Little-Acorn
Gold Member
Raise your hand if you can identify the section of the Constitution that authorizes the Fed Govt to regulate what foods are served in schools.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So you weren't mad that Junk Food was only offered but youre hopping mad that Healthy Foods will replace junk food?.?
I'd love to hear why? I fear you don't have any idea really
No I'm mad at federal tax money being wasted on this crap, both in the design of it, the implementation of it, and the forcing of localities to perform it at the risk of losing thier lunch money funding.
Its up to the local school board or state education department to figure this crap out, not the feds.
So your mad that tax money is going to give kids healthy food alternatives?
And so the Obama's USDA Gestapo deprives kids of the sugar intake they need to remain conscious during school time.
Newly Signed Law Will Help States Fight Growing Child Obesity Epidemic and Prevent Hunger Among Vulnerable Children and Families
My legislation includes important steps to promote comprehensive solutions to child health and nutrition, including provisions to promote nutrition education and physical activity at the state and local level. It also encourages school districts to establish local wellness policies, including goals for nutrition education and physical activity, and include nutrition guidelines for foods sold in schools,”
IF you morons do not understand we have an obesity problem,
then Sugar is NOT your problem.
lack of grey matter, is your problem.
ONE "pop" has 40 gr of sugar.
that's your daily intake in ONE beverage.
how much over weight are you fools?
have fun when you are OLD AND FAT!
THEN you want the Tax Payer to pick up the tab for YOUR irresponsible behavior.
DIM cons.
WE are the second FATTEST nation. YOU should be proud.
Obese and proud!
Fattest countries in the world revealed: Extraordinary graphic charts the average body mass index of men and women in every country (with some surprising results) | Mail Online
TRANSLATION: No, I have no explanation for why this is a FEDERAL issue.
You appear to be completely ignorant of the federal money that has been funding school lunches since...like...the 1930s.
These posts are amusing.
USDA targets candy, cola in new school nutrition regulations
By Ben Goad - 06/27/13 11:29 AM ET
...
Can some progressive explain to me why the hell this is a federal issue????
Can some progressive explain to me why the hell this is a federal issue????
And so the Obama's USDA Gestapo deprives kids of the sugar intake they need to remain conscious during school time.
And the republican gestapo wants to deprive women of what they do with their bodies also. Both political parties interfere in people's freedom.
And so the Obama's USDA Gestapo deprives kids of the sugar intake they need to remain conscious during school time.
President Bush Signs Legislation to Renew School Lunch & Child Nutrition Programs
Newly Signed Law Will Help States Fight Growing Child Obesity Epidemic and Prevent Hunger Among Vulnerable Children and Families
My legislation includes important steps to promote comprehensive solutions to child health and nutrition, including provisions to promote nutrition education and physical activity at the state and local level. It also encourages school districts to establish local wellness policies, including goals for nutrition education and physical activity, and include nutrition guidelines for foods sold in schools,”
Here we are, nine years later, and you are just now complaining?
"Because Obama!"
TRANSLATION: No, I have no explanation for why this is a FEDERAL issue.
You appear to be completely ignorant of the federal money that has been funding school lunches since...like...the 1930s.
These posts are amusing.
You seem to ignore the fact that the federal money is taken from the same citizens who have their children in those schools by threat of force and then returned to them if they comply what whatever edicts the feds care to impose on the citizenry.
USDA targets candy, cola in new school nutrition regulations
By Ben Goad - 06/27/13 11:29 AM ET
...
Can some progressive explain to me why the hell this is a federal issue????
(My bold)
Read Salt sugar fat - how the food giants hooked us - Michael Moss, Random House, NY. c2013, chapter notes, bibliography, index, 347pp. How the for-profit processed food industry trumps US public health, public policy, good sense. A riveting read. What it comes down to, is that in the name of profit, the "processed food" industry is perfectly willing to kill us all - slowly, so that we can spend our last available discretionary penny with them. It's especially interesting that none of them eat their own Scheiss, & that several scientists & admins have gone over to the public health side.
The for-profits will never act on their own, there's too much money involved, & if one lets up, the others close in on the empty market segment. So - the only way we'll resolve the issue is by fed gov action - which this is the beginning of - & about time. We may be able to save Medicare/Medicaid, if Congress doesn't cave for the nth time ...
And so the Obama's USDA Gestapo deprives kids of the sugar intake they need to remain conscious during school time.
Natural and healthy foods like fruits have plenty of sugar.
Can some progressive explain to me why the hell this is a federal issue????
I'm not a progressive, but I am glad to help.
See my previous two posts.
You're welcome.
And so the Obama's USDA Gestapo deprives kids of the sugar intake they need to remain conscious during school time.
Natural and healthy foods like fruits have plenty of sugar.
Natural sugar and refined sugar are two different things.
How can so many people defend letting kids have candy and sugary drinks in school?
And so the Obama's USDA Gestapo deprives kids of the sugar intake they need to remain conscious during school time.
Natural and healthy foods like fruits have plenty of sugar.
Natural sugar and refined sugar are two different things.
How can so many people defend letting kids have candy and sugary drinks in school?
Raise your hand if you can identify the section of the Constitution that authorizes the Fed Govt to regulate what foods are served in schools.
Natural and healthy foods like fruits have plenty of sugar.
Natural sugar and refined sugar are two different things.
How can so many people defend letting kids have candy and sugary drinks in school?
how is glucose different than glucose? or fructose different from fructose? Or Sucrose different from sucrose?
...Can some progressive explain to me why the hell this is a federal issue????
This is for vending machines that the students pay for themselves, using money provided to them by thier parents. The feds have nothing to do with them, they are via arrangements with the local schools themselves.
Provided meals are a seperate issue.
Raise your hand if you can identify the section of the Constitution that authorizes the Fed Govt to regulate what foods are served in schools.
Clock is ticking, and still no answers to this question.
A corollary question: Are we a country that goes by the "rule of law", or not?