the rioters have broken? Is it only the guy who shot a pedophile that is in the wrong?

You xan argue 2A, but it is irrelevant. Wisconsin law says otherwise and age restrictions have long been upheld.

You realize your argument would allow toddlers to posess abd use fire arms right?

Toddlers can use firearms for self defense. And if they could not, that's the type of utter leftist insanity that we don't need again. Shoot the pedophile home-invaders that you defend.

I already presented the clip of two lawyers discussing this. They don't agree.

But a better question is, why are you spending so much time going after this hero, when there are dozens and dozens of murders by the rioters still lacking even prosecution. Why are you on the camp of Satan?

He is not a hero. Killing people does not make one a hero. he was in a situation he should not have been in and illegally armed. Had he not been there none of this would have happened. He was saving no lives. He only made the situation a lot worse.

The question you shouldbe asking is why are so many armed people (left and right) appearing at protests?

I think gunrights extremists as nuts as any other extremists and we need some sanity.

Why?

How many thousands more do you need?

You have gone batshit crazy. I never would have believed that you could be so divorced from reality.

 

[westwall]

But he is tbe [sic] one that killed two people and wounded another. That rather elevates it.

He did not kill nor wound any people. He killed two and wounded one, subhuman criminal pieces of shit.

Kyle from Antoich is a murderer.

Why do you support criminala?

show us where he was convicted of murder,,,

give it time

you said he was a murderer,,,so show us where he was convicted of murder or shut up,,,

kyle from Antoich will be convicted of murder (twice) once for attempted murder, illegal possession of a deadly weapon and by public opinion of being a white racist Asshole.

No he won't you fucking dumbass. He is going to walk, and little stalinist fucks, like you, are going to whine all the way to your moms basement.

 

[Coyote]

KEEP RIGHT ON LYING you deceitful HAG. 16 and 17 are exempt in all cases if it is a Long rifle or shotgun.

You really are an asshole.

You linked to a wikipedia article, which interestingly was updated after this shooting.

I posted a link to the actual laws.

Your article cited two sections in support.

29.304  Restrictions on hunting and use of firearms by persons under 16 years of age.
Here is the actual law: Wisconsin Legislature: 29.304

This appears to relate to HUNTING and firearms.

941.28  Possession of short-barreled shotgun or short-barreled rifle

Here is the link.

Wisconsin Legislature: 941.28

docs.legis.wisconsin.gov

This doesnt seem particularly relevant.

Here is the link for possession of fire arms by minors.

Wisconsin Legislature: 948.55

docs.legis.wisconsin.gov

3a,b, and c state who this section does not apply to. None of those would seem to apply to Kyle.

Rittenhouse WAS charged with possession of a dangerous weapon while under 18.

I am not a lawyer. I doubt you are either.

 

[Coyote]

[
Look you retard the law has been posted in this forum several times, Kyle was NOT in violation of the LAW. You can disagree all you want Coyote but that is a BALD FACED LIE and you keep repeating it. You are a LYING ASSHOLE.

Again:

