Video Survives After Denver Cops Beat Man, Snatch Camera and Delete Footage

[Asclepias]

I know you are a convict but the police must have kicked your ass pretty hard for you to have become brainwashed into thinking kicking someones ass is their job. The point is that they deliberately attempted to erase the footage. If they were doing things the right way why would they need to delete the footage?

The video shows the cop doing his job. Nothing to see there.

Is that what they told you when you were beat and put in prison? Show me a police job description that says what they did is part of their job.

I wasn't beaten. I pled guilty and was sentenced. An officer is allowed to use force when subduing a subject.

The moral of this story, don't break the law. If you can't accomplish that then don' t resist arrest once you've broken the law and do not try to swallow the evidence.

That wasnt subduing the subject. They were punching him in the face while he was already subdued. We didnt ask about the moral. We are commenting on the fact the cops tried to delete the innocent by standers video which is a violation of their rights.

They were attempting to prevent the destruction of evidence that could have potently killed the guy. Would you rather have a broke jaw and live of die?

They could have potentially killed the guy. They have ways of retrieving the evidence that dont utilize body blows to the head.

 

[Boatswain2PA]

Don't break the law and you won't get your ass kicked by the police.

Yeah, the kid who had the flashbang thrown into his crib was a criminal.

Same with the scores of people who have had SWAT knock down their doors and their houses raided, sometimes resulting in death to the innocent inhabitants, only to have the police say "whoops, wrong house, you should get your door fixed."

The child wasn't but it was the child's parents that put him in danger were indeed breaking the law.

As for raiding the wrong house, rare events can and do happen.

Yes, and sometimes (albeit very rarely) police break the law as well, and need to be held to a higher standard when they do. Unfortunately they are not, which begets more criminality among the police.

Yes they do and they are punished accordingly.

Rarely. There are too many reports, and videos, of police misconduct that are either swept under the rug (like almost occurred with this one), or the police are incredulously exonerated (Rodney King, recent Cleveland playground, or recent NY choke hold).

There should be a higher standard.

 

[Boatswain2PA]

Yes, and sometimes (albeit very rarely) police break the law as well, and need to be held to a higher standard when they do. Unfortunately they are not, which begets more criminality among the police.

Cops are ASS KICKERS.....that's what they do when challenged.....don't like it, don't challenge them. If you are about to be arrested be calm and remember their name and badge number. If they rough you up anyway, most city governments will settle out of court and you'll make money on the deal. I've attacked 3 cops and an MP in my time....one was in Tennessee and I spent the night in jail for tossing him onto the hood of his car for starting to "frisk" the lady I was with. Then there was a cop in Nogales....same deal...put his hands on my woman....knocked his ass out and got away.....the MP got rough with me and I got rough with him...nothing came of it. I let my temper go off without caring about the consequences.....I could have got shot but I didn't....I'd rather to lucky than rich or crippled. Moral of the story....don't mess with ass kickers unless you got a Guardian Angel on your shoulder.

Usually the biggest actual bad-asses are the quietist guys in the room. Never knew a SEAL who bragged about how big & bad they were.

But thank you for proving my point. Police are not supposed to be ASS KICKERS, they are supposed to protect and serve.

 

[depotoo]

Did Michael Brown have his hands up when he was shot - The Washington Post
Judy Melinek, a forensic pathologist in San Francisco who reviewed the autopsy for the Post-Dispatch, told the paper that one of the officer’s shots hit Brown’s forearm and traveled from the back of the arm to the inner arm, which means Brown’s palms could not have been facing Wilson, as some witnesses have said. That trajectory shows Brown probably was not taking a standard surrender position with arms above the shoulders and palms out when he was shot outside the officer’s car, she said.

Don't break the law and you won't get your ass kicked by the police.

I know you are a convict but the police must have kicked your ass pretty hard for you to have become brainwashed into thinking kicking someones ass is their job. The point is that they deliberately attempted to erase the footage. If they were doing things the right way why would they need to delete the footage?

Forensic experts in Ferguson has stated that M Brown wasn't running away and didn't have his hands up. People who aren't experts still dont believe it because they don't want to. That means things were done the right way and still not accepted.

