Unsealed FISA court ruling shows 85% of Obama's FBI and DOJ 704-5 FISA searches were illegal prov...

[depotoo]

Actually it does cover the time period if you read my link to the document she opened this topic on. If she opened another claiming this is the memo, you are correct, this document is not.

This is evidence of abuses going on for quite some time. And which occurred within the same time of the fisa’s acquired within the memo.
If you don’t think this is important, just because of the date, just because it isn’t directly related to the memo, what can I say?

See post #16

A lot of sources reported on it last year....my article is from May 2017

But the whole review of the situation was all under the Obama administration....meaning, they had a review of, themselves....

it was not the Trump admin, or Nunes etc that forced this review by the FISA judge....they were nowhere around at the time....

And the review was for a 5 year period.

Yup. MW has egg all over his face. Which is why he's now spamming irrelevant documents.

Just last week he informed us that Alex Jones was releasing the secret 4 page 'Nunes memo' on the Infowars website. What was actually released was this exact 99 page court ruling from April of last year that was public.

The only part of "The Secret Memo" that MW got right.....was "The"

Again, this court ruling was released in April of 2017. It is neither the Nunes Memo nor is it secret. But instead a public court document that was discussed extensively in the media last year.

It is not the same time period. The time period in question is 2015. It has absolutely nothing to do with the Nunes Memo.

MW fraudulently claimed this 99 public court ruling from last year WAS the 4 page secret Nunes memo.

 

[Skylar]

Actually it does cover the time period if you read my link to the document she opened this topic on. If she opened another claiming this is the memo, you are correct, this document is not.

This is evidence of abuses going on for quite some time. And which occurred within the same time of the fisa’s acquired within the memo.
If you don’t think this is important, just because of the date, just because it isn’t directly related to the memo, what can I say?

See post #16

Yup. MW has egg all over his face. Which is why he's now spamming irrelevant documents.

Just last week he informed us that Alex Jones was releasing the secret 4 page 'Nunes memo' on the Infowars website. What was actually released was this exact 99 page court ruling from April of last year that was public.

The only part of "The Secret Memo" that MW got right.....was "The"

Again, this court ruling was released in April of 2017. It is neither the Nunes Memo nor is it secret. But instead a public court document that was discussed extensively in the media last year.

It is not the same time period. The time period in question is 2015. It has absolutely nothing to do with the Nunes Memo.

MW fraudulently claimed this 99 public court ruling from last year WAS the 4 page secret Nunes memo.

Your citations of the 99 page court ruling is on page 69. Your citations are part of a section called "Resolutions of Issues addressed in the November 6th, 2015 opinion", beginning on page 68.

The era in question is at least before November 6th 2015. It related specifically to the accessing of databases by the NSA. Not 'wire taps'.

There is absolutely nothing to do with the Nunes memo here. Despite that MW has fraudulent claimed that this 99 page court ruling from last year IS the secret 4 page Nunes memo.

Rendering MW either hopelessly ignorant. Or a liar.

 

[depotoo]

My citations are not the only ones within that 99 page document. The ones I cited were regarding the article title she posted. Read it. Find out for yourself what all it covers, by reading it.

Actually it does cover the time period if you read my link to the document she opened this topic on. If she opened another claiming this is the memo, you are correct, this document is not.

This is evidence of abuses going on for quite some time. And which occurred within the same time of the fisa’s acquired within the memo.
If you don’t think this is important, just because of the date, just because it isn’t directly related to the memo, what can I say?

See post #16

Again, this court ruling was released in April of 2017. It is neither the Nunes Memo nor is it secret. But instead a public court document that was discussed extensively in the media last year.

It is not the same time period. The time period in question is 2015. It has absolutely nothing to do with the Nunes Memo.

MW fraudulently claimed this 99 public court ruling from last year WAS the 4 page secret Nunes memo.

Your citations of the 99 page court ruling is on page 69. Your citations are part of a section called "Resolutions of Issues addressed in the November 6th, 2015 opinion", beginning on page 68.

The era in question is at least before November 6th 2015. It related specifically to the accessing of databases by the NSA. Not 'wire taps'.

There is absolutely nothing to do with the Nunes memo here. Despite that MW has fraudulent claimed that this 99 page court ruling from last year IS the secret 4 page Nunes memo.

