Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Pentagon is turning into a Political Correct institution because of that Muslim CINC they have to kowtow to. Where Graham erred is his failure to call Islam what it really is. A global cancer. And Wall Street isn't connected to Syria by any stretch of your imagination.Apparently, the Pentagon found something objectionable:He supports homicide bombers and religious hatred:
"Franklin Graham, a strong supporter of the 2003 American invasion of Iraq, came under criticism for comments he made about Islam in the wake of the September 11, 2001 attacks when he referred to Islam as 'a very evil and wicked religion.'"
Franklin Graham - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
So what's the error in what he said?
"On April 22, 2010 after objections from the Military Religious Freedom Foundation and the Muslim group Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the Pentagon rescinded his (Graham's) invitation from the Christian conservative National Day of Prayer Task Force to speak at a Pentagon National Day of Prayer event.[9]
"He still attended the National Day of Prayer meeting at the Pentagon, but outside in the parking lot with about a dozen people.
"In the August 30, 2010 issue of the Time magazine, 'Does America Hate Islam?' Graham reportedly said that Islam 'is a religion of hatred. It's a religion of war.' Building the cultural center near Ground Zero, he says, means Muslims 'will claim now that the World Trade Center property ... is Islamic land.'"[13]
If Islam is a "religion of war", what is capitalism?
Franklin Graham - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
That seems to be the strategy Obama bought into about the time he left California for Columbia where he undoubtedly read Brzezinski's Grand Chessboard:Ultimately it's always about the money and the expansion of empire into central Asia that is driving it.
"The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives is one of the major works of Zbigniew Brzezinski. Brzezinski graduated with a PhD from Harvard University in 1953 and became Professor of American Foreign Policy at Johns Hopkins University before becoming the United States National Security Advisor from 1977 - 1981 under the administration of President Jimmy Carter.
"Regarding the landmass of Eurasia as the center of global power, Brzezinski sets out to formulate a Eurasian geostrategy for the United States. In particular, he writes, it is imperative that no Eurasian challenger should emerge capable of dominating Eurasia and thus also of challenging America's global pre-eminence.
"Much of his analysis is concerned with geostrategy in Central Asia, focusing on the exercise of power on the Eurasian landmass in a post-Soviet environment. In his chapter dedicated to what he refers to as the 'Global Balkans', Brzezinski makes use of Halford J. Mackinder's Heartland Theory.
Apparently Lebanon, Syria, and Iran are slated to join Libya and Iraq in the Middle East in order to make this happen, and I don't think it matters in the slightest which major party controls the White House or Congress.
American Exceptionalism has always cut with two edges:That seems to be the strategy Obama bought into about the time he left California for Columbia where he undoubtedly read Brzezinski's Grand Chessboard:Ultimately it's always about the money and the expansion of empire into central Asia that is driving it.
"The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives is one of the major works of Zbigniew Brzezinski. Brzezinski graduated with a PhD from Harvard University in 1953 and became Professor of American Foreign Policy at Johns Hopkins University before becoming the United States National Security Advisor from 1977 - 1981 under the administration of President Jimmy Carter.
"Regarding the landmass of Eurasia as the center of global power, Brzezinski sets out to formulate a Eurasian geostrategy for the United States. In particular, he writes, it is imperative that no Eurasian challenger should emerge capable of dominating Eurasia and thus also of challenging America's global pre-eminence.
"Much of his analysis is concerned with geostrategy in Central Asia, focusing on the exercise of power on the Eurasian landmass in a post-Soviet environment. In his chapter dedicated to what he refers to as the 'Global Balkans', Brzezinski makes use of Halford J. Mackinder's Heartland Theory.
Apparently Lebanon, Syria, and Iran are slated to join Libya and Iraq in the Middle East in order to make this happen, and I don't think it matters in the slightest which major party controls the White House or Congress.
You get double bonus points for writing that. I was eluding to that a little bit.
Maybe it's Syria's refusal to connect with Wall Street that presents private bankers with their biggest threat?The Pentagon is turning into a Political Correct institution because of that Muslim CINC they have to kowtow to. Where Graham erred is his failure to call Islam what it really is. A global cancer. And Wall Street isn't connected to Syria by any stretch of your imagination.Apparently, the Pentagon found something objectionable:So what's the error in what he said?
