Update on Waffle house shooting over no smoking request…yep, a gun free zone, and he had a record.

[ClosedCaption]

Biloxi Waffle House server killed over a cigarette 'was so friendly'

So, like, we're ignoring this?

 

[candycorn]

If you're an indication, the average gun owner is mentally ill...very much so.

No, the vast majority of gun owners are sane, rational people - this one is his own special idiot.

The vast majority of gun owners don't prance around in Walmart with a gun strapped to their hip or oppose every effort at reasonable gun control. The crazies are carrying the gun message.

Tell us what reasonable gun control is……..enlighten us.

Magazine

now a moment of silence for the responsible gun owner that gave us the victims of Sandy Hook 3 years ago.

Thanks.

During that moment of silence did you hear gunfire outside, get a text or call from someone who prevented a gun crime?

No? Neither did anyone else--ask around at work today.

Yet some gun nuts here want you to believe that it happens 5000 times a day, every day of every month of every year and has done so since 1992.

I guess if you're going to tell a lie make it a big one

He was not a responsible gun owner. Sandy Hook was a gun free zone created by people like you. So therefore no responsible gun owners were allowed to be there, and the killer was able to murder all those children with no one to stop him…thanks to you guys.

The killer attended Sandy Hook elementary school, the middle school and the high school……both the middle school and high school had armed police resource officers on campus at the time of the shooting….Sandy Hook did not have one, and so was the chosen target.

Thanks guys…your gun free zone worked exactly as designed…no law abiding gun owner was there to stop him….congrats…...

The person who allowed their guns to be used in a massacre was "a responsible gun owner". Incredible. #smh

 

[candycorn]

Biloxi Waffle House server killed over a cigarette 'was so friendly'

So, like, we're ignoring this?

It's hard to keep all of the "responsible gun owners" who mow down innocent persons straight. So many and so many more to come.

 

[2aguy]

If you're an indication, the average gun owner is mentally ill...very much so.

No, the vast majority of gun owners are sane, rational people - this one is his own special idiot.

The vast majority of gun owners don't prance around in Walmart with a gun strapped to their hip or oppose every effort at reasonable gun control. The crazies are carrying the gun message.

Tell us what reasonable gun control is……..enlighten us.

Magazine

now a moment of silence for the responsible gun owner that gave us the victims of Sandy Hook 3 years ago.

Thanks.

During that moment of silence did you hear gunfire outside, get a text or call from someone who prevented a gun crime?

No? Neither did anyone else--ask around at work today.

Yet some gun nuts here want you to believe that it happens 5000 times a day, every day of every month of every year and has done so since 1992.

I guess if you're going to tell a lie make it a big one

He was not a responsible gun owner. Sandy Hook was a gun free zone created by people like you. So therefore no responsible gun owners were allowed to be there, and the killer was able to murder all those children with no one to stop him…thanks to you guys.

The killer attended Sandy Hook elementary school, the middle school and the high school……both the middle school and high school had armed police resource officers on campus at the time of the shooting….Sandy Hook did not have one, and so was the chosen target.

Thanks guys…your gun free zone worked exactly as designed…no law abiding gun owner was there to stop him….congrats…...

The person who allowed their guns to be used in a massacre was "a responsible gun owner". Incredible. #smh

Nope….the guy at Sandy Hook changed magazines several times with rounds still in them….saved no one…..magazine limits are in a new study…that specifically researched mass shootings and the effects magazine limits had..and found nothing to support you.

 

[2aguy]

If you're an indication, the average gun owner is mentally ill...very much so.

No, the vast majority of gun owners are sane, rational people - this one is his own special idiot.

The vast majority of gun owners don't prance around in Walmart with a gun strapped to their hip or oppose every effort at reasonable gun control. The crazies are carrying the gun message.

Tell us what reasonable gun control is……..enlighten us.

Magazine

now a moment of silence for the responsible gun owner that gave us the victims of Sandy Hook 3 years ago.

Thanks.

During that moment of silence did you hear gunfire outside, get a text or call from someone who prevented a gun crime?

No? Neither did anyone else--ask around at work today.

Yet some gun nuts here want you to believe that it happens 5000 times a day, every day of every month of every year and has done so since 1992.