Rendering MW either hopelessly ignorant. Or a liar.

 

[Skylar]

My citations are not the only ones within that 99 page document. The ones I cited were regarding the article title she posted. Read it. Find out for yourself what all it covers, by reading it.

Actually it does cover the time period if you read my link to the document she opened this topic on. If she opened another claiming this is the memo, you are correct, this document is not.

This is evidence of abuses going on for quite some time. And which occurred within the same time of the fisa’s acquired within the memo.
If you don’t think this is important, just because of the date, just because it isn’t directly related to the memo, what can I say?

Again, this court ruling was released in April of 2017. It is neither the Nunes Memo nor is it secret. But instead a public court document that was discussed extensively in the media last year.

It is not the same time period. The time period in question is 2015. It has absolutely nothing to do with the Nunes Memo.

MW fraudulently claimed this 99 public court ruling from last year WAS the 4 page secret Nunes memo.

Your citations of the 99 page court ruling is on page 69. Your citations are part of a section called "Resolutions of Issues addressed in the November 6th, 2015 opinion", beginning on page 68.

The era in question is at least before November 6th 2015. It related specifically to the accessing of databases by the NSA. Not 'wire taps'.

There is absolutely nothing to do with the Nunes memo here. Despite that MW has fraudulent claimed that this 99 page court ruling from last year IS the secret 4 page Nunes memo.

Rendering MW either hopelessly ignorant. Or a liar.

The pages you cited specifically referenced actions before November 6th, 2015.

Nothing about this court ruling has a thing to do with the Nunes Memo. MW's claims are fraudulent.

 

[Care4all]

This is evidence of abuses going on for quite some time. And which occurred within the same time of the fisa’s acquired within the memo.
If you don’t think this is important, just because of the date, just because it isn’t directly related to the memo, what can I say?

See post #16

A lot of sources reported on it last year....my article is from May 2017

But the whole review of the situation was all under the Obama administration....meaning, they had a review of, themselves....

it was not the Trump admin, or Nunes etc that forced this review by the FISA judge....they were nowhere around at the time....

And the review was for a 5 year period.

Yup. MW has egg all over his face. Which is why he's now spamming irrelevant documents.

Just last week he informed us that Alex Jones was releasing the secret 4 page 'Nunes memo' on the Infowars website. What was actually released was this exact 99 page court ruling from April of last year that was public.

The only part of "The Secret Memo" that MW got right.....was "The"

Again, this court ruling was released in April of 2017. It is neither the Nunes Memo nor is it secret. But instead a public court document that was discussed extensively in the media last year.

It is not the same time period. The time period in question is 2015. It has absolutely nothing to do with the Nunes Memo.

MW fraudulently claimed this 99 public court ruling from last year WAS the 4 page secret Nunes memo.

you are correct, except I don't believe it was a hearing in the public, I believe the 99 page document that went to the public, was a top secret leaked review....don't know who leaked it???

unless I am mistaken?

 

[Baz Ares]

Unsealed FISA Court Ruling Shows 85% of Obama’s FBI and DOJ 704-5 FISA Searches Were Illegal and Illegally Provided to Government Outsiders - Tea Party News
(Gateway Pundit) – A Report was released in April of 2017 that received no publicity until recently.

The report was a ruling on the results of an investigation or audit into FISA searches made by Obama’s FBI and DOJ during Obama’s time in office.

The report shows Obama’s FBI and DOJ participated in widespread criminal searches and criminal sharing of data with non authorized entities outside of government.

View attachment 174224
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It would be a day to celebrate if we could actually put this pos most hated President in history behind bars. We know that won't happen though because everyone up in the Elite league don't get sentenced , prosecuted they area all related they all run the show so they always cover up for each other.

But oh if you or I did even one thing these losers have done we would be looking at the death pentality.

Why Chelsea Manning was Obama's pawn they didn't just let her go for the hell of it.

Keep trying to show Pres. Obama is the most hated President. LOL!

But 65% of this nations is thinking, where the Great Douche will land.
1st or 2nd place?

 

[Skylar]

This is evidence of abuses going on for quite some time. And which occurred within the same time of the fisa’s acquired within the memo.
If you don’t think this is important, just because of the date, just because it isn’t directly related to the memo, what can I say?

