Unequal distribution of wealth

[mudwhistle]

Spoony, I'm richer than you are.

Wanna bet?

oooh ooh ooh I love this one.

Do you deserve your wealth? Liberalism says no.

That's a lie. They believe we all deserve wealth as long as it's spread equally.

Now if you're talking being rich...then you're more on track....but it seems that many libs are rich as fuck so they're a bunch of hypocrites.

What libs seem to have a problem with these days is the American dream. The thought that you can become rich on your own. Well that's just plain wrong to them. Course because they think that way they're really anti-business thus against job creation thus now in danger of becoming extinct.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Let children, the elderly, injured veterans, and the inform starve! No more socialism!

The problem is that they are not living "high on the hog" and want to live "higher" on the hog which "redistribution of wealth" implies.

Yep. Living on the sweat equity of someone else.

yeah, the sweat equity of trust funds, corporate profits, accumulation of wealth through financial instruments like the ones that brought the world economies to their knees?

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

It would seem to me as if many had very good years during that time making money. Why should it be taxed away from them to support those who didn't do as well?

How come the rich should get a bigger share of the pie than those who are poorer?

You get what you pay for? Where did you grow up, that you don't know that?

If you believe that you must be suffering mental illness. You get what you pay for? where and when?

 

[Intense]

The problem is that they are not living "high on the hog" and want to live "higher" on the hog which "redistribution of wealth" implies.

Yep. Living on the sweat equity of someone else.

yeah, the sweat equity of trust funds, corporate profits, accumulation of wealth through financial instruments like the ones that brought the world economies to their knees?

It is what it is, man. Who are we as a society to label it an accident of birth, and try to hijack it.

 

[The T]

The problem is that they are not living "high on the hog" and want to live "higher" on the hog which "redistribution of wealth" implies.

Yep. Living on the sweat equity of someone else.

yeah, the sweat equity of trust funds, corporate profits, accumulation of wealth through financial instruments like the ones that brought the world economies to their knees?

So in effect *YOU* are saying it's OK for the moochers are quite within their rights to anything they didn't work for?

YOU are an idiot Dantoid. And your example is off topic and obfuscation.

Nice try...

 

[mudwhistle]

The problem is that they are not living "high on the hog" and want to live "higher" on the hog which "redistribution of wealth" implies.

Yep. Living on the sweat equity of someone else.

yeah, the sweat equity of trust funds, corporate profits, accumulation of wealth through financial instruments like the ones that brought the world economies to their knees?

Like George Soros does.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Yep. Living on the sweat equity of someone else.

yeah, the sweat equity of trust funds, corporate profits, accumulation of wealth through financial instruments like the ones that brought the world economies to their knees?

So in effect *YOU* are saying it's OK for the moochers are quite within their rights to anything they didn't work for?

YOU are an idiot Dantoid. And your example is off topic and obfuscation.

Nice try...

If you had three brain cells to rub together the Discovery channel would be knocking down your door.

go away

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Yep. Living on the sweat equity of someone else.

yeah, the sweat equity of trust funds, corporate profits, accumulation of wealth through financial instruments like the ones that brought the world economies to their knees?

It is what it is, man. Who are we as a society to label it an accident of birth, and try to hijack it.

Most all philosophy has debated this. Read what the founding fathers read about societal obligations. Equality and fairness were major themes then and are now. A society without either is bound to collapse sooner than later.

 

[The T]

yeah, the sweat equity of trust funds, corporate profits, accumulation of wealth through financial instruments like the ones that brought the world economies to their knees?

So in effect *YOU* are saying it's OK for the moochers are quite within their rights to anything they didn't work for?

YOU are an idiot Dantoid. And your example is off topic and obfuscation.

Nice try...

If you had three brain cells to rub together the Discovery channel would be knocking down your door.

go away

More obfuscation. I am NOT the subject. Nice try again.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Yep. Living on the sweat equity of someone else.

yeah, the sweat equity of trust funds, corporate profits, accumulation of wealth through financial instruments like the ones that brought the world economies to their knees?

Like George Soros does.

your boogey man fears are childish, go away

 

[syrenn]

The problem is that they are not living "high on the hog" and want to live "higher" on the hog which "redistribution of wealth" implies.

Yep. Living on the sweat equity of someone else.

yeah, the sweat equity of trust funds, corporate profits, accumulation of wealth through financial instruments like the ones that brought the world economies to their knees?

Not ALL wealthy get their wealth like that.

 

[The T]

Yep. Living on the sweat equity of someone else.

yeah, the sweat equity of trust funds, corporate profits, accumulation of wealth through financial instruments like the ones that brought the world economies to their knees?

Like George Soros does.

This is more the case. Good From, Sir.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

So in effect *YOU* are saying it's OK for the moochers are quite within their rights to anything they didn't work for?

YOU are an idiot Dantoid. And your example is off topic and obfuscation.

Nice try...

If you had three brain cells to rub together the Discovery channel would be knocking down your door.

go away

More obfuscation. I am NOT the subject. Nice try again.

no you're not. stop thinking you are.

you're a lowly troll, and a poor one at that.

go away

 

[The T]

If you had three brain cells to rub together the Discovery channel would be knocking down your door.

go away

More obfuscation. I am NOT the subject. Nice try again.

no you're not. stop thinking you are.

you're a lowly troll, and a poor one at that.

go away

Then cease referring to me. See? That was easy moron.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Yep. Living on the sweat equity of someone else.

yeah, the sweat equity of trust funds, corporate profits, accumulation of wealth through financial instruments like the ones that brought the world economies to their knees?

Not ALL wealthy get their wealth like that.

that's why a few thousand people have kept the 'death tax' alive as an issue, eh?

Wealth is a relative term. But there is earned income and then there is other income.

 

[syrenn]

How come the rich should get a bigger share of the pie than those who are poorer?

You get what you pay for? Where did you grow up, that you don't know that?

If you believe that you must be suffering mental illness. You get what you pay for? where and when?

Please dont forget all about the people who get and don't pay a cent for anything or work for anything.

 

[The T]

yeah, the sweat equity of trust funds, corporate profits, accumulation of wealth through financial instruments like the ones that brought the world economies to their knees?

Not ALL wealthy get their wealth like that.

that's why a few thousand people have kept the 'death tax' alive as an issue, eh?

Wealth is a relative term. But there is earned income and then there is other income.

It is kept alive because the Government has become greedy that they strip wealth that has already been taxed and wealth that doesn't belong to them in order to give to moochers of society.

The Government has become vultures in this regard...and that doesn't bother you?

 

[shintao]

It would seem to me as if many had very good years during that time making money. Why should it be taxed away from them to support those who didn't do as well?

How come the rich should get a bigger share of the pie than those who are poorer?

You get what you pay for? Where did you grow up, that you don't know that?

So if you make bigger campaign contributions you get more? I grew up out West, where did you grow up?

 

[The T]

You get what you pay for? Where did you grow up, that you don't know that?

If you believe that you must be suffering mental illness. You get what you pay for? where and when?

Please dont forget all about the people who get and don't pay a cent for anything or work for anything.

Exactly. They think they are entitled just because they are born here.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

You get what you pay for? Where did you grow up, that you don't know that?

If you believe that you must be suffering mental illness. You get what you pay for? where and when?

Please dont forget all about the people who get and don't pay a cent for anything or work for anything.

and if we cut all the programs they get monies from you'd save a dollar or two at most. but seriously, all the people who do not work? have a number/percentage? number of people who pay nothing? I guess they don't pay sales taxes or state fees either?

everyone pays something, even the illegals. cherry picking should be beneath you.