I guess if you're going to tell a lie make it a big one

He was not a responsible gun owner. Sandy Hook was a gun free zone created by people like you. So therefore no responsible gun owners were allowed to be there, and the killer was able to murder all those children with no one to stop him…thanks to you guys.

The killer attended Sandy Hook elementary school, the middle school and the high school……both the middle school and high school had armed police resource officers on campus at the time of the shooting….Sandy Hook did not have one, and so was the chosen target.

Thanks guys…your gun free zone worked exactly as designed…no law abiding gun owner was there to stop him….congrats…...

The person who allowed their guns to be used in a massacre was "a responsible gun owner". Incredible. #smh

Which ones….the ones who were murdered and had their weapons stolen or the killers themselves, who were not responsible…and again…you guys created gun free zones…so not one responsible gun owner is allowed in a gun free zone…only killers are….that was your intent…right?

 

[2aguy]

If you're an indication, the average gun owner is mentally ill...very much so.

No, the vast majority of gun owners are sane, rational people - this one is his own special idiot.

The vast majority of gun owners don't prance around in Walmart with a gun strapped to their hip or oppose every effort at reasonable gun control. The crazies are carrying the gun message.

Tell us what reasonable gun control is……..enlighten us.

Magazine

now a moment of silence for the responsible gun owner that gave us the victims of Sandy Hook 3 years ago.

Thanks.

During that moment of silence did you hear gunfire outside, get a text or call from someone who prevented a gun crime?

No? Neither did anyone else--ask around at work today.

Yet some gun nuts here want you to believe that it happens 5000 times a day, every day of every month of every year and has done so since 1992.

I guess if you're going to tell a lie make it a big one

He was not a responsible gun owner. Sandy Hook was a gun free zone created by people like you. So therefore no responsible gun owners were allowed to be there, and the killer was able to murder all those children with no one to stop him…thanks to you guys.

The killer attended Sandy Hook elementary school, the middle school and the high school……both the middle school and high school had armed police resource officers on campus at the time of the shooting….Sandy Hook did not have one, and so was the chosen target.

Thanks guys…your gun free zone worked exactly as designed…no law abiding gun owner was there to stop him….congrats…...

The person who allowed their guns to be used in a massacre was "a responsible gun owner". Incredible. #smh

Here you go….why magazine limits are dumb….

KLECK: Magazine Size Limits Have No Effect On Mass Shootings - Bearing Arms - Gary Kleck, High capacity magazines



Criminologist Gary Kleck is a legend in his field, and a thorn in the side of gun control supporters for his rigid insistence on listening to what the data tells us, instead of attempting to twist the data to suit his political agenda. His latest study looks like it will crush the gun control conceit that magazine size limits have anything at all to do with casualty counts.

Magazine size limits are irrelevant in mass shootings.

Kleck identified and examined 88 mass shooting incidents in which more than six people were killed or wounded for the 20 year period from 1994 through 2013. He looked at incidents with more than six victims because six or fewer people could be shot with a traditional six-shot revolver with no large-capacity magazine needed. So he wanted to look at those events in which possession of large-capacity magazines would be most relevant.

Even with this restrictive definition of a mass shooting, Kleck found that large capacity magazines – defined as holding over 10 rounds – were used in only 21 of the 88 incidents (24%). So, in 76% of the incidents, a large-capacity magazine ban would have made no difference in any event.

Kleck then goes on to analyze further the 21 incidents in which a large-capacity magazine was used. In every case, the shooters carried either multiple guns or multiple magazines. Therefore, even without a large-capacity magazine, the shooters could easily switch guns or magazines.

Kleck also marshals evidence to show that the rate of fire of most mass shooters is so slow that having to change guns or magazines more frequently would not diminish their casualty counts.



******************



Another short essay by Kleck and a partner....



http://www.utdallas.edu/~tvk071000/Banning Large Capacity Magazines Will Not Reduce Crime.pdf


Nevertheless, supporters might still argue that banning LCM’s could save lives by reducing the number of persons killed and wounded in mass public shootings. If there were nearby persons willing to tackle the shooter, limits on magazine capacity might limit how much death and injury a shooter could inflict with the initial magazine; the smaller the magazine, the fewer the victims shot before the killer was stopped by interveners.