See post #16

Yup. MW has egg all over his face. Which is why he's now spamming irrelevant documents.

Just last week he informed us that Alex Jones was releasing the secret 4 page 'Nunes memo' on the Infowars website. What was actually released was this exact 99 page court ruling from April of last year that was public.

The only part of "The Secret Memo" that MW got right.....was "The"

Again, this court ruling was released in April of 2017. It is neither the Nunes Memo nor is it secret. But instead a public court document that was discussed extensively in the media last year.

It is not the same time period. The time period in question is 2015. It has absolutely nothing to do with the Nunes Memo.

MW fraudulently claimed this 99 public court ruling from last year WAS the 4 page secret Nunes memo.

you are correct, except I don't believe it was a hearing in the public, I believe the 99 page document that went to the public, was a top secret leaked review....don't know who leaked it???

unless I am mistaken?

I don't know what it was leaked. No article I've read indicated as much. And its downloadable from a government website

 

[Baz Ares]

The dirt is coming out on this POS loser....

View attachment 174227

Former Secret Service Agent: FISA Memo will Implicate Obama!

Did you put on your AJ Lizard mask before or after this post?



The fraud is a well known fabricator of Fake baseless spews, aka: Alt-FACTS pure lies.

 

[koshergrl]

Unsealed FISA Court Ruling Shows 85% of Obama’s FBI and DOJ 704-5 FISA Searches Were Illegal and Illegally Provided to Government Outsiders - Tea Party News
(Gateway Pundit) – A Report was released in April of 2017 that received no publicity until recently.

The report was a ruling on the results of an investigation or audit into FISA searches made by Obama’s FBI and DOJ during Obama’s time in office.

The report shows Obama’s FBI and DOJ participated in widespread criminal searches and criminal sharing of data with non authorized entities outside of government.

View attachment 174224
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It would be a day to celebrate if we could actually put this pos most hated President in history behind bars. We know that won't happen though because everyone up in the Elite league don't get sentenced , prosecuted they area all related they all run the show so they always cover up for each other.

But oh if you or I did even one thing these losers have done we would be looking at the death pentality.

Why Chelsea Manning was Obama's pawn they didn't just let her go for the hell of it.

The FBI is a criminal organization. It always has been.

 

[MindWars]

Unsealed FISA Court Ruling Shows 85% of Obama’s FBI and DOJ 704-5 FISA Searches Were Illegal and Illegally Provided to Government Outsiders - Tea Party News
(Gateway Pundit) – A Report was released in April of 2017 that received no publicity until recently.

The report was a ruling on the results of an investigation or audit into FISA searches made by Obama’s FBI and DOJ during Obama’s time in office.

The report shows Obama’s FBI and DOJ participated in widespread criminal searches and criminal sharing of data with non authorized entities outside of government.

View attachment 174224
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It would be a day to celebrate if we could actually put this pos most hated President in history behind bars. We know that won't happen though because everyone up in the Elite league don't get sentenced , prosecuted they area all related they all run the show so they always cover up for each other.

But oh if you or I did even one thing these losers have done we would be looking at the death pentality.

Why Chelsea Manning was Obama's pawn they didn't just let her go for the hell of it.

The FBI is a criminal organization. It always has been.

It is and isn't there are a " few good ones left" . who see what is going on esp. with Obama and the deep state, some are on the inside leaking this information on purpose because they know what the NWO IS ABOUT and they see it unfolding. So to destroy it they must leak the truth. That's one reason these Demorats are getting nervous. That train wreck was a message for the leakers to stop while ahead etc. ..

No matter what truths come out though the leftist pricks are on it to create propaganda news so the sheep bite it etc...

 

[Skylar]

Unsealed FISA Court Ruling Shows 85% of Obama’s FBI and DOJ 704-5 FISA Searches Were Illegal and Illegally Provided to Government Outsiders - Tea Party News
(Gateway Pundit) – A Report was released in April of 2017 that received no publicity until recently.

The report was a ruling on the results of an investigation or audit into FISA searches made by Obama’s FBI and DOJ during Obama’s time in office.

The report shows Obama’s FBI and DOJ participated in widespread criminal searches and criminal sharing of data with non authorized entities outside of government.

