Rigby5
Diamond Member
That would be true if the person was never in the persons home, but swore under penalty of perjury that they were in the persons home, and saw the person in possession of the illegal objects in question.
But that is clearly not the case here. Somebody who had access to Trumps boxes, swore an affidavit to their contents.
The person would have had to prove he had access as part of affidavit validation. And finding the items he swore to, proves he was truthful about that part of the affidavit too.
Affidavit verified. Warrant verified. Search verified.
Wrong.
Nothing has been verified.
We do not yet know if all 15 boxes were personal or not?
Nor have we seen the warrant or affidavit, so have no way or knowing validity or not.