Even in these rare events, however, LCM’s are irrelevant to the number of victims shot. For example, in the decade before the expired AW ban, in the entire U.S. there were 15 mass shooting incidents in which more than 6 victims were killed or more than 12 were killed or wounded. Of the 15 cases, in 14 of them either the shooter possessed multiple guns, which made it unnecessary for him to reload once one gun was empty, or the shooter in fact reloaded.

Recent history also casts doubt on whether a ban on LCM’s would alter the number of persons killed and wounded in mass public shootings. While one of the Columbine shooters used a 995 Hi-Point carbine rifle with a 10-round limit on magazine capacity (during the AW ban), he simply brought additional magazines to the attack—13 to be exact.

The Virginia Tech shooter had 17 magazines for his handguns and most were of the 10- round variety. The Newtown shooter brought three guns to the school and fired at least two of them. Simply put, these killers do not need LCM’s to fire many rounds without reloading – they simply bring plenty of magazines with them or drop one gun when its ammunition is exhausted and start firing another. Further, there are virtually no mass killings in which there is a bystander or victim willing to tackle the killer even if he does need to reload.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Biloxi Waffle House server killed over a cigarette 'was so friendly'

So, like, we're ignoring this?

It's hard to keep all of the "responsible gun owners" who mow down innocent persons straight. So many and so many more to come.

I mean when MB was called a gentle giant they lost their minds. Now a guy shoots someone over a goddam cigarette and is descrbed as "so friendly" and no one bats an eye?

 

[2aguy]

Biloxi Waffle House server killed over a cigarette 'was so friendly'

So, like, we're ignoring this?

It's hard to keep all of the "responsible gun owners" who mow down innocent persons straight. So many and so many more to come.

I mean when MB was called a gentle giant they lost their minds. Now a guy shoots someone over a goddam cigarette and is descrbed as "so friendly" and no one bats an eye?

No……the gentle giant was seen in a video pushing around a smaller guy during a strong armed robbery…….and the media and his family still called him a gentle giant…this guy was a dangerous guy probably due to that accident. He used to be a fireman unitl the injury that damaged his brain….big difference. I am not surprised you don't see it though…the left rarely sees the truth, facts or reality...

 

[ClosedCaption]

Biloxi Waffle House server killed over a cigarette 'was so friendly'

So, like, we're ignoring this?

It's hard to keep all of the "responsible gun owners" who mow down innocent persons straight. So many and so many more to come.

I mean when MB was called a gentle giant they lost their minds. Now a guy shoots someone over a goddam cigarette and is descrbed as "so friendly" and no one bats an eye?

No……the gentle giant was seen in a video pushing around a smaller guy during a strong armed robbery…….and the media and his family still called him a gentle giant…this guy was a dangerous guy probably due to that accident. He used to be a fireman unitl the injury that damaged his brain….big difference. I am not surprised you don't see it though…the left rarely sees the truth, facts or reality...

Its always a difference but the difference is always coincidentally that the white guy has excuses to kill. Just a coincidence tho.

He was friendly....BLAM!

 

[2aguy]

Biloxi Waffle House server killed over a cigarette 'was so friendly'

So, like, we're ignoring this?

It's hard to keep all of the "responsible gun owners" who mow down innocent persons straight. So many and so many more to come.

I mean when MB was called a gentle giant they lost their minds. Now a guy shoots someone over a goddam cigarette and is descrbed as "so friendly" and no one bats an eye?

No……the gentle giant was seen in a video pushing around a smaller guy during a strong armed robbery…….and the media and his family still called him a gentle giant…this guy was a dangerous guy probably due to that accident. He used to be a fireman unitl the injury that damaged his brain….big difference. I am not surprised you don't see it though…the left rarely sees the truth, facts or reality...

Its always a difference but the difference is always coincidentally that the white guy has excuses to kill. Just a coincidence tho.

He was friendly....BLAM!

No…he still killed people and should be put to death. The difference here is that the family of the gentle giant lied….the media also lied….they said he was a normal kid, getting ready to go to some sort of college….then the video came out and it was obvious this thug was a thug, and with the way he treated the much smaller clerk that he was a thug with a history of being a thug.