View attachment 174224
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It would be a day to celebrate if we could actually put this pos most hated President in history behind bars. We know that won't happen though because everyone up in the Elite league don't get sentenced , prosecuted they area all related they all run the show so they always cover up for each other.

But oh if you or I did even one thing these losers have done we would be looking at the death pentality.

Why Chelsea Manning was Obama's pawn they didn't just let her go for the hell of it.

The FBI is a criminal organization. It always has been.

It is and isn't there are a " few good ones left" . who see what is going on esp. with Obama and the deep state, some are on the inside leaking this information on purpose because they know what the NWO IS ABOUT and they see it unfolding. So to destroy it they must leak the truth. That's one reason these Demorats are getting nervous. That train wreck was a message for the leakers to stop while ahead etc. ..

No matter what truths come out though the leftist pricks are on it to create propaganda news so the sheep bite it etc...

The 'New World Order'? The conspiracy rorschach test that tin foil aficionados everywhere project their fantasies upon?

 

[Skylar]

And the other shoe dropped.......Nunes won't answer when asked if he coordinated with the White House on the memo.

Devin Nunes Won’t Say If He Worked With White House on Anti-FBI Memo

 

[MindWars]

The dirt is coming out on this POS loser....

View attachment 174227

Former Secret Service Agent: FISA Memo will Implicate Obama!

Did you put on your AJ Lizard mask before or after this post?



The fraud is a well known fabricator of Fake baseless spews, aka: Alt-FACTS pure lies.

Why look how well they teach their kids typical leftist ......t

 

[JimBowie1958]

I wouldn't be surprised if this was true, but I need a better link.

Any of these fly for ya?

The Uncovering – Section 702 “About” Queries, Independent...

Understanding FISA-702(16)(17) And How It Was Used in 2016….

How The FBI and DOJ Intelligence Units Were Weaponized Around Congressional Oversight…

These kinds of sites are our only reliable objective media these days.

 

[JimBowie1958]

And the other shoe dropped.......Nunes won't answer when asked if he coordinated with the White House on the memo.

Devin Nunes Won’t Say If He Worked With White House on Anti-FBI Memo

He MUST coordinate with the White House, you blithering fool.

 

[JimBowie1958]

THIS explains more....! Plus, there is a link to the original FISA ruling top secret leaked document is in the article...


National
Secret court rebukes NSA for 5-year illegal surveillance of U.S. citizens
By Tim Johnson

[email protected]

May 26, 2017 06:37 PM

Updated May 26, 2017 05:37 PM

WASHINGTON
U.S. intelligence agencies conducted illegal surveillance on American citizens over a five-year period, a practice that earned them a sharp rebuke from a secret court that called the matter a “very serious” constitutional issue.

The criticism is in a lengthy secret ruling that lays bare some of the frictions between the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court and U.S. intelligence agencies obligated to obtain the court’s approval for surveillance activities.

The ruling, dated April 26 and bearing the label “top secret,” was obtained and published Thursday by the news site Circa.

It is rare that such rulings see the light of day, and the lengthy unraveling of issues in the 99-page document opens a window on how the secret federal court oversees surveillance activities and seeks to curtail those that it deems overstep legal authority.

The document, signed by Judge Rosemary M. Collyer, said the court had learned in a notice filed Oct. 26, 2016, that National Security Agency analysts had been conducting prohibited queries of databases “with much greater frequency than had previously been disclosed to the court.”

It said a judge chastised the NSA’s inspector general and Office of Compliance for Operations for an “institutional ‘lack of candor’ ” for failing to inform the court. It described the matter as “a very serious Fourth Amendment issue.”

The Fourth Amendment protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government, and is a constitutional bedrock protection against intrusion.

Parts of the ruling were redacted, including sections that give an indication of the extent of the illegal surveillance, which the NSA told the court in a Jan. 3 notice was partly the fault of “human error” and “system design issues” rather than intentional illegal searches.

The NSA inspector general’s office tallied up the number of prohibited searches conducted in a three-month period in 2015, but the number of analysts who made the searches and the number of queries were blacked out in the ruling.

The NSA gathers communications in ways known as “upstream” and “downstream” collection. Upstream collection occurs when data are captured as they move through massive data highways – the internet backbone – within the United States. Downstream collection occurs as data move outside the country along fiber optic cables and satellite links.