948.60  Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18.
(1)  In this section, “dangerous weapon" means any firearm, loaded or unloaded; any electric weapon, as defined in s. 941.295 (1c) (a); metallic knuckles or knuckles of any substance which could be put to the same use with the same or similar effect as metallic knuckles; a nunchaku or any similar weapon consisting of 2 sticks of wood, plastic or metal connected at one end by a length of rope, chain, wire or leather; a cestus or similar material weighted with metal or other substance and worn on the hand; a shuriken or any similar pointed star-like object intended to injure a person when thrown; or a manrikigusari or similar length of chain having weighted ends.
(2) 
(a) Any person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.
(b) Except as provided in par. (c), any person who intentionally sells, loans or gives a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age is guilty of a Class I felony.
(c) Whoever violates par. (b) is guilty of a Class H felony if the person under 18 years of age under par. (b) discharges the firearm and the discharge causes death to himself, herself or another.
(d) A person under 17 years of age who has violated this subsection is subject to the provisions of ch. 938 unless jurisdiction is waived under s. 938.18 or the person is subject to the jurisdiction of a court of criminal jurisdiction under s. 938.183.
(3) 
(a) This section does not apply to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a dangerous weapon when the dangerous weapon is being used in target practice under the supervision of an adult or in a course of instruction in the traditional and proper use of the dangerous weapon under the supervision of an adult. This section does not apply to an adult who transfers a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age for use only in target practice under the adult's supervision or in a course of instruction in the traditional and proper use of the dangerous weapon under the adult's supervision.
(b) This section does not apply to a person under 18 years of age who is a member of the armed forces or national guard and who possesses or is armed with a dangerous weapon in the line of duty. This section does not apply to an adult who is a member of the armed forces or national guard and who transfers a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age in the line of duty.
(c) This section applies only to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the person is in violation of s. 941.28 or is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593. This section applies only to an adult who transfers a firearm to a person under 18 years of age if the person under 18 years of age is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593 or to an adult who is in violation of s. 941.28.
History: 1987 a. 332; 1991 a. 18, 139; 1993 a. 98; 1995 a. 27, 77; 1997 a. 248; 2001 a. 109; 2005 a. 163; 2011 a. 35.
Sub. (2) (b) does not set a standard for civil liability, and a violation of sub. (2) (b) does not constitute negligence per se. Logarto v. Gustafson, 998 F. Supp. 998(1998).

Same with curfew. I think that as well as allowing an illegally armed 17 yr old in are reasonable questions to ask and all you have is a partisan political response?

The streets were filled with anarchy and mayhem thanks to bedwetting liberal democrat mayors

Rittenhouse was only one small part of the insanity

True. But he is tbe one that killed two people and wounded another. That rather elevates it.

I think you are very confused. The law says "Shall not be infringed".

He was using the 2A EXACTLY for the purpose it was intended. If you think that's not going to come up in the trial, you are wrong.

By the way, have you not found any laws the rioters have broken? Is it only the guy who shot a pedophile that is in the wrong?

You xan argue 2A, but it is irrelevant. Wisconsin law says otherwise and age restrictions have long been upheld.

You realize your argument would allow toddlers to posess abd use fire arms right?

Toddlers can use firearms for self defense. And if they could not, that's the type of utter leftist insanity that we don't need again. Shoot the pedophile home-invaders that you defend.

I already presented the clip of two lawyers discussing this. They don't agree.

But a better question is, why are you spending so much time going after this hero, when there are dozens and dozens of murders by the rioters still lacking even prosecution. Why are you on the camp of Satan?

He is not a hero. Killing people does not make one a hero. he was in a situation he should not have been in and illegally armed. Had he not been there none of this would have happened. He was saving no lives. He only made the situation a lot worse.

The question you shouldbe asking is why are so many armed people (left and right) appearing at protests?

I think gunrights extremists as nuts as any other extremists and we need some sanity.

Why?

How many thousands more do you need?

You have gone batshit crazy. I never would have believed that you could be so divorced from reality.

So which of those people are tbe three in question? There were legitim a te protestors thete as well.

 

[Coyote]

The question you shouldbe asking is why are so many armed people (left and right) appearing at protests?

Thats a good question

and the answer is because the liberal democrat mayors of blue cities are not allowing the police to do their duty

so show me specifically what the Kenosha mayor that prevented the police from doing their job?

 

[Norman]

The question you shouldbe asking is why are so many armed people (left and right) appearing at protests?

Thats a good question

and the answer is because the liberal democrat mayors of blue cities are not allowing the police to do their duty

so show me specifically what the Kenosha mayor that prevented the police from doing their job?

Like Biden would, defunded the police?

 

[Bob Blaylock]

There were legitim a te [sic] protestors [sic] thete [sic] as well.

Only LIbtARds call looters and rioters “legitimate protesters”.

