RodISHI
Platinum Member
- Nov 29, 2008
- 25,786
- 11,297
- 940
In your or someone else's theory? I am for personal choice. If the people are informed of the risk whatever those may be from both sides and they make the choice to take or forgo vaccines or any other modern device that is called 'freedom of choice' and I am for personal choice. I can tell the neighbors east, west, north or south of me that they have polluted water and warn them what they may possibly suffer the physical consequences if they drink it with out treating it but the choice is still theirs to make whether to drink it or not.I think that's a fair statement, except that if more than 5 or 6% of the population in this country believed as you do, epidemics would again start taking people's lives. Lots of lives. Is that what you want?If you choose to take that like gambling on the "odds" it should be a personal choice, not a forced requirement ever in a society of people with liberty and freedom.Aren't the odds way, way, way in our favor? If they weren't, vaccines would not be used.