"On April 22, 2010 after objections from the Military Religious Freedom Foundation and the Muslim group Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the Pentagon rescinded his (Graham's) invitation from the Christian conservative National Day of Prayer Task Force to speak at a Pentagon National Day of Prayer event.[9]
"He still attended the National Day of Prayer meeting at the Pentagon, but outside in the parking lot with about a dozen people.
"In the August 30, 2010 issue of the Time magazine, 'Does America Hate Islam?' Graham reportedly said that Islam 'is a religion of hatred. It's a religion of war.' Building the cultural center near Ground Zero, he says, means Muslims 'will claim now that the World Trade Center property ... is Islamic land.'"[13]
If Islam is a "religion of war", what is capitalism?
Franklin Graham - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Of course NOT!There is no empire here!
Maybe it's Syria's refusal to connect with Wall Street that presents private bankers with their biggest threat?The Pentagon is turning into a Political Correct institution because of that Muslim CINC they have to kowtow to. Where Graham erred is his failure to call Islam what it really is. A global cancer. And Wall Street isn't connected to Syria by any stretch of your imagination.Apparently, the Pentagon found something objectionable:
"On April 22, 2010 after objections from the Military Religious Freedom Foundation and the Muslim group Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the Pentagon rescinded his (Graham's) invitation from the Christian conservative National Day of Prayer Task Force to speak at a Pentagon National Day of Prayer event.[9]
"He still attended the National Day of Prayer meeting at the Pentagon, but outside in the parking lot with about a dozen people.
"In the August 30, 2010 issue of the Time magazine, 'Does America Hate Islam?' Graham reportedly said that Islam 'is a religion of hatred. It's a religion of war.' Building the cultural center near Ground Zero, he says, means Muslims 'will claim now that the World Trade Center property ... is Islamic land.'"[13]
If Islam is a "religion of war", what is capitalism?
Franklin Graham - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"Iraq and Libya have been taken out, and Iran has been heavily boycotted. Syria is now in the cross-hairs. Why? Here is one overlooked scenario . . .
In an August 2013 article titled 'Larry Summers and the Secret "End-game" Memo,' Greg Palast posted evidence of a secret late-1990s plan devised by Wall Street and U.S. Treasury officials to open banking to the lucrative derivatives business.
"To pull this off required the relaxation of banking regulations not just in the US but globally.
"The vehicle to be used was the Financial Services Agreement of the World Trade Organization.
"The 'end-game' would require not just coercing support among WTO members but taking down those countries refusing to join. Some key countries remained holdouts from the WTO, including Iraq, Libya, Iran and Syria.
"In these Islamic countries, banks are largely state-owned; and 'usury' charging rent for the 'use' of money is viewed as a sin, if not a crime.
"That puts them at odds with the Western model of rent extraction by private middlemen."
Surely, you remember Wesley Clark's admission regarding seven usury-hating Muslim states slated for extinction in five years?
"That was the fate of countries in the WTO, but (what about) those that were not in that organization at all, including Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran.
"These seven countries were named by U.S. General Wesley Clark (Ret.) in a 2007 'Democracy Now' interview as the new 'rogue states' being targeted for take down after September 11, 2001.
"He said that about 10 days after 9-11, he was told by a general that the decision had been made to go to war with Iraq. Later, the same general said they planned to take out seven countries in five years: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran.
"What did these countries have in common?
"Besides being Islamic, they were not members either of the WTO or of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS).
"That left them outside the long regulatory arm of the central bankers central bank in Switzerland.
"Other countries later identified as 'rogue states' that were also not members of the BIS included North Korea, Cuba, and Afghanistan."
Wall Street?s Secret ?Economic Endgame?: Making the World Safe for Banksters, Syria in the Cross-hairs | Global Research
I sincerely hope you are not really naive enough to doubt the Evil of private bankers when it comes to protecting their $700 trillion global derivatives pyramid.
