LoneLaugher
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #101
Trump is rightRepublican president and suddenly the liberals want to ignore the U3. We don't change the rules when the outcome is favorable to your opposition. If the numbers look "worse" for liberals, it's because there are more jobs than can be filled.
A) I am neither Dem nor Rep. I was knocking the numbers under Obama as well.
B) Trump himself has called the U-3 a 'Hoax' several times (rightly).
C) The U-3 is based on the Household Survey...and that only went up 3,000 last month.
So if you support the U-3 (against Trump's own advice), then you have to accept that only 3,000 jobs were created last month in the Household Survey.
The '164,000' number has NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with the unemployment rate.
My guess is that you have little idea what you are talking about on this and just get all bent out of shape when someone knocks fed numbers while Trump is in power...like Trumpbots do.
Obamabots did the same thing when he was in the WH.
The real unemployment rate is 52 percent
I do not know what it really is. But Trump IS right that the U-3 is a hoax. It is a ridiculous joke.
It isn’t a hoax. It is a formula. It provides the reader with data based on a set of criteria.
If the U3 rate was 10% five years ago and it is 5% today, we can infer that the employment situation has improved.
You may find the criteria used to be lacking. That’s fine. But the U3 serves as a data point just fine.
It serves as a data point to you just fine.
But as a measurement of unemployment...it is a joke. Plus, it makes everything seem MUCH better than it really is. Which is EXACTLY why Congress agreed to change it back in the 1990's. The employment-population ratio is a FAR better barometer.
Even the Fed has stopped using it as THE metric for employment.
You seem upset. As long as the formula used remains constant, good info can be gleaned from the data.