US adds massive 287,000 jobs in June.....Quite A Change From Bush's Fiasco

[IcebergSlim]

The U.S. added 287,000 new jobs in June, according to the Labor Department report ...

You ruined the weekend for many conservatives. How dare you post great news about the US economy when they want misery and unemployment.

Looking forward to Hillary running on Obamanomics.

Politicians can bullshit about a lot of things and get away with it, but everyone knows their personal economic situation.

Voters care about the unemployment rate and the price of gas
Unemployment is at 4.9% and gas is around two bucks

You are not going to get voters outraged about the economy

ask the workers working you new 58 hour obamacare work week....

You have no fucking idea what's going on....

With what part of

"There are far fewer people working part time for economic reasons than before the passage of ACA"

are you struggling, Drudge Dross?

 

[IcebergSlim]

Far be it for me to piss on another man's parade but.......
The major banks are all buying up metals.
Nations are buying up metals.
By most accounts the Stocks are over priced.
Debt is soaring around the world.
Puerto Rico defaulted.
Greece, Italy, Spain, Ireland, Cypress and Japan are teetering on the brink of economic implosion.
We spent the last 9 years ( yes Bush did it too) lining the pockets of the 1%.
Deutsche Bank is walking a tight rope, and is on the brink of implosion.

Soros is buying Gold and made a killing shorting the EU economy ( he does this just before a major calamity).

Sorry boys and girls, it ain't all sunshine and lollipops out there.

Certainly not in "Cypress"........the place is like hell....

 

[IcebergSlim]

The U.S. added 287,000 new jobs in June, according to the Labor Department report ...

MORE good news for HRC.

All these supposed jobs yet still millions more living on the dole than when Bush was President. If all the jobs are being created, why are more people relying on taxpayers to support them than before Obama was President?

Why don't you put up some numbers, provide the sources, and we can go over them -- 'k?

 

[IcebergSlim]

Like I said....me too
Remind voters of the Great Bush Recession of 2008

So you don't even have a clue as to how many entered the job market. Figures.

10 million jobs added in eight years compared to 1 million for Bush

Better yet, let Hillary run on the 23 million jobs added while Bill was President

So you're still clueless as to how many entered the work force. Tsk tsk.

Nothing stopping you from actually making your point

But I already know it is bogus

Idiot posts job numbers and doesn't even know how many entered the workforce.

How do you believe that qualifies the nominal jobs data?

 

[IcebergSlim]

Obamanomics:

Record 46 Million Americans Are on Food Stamps

Tuesday, 4 Sep 2012


Seriously......you're a fucking moron...

 

[IcebergSlim]

Obamanomics:

Record 46 Million Americans Are on Food Stamps

Blame the Job Creators not the Government for compensating for low wages

Supply and demand, fascist. No jobs, so people can offer anything.

So when Private Sector payrolls CONTRACTED under the stewardship of the last POTUS for whom you voted, what effect did that have on the negotiating leverage of labor?

 

[healthmyths]

The U.S. added 287,000 new jobs in June, according to the Labor Department report ...

And of course you idiots tell ONLY ONE SIDE of the story!
HERE is why GWB will be considered a "great" President when you idiots remember the FACTS of what occurred from 2001 to 2008!
Recession??
Are you aware that a recession started under Clinton and became official 3/01 ended 11/01?
Because idiots don't seem to comprehend... RECESSIONS are like large ships.. it takes miles to turn one...i.e. so does a "RECESSION"...
it doesn't just start the day NBER states... it is a slow degradation and it started under CLINTON!!!
Source: USATODAY.com - It's official: 2001 recession only lasted eight months

A Major $8 trillion market loss
Are you aware that the dot.com bust occurred and cost $8 trillion in losses? Again Clinton laid claim BUT someone had to pay and it occurred during Bush's first year!
$8 trillion in market losses MEAN lost tax revenue. PLUS JOBS!!!!
According to the Los Angeles Times, when the dot-com bubble burst, it wiped out $8 trillion dollars in market value for tech companies.
More than half of the Internet companies created since 1995 were gone by 2004 -
and hundreds of thousands of skilled technology workers were out of jobs.
Source: The dot-com bubble: How to lose $5 trillion

