Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Obama and Kerry cut deals with Soleimani to give Iran billions of dollars and a legitimate path way to nuclear WMDs and Trump droned his ass into oblivion.Maybe you should run for president on that.
First, we did not "go to war." We killed a guy who murdered 600 AMERICANS.
Where are your priorities? And your loyalties?
Wouldn't it be equally a "deterrent" to strike one of their aircraft carriers? Flatten a military installation? Are we so feeble that we must hit targets that can't strike back?Yes, I do. We do not sink to their level. If the Pres feels we need to go to war with Iran for its provocations, then let him explain and we will begin. Targeting cultural sites? Why that instead of military sites?You have a problem with this?“They’re allowed to kill our people. They’re allowed to torture and maim our people. They’re allowed to use roadside bombs and blow up our people. And we’re not allowed to touch their cultural site? It doesn’t work that way,” he said
Have you ever heard of the word "deterrent"?
You have no cause to question my loyalties, asshole. And don't misquote me, either.Maybe you should run for president on that.Yes, I do. We do not sink to their level. If the Pres feels we need to go to war with Iran for its provocations, then let him explain and we will begin. Targeting cultural sites? Why that instead of military sites?You have a problem with this?“They’re allowed to kill our people. They’re allowed to torture and maim our people. They’re allowed to use roadside bombs and blow up our people. And we’re not allowed to touch their cultural site? It doesn’t work that way,” he said
First, we did not "go to war." We killed a guy who murdered 600 AMERICANS.
Where are your priorities? And your loyalties?
LindaK...is that you with your stupid LOLOLOL's?Pompeo Says Europe Should Rally to Support U.S. After Strike.....LOLOLOLOL....LOLOLOLOL.....
Even on your best day, you couldn't make shit like this up....if these leaders wanted to be funny, I'd tell the US, the check is in the mail....LOLOLOLOLOLOLO
Folks, the nerves the absolute nerves....LOLOLOLOLOLOL
I wish we could all revisit history and learn a few things....the United States of America, has never ever ever won a war...ALONE. Bad as we want to be, we've always had help.....of course draft dodging morons don't know this.
You have no cause to question my loyalties, asshole. And don't misquote me, either.Maybe you should run for president on that.Yes, I do. We do not sink to their level. If the Pres feels we need to go to war with Iran for its provocations, then let him explain and we will begin. Targeting cultural sites? Why that instead of military sites?You have a problem with this?“They’re allowed to kill our people. They’re allowed to torture and maim our people. They’re allowed to use roadside bombs and blow up our people. And we’re not allowed to touch their cultural site? It doesn’t work that way,” he said
First, we did not "go to war." We killed a guy who murdered 600 AMERICANS.
Where are your priorities? And your loyalties?
You still haven't answered my question: why cultural sites instead of military targets, which would be the appropriate hit if we were going to engage in war.
Pompeo Says Europe Should Rally to Support U.S. After Strike.....LOLOLOLOL....LOLOLOLOL.....
Even on your best day, you couldn't make shit like this up....if these leaders wanted to be funny, I'd tell the US, the check is in the mail....LOLOLOLOLOLOLO
Folks, the nerves the absolute nerves....LOLOLOLOLOLOL
I wish we could all revisit history and learn a few things....the United States of America, has never ever ever won a war...ALONE. Bad as we want to be, we've always had help.....of course draft dodging morons don't know this.
Pompeo Says Europe Should Rally to Support U.S. After Strike.....LOLOLOLOL....LOLOLOLOL.....
Even on your best day, you couldn't make shit like this up....if these leaders wanted to be funny, I'd tell the US, the check is in the mail....LOLOLOLOLOLOLO
Folks, the nerves the absolute nerves....LOLOLOLOLOLOL
I wish we could all revisit history and learn a few things....the United States of America, has never ever ever won a war...ALONE. Bad as we want to be, we've always had help.....of course draft dodging morons don't know this.
Europe was happy with the Iran Disarmament Deal
It saw a de-escalation of tension as a good deal for all
But the deal had Obama’s name on it and Trump had to destroy it
Now, Trump is stuck with the consequences
You have no cause to question my loyalties, asshole. And don't misquote me, either.Maybe you should run for president on that.Yes, I do. We do not sink to their level. If the Pres feels we need to go to war with Iran for its provocations, then let him explain and we will begin. Targeting cultural sites? Why that instead of military sites?You have a problem with this?“They’re allowed to kill our people. They’re allowed to torture and maim our people. They’re allowed to use roadside bombs and blow up our people. And we’re not allowed to touch their cultural site? It doesn’t work that way,” he said
First, we did not "go to war." We killed a guy who murdered 600 AMERICANS.