This guy…..seems to have been a normal person until a tragic accident that seems to have damaged his brain. He was a firefighter and had to leave that job because of the traumatic brain injury.

Big difference..don't worry. We know you don't understand the difference. As most lefties do, you must suffer from what I have named, "Reality Dyslexia."

 

[candycorn]

So, like, we're ignoring this?

It's hard to keep all of the "responsible gun owners" who mow down innocent persons straight. So many and so many more to come.

I mean when MB was called a gentle giant they lost their minds. Now a guy shoots someone over a goddam cigarette and is descrbed as "so friendly" and no one bats an eye?

No……the gentle giant was seen in a video pushing around a smaller guy during a strong armed robbery…….and the media and his family still called him a gentle giant…this guy was a dangerous guy probably due to that accident. He used to be a fireman unitl the injury that damaged his brain….big difference. I am not surprised you don't see it though…the left rarely sees the truth, facts or reality...

Its always a difference but the difference is always coincidentally that the white guy has excuses to kill. Just a coincidence tho.

He was friendly....BLAM!

No…he still killed people and should be put to death. The difference here is that the family of the gentle giant lied….the media also lied….they said he was a normal kid, getting ready to go to some sort of college….then the video came out and it was obvious this thug was a thug, and with the way he treated the much smaller clerk that he was a thug with a history of being a thug.

This guy…..seems to have been a normal person until a tragic accident that seems to have damaged his brain. He was a firefighter and had to leave that job because of the traumatic brain injury.

Big difference..don't worry. We know you don't understand the difference. As most lefties do, you must suffer from what I have named, "Reality Dyslexia."

So Michael Brown should have armed himself? You'd be okay with him being armed?

 

[2aguy]

It's hard to keep all of the "responsible gun owners" who mow down innocent persons straight. So many and so many more to come.

I mean when MB was called a gentle giant they lost their minds. Now a guy shoots someone over a goddam cigarette and is descrbed as "so friendly" and no one bats an eye?

No……the gentle giant was seen in a video pushing around a smaller guy during a strong armed robbery…….and the media and his family still called him a gentle giant…this guy was a dangerous guy probably due to that accident. He used to be a fireman unitl the injury that damaged his brain….big difference. I am not surprised you don't see it though…the left rarely sees the truth, facts or reality...

Its always a difference but the difference is always coincidentally that the white guy has excuses to kill. Just a coincidence tho.

He was friendly....BLAM!

No…he still killed people and should be put to death. The difference here is that the family of the gentle giant lied….the media also lied….they said he was a normal kid, getting ready to go to some sort of college….then the video came out and it was obvious this thug was a thug, and with the way he treated the much smaller clerk that he was a thug with a history of being a thug.

This guy…..seems to have been a normal person until a tragic accident that seems to have damaged his brain. He was a firefighter and had to leave that job because of the traumatic brain injury.

Big difference..don't worry. We know you don't understand the difference. As most lefties do, you must suffer from what I have named, "Reality Dyslexia."

So Michael Brown should have armed himself? You'd be okay with him being atmed'

No…he was a violent thug…..however, until he actually committed a crime that would bar him owning or carrying a gun he would have been allowed to do so. He was also not old enough to own or carry a gun.

Once he committed a crime with a gun, which was obviously in his future, he should have been arrested and locked up for a long time. That is how you stop gun violence.

 

[ClosedCaption]

So, like, we're ignoring this?

It's hard to keep all of the "responsible gun owners" who mow down innocent persons straight. So many and so many more to come.

I mean when MB was called a gentle giant they lost their minds. Now a guy shoots someone over a goddam cigarette and is descrbed as "so friendly" and no one bats an eye?

No……the gentle giant was seen in a video pushing around a smaller guy during a strong armed robbery…….and the media and his family still called him a gentle giant…this guy was a dangerous guy probably due to that accident. He used to be a fireman unitl the injury that damaged his brain….big difference. I am not surprised you don't see it though…the left rarely sees the truth, facts or reality...

Its always a difference but the difference is always coincidentally that the white guy has excuses to kill. Just a coincidence tho.

He was friendly....BLAM!