The worst attacks on the USA in History.. 3,000 deaths!!!
Obviously most of you are UNAWARE 9/11 cost 3,000 lives, $2 trillion in lost businesses,market values assets.
Jobs lost in New York owing to the attacks: 146,100 JUST in New York.
Are you aware this happened???
Now before you idiots say "well Bush should have known"! DUMMIES... ever hear of the Gorelick Memo signed under CLINTON??
Gorelick Memo that created the wall between FBI & CIA thus no knowledge of the 9/11 bombers shared with the FBI!!! Looks especially imprudent 10 years later.
Because the memo created a barrier for U.S. intelligence agencies to share information with the FBI, one of its unintended consequences may have been to prevent the FBI from receiving the necessary intelligence to stop the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, the worst in American history.
Gorelick Memo Allegedly Impeded Probe of Clinton Fundraising Scandal
1995 memo [Clinton presidency-concerned about Chinese election sales] Gorelick wrote, stated explicitly that they would “go beyond what is legally required, [to] prevent any risk of creating an unwarranted appearance that FISA is being used to avoid procedural safeguards which would apply in a criminal investigation.” GORELICK Memo!
Jamie Gorelick’s wall barred anti-terror investigators from accessing the computer of Zacarias Moussaoui, the 20th hijacker, already in custody on an immigration violation shortly before 9/11.
At the time, an enraged FBI investigator wrote a prophetic memo to headquarters about the wall.
Whatever has happened to this — someday someone will die — and wall or not — the public will not understand why we were not more effective in throwing every resource we had at certain problems…..
especially since the biggest threat to us UBL [Usama bin Laden], is getting the most protection.
So, a year before the 9/11 attacks, a special unit in the U.S. military was aware of the presence of an al-Queda cell in Brooklyn, New York, and sought to share its information with the FBI but was stopped cold.Why?Because (as described in the April 16, 2004 Washington Times piece) “on March 4, 1995, [Jamie Gorelick, the then number 2 official in the Clinton Justice Department, sent a 4-page directive] to FBI Director Louis Freeh and Mary Jo White, the New York-based U.S. attorney investigating the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.
In the memo, Ms. Gorelick ordered Mr. Freeh and Ms. White to follow information-sharing procedures
that ‘go beyond what is legally required,’ in order to avoid ‘any risk of creating an unwarranted appearance’
that the Justice Department was using Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants, instead of ordinary criminal investigative procedures, in an effort to undermine the civil liberties of terrorism suspects.”
Could 9/11 Have Been Prevented? The Gorelick Memo and What We Knew

Year 2001: September 11 Terrorist Attacks
The 9/11 terrorist attacks were the events that helped shape other financial events of the decade. After that terrible day in September 2001, our economic climate was never to be the same again. It was only the third time in history that the New York Stock Exchange was shut down for a period of time. In this case, it was closed from September 10 - 17. Besides the tragic human loss of that day, the economic loss cannot even be estimated. Some estimate that there was over $60 billion in insurance losses alone. Airlines didn't fly for 3 days!
Approximately 18,000 small businesses were either displaced or destroyed in Lower Manhattan after the Twin Towers fell. There was a buildup in homeland security on all levels. 9/11 caused a catastrophic financial loss for the U.S.
Source: 10 Events That Rocked the Financial World

Anthrax Attacks...
The 2001 anthrax attacks in the United States, also known as Amerithrax from its Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) case name, occurred over the course of several weeks beginning on Tuesday, September 18, 2001, one week after the September 11 attacks. Letters containing anthrax spores were mailed to several news media offices and two DemocraticU.S. Senators, killing five people and infecting 17 others.