Where are your priorities? And your loyalties?
You still haven't answered my question: why cultural sites instead of military targets, which would be the appropriate hit if we were going to engage in war.
Why not both? If we are forced to order a large scale strike against the Iranian leadership, it will be more to deliver a scathing message than to weaken its military - remember that while these are acts of war, we are not at war with Iran. The purpose of the attack will be to so humble the Iranian leadership that they will be hesitant to attack Americans again.You have no cause to question my loyalties, asshole. And don't misquote me, either.Maybe you should run for president on that.Yes, I do. We do not sink to their level. If the Pres feels we need to go to war with Iran for its provocations, then let him explain and we will begin. Targeting cultural sites? Why that instead of military sites?You have a problem with this?“They’re allowed to kill our people. They’re allowed to torture and maim our people. They’re allowed to use roadside bombs and blow up our people. And we’re not allowed to touch their cultural site? It doesn’t work that way,” he said
First, we did not "go to war." We killed a guy who murdered 600 AMERICANS.
Where are your priorities? And your loyalties?
You still haven't answered my question: why cultural sites instead of military targets, which would be the appropriate hit if we were going to engage in war.
Why not both? If we are forced to order a large scale strike against the Iranian leadership, it will be more to deliver a scathing message than to weaken its military - remember that while these are acts of war, we are not at war with Iran. The purpose of the attack will be to so humble the Iranian leadership that they will be hesitant to attack Americans again.You have no cause to question my loyalties, asshole. And don't misquote me, either.Maybe you should run for president on that.Yes, I do. We do not sink to their level. If the Pres feels we need to go to war with Iran for its provocations, then let him explain and we will begin. Targeting cultural sites? Why that instead of military sites?You have a problem with this?“They’re allowed to kill our people. They’re allowed to torture and maim our people. They’re allowed to use roadside bombs and blow up our people. And we’re not allowed to touch their cultural site? It doesn’t work that way,” he said
First, we did not "go to war." We killed a guy who murdered 600 AMERICANS.
Where are your priorities? And your loyalties?
You still haven't answered my question: why cultural sites instead of military targets, which would be the appropriate hit if we were going to engage in war.
Iran is filled with shrines commemorating the Islamic Revolution and especially the capture of the US embassy and the taking of US hostages and of leaders of the present regime, all propaganda pieces intended to inspire loyalty and fear in the population. Why not blow these u? This is not a war in which we have to choose strategic targets to weaken the enemy's ability to fight back; this is a strongly worded message not to attack Americans. Let's blow up all the statues and shrines that seek to glorify the present regime.
Now that's something...you're white stupid ass is at home laughing at me, while all the fuckin planet is laughing at you simple minded red white and vomit retards who support Trump and lets not forget how they treat that bitch. So you keep on laughing fool and trust me, the american sane would vote for a dust ball stuck in a belly button before the clown gets another term....remember idiot, Putin may be off that day, who knows in Nov.Winning??? LOLOLOLOL....only a simple minded redneck hooked on OPIODs and SSI checks, think we're winning....oh and making america great again....LOLOLOLOLOLOUS upset that our allies aren't helping us
YOU seem to be the one who is upset. I wonder why? Too much winning?
As opposed to an illiterate, uneducated, triggered, welfare queen like you moron? Your stupidity is truly astounding. We’re winning, laughing at you, and will enjoy rubbing your face in another Trump term in November.
In that case, they are simply military targets. That is NOT what Trump was threatening.You have no cause to question my loyalties, asshole. And don't misquote me, either.Maybe you should run for president on that.Yes, I do. We do not sink to their level. If the Pres feels we need to go to war with Iran for its provocations, then let him explain and we will begin. Targeting cultural sites? Why that instead of military sites?You have a problem with this?“They’re allowed to kill our people. They’re allowed to torture and maim our people. They’re allowed to use roadside bombs and blow up our people. And we’re not allowed to touch their cultural site? It doesn’t work that way,” he said
First, we did not "go to war." We killed a guy who murdered 600 AMERICANS.
Where are your priorities? And your loyalties?
You still haven't answered my question: why cultural sites instead of military targets, which would be the appropriate hit if we were going to engage in war.
