Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why should our children be sent overseas to die or be maimed when the Arabs themselves should be fighting to wipe out the terrorists who are anchored in their countries?
We've already answered that one...Obama does not want to fight ISIS - he wants to go after Assad...and Russia and Iran who is protecting him.Why won't the GOP approve the AUMF against ISIS for which Obama has been asking for over a year?
What France is doing is bombing. What we did was for show, only. No real effort.LOL!!! France and Russia just recently join us in bombing ISIS and they're the heroes?!?! The wingnuts apparently care more about bashing Democrats than they do about truth and their country.
France is putting on the show . 20 bombs over a target that one bomb can take care of .
But I don't blame them. They were personally attacked .
We've already answered that one...Obama does not want to fight ISIS - he wants to go after Assad...and Russia and Iran who is protecting him.Why won't the GOP approve the AUMF against ISIS for which Obama has been asking for over a year?
Why won't the GOP approve the AUMF against ISIS for which Obama has been asking for over a year?
Whether "atracks" or "attacks", yes, they are acts of war against us. You are under the impression we can stop all attacks here in the homeland You are wrong. But we can severely limit them and have done so.We haven't been? What do you call the recruiting office attacks, the school attack, Fort Hood? Since they didn't happen simultaneously, I guess you don't consider them atracks, right?What France is doing is bombing. What we did was for show, only. No real effort.LOL!!! France and Russia just recently join us in bombing ISIS and they're the heroes?!?! The wingnuts apparently care more about bashing Democrats than they do about truth and their country.
France is putting on the show . 20 bombs over a target that one bomb can take care of .
But I don't blame them. They were personally attacked .
The hard right legislators want America vulnerable to the enemy.Why won't the GOP approve the AUMF against ISIS for which Obama has been asking for over a year?
the one the House voted down (139-288) ????
apparently Obama made them.
Easyt is asking to continue a zero sum game. The USA cannot and will not maintain an Army in the ME again. If we do, we will lose again.
Only the Arabs and Muslims can defend their own freedom. We can arm, train, supply, and help with air and naval assets.
But we will not send in another Amry.
Why should we lead?
I'm tired if these macho meatheads getting all mad that we don't have troops coming home in body bags . We've done our time in the Mid East.
Let the countries over there take the lead and we"ll help them. They have far more to lose than us .
Whether "atracks" or "attacks", yes, they are acts of war against us. You are under the impression we can stop all attacks here in the homeland You are wrong. But we can severely limit them and have done so.
Pin-prick drone strikes is not 'fighting. Paris' President GETS IT - when they attack you, you respond definitively, aggressively, NO MERCY,
with the intent to hurt them so badly they will nt want to F* with you ever again.
No, he is not, but if you get your way, Iran will get nukes.The hard right legislators want America vulnerable to the enemy.
Obama is the one helping Iran acquire nukes and IMPORTING terrorists / ISIS-infiltrated 'Refugees', moron.
Yeah. 24 bombs will hurt ISIS so badly they will never fuck with France again.
No, he is not, but if you get your way, Iran will get nukes.
...dumbmass
Easyt, we are attacking them. Study the graphic above.
"Arm, train, and supply them? How was that (FAILED) policy worked out for Obama?"
Iraq is still standing.
If we fight it your way, we will lose.