$1 trillion in losses due to the WORST Hurricane SEASONS in history. 2,215 lives lost
The worst, Katrina made landfall in Louisiana as a Category 3 in 2005. It took 1,836 lives and caused $81.2 billion in damages. It quickly became the biggest natural disaster in U.S. history, almost destroying New Orleans due to severe flooding.
Rank Disaster Year Deaths Damage* $250 Billion in damages in the 8 disasters of the top 15 disasters in history!
1. Hurricane Katrina (LA/MS/AL/FL) 2005 1833 $133,800,000,000
6. Hurricane Ike (TX/LA/MS) 2008 112 $27,000,000,000
7. Hurricane Wilma (FL) 2005 35 $17,100,000,000
8. Hurricane Rita (TX/LA) 2005 119 $17,100,000,000
9. Hurricane Charley (FL) 2004 35 $16,500,000,000
12. Midwest Floods 2008 24 $15,000,000,000
13. Hurricane Ivan (FL/AL) 2004 57 $13,000,000,000
14. 30-State Drought 2002 0 $11,400,000,000
Costliest U.S. Weather Disasters | Weather Underground

THESE events OCCURRED!
YET in SPITE of:
a) 400,000 jobs lost due to Hurricanes Katrina/Rita ,
b) 2,800,000 jobs lost in alone due to 9/11,
c) 300,000 jobs lost due to dot.com busts... In spite of nearly $8 trillion in lost businesses, market values, destroyed property..

IN SPITE of the above:
2002 $157.8 billion deficit.. also 9/11 occurred and tax revenues lowered for years later due to dot.com/9-11 losses against revenue.
2003 $377.6 billion deficit.. BRAND new cabinet Homeland Security, plus loans made to businesses.. again tax revenues down..affect of 9/11
2004 $412.7 billion deficit.. Revenues up by 5.5% spending increased and economy getting back.
2005 $318.3 billion deficit.. revenues up by 14.5% deficit decreasing at rate of 22%
2006 $248.2 billion deficit.. revenues up by 11.7% deficit decrease 22%
2007 $160.7 billion deficit.. revenues up by 6.7% deficit decrease 35%
2008 $458.6 billion deficit.. revenues down and deficit INCREASED TARP loan mostly...
http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxfacts/displayafact.cfm?Docid=20

BEA National Economic Accounts
Average annual growth in the Gross Domestic Product over 8 years 2.9% compared to the Idiot's..
SMPLY THE WORST=> Obama is First President Ever to Not See Single Year of 3% GDP Growth
SIMPLY THE WORST=> Obama is First President Ever to Not See Single Year of 3% GDP Growth

IN Spite of all the events AND if the housing bubble caused by the below people hadn't occurred it would have
been: 4.4% compared to what now???
2001 2.3% increase
2002 2.4%
2003 6.8%
2004 6.4%
2005 5.4%
2006 4.6%
2007 3.2%
2008 -7.7%

 

[IcebergSlim]

The U.S. added 287,000 new jobs in June, according to the Labor Department report ...

And of course you idiots tell ONLY ONE SIDE of the story!
HERE is why GWB will be considered a "great" President when you idiots remember the FACTS of what occurred from 2001 to 2008!
Recession??
Are you aware that a recession started under Clinton and became official 3/01 ended 11/01?
Because idiots don't seem to comprehend... RECESSIONS are like large ships.. it takes miles to turn one...i.e. so does a "RECESSION"...
it doesn't just start the day NBER states... it is a slow degradation and it started under CLINTON!!!
Source: USATODAY.com - It's official: 2001 recession only lasted eight months

A Major $8 trillion market loss
Are you aware that the dot.com bust occurred and cost $8 trillion in losses? Again Clinton laid claim BUT someone had to pay and it occurred during Bush's first year!
$8 trillion in market losses MEAN lost tax revenue. PLUS JOBS!!!!
According to the Los Angeles Times, when the dot-com bubble burst, it wiped out $8 trillion dollars in market value for tech companies.
More than half of the Internet companies created since 1995 were gone by 2004 -
and hundreds of thousands of skilled technology workers were out of jobs.
Source: The dot-com bubble: How to lose $5 trillion