No…he still killed people and should be put to death. The difference here is that the family of the gentle giant lied….the media also lied….they said he was a normal kid, getting ready to go to some sort of college….then the video came out and it was obvious this thug was a thug, and with the way he treated the much smaller clerk that he was a thug with a history of being a thug.

This guy…..seems to have been a normal person until a tragic accident that seems to have damaged his brain. He was a firefighter and had to leave that job because of the traumatic brain injury.

Big difference..don't worry. We know you don't understand the difference. As most lefties do, you must suffer from what I have named, "Reality Dyslexia."

He was a normal kid getting ready to go to college. If that makes you mad then your problem isnt with MB at all....Its a larger issue altogether for something so small to anger you.

You just said "this guy seems"....Skkkrt....Of course he's going to SEEM normal and shit to you because you are in the business of making excuses for whites when they commit crimes as somehow being less crimey and more accidental criminal.

 

[candycorn]

I mean when MB was called a gentle giant they lost their minds. Now a guy shoots someone over a goddam cigarette and is descrbed as "so friendly" and no one bats an eye?

No……the gentle giant was seen in a video pushing around a smaller guy during a strong armed robbery…….and the media and his family still called him a gentle giant…this guy was a dangerous guy probably due to that accident. He used to be a fireman unitl the injury that damaged his brain….big difference. I am not surprised you don't see it though…the left rarely sees the truth, facts or reality...

Its always a difference but the difference is always coincidentally that the white guy has excuses to kill. Just a coincidence tho.

He was friendly....BLAM!

No…he still killed people and should be put to death. The difference here is that the family of the gentle giant lied….the media also lied….they said he was a normal kid, getting ready to go to some sort of college….then the video came out and it was obvious this thug was a thug, and with the way he treated the much smaller clerk that he was a thug with a history of being a thug.

This guy…..seems to have been a normal person until a tragic accident that seems to have damaged his brain. He was a firefighter and had to leave that job because of the traumatic brain injury.

Big difference..don't worry. We know you don't understand the difference. As most lefties do, you must suffer from what I have named, "Reality Dyslexia."

So Michael Brown should have armed himself? You'd be okay with him being atmed'

No…he was a violent thug…..however, until he actually committed a crime that would bar him owning or carrying a gun he would have been allowed to do so. He was also not old enough to own or carry a gun.

Once he committed a crime with a gun, which was obviously in his future, he should have been arrested and locked up for a long time. That is how you stop gun violence.

Isn't he innocent until proven guilty in court of law?

 

[2aguy]

It's hard to keep all of the "responsible gun owners" who mow down innocent persons straight. So many and so many more to come.

I mean when MB was called a gentle giant they lost their minds. Now a guy shoots someone over a goddam cigarette and is descrbed as "so friendly" and no one bats an eye?

No……the gentle giant was seen in a video pushing around a smaller guy during a strong armed robbery…….and the media and his family still called him a gentle giant…this guy was a dangerous guy probably due to that accident. He used to be a fireman unitl the injury that damaged his brain….big difference. I am not surprised you don't see it though…the left rarely sees the truth, facts or reality...

Its always a difference but the difference is always coincidentally that the white guy has excuses to kill. Just a coincidence tho.

He was friendly....BLAM!

No…he still killed people and should be put to death. The difference here is that the family of the gentle giant lied….the media also lied….they said he was a normal kid, getting ready to go to some sort of college….then the video came out and it was obvious this thug was a thug, and with the way he treated the much smaller clerk that he was a thug with a history of being a thug.

This guy…..seems to have been a normal person until a tragic accident that seems to have damaged his brain. He was a firefighter and had to leave that job because of the traumatic brain injury.

Big difference..don't worry. We know you don't understand the difference. As most lefties do, you must suffer from what I have named, "Reality Dyslexia."

He was a normal kid getting ready to go to college. If that makes you mad then your problem isnt with MB at all....Its a larger issue altogether for something so small to anger you.

You just said "this guy seems"....Skkkrt....Of course he's going to SEEM normal and shit to you because you are in the business of making excuses for whites when they commit crimes as somehow being less crimey and more accidental criminal.