Relax, maam. Sometimes "cultural" sites can overlap with military targets. It depends on what the site is being used for. If it is a ancient shrine with on the hill with a thousand prayer rugs and a guy in a funny hat, that's one thing. If it is an ancient or modern temple also housing weapons and ammunition storage, or disguising an anti-aircraft site site sometimes with military trucks in and out on a daily or weekly basis, that's something else. In the middle east, middle eastern military have done that sort of thing, even putting anti-aircraft sites on top of churches, mosques, even hospitals.
To me, that is the height of arrogance. No.Why not both? If we are forced to order a large scale strike against the Iranian leadership, it will be more to deliver a scathing message than to weaken its military - remember that while these are acts of war, we are not at war with Iran. The purpose of the attack will be to so humble the Iranian leadership that they will be hesitant to attack Americans again.You have no cause to question my loyalties, asshole. And don't misquote me, either.Maybe you should run for president on that.Yes, I do. We do not sink to their level. If the Pres feels we need to go to war with Iran for its provocations, then let him explain and we will begin. Targeting cultural sites? Why that instead of military sites?You have a problem with this?“They’re allowed to kill our people. They’re allowed to torture and maim our people. They’re allowed to use roadside bombs and blow up our people. And we’re not allowed to touch their cultural site? It doesn’t work that way,” he said
First, we did not "go to war." We killed a guy who murdered 600 AMERICANS.
Where are your priorities? And your loyalties?
You still haven't answered my question: why cultural sites instead of military targets, which would be the appropriate hit if we were going to engage in war.
Iran is filled with shrines commemorating the Islamic Revolution and especially the capture of the US embassy and the taking of US hostages and of leaders of the present regime, all propaganda pieces intended to inspire loyalty and fear in the population. Why not blow these u? This is not a war in which we have to choose strategic targets to weaken the enemy's ability to fight back; this is a strongly worded message not to attack Americans. Let's blow up all the statues and shrines that seek to glorify the present regime.
To me, that is the height of arrogance. No.Why not both? If we are forced to order a large scale strike against the Iranian leadership, it will be more to deliver a scathing message than to weaken its military - remember that while these are acts of war, we are not at war with Iran. The purpose of the attack will be to so humble the Iranian leadership that they will be hesitant to attack Americans again.You have no cause to question my loyalties, asshole. And don't misquote me, either.Maybe you should run for president on that.Yes, I do. We do not sink to their level. If the Pres feels we need to go to war with Iran for its provocations, then let him explain and we will begin. Targeting cultural sites? Why that instead of military sites?You have a problem with this?
First, we did not "go to war." We killed a guy who murdered 600 AMERICANS.
Where are your priorities? And your loyalties?
You still haven't answered my question: why cultural sites instead of military targets, which would be the appropriate hit if we were going to engage in war.
Iran is filled with shrines commemorating the Islamic Revolution and especially the capture of the US embassy and the taking of US hostages and of leaders of the present regime, all propaganda pieces intended to inspire loyalty and fear in the population. Why not blow these u? This is not a war in which we have to choose strategic targets to weaken the enemy's ability to fight back; this is a strongly worded message not to attack Americans. Let's blow up all the statues and shrines that seek to glorify the present regime.
Because I think we should hit their military sites and strategic targets instead of ancient temples etc.? We call those jihadis terrorists for not sticking to attacking identified military personnel. Right? So why are we even thinking of hitting cultural targets as some sort of "punishment?"To me, that is the height of arrogance. No.Why not both? If we are forced to order a large scale strike against the Iranian leadership, it will be more to deliver a scathing message than to weaken its military - remember that while these are acts of war, we are not at war with Iran. The purpose of the attack will be to so humble the Iranian leadership that they will be hesitant to attack Americans again.You have no cause to question my loyalties, asshole. And don't misquote me, either.Maybe you should run for president on that.Yes, I do. We do not sink to their level. If the Pres feels we need to go to war with Iran for its provocations, then let him explain and we will begin. Targeting cultural sites? Why that instead of military sites?
First, we did not "go to war." We killed a guy who murdered 600 AMERICANS.
Where are your priorities? And your loyalties?
You still haven't answered my question: why cultural sites instead of military targets, which would be the appropriate hit if we were going to engage in war.
Iran is filled with shrines commemorating the Islamic Revolution and especially the capture of the US embassy and the taking of US hostages and of leaders of the present regime, all propaganda pieces intended to inspire loyalty and fear in the population. Why not blow these u? This is not a war in which we have to choose strategic targets to weaken the enemy's ability to fight back; this is a strongly worded message not to attack Americans. Let's blow up all the statues and shrines that seek to glorify the present regime.