The worst attacks on the USA in History.. 3,000 deaths!!!
Obviously most of you are UNAWARE 9/11 cost 3,000 lives, $2 trillion in lost businesses,market values assets.
Jobs lost in New York owing to the attacks: 146,100 JUST in New York.
Are you aware this happened???
Now before you idiots say "well Bush should have known"! DUMMIES... ever hear of the Gorelick Memo signed under CLINTON??
Gorelick Memo that created the wall between FBI & CIA thus no knowledge of the 9/11 bombers shared with the FBI!!! Looks especially imprudent 10 years later.
Because the memo created a barrier for U.S. intelligence agencies to share information with the FBI, one of its unintended consequences may have been to prevent the FBI from receiving the necessary intelligence to stop the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, the worst in American history.
Gorelick Memo Allegedly Impeded Probe of Clinton Fundraising Scandal
1995 memo [Clinton presidency-concerned about Chinese election sales] Gorelick wrote, stated explicitly that they would “go beyond what is legally required, [to] prevent any risk of creating an unwarranted appearance that FISA is being used to avoid procedural safeguards which would apply in a criminal investigation.” GORELICK Memo!
Jamie Gorelick’s wall barred anti-terror investigators from accessing the computer of Zacarias Moussaoui, the 20th hijacker, already in custody on an immigration violation shortly before 9/11.
At the time, an enraged FBI investigator wrote a prophetic memo to headquarters about the wall.
Whatever has happened to this — someday someone will die — and wall or not — the public will not understand why we were not more effective in throwing every resource we had at certain problems…..
especially since the biggest threat to us UBL [Usama bin Laden], is getting the most protection.
So, a year before the 9/11 attacks, a special unit in the U.S. military was aware of the presence of an al-Queda cell in Brooklyn, New York, and sought to share its information with the FBI but was stopped cold.Why?Because (as described in the April 16, 2004 Washington Times piece) “on March 4, 1995, [Jamie Gorelick, the then number 2 official in the Clinton Justice Department, sent a 4-page directive] to FBI Director Louis Freeh and Mary Jo White, the New York-based U.S. attorney investigating the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.
In the memo, Ms. Gorelick ordered Mr. Freeh and Ms. White to follow information-sharing procedures
that ‘go beyond what is legally required,’ in order to avoid ‘any risk of creating an unwarranted appearance’
that the Justice Department was using Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants, instead of ordinary criminal investigative procedures, in an effort to undermine the civil liberties of terrorism suspects.”
Could 9/11 Have Been Prevented? The Gorelick Memo and What We Knew

Year 2001: September 11 Terrorist Attacks
The 9/11 terrorist attacks were the events that helped shape other financial events of the decade. After that terrible day in September 2001, our economic climate was never to be the same again. It was only the third time in history that the New York Stock Exchange was shut down for a period of time. In this case, it was closed from September 10 - 17. Besides the tragic human loss of that day, the economic loss cannot even be estimated. Some estimate that there was over $60 billion in insurance losses alone. Airlines didn't fly for 3 days!
Approximately 18,000 small businesses were either displaced or destroyed in Lower Manhattan after the Twin Towers fell. There was a buildup in homeland security on all levels. 9/11 caused a catastrophic financial loss for the U.S.
Source: 10 Events That Rocked the Financial World

Anthrax Attacks...
The 2001 anthrax attacks in the United States, also known as Amerithrax from its Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) case name, occurred over the course of several weeks beginning on Tuesday, September 18, 2001, one week after the September 11 attacks. Letters containing anthrax spores were mailed to several news media offices and two DemocraticU.S. Senators, killing five people and infecting 17 others.

$1 trillion in losses due to the WORST Hurricane SEASONS in history. 2,215 lives lost
The worst, Katrina made landfall in Louisiana as a Category 3 in 2005. It took 1,836 lives and caused $81.2 billion in damages. It quickly became the biggest natural disaster in U.S. history, almost destroying New Orleans due to severe flooding.
Rank Disaster Year Deaths Damage* $250 Billion in damages in the 8 disasters of the top 15 disasters in history!
1. Hurricane Katrina (LA/MS/AL/FL) 2005 1833 $133,800,000,000
6. Hurricane Ike (TX/LA/MS) 2008 112 $27,000,000,000
7. Hurricane Wilma (FL) 2005 35 $17,100,000,000
8. Hurricane Rita (TX/LA) 2005 119 $17,100,000,000
9. Hurricane Charley (FL) 2004 35 $16,500,000,000
12. Midwest Floods 2008 24 $15,000,000,000
13. Hurricane Ivan (FL/AL) 2004 57 $13,000,000,000
14. 30-State Drought 2002 0 $11,400,000,000
Costliest U.S. Weather Disasters | Weather Underground

THESE events OCCURRED!
YET in SPITE of:
a) 400,000 jobs lost due to Hurricanes Katrina/Rita ,
b) 2,800,000 jobs lost in alone due to 9/11,
c) 300,000 jobs lost due to dot.com busts... In spite of nearly $8 trillion in lost businesses, market values, destroyed property..