Maybe it's Syria's refusal to connect with Wall Street that presents private bankers with their biggest threat?The Pentagon is turning into a Political Correct institution because of that Muslim CINC they have to kowtow to. Where Graham erred is his failure to call Islam what it really is. A global cancer. And Wall Street isn't connected to Syria by any stretch of your imagination.Apparently, the Pentagon found something objectionable:
"On April 22, 2010 after objections from the Military Religious Freedom Foundation and the Muslim group Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the Pentagon rescinded his (Graham's) invitation from the Christian conservative National Day of Prayer Task Force to speak at a Pentagon National Day of Prayer event.[9]
"He still attended the National Day of Prayer meeting at the Pentagon, but outside in the parking lot with about a dozen people.
"In the August 30, 2010 issue of the Time magazine, 'Does America Hate Islam?' Graham reportedly said that Islam 'is a religion of hatred. It's a religion of war.' Building the cultural center near Ground Zero, he says, means Muslims 'will claim now that the World Trade Center property ... is Islamic land.'"[13]
If Islam is a "religion of war", what is capitalism?
Franklin Graham - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"Iraq and Libya have been taken out, and Iran has been heavily boycotted. Syria is now in the cross-hairs. Why? Here is one overlooked scenario . . .
In an August 2013 article titled 'Larry Summers and the Secret "End-game" Memo,' Greg Palast posted evidence of a secret late-1990s plan devised by Wall Street and U.S. Treasury officials to open banking to the lucrative derivatives business.
"To pull this off required the relaxation of banking regulations not just in the US but globally.
"The vehicle to be used was the Financial Services Agreement of the World Trade Organization.
"The 'end-game' would require not just coercing support among WTO members but taking down those countries refusing to join. Some key countries remained holdouts from the WTO, including Iraq, Libya, Iran and Syria.
"In these Islamic countries, banks are largely state-owned; and 'usury' charging rent for the 'use' of money is viewed as a sin, if not a crime.
"That puts them at odds with the Western model of rent extraction by private middlemen."
Surely, you remember Wesley Clark's admission regarding seven usury-hating Muslim states slated for extinction in five years?
"That was the fate of countries in the WTO, but (what about) those that were not in that organization at all, including Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran.
"These seven countries were named by U.S. General Wesley Clark (Ret.) in a 2007 'Democracy Now' interview as the new 'rogue states' being targeted for take down after September 11, 2001.
"He said that about 10 days after 9-11, he was told by a general that the decision had been made to go to war with Iraq. Later, the same general said they planned to take out seven countries in five years: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran.
"What did these countries have in common?
"Besides being Islamic, they were not members either of the WTO or of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS).
"That left them outside the long regulatory arm of the central bankers central bank in Switzerland.
"Other countries later identified as 'rogue states' that were also not members of the BIS included North Korea, Cuba, and Afghanistan."
Wall Street?s Secret ?Economic Endgame?: Making the World Safe for Banksters, Syria in the Cross-hairs | Global Research
I sincerely hope you are not really naive enough to doubt the Evil of private bankers when it comes to protecting their $700 trillion global derivatives pyramid.
Maybe it's Syria's refusal to connect with Wall Street that presents private bankers with their biggest threat?The Pentagon is turning into a Political Correct institution because of that Muslim CINC they have to kowtow to. Where Graham erred is his failure to call Islam what it really is. A global cancer. And Wall Street isn't connected to Syria by any stretch of your imagination.
"Iraq and Libya have been taken out, and Iran has been heavily boycotted. Syria is now in the cross-hairs. Why? Here is one overlooked scenario . . .
In an August 2013 article titled 'Larry Summers and the Secret "End-game" Memo,' Greg Palast posted evidence of a secret late-1990s plan devised by Wall Street and U.S. Treasury officials to open banking to the lucrative derivatives business.
"To pull this off required the relaxation of banking regulations not just in the US but globally.
"The vehicle to be used was the Financial Services Agreement of the World Trade Organization.
"The 'end-game' would require not just coercing support among WTO members but taking down those countries refusing to join. Some key countries remained holdouts from the WTO, including Iraq, Libya, Iran and Syria.
"In these Islamic countries, banks are largely state-owned; and 'usury' charging rent for the 'use' of money is viewed as a sin, if not a crime.