Sane people call them for what they are—subhuman criminal pieces of shit.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

so show me specifically what the Kenosha mayor that prevented the police from doing their job?

If the police had been allowed to do their job, then the looters, rioters, and other related subhuman pieces of shit would have been thrown in jail.

 

[otto105]

[
Look you retard the law has been posted in this forum several times, Kyle was NOT in violation of the LAW. You can disagree all you want Coyote but that is a BALD FACED LIE and you keep repeating it. You are a LYING ASSHOLE.

Again:

948.60  Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18.
(1)  In this section, “dangerous weapon" means any firearm, loaded or unloaded; any electric weapon, as defined in s. 941.295 (1c) (a); metallic knuckles or knuckles of any substance which could be put to the same use with the same or similar effect as metallic knuckles; a nunchaku or any similar weapon consisting of 2 sticks of wood, plastic or metal connected at one end by a length of rope, chain, wire or leather; a cestus or similar material weighted with metal or other substance and worn on the hand; a shuriken or any similar pointed star-like object intended to injure a person when thrown; or a manrikigusari or similar length of chain having weighted ends.
(2) 
(a) Any person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.
(b) Except as provided in par. (c), any person who intentionally sells, loans or gives a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age is guilty of a Class I felony.
(c) Whoever violates par. (b) is guilty of a Class H felony if the person under 18 years of age under par. (b) discharges the firearm and the discharge causes death to himself, herself or another.
(d) A person under 17 years of age who has violated this subsection is subject to the provisions of ch. 938 unless jurisdiction is waived under s. 938.18 or the person is subject to the jurisdiction of a court of criminal jurisdiction under s. 938.183.
(3) 
(a) This section does not apply to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a dangerous weapon when the dangerous weapon is being used in target practice under the supervision of an adult or in a course of instruction in the traditional and proper use of the dangerous weapon under the supervision of an adult. This section does not apply to an adult who transfers a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age for use only in target practice under the adult's supervision or in a course of instruction in the traditional and proper use of the dangerous weapon under the adult's supervision.
(b) This section does not apply to a person under 18 years of age who is a member of the armed forces or national guard and who possesses or is armed with a dangerous weapon in the line of duty. This section does not apply to an adult who is a member of the armed forces or national guard and who transfers a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age in the line of duty.
(c) This section applies only to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the person is in violation of s. 941.28 or is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593. This section applies only to an adult who transfers a firearm to a person under 18 years of age if the person under 18 years of age is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593 or to an adult who is in violation of s. 941.28.
History: 1987 a. 332; 1991 a. 18, 139; 1993 a. 98; 1995 a. 27, 77; 1997 a. 248; 2001 a. 109; 2005 a. 163; 2011 a. 35.
Sub. (2) (b) does not set a standard for civil liability, and a violation of sub. (2) (b) does not constitute negligence per se. Logarto v. Gustafson, 998 F. Supp. 998(1998).

Same with curfew. I think that as well as allowing an illegally armed 17 yr old in are reasonable questions to ask and all you have is a partisan political response?

The streets were filled with anarchy and mayhem thanks to bedwetting liberal democrat mayors

Rittenhouse was only one small part of the insanity

True. But he is tbe one that killed two people and wounded another. That rather elevates it.

I POSTED the ACTUAL LAW you lying MORON, 16 and 17 ARE EXEMPT if it is a Long rifle or Shotgun. DID YOU MISS IT YOU LYING HAG?

it is exempt if the underage person is hunting not playing little militia boi.

 

[Turtlesoup]

Since when is a murderer a "patriot"?

What murder?

 

[westwall]

[
Look you retard the law has been posted in this forum several times, Kyle was NOT in violation of the LAW. You can disagree all you want Coyote but that is a BALD FACED LIE and you keep repeating it. You are a LYING ASSHOLE.