IN SPITE of the above:
2002 $157.8 billion deficit.. also 9/11 occurred and tax revenues lowered for years later due to dot.com/9-11 losses against revenue.
2003 $377.6 billion deficit.. BRAND new cabinet Homeland Security, plus loans made to businesses.. again tax revenues down..affect of 9/11
2004 $412.7 billion deficit.. Revenues up by 5.5% spending increased and economy getting back.
2005 $318.3 billion deficit.. revenues up by 14.5% deficit decreasing at rate of 22%
2006 $248.2 billion deficit.. revenues up by 11.7% deficit decrease 22%
2007 $160.7 billion deficit.. revenues up by 6.7% deficit decrease 35%
2008 $458.6 billion deficit.. revenues down and deficit INCREASED TARP loan mostly...
http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxfacts/displayafact.cfm?Docid=20

BEA National Economic Accounts
Are you aware that a recession started under Clinton and became official 3/01 ended 11/01?
SMPLY THE WORST=> Obama is First President Ever to Not See Single Year of 3% GDP Growth
SIMPLY THE WORST=> Obama is First President Ever to Not See Single Year of 3% GDP Growth

IN Spite of all the events AND if the housing bubble caused by the below people hadn't occurred it would have
been: 4.4% compared to what now???
2001 2.3% increase
2002 2.4%
2003 6.8%
2004 6.4%
2005 5.4%
2006 4.6%
2007 3.2%
2008 -7.7%

You open this Marathon of Idiocy with

Are you aware that a recession started under Clinton and became official 3/01 ended 11/01?

Recessions don't "start" on one date and "become official" on another...Dayum!


and then it ends with a flurry of Bullshit....


Average annual growth in the Gross Domestic Product over 8 years 2.9% compared to the Idiot's..

Real Gross Domestic Product

Real GDP

End of Q1, 2001 - 12.643 billion

End of Q1, 2009 - 14.375 billion

CAGR - 1.62%

 

[IcebergSlim]

The U.S. added 287,000 new jobs in June, according to the Labor Department report ...

And of course you idiots tell ONLY ONE SIDE of the story!
HERE is why GWB will be considered a "great" President when you idiots remember the FACTS of what occurred from 2001 to 2008!
Recession??
Are you aware that a recession started under Clinton and became official 3/01 ended 11/01?
Because idiots don't seem to comprehend... RECESSIONS are like large ships.. it takes miles to turn one...i.e. so does a "RECESSION"...
it doesn't just start the day NBER states... it is a slow degradation and it started under CLINTON!!!
Source: USATODAY.com - It's official: 2001 recession only lasted eight months

A Major $8 trillion market loss
Are you aware that the dot.com bust occurred and cost $8 trillion in losses? Again Clinton laid claim BUT someone had to pay and it occurred during Bush's first year!
$8 trillion in market losses MEAN lost tax revenue. PLUS JOBS!!!!
According to the Los Angeles Times, when the dot-com bubble burst, it wiped out $8 trillion dollars in market value for tech companies.
More than half of the Internet companies created since 1995 were gone by 2004 -
and hundreds of thousands of skilled technology workers were out of jobs.
Source: The dot-com bubble: How to lose $5 trillion