Yes…I understand you are a troll…but to answer your trolling, the genle giant was caught on video, minutes before his confrontation with the police officer that actual witnesses state the gentle giant initiated, he was seen robbing a convenience store. That is a thug. The relaxed manner in which he committed the crime reveals how much of a thug he was. What part of the white guy should get the death penalty is being less "Crimey" to you. He is obviously mentally ill, but he still needs the death penalty…..try to tell me how that is letting him off the hook because he is white.

 

[2aguy]

No……the gentle giant was seen in a video pushing around a smaller guy during a strong armed robbery…….and the media and his family still called him a gentle giant…this guy was a dangerous guy probably due to that accident. He used to be a fireman unitl the injury that damaged his brain….big difference. I am not surprised you don't see it though…the left rarely sees the truth, facts or reality...

Its always a difference but the difference is always coincidentally that the white guy has excuses to kill. Just a coincidence tho.

He was friendly....BLAM!

No…he still killed people and should be put to death. The difference here is that the family of the gentle giant lied….the media also lied….they said he was a normal kid, getting ready to go to some sort of college….then the video came out and it was obvious this thug was a thug, and with the way he treated the much smaller clerk that he was a thug with a history of being a thug.

This guy…..seems to have been a normal person until a tragic accident that seems to have damaged his brain. He was a firefighter and had to leave that job because of the traumatic brain injury.

Big difference..don't worry. We know you don't understand the difference. As most lefties do, you must suffer from what I have named, "Reality Dyslexia."

So Michael Brown should have armed himself? You'd be okay with him being atmed'

No…he was a violent thug…..however, until he actually committed a crime that would bar him owning or carrying a gun he would have been allowed to do so. He was also not old enough to own or carry a gun.

Once he committed a crime with a gun, which was obviously in his future, he should have been arrested and locked up for a long time. That is how you stop gun violence.

Isn't he innocent until proven guilty in court of law?

Yes….and if he hadn't attacked the police officer and been shot for the attack he would have gone to court.

 

[candycorn]

I mean when MB was called a gentle giant they lost their minds. Now a guy shoots someone over a goddam cigarette and is descrbed as "so friendly" and no one bats an eye?

No……the gentle giant was seen in a video pushing around a smaller guy during a strong armed robbery…….and the media and his family still called him a gentle giant…this guy was a dangerous guy probably due to that accident. He used to be a fireman unitl the injury that damaged his brain….big difference. I am not surprised you don't see it though…the left rarely sees the truth, facts or reality...

Its always a difference but the difference is always coincidentally that the white guy has excuses to kill. Just a coincidence tho.

He was friendly....BLAM!

No…he still killed people and should be put to death. The difference here is that the family of the gentle giant lied….the media also lied….they said he was a normal kid, getting ready to go to some sort of college….then the video came out and it was obvious this thug was a thug, and with the way he treated the much smaller clerk that he was a thug with a history of being a thug.

This guy…..seems to have been a normal person until a tragic accident that seems to have damaged his brain. He was a firefighter and had to leave that job because of the traumatic brain injury.

Big difference..don't worry. We know you don't understand the difference. As most lefties do, you must suffer from what I have named, "Reality Dyslexia."

He was a normal kid getting ready to go to college. If that makes you mad then your problem isnt with MB at all....Its a larger issue altogether for something so small to anger you.

You just said "this guy seems"....Skkkrt....Of course he's going to SEEM normal and shit to you because you are in the business of making excuses for whites when they commit crimes as somehow being less crimey and more accidental criminal.

Yes…I understand you are a troll…but to answer your trolling, the genle giant was caught on video, minutes before his confrontation with the police officer that actual witnesses state the gentle giant initiated, he was seen robbing a convenience store. That is a thug. The relaxed manner in which he committed the crime reveals how much of a thug he was. What part of the white guy should get the death penalty is being less "Crimey" to you. He is obviously mentally ill, but he still needs the death penalty…..try to tell me how that is letting him off the hook because he is white.

Kind of like the white dude that drove his truck into a hotel in OK. White guy, still alive.

 

[2aguy]

No……the gentle giant was seen in a video pushing around a smaller guy during a strong armed robbery…….and the media and his family still called him a gentle giant…this guy was a dangerous guy probably due to that accident. He used to be a fireman unitl the injury that damaged his brain….big difference. I am not surprised you don't see it though…the left rarely sees the truth, facts or reality...

