- Feb 22, 2017
- 109,034
- 37,884
- 2,290
Well, common sense tells me that if one had a genuine concern for spending they’d start their crusade by cutting out all the senseless bullshit that never made sense to begin with before moving on to revolutionary cuts.
Example:
If I knew I had to bring down my overhead within my own household I’d probably start by not going out to restaurants and terminating my NFL Sunday Ticket before I started selling autos.
Come on fellas...you’re not that stupid...you already knew this shit.
There are a number of flaws with your "logic". First, if you built the wall and manned it with terminator robots and stopped every single illegal crossing...you would still be spending 100 billion a year on the ones that are already here.
Second, I cannot speak for G5000, but i would love to see some actual immigration legislation that addressed the problems, but that is not happening...and did not happen when the Repubs controlled the House, the Senate and the White House.
3rd...if your "auto" was $60,000 sedan with $500 a month payments, it would make a lot more sense to get rid of the sedan and get something more reasonable.
4th...I am not calling for revolutionary cuts, I am calling for 3% across the board for 5 years and then we move on to more surgical cuts.
Further, aren’t those tax cuts for those RICH pieces of shits that you two always whine about supposed to “cost” the treasury $1.2T over ten years? If wetback spending costs $100B per year why aren’t you whining about that?
Come on..l thought you two were mathematicians..no?
My only complaint with the tax cuts is they were not accompanied with spending cuts to offset the loss of revenue