The worst attacks on the USA in History.. 3,000 deaths!!!
Obviously most of you are UNAWARE 9/11 cost 3,000 lives, $2 trillion in lost businesses,market values assets.
Jobs lost in New York owing to the attacks: 146,100 JUST in New York.
Are you aware this happened???
Now before you idiots say "well Bush should have known"! DUMMIES... ever hear of the Gorelick Memo signed under CLINTON??
Gorelick Memo that created the wall between FBI & CIA thus no knowledge of the 9/11 bombers shared with the FBI!!! Looks especially imprudent 10 years later.
Because the memo created a barrier for U.S. intelligence agencies to share information with the FBI, one of its unintended consequences may have been to prevent the FBI from receiving the necessary intelligence to stop the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, the worst in American history.
Gorelick Memo Allegedly Impeded Probe of Clinton Fundraising Scandal
1995 memo [Clinton presidency-concerned about Chinese election sales] Gorelick wrote, stated explicitly that they would “go beyond what is legally required, [to] prevent any risk of creating an unwarranted appearance that FISA is being used to avoid procedural safeguards which would apply in a criminal investigation.” GORELICK Memo!
Jamie Gorelick’s wall barred anti-terror investigators from accessing the computer of Zacarias Moussaoui, the 20th hijacker, already in custody on an immigration violation shortly before 9/11.
At the time, an enraged FBI investigator wrote a prophetic memo to headquarters about the wall.
Whatever has happened to this — someday someone will die — and wall or not — the public will not understand why we were not more effective in throwing every resource we had at certain problems…..
especially since the biggest threat to us UBL [Usama bin Laden], is getting the most protection.
So, a year before the 9/11 attacks, a special unit in the U.S. military was aware of the presence of an al-Queda cell in Brooklyn, New York, and sought to share its information with the FBI but was stopped cold.Why?Because (as described in the April 16, 2004 Washington Times piece) “on March 4, 1995, [Jamie Gorelick, the then number 2 official in the Clinton Justice Department, sent a 4-page directive] to FBI Director Louis Freeh and Mary Jo White, the New York-based U.S. attorney investigating the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.
In the memo, Ms. Gorelick ordered Mr. Freeh and Ms. White to follow information-sharing procedures
that ‘go beyond what is legally required,’ in order to avoid ‘any risk of creating an unwarranted appearance’
that the Justice Department was using Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrants, instead of ordinary criminal investigative procedures, in an effort to undermine the civil liberties of terrorism suspects.”
Could 9/11 Have Been Prevented? The Gorelick Memo and What We Knew

Year 2001: September 11 Terrorist Attacks
The 9/11 terrorist attacks were the events that helped shape other financial events of the decade. After that terrible day in September 2001, our economic climate was never to be the same again. It was only the third time in history that the New York Stock Exchange was shut down for a period of time. In this case, it was closed from September 10 - 17. Besides the tragic human loss of that day, the economic loss cannot even be estimated. Some estimate that there was over $60 billion in insurance losses alone. Airlines didn't fly for 3 days!
Approximately 18,000 small businesses were either displaced or destroyed in Lower Manhattan after the Twin Towers fell. There was a buildup in homeland security on all levels. 9/11 caused a catastrophic financial loss for the U.S.
Source: 10 Events That Rocked the Financial World

Anthrax Attacks...
The 2001 anthrax attacks in the United States, also known as Amerithrax from its Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) case name, occurred over the course of several weeks beginning on Tuesday, September 18, 2001, one week after the September 11 attacks. Letters containing anthrax spores were mailed to several news media offices and two DemocraticU.S. Senators, killing five people and infecting 17 others.

$1 trillion in losses due to the WORST Hurricane SEASONS in history. 2,215 lives lost
The worst, Katrina made landfall in Louisiana as a Category 3 in 2005. It took 1,836 lives and caused $81.2 billion in damages. It quickly became the biggest natural disaster in U.S. history, almost destroying New Orleans due to severe flooding.
Rank Disaster Year Deaths Damage* $250 Billion in damages in the 8 disasters of the top 15 disasters in history!
1. Hurricane Katrina (LA/MS/AL/FL) 2005 1833 $133,800,000,000
6. Hurricane Ike (TX/LA/MS) 2008 112 $27,000,000,000
7. Hurricane Wilma (FL) 2005 35 $17,100,000,000
8. Hurricane Rita (TX/LA) 2005 119 $17,100,000,000
9. Hurricane Charley (FL) 2004 35 $16,500,000,000
12. Midwest Floods 2008 24 $15,000,000,000
13. Hurricane Ivan (FL/AL) 2004 57 $13,000,000,000
14. 30-State Drought 2002 0 $11,400,000,000
Costliest U.S. Weather Disasters | Weather Underground

THESE events OCCURRED!
YET in SPITE of:
a) 400,000 jobs lost due to Hurricanes Katrina/Rita ,
b) 2,800,000 jobs lost in alone due to 9/11,
c) 300,000 jobs lost due to dot.com busts... In spite of nearly $8 trillion in lost businesses, market values, destroyed property..