Are you a terrorist sympathizer - or is there something else going on here?
In that case, they are simply military targets. That is NOT what Trump was threatening.You have no cause to question my loyalties, asshole. And don't misquote me, either.Maybe you should run for president on that.Yes, I do. We do not sink to their level. If the Pres feels we need to go to war with Iran for its provocations, then let him explain and we will begin. Targeting cultural sites? Why that instead of military sites?You have a problem with this?
First, we did not "go to war." We killed a guy who murdered 600 AMERICANS.
Where are your priorities? And your loyalties?
You still haven't answered my question: why cultural sites instead of military targets, which would be the appropriate hit if we were going to engage in war.
Relax, maam. Sometimes "cultural" sites can overlap with military targets. It depends on what the site is being used for. If it is a ancient shrine with on the hill with a thousand prayer rugs and a guy in a funny hat, that's one thing. If it is an ancient or modern temple also housing weapons and ammunition storage, or disguising an anti-aircraft site site sometimes with military trucks in and out on a daily or weekly basis, that's something else. In the middle east, middle eastern military have done that sort of thing, even putting anti-aircraft sites on top of churches, mosques, even hospitals.
That is an act of war. Where is your evidence he murdered 600 Americans?First, we did not "go to war." We killed a guy who murdered 600 AMERICANS.
You call them 'terrorist' for attacking US military targets too. It has replaced the label 'communist' in the American lexicon.We call those jihadis terrorists for not sticking to attacking identified military personnel.
Ah, I see, bad manners.To me, that is the height of arrogance. No.Why not both? If we are forced to order a large scale strike against the Iranian leadership, it will be more to deliver a scathing message than to weaken its military - remember that while these are acts of war, we are not at war with Iran. The purpose of the attack will be to so humble the Iranian leadership that they will be hesitant to attack Americans again.You have no cause to question my loyalties, asshole. And don't misquote me, either.Maybe you should run for president on that.Yes, I do. We do not sink to their level. If the Pres feels we need to go to war with Iran for its provocations, then let him explain and we will begin. Targeting cultural sites? Why that instead of military sites?You have a problem with this?
First, we did not "go to war." We killed a guy who murdered 600 AMERICANS.
Where are your priorities? And your loyalties?
You still haven't answered my question: why cultural sites instead of military targets, which would be the appropriate hit if we were going to engage in war.
Iran is filled with shrines commemorating the Islamic Revolution and especially the capture of the US embassy and the taking of US hostages and of leaders of the present regime, all propaganda pieces intended to inspire loyalty and fear in the population. Why not blow these u? This is not a war in which we have to choose strategic targets to weaken the enemy's ability to fight back; this is a strongly worded message not to attack Americans. Let's blow up all the statues and shrines that seek to glorify the present regime.
Hope so.In that case, they are simply military targets. That is NOT what Trump was threatening.You have no cause to question my loyalties, asshole. And don't misquote me, either.Maybe you should run for president on that.Yes, I do. We do not sink to their level. If the Pres feels we need to go to war with Iran for its provocations, then let him explain and we will begin. Targeting cultural sites? Why that instead of military sites?
First, we did not "go to war." We killed a guy who murdered 600 AMERICANS.
Where are your priorities? And your loyalties?
You still haven't answered my question: why cultural sites instead of military targets, which would be the appropriate hit if we were going to engage in war.
Relax, maam. Sometimes "cultural" sites can overlap with military targets. It depends on what the site is being used for. If it is a ancient shrine with on the hill with a thousand prayer rugs and a guy in a funny hat, that's one thing. If it is an ancient or modern temple also housing weapons and ammunition storage, or disguising an anti-aircraft site site sometimes with military trucks in and out on a daily or weekly basis, that's something else. In the middle east, middle eastern military have done that sort of thing, even putting anti-aircraft sites on top of churches, mosques, even hospitals.
Mosques for being mosques, shrines for being shrines are unlikely targets for symbolism sake. The officers that show him the lists are usually men of Honor, as are the Officers that implement orders up and down the chain. Some of you refer to could be criminal under UCMJ. You can get pardoned, but it doesn't restore honor you may have lived, supporting for most of your life, and as I said, Most of these are men of honor. Trump often just blows hot air up the skirts of his fans for cheap thrills.