"That puts them at odds with the Western model of rent extraction by private middlemen."
Surely, you remember Wesley Clark's admission regarding seven usury-hating Muslim states slated for extinction in five years?
"That was the fate of countries in the WTO, but (what about) those that were not in that organization at all, including Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran.
"These seven countries were named by U.S. General Wesley Clark (Ret.) in a 2007 'Democracy Now' interview as the new 'rogue states' being targeted for take down after September 11, 2001.
"He said that about 10 days after 9-11, he was told by a general that the decision had been made to go to war with Iraq. Later, the same general said they planned to take out seven countries in five years: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran.
"What did these countries have in common?
"Besides being Islamic, they were not members either of the WTO or of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS).
"That left them outside the long regulatory arm of the central bankers central bank in Switzerland.
"Other countries later identified as 'rogue states' that were also not members of the BIS included North Korea, Cuba, and Afghanistan."
Wall Street?s Secret ?Economic Endgame?: Making the World Safe for Banksters, Syria in the Cross-hairs | Global Research
I sincerely hope you are not really naive enough to doubt the Evil of private bankers when it comes to protecting their $700 trillion global derivatives pyramid.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=40cD8uYOsBo]SYRIAN GIRL: 8 Reasons Why The NWO Hates Syria! GLOBAL DOMINATION! - YouTube[/ame]
To tell you the truth, Todd, I very rarely read the King of Cut and Pastes stuff because of where he gets his information. Meanwhile, I think it is very obvious to the viewers that he is very bitter about his circumstances in life and has to find an entity to blame -- now it is the "evil" bankers and Wall Street. Naturally he will continue on with his blabbering about this.Maybe it's Syria's refusal to connect with Wall Street that presents private bankers with their biggest threat?The Pentagon is turning into a Political Correct institution because of that Muslim CINC they have to kowtow to. Where Graham erred is his failure to call Islam what it really is. A global cancer. And Wall Street isn't connected to Syria by any stretch of your imagination.
"Iraq and Libya have been taken out, and Iran has been heavily boycotted. Syria is now in the cross-hairs. Why? Here is one overlooked scenario . . .
In an August 2013 article titled 'Larry Summers and the Secret "End-game" Memo,' Greg Palast posted evidence of a secret late-1990s plan devised by Wall Street and U.S. Treasury officials to open banking to the lucrative derivatives business.
"To pull this off required the relaxation of banking regulations not just in the US but globally.
"The vehicle to be used was the Financial Services Agreement of the World Trade Organization.
"The 'end-game' would require not just coercing support among WTO members but taking down those countries refusing to join. Some key countries remained holdouts from the WTO, including Iraq, Libya, Iran and Syria.
"In these Islamic countries, banks are largely state-owned; and 'usury' charging rent for the 'use' of money is viewed as a sin, if not a crime.
"That puts them at odds with the Western model of rent extraction by private middlemen."
Surely, you remember Wesley Clark's admission regarding seven usury-hating Muslim states slated for extinction in five years?
"That was the fate of countries in the WTO, but (what about) those that were not in that organization at all, including Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran.
"These seven countries were named by U.S. General Wesley Clark (Ret.) in a 2007 'Democracy Now' interview as the new 'rogue states' being targeted for take down after September 11, 2001.
"He said that about 10 days after 9-11, he was told by a general that the decision had been made to go to war with Iraq. Later, the same general said they planned to take out seven countries in five years: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran.
"What did these countries have in common?
"Besides being Islamic, they were not members either of the WTO or of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS).
"That left them outside the long regulatory arm of the central bankers central bank in Switzerland.
"Other countries later identified as 'rogue states' that were also not members of the BIS included North Korea, Cuba, and Afghanistan."
Wall Street?s Secret ?Economic Endgame?: Making the World Safe for Banksters, Syria in the Cross-hairs | Global Research
I sincerely hope you are not really naive enough to doubt the Evil of private bankers when it comes to protecting their $700 trillion global derivatives pyramid.
Greg Palast posted evidence of a secret late-1990s plan devised by Wall Street and U.S. Treasury officials to open banking to the lucrative derivatives business.