Its always a difference but the difference is always coincidentally that the white guy has excuses to kill. Just a coincidence tho.

He was friendly....BLAM!

No…he still killed people and should be put to death. The difference here is that the family of the gentle giant lied….the media also lied….they said he was a normal kid, getting ready to go to some sort of college….then the video came out and it was obvious this thug was a thug, and with the way he treated the much smaller clerk that he was a thug with a history of being a thug.

This guy…..seems to have been a normal person until a tragic accident that seems to have damaged his brain. He was a firefighter and had to leave that job because of the traumatic brain injury.

Big difference..don't worry. We know you don't understand the difference. As most lefties do, you must suffer from what I have named, "Reality Dyslexia."

He was a normal kid getting ready to go to college. If that makes you mad then your problem isnt with MB at all....Its a larger issue altogether for something so small to anger you.

You just said "this guy seems"....Skkkrt....Of course he's going to SEEM normal and shit to you because you are in the business of making excuses for whites when they commit crimes as somehow being less crimey and more accidental criminal.

Yes…I understand you are a troll…but to answer your trolling, the genle giant was caught on video, minutes before his confrontation with the police officer that actual witnesses state the gentle giant initiated, he was seen robbing a convenience store. That is a thug. The relaxed manner in which he committed the crime reveals how much of a thug he was. What part of the white guy should get the death penalty is being less "Crimey" to you. He is obviously mentally ill, but he still needs the death penalty…..try to tell me how that is letting him off the hook because he is white.

Kind of like the white dude that drove his truck into a hotel in OK. White guy, still alive.

Not really…….Don't know the story….care to link….each violent attack on a police officer is a unique event….the gentle giant had a real bad ending for his violence.

 

[candycorn]

White dude from Texas drives his truck through the hotel lobby, missed the clerks by inches. This was after lining his truck up to make the run and being in contact with the police. He's probably out on bail and has a go funded account already.

 

[ClosedCaption]

I mean when MB was called a gentle giant they lost their minds. Now a guy shoots someone over a goddam cigarette and is descrbed as "so friendly" and no one bats an eye?

No……the gentle giant was seen in a video pushing around a smaller guy during a strong armed robbery…….and the media and his family still called him a gentle giant…this guy was a dangerous guy probably due to that accident. He used to be a fireman unitl the injury that damaged his brain….big difference. I am not surprised you don't see it though…the left rarely sees the truth, facts or reality...

Its always a difference but the difference is always coincidentally that the white guy has excuses to kill. Just a coincidence tho.

He was friendly....BLAM!

No…he still killed people and should be put to death. The difference here is that the family of the gentle giant lied….the media also lied….they said he was a normal kid, getting ready to go to some sort of college….then the video came out and it was obvious this thug was a thug, and with the way he treated the much smaller clerk that he was a thug with a history of being a thug.

This guy…..seems to have been a normal person until a tragic accident that seems to have damaged his brain. He was a firefighter and had to leave that job because of the traumatic brain injury.

Big difference..don't worry. We know you don't understand the difference. As most lefties do, you must suffer from what I have named, "Reality Dyslexia."

He was a normal kid getting ready to go to college. If that makes you mad then your problem isnt with MB at all....Its a larger issue altogether for something so small to anger you.

You just said "this guy seems"....Skkkrt....Of course he's going to SEEM normal and shit to you because you are in the business of making excuses for whites when they commit crimes as somehow being less crimey and more accidental criminal.

Yes…I understand you are a troll…but to answer your trolling, the genle giant was caught on video, minutes before his confrontation with the police officer that actual witnesses state the gentle giant initiated, he was seen robbing a convenience store. That is a thug.

Thats not a mental issue? Does it become one with the presence of whiteness?

The relaxed manner in which he committed the crime reveals how much of a thug he was. What part of the white guy should get the death penalty is being less "Crimey" to you. He is obviously mentally ill, but he still needs the death penalty…..try to tell me how that is letting him off the hook because he is white.

But this guy shot someone for a cigarette. Thats not a Thug. His relaxed manner is not thuggish but one of a poor soul who has mental issues (BLAM) and so friendly...until he shot that person for the smallest reason

(BLAM)