NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
Anyone else notice the idiocy of saying that government assistance to the poor is a bad thing, because it supposedly makes them lazy and dependent, blah blah blah,
and the same people turn around and advocate charity?
If I'm a poor person, and the government is feeding me, for example, or a charity is doing it,
what the fuck's the difference?
There is a big difference. You're a lib so you can't see it. Charitiy is given voluntarily. The government gets its money by seizing it. No charity can tell you "pay us or we'll put you in jail and take everything you have".
You can decide that the chairity you support isn't spending your money wisely and refuse to donate more. You don't get that choice with the government. Private charities are subject to oversight, the government is not.
You're another retard who can't read.