No they never stated that. What did Wilson change his story again? If Brown didnt run away why was he so far from the car? Also where does it say Brown didnt have his hands up and how does the forensic evidence tell you this?. I need a quote with a link.

Autopsy reports say Brown wasn't running away and didnt' have his hands up.

Official autopsy shows Michael Brown had close-range wound to his hand marijuana in system News

New Autopsy Indicates Michael Brown Didn t Have Hands Up Surrendering New Republic
Here's your link but you won't believe it. It doesn't fit what you want to hear.

Yes I have read this before. Is there a reason you couldnt find a quote to support your assertion?

 

[Kondor3]

I had grave doubts about the Martin-Zimmerman case, and erred on the side of the cop (or pseudo-cop).

I had grave doubts about the Brown case in Ferguson, MO, and erred on the side of the cop.

I had some doubts about the Garner case in NYC, and erred on the side of the cop.

I have no doubts about the Denver case seen here.

The goddamned cops should be punished just as harshly as the law can possibly allow.

To drag-out an old 1960s protester sentiment, directed against The Establishment...

"Up against the wall, mother fucker!"

 

[Lonestar_logic]

The video shows the cop doing his job. Nothing to see there.

Is that what they told you when you were beat and put in prison? Show me a police job description that says what they did is part of their job.

I wasn't beaten. I pled guilty and was sentenced. An officer is allowed to use force when subduing a subject.

The moral of this story, don't break the law. If you can't accomplish that then don' t resist arrest once you've broken the law and do not try to swallow the evidence.

That wasnt subduing the subject. They were punching him in the face while he was already subdued. We didnt ask about the moral. We are commenting on the fact the cops tried to delete the innocent by standers video which is a violation of their rights.

They were attempting to prevent the destruction of evidence that could have potently killed the guy. Would you rather have a broke jaw and live of die?

They could have potentially killed the guy. They have ways of retrieving the evidence that dont utilize body blows to the head.

Did he die?

 

[bodecea]

FAGGOT THREAD

Not until you got here

Boy you sure told me eh, Nancy?

Again, welcome aboard.

 

[Boatswain2PA]

Is that what they told you when you were beat and put in prison? Show me a police job description that says what they did is part of their job.

I wasn't beaten. I pled guilty and was sentenced. An officer is allowed to use force when subduing a subject.

The moral of this story, don't break the law. If you can't accomplish that then don' t resist arrest once you've broken the law and do not try to swallow the evidence.

That wasnt subduing the subject. They were punching him in the face while he was already subdued. We didnt ask about the moral. We are commenting on the fact the cops tried to delete the innocent by standers video which is a violation of their rights.

They were attempting to prevent the destruction of evidence that could have potently killed the guy. Would you rather have a broke jaw and live of die?

They could have potentially killed the guy. They have ways of retrieving the evidence that dont utilize body blows to the head.

Did he die?

No, so the cops should be charged with assault & battery, not murder. Come on man, try to use some of that Texan common sense...

 

[Asclepias]

Is that what they told you when you were beat and put in prison? Show me a police job description that says what they did is part of their job.

I wasn't beaten. I pled guilty and was sentenced. An officer is allowed to use force when subduing a subject.

The moral of this story, don't break the law. If you can't accomplish that then don' t resist arrest once you've broken the law and do not try to swallow the evidence.

That wasnt subduing the subject. They were punching him in the face while he was already subdued. We didnt ask about the moral. We are commenting on the fact the cops tried to delete the innocent by standers video which is a violation of their rights.

They were attempting to prevent the destruction of evidence that could have potently killed the guy. Would you rather have a broke jaw and live of die?

They could have potentially killed the guy. They have ways of retrieving the evidence that dont utilize body blows to the head.

Did he die?

What does that have to do with the point he could have?

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Don't break the law and you won't get your ass kicked by the police.

Yeah, the kid who had the flashbang thrown into his crib was a criminal.

Same with the scores of people who have had SWAT knock down their doors and their houses raided, sometimes resulting in death to the innocent inhabitants, only to have the police say "whoops, wrong house, you should get your door fixed."

The child wasn't but it was the child's parents that put him in danger were indeed breaking the law.