Sounds like Greg doesn't understand what derivative means.
You dirty ol' lecher!I wouldn't mindwith her !
JK
Or am I ??
So we are supposed to take the opinion of a young lady who looks like she is still in high school. Tinnie? I wouldn't be surprised if you are awaiting the worldwide caliphate. Perhaps you can assist those extremists rebels in using Syria as the stepping stone to this. You can be one of the strategists in planning what the next step will be.Maybe it's Syria's refusal to connect with Wall Street that presents private bankers with their biggest threat?The Pentagon is turning into a Political Correct institution because of that Muslim CINC they have to kowtow to. Where Graham erred is his failure to call Islam what it really is. A global cancer. And Wall Street isn't connected to Syria by any stretch of your imagination.
"Iraq and Libya have been taken out, and Iran has been heavily boycotted. Syria is now in the cross-hairs. Why? Here is one overlooked scenario . . .
In an August 2013 article titled 'Larry Summers and the Secret "End-game" Memo,' Greg Palast posted evidence of a secret late-1990s plan devised by Wall Street and U.S. Treasury officials to open banking to the lucrative derivatives business.
"To pull this off required the relaxation of banking regulations not just in the US but globally.
"The vehicle to be used was the Financial Services Agreement of the World Trade Organization.
"The 'end-game' would require not just coercing support among WTO members but taking down those countries refusing to join. Some key countries remained holdouts from the WTO, including Iraq, Libya, Iran and Syria.
"In these Islamic countries, banks are largely state-owned; and 'usury' charging rent for the 'use' of money is viewed as a sin, if not a crime.
"That puts them at odds with the Western model of rent extraction by private middlemen."
Surely, you remember Wesley Clark's admission regarding seven usury-hating Muslim states slated for extinction in five years?
"That was the fate of countries in the WTO, but (what about) those that were not in that organization at all, including Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran.
"These seven countries were named by U.S. General Wesley Clark (Ret.) in a 2007 'Democracy Now' interview as the new 'rogue states' being targeted for take down after September 11, 2001.
"He said that about 10 days after 9-11, he was told by a general that the decision had been made to go to war with Iraq. Later, the same general said they planned to take out seven countries in five years: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran.
"What did these countries have in common?
"Besides being Islamic, they were not members either of the WTO or of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS).
"That left them outside the long regulatory arm of the central bankers central bank in Switzerland.
"Other countries later identified as 'rogue states' that were also not members of the BIS included North Korea, Cuba, and Afghanistan."
Wall Street?s Secret ?Economic Endgame?: Making the World Safe for Banksters, Syria in the Cross-hairs | Global Research
I sincerely hope you are not really naive enough to doubt the Evil of private bankers when it comes to protecting their $700 trillion global derivatives pyramid.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=40cD8uYOsBo]SYRIAN GIRL: 8 Reasons Why The NWO Hates Syria! GLOBAL DOMINATION! - YouTube[/ame]
Maybe it's Syria's refusal to connect with Wall Street that presents private bankers with their biggest threat?
"Iraq and Libya have been taken out, and Iran has been heavily boycotted. Syria is now in the cross-hairs. Why? Here is one overlooked scenario . . .
In an August 2013 article titled 'Larry Summers and the Secret "End-game" Memo,' Greg Palast posted evidence of a secret late-1990s plan devised by Wall Street and U.S. Treasury officials to open banking to the lucrative derivatives business.
"To pull this off required the relaxation of banking regulations not just in the US but globally.
"The vehicle to be used was the Financial Services Agreement of the World Trade Organization.
"The 'end-game' would require not just coercing support among WTO members but taking down those countries refusing to join. Some key countries remained holdouts from the WTO, including Iraq, Libya, Iran and Syria.
"In these Islamic countries, banks are largely state-owned; and 'usury' charging rent for the 'use' of money is viewed as a sin, if not a crime.
"That puts them at odds with the Western model of rent extraction by private middlemen."
Surely, you remember Wesley Clark's admission regarding seven usury-hating Muslim states slated for extinction in five years?
"That was the fate of countries in the WTO, but (what about) those that were not in that organization at all, including Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran.