Again:

948.60  Possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18.
(1)  In this section, “dangerous weapon" means any firearm, loaded or unloaded; any electric weapon, as defined in s. 941.295 (1c) (a); metallic knuckles or knuckles of any substance which could be put to the same use with the same or similar effect as metallic knuckles; a nunchaku or any similar weapon consisting of 2 sticks of wood, plastic or metal connected at one end by a length of rope, chain, wire or leather; a cestus or similar material weighted with metal or other substance and worn on the hand; a shuriken or any similar pointed star-like object intended to injure a person when thrown; or a manrikigusari or similar length of chain having weighted ends.
(2) 
(a) Any person under 18 years of age who possesses or goes armed with a dangerous weapon is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.
(b) Except as provided in par. (c), any person who intentionally sells, loans or gives a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age is guilty of a Class I felony.
(c) Whoever violates par. (b) is guilty of a Class H felony if the person under 18 years of age under par. (b) discharges the firearm and the discharge causes death to himself, herself or another.
(d) A person under 17 years of age who has violated this subsection is subject to the provisions of ch. 938 unless jurisdiction is waived under s. 938.18 or the person is subject to the jurisdiction of a court of criminal jurisdiction under s. 938.183.
(3) 
(a) This section does not apply to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a dangerous weapon when the dangerous weapon is being used in target practice under the supervision of an adult or in a course of instruction in the traditional and proper use of the dangerous weapon under the supervision of an adult. This section does not apply to an adult who transfers a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age for use only in target practice under the adult's supervision or in a course of instruction in the traditional and proper use of the dangerous weapon under the adult's supervision.
(b) This section does not apply to a person under 18 years of age who is a member of the armed forces or national guard and who possesses or is armed with a dangerous weapon in the line of duty. This section does not apply to an adult who is a member of the armed forces or national guard and who transfers a dangerous weapon to a person under 18 years of age in the line of duty.
(c) This section applies only to a person under 18 years of age who possesses or is armed with a rifle or a shotgun if the person is in violation of s. 941.28 or is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593. This section applies only to an adult who transfers a firearm to a person under 18 years of age if the person under 18 years of age is not in compliance with ss. 29.304 and 29.593 or to an adult who is in violation of s. 941.28.
History: 1987 a. 332; 1991 a. 18, 139; 1993 a. 98; 1995 a. 27, 77; 1997 a. 248; 2001 a. 109; 2005 a. 163; 2011 a. 35.
Sub. (2) (b) does not set a standard for civil liability, and a violation of sub. (2) (b) does not constitute negligence per se. Logarto v. Gustafson, 998 F. Supp. 998(1998).

Same with curfew. I think that as well as allowing an illegally armed 17 yr old in are reasonable questions to ask and all you have is a partisan political response?

The streets were filled with anarchy and mayhem thanks to bedwetting liberal democrat mayors

Rittenhouse was only one small part of the insanity

True. But he is tbe one that killed two people and wounded another. That rather elevates it.

I think you are very confused. The law says "Shall not be infringed".

He was using the 2A EXACTLY for the purpose it was intended. If you think that's not going to come up in the trial, you are wrong.

By the way, have you not found any laws the rioters have broken? Is it only the guy who shot a pedophile that is in the wrong?

You xan argue 2A, but it is irrelevant. Wisconsin law says otherwise and age restrictions have long been upheld.

You realize your argument would allow toddlers to posess abd use fire arms right?

Toddlers can use firearms for self defense. And if they could not, that's the type of utter leftist insanity that we don't need again. Shoot the pedophile home-invaders that you defend.

I already presented the clip of two lawyers discussing this. They don't agree.

But a better question is, why are you spending so much time going after this hero, when there are dozens and dozens of murders by the rioters still lacking even prosecution. Why are you on the camp of Satan?

He is not a hero. Killing people does not make one a hero. he was in a situation he should not have been in and illegally armed. Had he not been there none of this would have happened. He was saving no lives. He only made the situation a lot worse.