IN SPITE of the above:
2002 $157.8 billion deficit.. also 9/11 occurred and tax revenues lowered for years later due to dot.com/9-11 losses against revenue.
2003 $377.6 billion deficit.. BRAND new cabinet Homeland Security, plus loans made to businesses.. again tax revenues down..affect of 9/11
2004 $412.7 billion deficit.. Revenues up by 5.5% spending increased and economy getting back.
2005 $318.3 billion deficit.. revenues up by 14.5% deficit decreasing at rate of 22%
2006 $248.2 billion deficit.. revenues up by 11.7% deficit decrease 22%
2007 $160.7 billion deficit.. revenues up by 6.7% deficit decrease 35%
2008 $458.6 billion deficit.. revenues down and deficit INCREASED TARP loan mostly...
http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxfacts/displayafact.cfm?Docid=20

BEA National Economic Accounts
Average annual growth in the Gross Domestic Product over 8 years 2.9% compared to the Idiot's..
SMPLY THE WORST=> Obama is First President Ever to Not See Single Year of 3% GDP Growth
SIMPLY THE WORST=> Obama is First President Ever to Not See Single Year of 3% GDP Growth

IN Spite of all the events AND if the housing bubble caused by the below people hadn't occurred it would have
been: 4.4% compared to what now???
2001 2.3% increase
2002 2.4%
2003 6.8%
2004 6.4%
2005 5.4%
2006 4.6%
2007 3.2%
2008 -7.7%

What are these numbers supposed to represent, and where did you find them? (Brace yourself, cause this is gonna get ugly......fast.)

2002 2.4%
2003 6.8%
2004 6.4%
2005 5.4%
2006 4.6%
2007 3.2%

 

[Weatherman2020]

Obamanomics:

Record 46 Million Americans Are on Food Stamps

Tuesday, 4 Sep 2012


Seriously......you're a fucking moron...

You deny 46 million Americans are on food stamps?
No wonder you vote Democrat, no concept of the real world.

 

[IcebergSlim]

Obamanomics:

Record 46 Million Americans Are on Food Stamps

Tuesday, 4 Sep 2012


Seriously......you're a fucking moron...

You deny 46 million Americans are on food stamps?
No wonder you vote Democrat, no concept of the real world.

http://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/pd/29SNAPcurrPP.pdf

43.5 according to those who actually administer the program.....

wtf,do you consider the "real world", Hondo?

 

[owebo]

The U.S. added 287,000 new jobs in June, according to the Labor Department report ...

You ruined the weekend for many conservatives. How dare you post great news about the US economy when they want misery and unemployment.

Looking forward to Hillary running on Obamanomics.

Politicians can bullshit about a lot of things and get away with it, but everyone knows their personal economic situation.

Voters care about the unemployment rate and the price of gas
Unemployment is at 4.9% and gas is around two bucks

You are not going to get voters outraged about the economy

ask the workers working you new 58 hour obamacare work week....

You have no fucking idea what's going on....

With what part of

"There are far fewer people working part time for economic reasons than before the passage of ACA"

are you struggling, Drudge Dross?

Jesus, you are one of the more stupid fucktard liberals....

Reading, it is fundamental....your liberal propaganda, not so much.....

 

[Iceweasel]

The U.S. added 287,000 new jobs in June, according to the Labor Department report ...

Check who was holding the purse strings in congress during those years.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Obamanomics:

Record 46 Million Americans Are on Food Stamps

Tuesday, 4 Sep 2012


Seriously......you're a fucking moron...

You deny 46 million Americans are on food stamps?
No wonder you vote Democrat, no concept of the real world.

http://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/pd/29SNAPcurrPP.pdf

43.5 according to those who actually administer the program.....

wtf,do you consider the "real world", Hondo?

OK, let's run with your 43 million.
That's 17% of America requiring food assistance in your "wonderful" economy.

Checkmate.

 

[owebo]

Obamanomics:

Record 46 Million Americans Are on Food Stamps

Tuesday, 4 Sep 2012


Seriously......you're a fucking moron...