"These seven countries were named by U.S. General Wesley Clark (Ret.) in a 2007 'Democracy Now' interview as the new 'rogue states' being targeted for take down after September 11, 2001.
"He said that about 10 days after 9-11, he was told by a general that the decision had been made to go to war with Iraq. Later, the same general said they planned to take out seven countries in five years: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Iran.
"What did these countries have in common?
"Besides being Islamic, they were not members either of the WTO or of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS).
"That left them outside the long regulatory arm of the central bankers central bank in Switzerland.
"Other countries later identified as 'rogue states' that were also not members of the BIS included North Korea, Cuba, and Afghanistan."
Wall Street?s Secret ?Economic Endgame?: Making the World Safe for Banksters, Syria in the Cross-hairs | Global Research
I sincerely hope you are not really naive enough to doubt the Evil of private bankers when it comes to protecting their $700 trillion global derivatives pyramid.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=40cD8uYOsBo]SYRIAN GIRL: 8 Reasons Why The NWO Hates Syria! GLOBAL DOMINATION! - YouTube[/ame]
No one gives a shit about their central bank or her silly beliefs about the Rothschildes.
Good for them not borrowing from the IMF. So what?
GMOs? LOL!
Iraqi seeds are outlawed in the Iraqi Constitution? OMG! I love it.
Typical Muslim belief in conspiracies.
No one gives a shit about their central bank or her silly beliefs about the Rothschildes.
Good for them not borrowing from the IMF. So what?
GMOs? LOL!
Iraqi seeds are outlawed in the Iraqi Constitution? OMG! I love it.
Typical Muslim belief in conspiracies.
Is it possible that Iraqi farmers think back fondly to the good old
days before the Occupation and before Order 81? Even Saddam Hussein
allowed them to save seeds for the next year's crop. Is Monsanto a
worse master than Saddam?
IRAQI ORDER 81
No one gives a shit about their central bank or her silly beliefs about the Rothschildes.
Good for them not borrowing from the IMF. So what?
GMOs? LOL!
Iraqi seeds are outlawed in the Iraqi Constitution? OMG! I love it.
Typical Muslim belief in conspiracies.
Is it possible that Iraqi farmers think back fondly to the good old
days before the Occupation and before Order 81? Even Saddam Hussein
allowed them to save seeds for the next year's crop. Is Monsanto a
worse master than Saddam?
IRAQI ORDER 81
Wow, convincing source. LOL!
As if your mind is open to any justified true beliefs that don't include $$$No one gives a shit about their central bank or her silly beliefs about the Rothschildes.
Good for them not borrowing from the IMF. So what?
GMOs? LOL!
Iraqi seeds are outlawed in the Iraqi Constitution? OMG! I love it.
Typical Muslim belief in conspiracies.
Is it possible that Iraqi farmers think back fondly to the good old
days before the Occupation and before Order 81? Even Saddam Hussein
allowed them to save seeds for the next year's crop. Is Monsanto a
worse master than Saddam?
IRAQI ORDER 81
Wow, convincing source. LOL!
As if your mind is open to any justified true beliefs that don't include $$$Is it possible that Iraqi farmers think back fondly to the good old
days before the Occupation and before Order 81? Even Saddam Hussein
allowed them to save seeds for the next year's crop. Is Monsanto a
worse master than Saddam?
IRAQI ORDER 81
Wow, convincing source. LOL!
"For generations, small farmers in Iraq operated in an essentially unregulated, informal seed supply system. Farm-saved seed and the free innovation with and exchange of planting materials among farming communities has long been the basis of agricultural practice.
"This is now history.
"The CPA has made it illegal for Iraqi farmers to re-use seeds harvested from new varieties registered under the law. Iraqis may continue to use and save from their traditional seed stocks or whats left of them after the years of war and drought, but that is the not the agenda for reconstruction embedded in the ruling.
"The purpose of the law is to facilitate the establishment of a new seed market in Iraq, where transnational corporations can sell their seeds  genetically modified or not, which farmers would have to purchase afresh every single cropping season."
GRAIN ? Iraq's new patent law: a declaration of war against farmers