The question you shouldbe asking is why are so many armed people (left and right) appearing at protests?

I think gunrights extremists as nuts as any other extremists and we need some sanity.

Why?

How many thousands more do you need?

You have gone batshit crazy. I never would have believed that you could be so divorced from reality.

So which of those people are tbe three in question? There were legitim a te protestors thete as well.

No there weren't. The legit protesters left when it got dark. Then the scumbags came in and began burning the place down. Here's the deal. I know this is a hard concept for you to take but this is reality, if you as a protester stay around when the rioters begin burning the place down, you are now one of them. You are no longer a legit protester you are now one of the mob. You may not be actively burning, but you are not condemning the actions either. That makes you complicit. Complicit IS support.

 

[westwall]

The question you shouldbe asking is why are so many armed people (left and right) appearing at protests?

Thats a good question

and the answer is because the liberal democrat mayors of blue cities are not allowing the police to do their duty

so show me specifically what the Kenosha mayor that prevented the police from doing their job?

The dumbshit didn't ask for help. That's what. He instead allowed an army of protesters, and an even bigger army of assholes, (many from OREGON!) to descend upon his city and then he refused to ask for help. Duh.

 

[otto105]

But he is tbe [sic] one that killed two people and wounded another. That rather elevates it.

He did not kill nor wound any people. He killed two and wounded one, subhuman criminal pieces of shit.

Kyle from Antoich is a murderer.

Why do you support criminala?

show us where he was convicted of murder,,,

give it time

you said he was a murderer,,,so show us where he was convicted of murder or shut up,,,

kyle from Antoich will be convicted of murder (twice) once for attempted murder, illegal possession of a deadly weapon and by public opinion of being a white racist Asshole.

White guy shoots 3 other white guys..... and this makes him a racist?

Logic and you should meet sometime, maybe get know each other, because you're clearly strangers now.

bangoolo boi wasn’t there because white people were protesting in Kenosha.

 

[westwall]

But he is tbe [sic] one that killed two people and wounded another. That rather elevates it.

He did not kill nor wound any people. He killed two and wounded one, subhuman criminal pieces of shit.

Kyle from Antoich is a murderer.

Why do you support criminala?

show us where he was convicted of murder,,,

give it time

you said he was a murderer,,,so show us where he was convicted of murder or shut up,,,

kyle from Antoich will be convicted of murder (twice) once for attempted murder, illegal possession of a deadly weapon and by public opinion of being a white racist Asshole.

White guy shoots 3 other white guys..... and this makes him a racist?

Logic and you should meet sometime, maybe get know each other, because you're clearly strangers now.

bangoolo boi wasn’t there because white people were protesting in Kenosha.

boogaloo bois are LEFTISTS you idiot. They fucking marched with BLM you halfwit.

 

[otto105]

But he is tbe [sic] one that killed two people and wounded another. That rather elevates it.

He did not kill nor wound any people. He killed two and wounded one, subhuman criminal pieces of shit.

Kyle from Antoich is a murderer.

Why do you support criminala?

show us where he was convicted of murder,,,

give it time

you said he was a murderer,,,so show us where he was convicted of murder or shut up,,,

kyle from Antoich will be convicted of murder (twice) once for attempted murder, illegal possession of a deadly weapon and by public opinion of being a white racist Asshole.

White guy shoots 3 other white guys..... and this makes him a racist?

Logic and you should meet sometime, maybe get know each other, because you're clearly strangers now.

bangoolo boi wasn’t there because white people were protesting in Kenosha.

boogaloo bois are LEFTISTS you idiot. They fucking marched with BLM you halfwit.

Yeah sure boololio boi.

 

[westwall]

But he is tbe [sic] one that killed two people and wounded another. That rather elevates it.

He did not kill nor wound any people. He killed two and wounded one, subhuman criminal pieces of shit.

Kyle from Antoich is a murderer.