As for raiding the wrong house, rare events can and do happen.

Yes, and sometimes (albeit very rarely) police break the law as well, and need to be held to a higher standard when they do. Unfortunately they are not, which begets more criminality among the police.

Yes they do and they are punished accordingly.

Rarely. There are too many reports, and videos, of police misconduct that are either swept under the rug (like almost occurred with this one), or the police are incredulously exonerated (Rodney King, recent Cleveland playground, or recent NY choke hold).

There should be a higher standard.

Laws must be equally applied.

 

[Asclepias]

Did Michael Brown have his hands up when he was shot - The Washington Post
Judy Melinek, a forensic pathologist in San Francisco who reviewed the autopsy for the Post-Dispatch, told the paper that one of the officer’s shots hit Brown’s forearm and traveled from the back of the arm to the inner arm, which means Brown’s palms could not have been facing Wilson, as some witnesses have said. That trajectory shows Brown probably was not taking a standard surrender position with arms above the shoulders and palms out when he was shot outside the officer’s car, she said.

I know you are a convict but the police must have kicked your ass pretty hard for you to have become brainwashed into thinking kicking someones ass is their job. The point is that they deliberately attempted to erase the footage. If they were doing things the right way why would they need to delete the footage?

Forensic experts in Ferguson has stated that M Brown wasn't running away and didn't have his hands up. People who aren't experts still dont believe it because they don't want to. That means things were done the right way and still not accepted.

No they never stated that. What did Wilson change his story again? If Brown didnt run away why was he so far from the car? Also where does it say Brown didnt have his hands up and how does the forensic evidence tell you this?. I need a quote with a link.

Autopsy reports say Brown wasn't running away and didnt' have his hands up.

Official autopsy shows Michael Brown had close-range wound to his hand marijuana in system News

New Autopsy Indicates Michael Brown Didn t Have Hands Up Surrendering New Republic
Here's your link but you won't believe it. It doesn't fit what you want to hear.

Yes I have read this before. Is there a reason you couldnt find a quote to support your assertion?

Was that after the shots to his body or before? Most people dont keep their hands up after taking one in the chest or abdomen.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

I wasn't beaten. I pled guilty and was sentenced. An officer is allowed to use force when subduing a subject.

The moral of this story, don't break the law. If you can't accomplish that then don' t resist arrest once you've broken the law and do not try to swallow the evidence.

That wasnt subduing the subject. They were punching him in the face while he was already subdued. We didnt ask about the moral. We are commenting on the fact the cops tried to delete the innocent by standers video which is a violation of their rights.

They were attempting to prevent the destruction of evidence that could have potently killed the guy. Would you rather have a broke jaw and live of die?

They could have potentially killed the guy. They have ways of retrieving the evidence that dont utilize body blows to the head.

Did he die?

No, so the cops should be charged with assault & battery, not murder. Come on man, try to use some of that Texan common sense...

Mess with the bull..........

 

[Lonestar_logic]

I wasn't beaten. I pled guilty and was sentenced. An officer is allowed to use force when subduing a subject.

The moral of this story, don't break the law. If you can't accomplish that then don' t resist arrest once you've broken the law and do not try to swallow the evidence.

That wasnt subduing the subject. They were punching him in the face while he was already subdued. We didnt ask about the moral. We are commenting on the fact the cops tried to delete the innocent by standers video which is a violation of their rights.

They were attempting to prevent the destruction of evidence that could have potently killed the guy. Would you rather have a broke jaw and live of die?

They could have potentially killed the guy. They have ways of retrieving the evidence that dont utilize body blows to the head.

Did he die?

What does that have to do with the point he could have?

He didn't. You have no point. Woulda, coulda, shoulda doesn't matter. Facts are what matters.

Fact the subject was attempting to swallow a large amount of heroin.
Fact the police attempting to stop the subject.
Fact the man is still alive, in jail, but alive.

 

[Kondor3]

* Excessive use of force directed against the drug suspect.

* Aggravated assault and battery on the camera-equipped witness-bystander.

* Obstruction of justice - attempted deletion by the cop(s) of video file(s) pertaining to a police matter.