Data captured from both upstream and downstream sources are stored in massive databases, available to be searched when analysts need to, often months or as much as two years after the captures took place.

The prohibited searches the court mentioned involved NSA queries into the upstream databanks, which constitute a fraction of all the data NSA captures around the globe but are more likely to contain the emails and phone calls of people in the United States.

Federal law empowers the NSA and CIA to battle foreign terrorist actions against the United States by collecting the electronic communications of targets believed to be outside the country. While communications of U.S. citizens or residents may get hoovered up in such sweeps, they are considered “incidental” and must be “minimized” – removing the identities of Americans – before broader distribution.

The court filing noted an NSA decision March 30 to narrow collection of “upstream” data within the United States. Under that decision, the NSA acknowledged that it had erred in sweeping up the communications of U.S. citizens or residents but said those errors “were not willful.” Even so, the NSA said it would no longer collect certain kinds of data known as “about” communications, in which a U.S. citizen was merely mentioned.

The NSA announced that change publicly on April 28, two days after the court ruling, saying the agency would limit its sweeps to communications either directly to or from a foreign intelligence target. That change would reduce “the likelihood that NSA will acquire communications of U.S. persons or others who are not in direct contact with one of the agency’s foreign intelligence targets.”

The court document also criticized the FBI’s distribution of intelligence data, saying it had disclosed raw surveillance data to sectors of its bureaucracy “largely staffed by private contractors.”

The “contractors had access to raw FISA information that went well beyond what was necessary to respond to the FBI’s requests,” it said, adding that the bureau discontinued the practice on April 18, 2016.


Read more here: Secret court rebukes NSA for 5-year illegal surveillance of U.S. citizens

McClatchy reported this last year.

It is still relevant, dude.

 

[JimBowie1958]

This is evidence of abuses going on for quite some time. And which occurred within the same time of the fisa’s acquired within the memo.
If you don’t think this is important, just because of the date, just because it isn’t directly related to the memo, what can I say?

See post #16

A lot of sources reported on it last year....my article is from May 2017

But the whole review of the situation was all under the Obama administration....meaning, they had a review of, themselves....

it was not the Trump admin, or Nunes etc that forced this review by the FISA judge....they were nowhere around at the time....

And the review was for a 5 year period.

Yup. MW has egg all over his face. Which is why he's now spamming irrelevant documents.

Just last week he informed us that Alex Jones was releasing the secret 4 page 'Nunes memo' on the Infowars website. What was actually released was this exact 99 page court ruling from April of last year that was public.

The only part of "The Secret Memo" that MW got right.....was "The"

Again, this court ruling was released in April of 2017. It is neither the Nunes Memo nor is it secret. But instead a public court document that was discussed extensively in the media last year.

It is not the same time period. The time period in question is 2015. It has absolutely nothing to do with the Nunes Memo.

MW fraudulently claimed this 99 public court ruling from last year WAS the 4 page secret Nunes memo.

It is the epitome of how the Obama regime abused the FISA warrants, jack ass.

Good God, grow a fucking brain why dont ya?

 

[JimBowie1958]

The era in question is at least before November 6th 2015. It related specifically to the accessing of databases by the NSA. Not 'wire taps'..

Semantic horse shit out of your pie hole is an expected thing if you can do that to protect your fellow Dimocrat Nazis.

 

[Skylar]

The era in question is at least before November 6th 2015. It related specifically to the accessing of databases by the NSA. Not 'wire taps'..

Semantic horse shit out of your pie hole is an expected thing if you can do that to protect your fellow Dimocrat Nazis.

You're not following the conversation. MW said that the 99 page court ruling was the secret 4 page Nunes Memo.

It isn't. The dates are wrong, the size is wrong, the subject matter is wrong, its a court ruling and not a memo, its 99 pages not 4, and its a public document.....not a 'secret memo'.

I'm assuming its the afternoon and the morning pain meds aren't doing the trick. Which tends to make you cranky. Take your early evening boosters, come on back and read the actual discussion.

 

[HenryBHough]

I'm Shocked I Tell You!

Absofuckingloutely SHOCKED!

ONLY 85%?????

Get real........