Why do you support criminala?

show us where he was convicted of murder,,,

give it time

you said he was a murderer,,,so show us where he was convicted of murder or shut up,,,

kyle from Antoich will be convicted of murder (twice) once for attempted murder, illegal possession of a deadly weapon and by public opinion of being a white racist Asshole.

White guy shoots 3 other white guys..... and this makes him a racist?

Logic and you should meet sometime, maybe get know each other, because you're clearly strangers now.

bangoolo boi wasn’t there because white people were protesting in Kenosha.

boogaloo bois are LEFTISTS you idiot. They fucking marched with BLM you halfwit.

Yeah sure boololio boi.

Yeah, sure pootin stooge...

Lemp, a New Hampshire resident and adherent of the Boogaloo movement, did not give his real name but instead used the name of Duncan Lemp, 21-year-old Maryland man killed by police during a March incident. Police said Lemp confronted officers when they executed a search warrant at his parent’s home, his family however have said Lemp was sleeping. Lemp’s death has inspired many in the Boogaloo movement and members often use his name. According to news reports about his death, Lemp associated himself with the 3 Percenters, described by some as a far-right paramilitary militia group, although the Boogaloo denounce this characterization on its website.

Who are those gun-toting dudes in Hawaiian shirts at protests? Depends on who you ask | Manchester Ink Link

Men associating themselves with the movement have been making news as the country has erupted into protests over the Minneapolis police killing of George Floyd, and African American with arrests of armed Boogaloo adherents in Las Vegas and in Colorado in recent days. Boogaloo Bois, as they are...

manchesterinklink.com

 

[conserveguy877]

But he is tbe [sic] one that killed two people and wounded another. That rather elevates it.

He did not kill nor wound any people. He killed two and wounded one, subhuman criminal pieces of shit.

Kyle from Antoich is a murderer.

Why do you support criminala?

show us where he was convicted of murder,,,

give it time

you said he was a murderer,,,so show us where he was convicted of murder or shut up,,,

kyle from Antoich will be convicted of murder (twice) once for attempted murder, illegal possession of a deadly weapon and by public opinion of being a white racist Asshole.

White guy shoots 3 other white guys..... and this makes him a racist?

Logic and you should meet sometime, maybe get know each other, because you're clearly strangers now.

bangoolo boi wasn’t there because white people were protesting in Kenosha.

boogaloo bois are LEFTISTS you idiot. They fucking marched with BLM you halfwit.

 

[Coyote]

so show me specifically what the Kenosha mayor that prevented the police from doing their job?

If the police had been allowed to do their job, then the looters, rioters, and other related subhuman pieces of shit would have been thrown in jail.

What did the mayor to prevent them from doing their job?

 

[lantern2814]

KEEP RIGHT ON LYING you deceitful HAG. 16 and 17 are exempt in all cases if it is a Long rifle or shotgun.

You really are an asshole.

You linked to a wikipedia article, which interestingly was updated after this shooting.

I posted a link to the actual laws.

Your article cited two sections in support.

29.304  Restrictions on hunting and use of firearms by persons under 16 years of age.
Here is the actual law: Wisconsin Legislature: 29.304

This appears to relate to HUNTING and firearms.

941.28  Possession of short-barreled shotgun or short-barreled rifle

Here is the link.

Wisconsin Legislature: 941.28

docs.legis.wisconsin.gov

This doesnt seem particularly relevant.

Here is the link for possession of fire arms by minors.

Wisconsin Legislature: 948.55

docs.legis.wisconsin.gov

3a,b, and c state who this section does not apply to. None of those would seem to apply to Kyle.

Rittenhouse WAS charged with possession of a dangerous weapon while under 18.

I am not a lawyer. I doubt you are either.

No, the only asshole here is YOU. Denying reality and denigrating a young man who defended himself from a pedo and a domestic abuser among others who have stated they wanted to kill him. He did what your Dim mayors and governors WON’T do. Protect property and businesses from rioters.