* Violation of the civil rights of the camera-equipped witness-bystander, with respect to illegal seizure of property and deletion of personally-owned and legally created video file(s).

* Aggravated assault and battery on the pregnant wife.

* Aggravated assault and battery on the unborn child.

* Violation of whatever other criminal statutes might apply in their jurisdiction pertaining to police behaviors in such circumstances.

* Violation of various police procedures, policies and guidelines - with appropriate job-related disciplinary action - suspension without pay, termination without severance or benefits, loss of pension - throw the book at the bastard(s).

---------------------

Intentionally harming the pregnant mother is what did it for me... phukk 'em... throw 'em to the wolves.

 

[Boatswain2PA]

Yeah, the kid who had the flashbang thrown into his crib was a criminal.

Same with the scores of people who have had SWAT knock down their doors and their houses raided, sometimes resulting in death to the innocent inhabitants, only to have the police say "whoops, wrong house, you should get your door fixed."

The child wasn't but it was the child's parents that put him in danger were indeed breaking the law.

As for raiding the wrong house, rare events can and do happen.

Yes, and sometimes (albeit very rarely) police break the law as well, and need to be held to a higher standard when they do. Unfortunately they are not, which begets more criminality among the police.

Yes they do and they are punished accordingly.

Rarely. There are too many reports, and videos, of police misconduct that are either swept under the rug (like almost occurred with this one), or the police are incredulously exonerated (Rodney King, recent Cleveland playground, or recent NY choke hold).

There should be a higher standard.

Laws must be equally applied.

But the are not!!!

Not when there is a blue wall of officers protecting officers who violate our rights. A cop can arrest you and, when handcuffing you can get away with beating the hell out of you simply by saying you resisted. Or, jump on your back and put you in a fatal choke hold, and get away with it simply by saying you were resisting.

We as society rightly give more credence to their testimony than to the "average" citizens testimony, but this should come with the expectation that they be held to a HIGHER standard of honesty. Unfortunately the latter part of that social contract has failed.

 

[BullKurtz]

Usually the biggest actual bad-asses are the quietist guys in the room. Never knew a SEAL who bragged about how big & bad they were.

But thank you for proving my point. Police are not supposed to be ASS KICKERS, they are supposed to protect and serve.

See, this is why threads like this are FAGGOT THREADS....bellyaching twinks who don't know shit about anything. Who's the "quietest guy in the room" means what? Nothing.....who's talking about a S.E.A.L.? I've known a couple and you haven't....so you're talking out your fairy ass. "to serve and protect" is what's written on the side of the patrol car.....a cop's motto, GET HOME ALIVE TONIGHT. You want your negroes to be a protected class, tell them to act like decent citizens and to police their own neighborhoods. As long as there is a HUGE criminal class of negroes, innocent blacks will be hassled to see what they're up to....it's a thin blue line....you punks don't really want what you're asking for because YOU are more afraid of the thug element than we are.....we'll defend ourselves...you don't know how.

 

[BullKurtz]

Again, welcome aboard.

Bitch...don't talk with your mouth full.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

 

[Asclepias]

That wasnt subduing the subject. They were punching him in the face while he was already subdued. We didnt ask about the moral. We are commenting on the fact the cops tried to delete the innocent by standers video which is a violation of their rights.

They were attempting to prevent the destruction of evidence that could have potently killed the guy. Would you rather have a broke jaw and live of die?

They could have potentially killed the guy. They have ways of retrieving the evidence that dont utilize body blows to the head.

Did he die?

What does that have to do with the point he could have?

He didn't. You have no point. Woulda, coulda, shoulda doesn't matter. Facts are what matters.

Fact the subject was attempting to swallow a large amount of heroin.
Fact the police attempting to stop the subject.
Fact the man is still alive, in jail, but alive.

Fact. They didnt have to pummel him to stop the object and possibly kill him. How badly did the CO beat you in prison to cause your brain damage?

 

[BullKurtz]

Fact. They didnt have to pummel him to stop the object and possibly kill him. How badly did the CO beat you in prison to cause your brain damage?

So Asslips...when ya gonna break out your "white chicks want black cock" routine for these fairies?

BTW, Lonestar would take you apart like a tinkertoy set, boy.