You deny 46 million Americans are on food stamps?
No wonder you vote Democrat, no concept of the real world.

http://www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/pd/29SNAPcurrPP.pdf

43.5 according to those who actually administer the program.....

wtf,do you consider the "real world", Hondo?

OK, let's run with your 43 million.
That's 17% of America requiring food assistance in your "wonderful" economy.

Checkmate.

I only go to food stores that don't take EBT....what a refreshing American experience....

 

[Iceweasel]

You have 94 million out of the workforce and are saying it's near full employment? Really?

yes really, though perhaps you don't understand what those words mean.

Let me explain what it means:

market supply of jobs is beginning to outpace demand for jobs.

This generally indicates being able to find a job quickly, less layoffs and more income growth as workers have more leverage.

It DOES NOT mean that old people came back out of retirement and schools and colleges need to be closed because no students are left. (DUH)

What do you consider old? 30? I know people who can't find jack shit for work and they've been looking for a long time. 94 million is just old people too lazy to go back to work? You drank the KooAid big time.

 

[IcebergSlim]

You ruined the weekend for many conservatives. How dare you post great news about the US economy when they want misery and unemployment.

Looking forward to Hillary running on Obamanomics.

Politicians can bullshit about a lot of things and get away with it, but everyone knows their personal economic situation.

Voters care about the unemployment rate and the price of gas
Unemployment is at 4.9% and gas is around two bucks

You are not going to get voters outraged about the economy

ask the workers working you new 58 hour obamacare work week....

You have no fucking idea what's going on....

With what part of

"There are far fewer people working part time for economic reasons than before the passage of ACA"

are you struggling, Drudge Dross?

Jesus, you are one of the more stupid fucktard liberals....

Reading, it is fundamental....your liberal propaganda, not so much.....

Employment data is not "liberal propaganda".....

Now why don't you reconcile your Bold Assertion with the actual numbers for part time employment?

 

[owebo]

Looking forward to Hillary running on Obamanomics.

Politicians can bullshit about a lot of things and get away with it, but everyone knows their personal economic situation.

Voters care about the unemployment rate and the price of gas
Unemployment is at 4.9% and gas is around two bucks

You are not going to get voters outraged about the economy

ask the workers working you new 58 hour obamacare work week....

You have no fucking idea what's going on....

With what part of

"There are far fewer people working part time for economic reasons than before the passage of ACA"

are you struggling, Drudge Dross?

Jesus, you are one of the more stupid fucktard liberals....

Reading, it is fundamental....your liberal propaganda, not so much.....

Employment data is not "liberal propaganda".....

Now why don't you reconcile your Bold Assertion with the actual numbers for part time employment?

Well now, let's take a step back then....

Can you even read?

 

[IcebergSlim]

You have 94 million out of the workforce and are saying it's near full employment? Really?

yes really, though perhaps you don't understand what those words mean.

Let me explain what it means:

market supply of jobs is beginning to outpace demand for jobs.

This generally indicates being able to find a job quickly, less layoffs and more income growth as workers have more leverage.

It DOES NOT mean that old people came back out of retirement and schools and colleges need to be closed because no students are left. (DUH)

What do you consider old? 30? I know people who can't find jack shit for work and they've been looking for a long time. 94 million is just old people too lazy to go back to work? You drank the KooAid big time.

IceIce,

Catch up.....BLS tracks the numbers of those who are actively looking, as well as the "discouraged", neither of which are close to 94 million.

 

[IcebergSlim]

Voters care about the unemployment rate and the price of gas
Unemployment is at 4.9% and gas is around two bucks

You are not going to get voters outraged about the economy

ask the workers working you new 58 hour obamacare work week....

You have no fucking idea what's going on....

With what part of

"There are far fewer people working part time for economic reasons than before the passage of ACA"

are you struggling, Drudge Dross?

Jesus, you are one of the more stupid fucktard liberals....

Reading, it is fundamental....your liberal propaganda, not so much.....

Employment data is not "liberal propaganda".....

Now why don't you reconcile your Bold Assertion with the actual numbers for part time employment?

Well now, let's take a step back then....

Can you even read?

Think about how fucking stupid that question is on a text based medium.........take all the time you need.....

when you give up, proceed with reconciling your Bold Assertion with the facts.....