Want To Stop Mass Shootings/Mass Killings In The US??

The OP's question reflects a disturbing level of obliviousness regarding gun violence.

"Mass killings" are not a problem in the U.S., statistically speaking. The U.S. had about 26 thousand homicides, 21 thousand were apparently gun related. There were 647 deaths attributable to "mass shootings." That's about three percent.

Sooooooooo, should "we" focus on some measures to to reduce the 647 or the 21 thousand?
 
Who said anyone was worried? Taking defensive action while armed is just good sense which you, obviously lack.
Locking down the state seems to indicate a sense of worry.
 

Want To Stop Mass Shootings/Mass Killings In The US??​

It's really simple.

Stop covering them. Stop giving crazy people the attention they desire.

As soo as one of these horrors happens, shut the coverage of it down. Completely, absolutely put a lid on it.

You know one thing the Media will NOT cover? A shooting of one its people. A reporter.

Oh, they'll report it but they WILL NOT obsess on it like they do with any other shooting.

As soon as these nutjobs, and they are, realize they're not going to get the attention, the fame, the notoriety, their "15 minutes of fame" - they won't do it.

I mean, it's almost like the media has an agenda or something

Hopefully they'll do first what they always end up doing anyway. End it all.
Many people in this country today think traditional life doesn't matter. You can't neglect a child's spiritual growth to love and care for others and expect him to tolerate people unlike him or herself. The good book is a good place to start, and many churches make this kind of learning fun because they have volunteers to teach out of the good book as well as the Sunday School's curriculum that is age-appropriate.

Without the majority of people who would never open the good book for learning Godly things, our society will see more and more antisocial behaviors, the worst of which is seeing if you can outshoot the number of people you kill more than the last shoot-and-kill newsmaker. Hollywood is the teacher that substitutes, and they're zeroing in on people who do bad things to good people, and glamorize shocking antisocial behaviors. People win lawsuits against schools of yesteryear that had a semblance of discipline to improve the chances that every pupil would have the opportunity to learn without having some antisocial joker taking over the class with disrespect for the teacher, loud noises, cheating by looking over the shoulder of someone who did his homework and is prepared for the test. Because of the lawsuits that claim a student has been singled out and boo hoo hoo, frequently cost a school district money they had planned on building a women's gymnasium to get directed to a court order for the poor little thing who was told to stop talking while taking a test, didn't, and got paddled. Those days are gone. And the talker feels his oats by bragging how he got a teacher fired, money for a new car, and then drops out of school when he wrecks the car so harshly, he now only has one leg to limp around on. The courts listen to the best speaking lawyer. The lawyer who's stuck with the truth about the problem is not always the winner of the lawsuit. Teachers who seduce a student are part of todays' culture, and they weren't 50 years ago. Schools can't ban a teacher who is an atheist unless the school is run by a Church, and requires spiritually kind behaviors of their staff and instructors. A child who is liking a teacher who spews disrespect for spiritual things may wind up in a conundrum with his or her parent for life, because the child is taught to ignore things that don't please him or her, and that church is a bad place to be when sports play goes on when most churches have their services. Families are torn when a child is bait for a disrespectful person and develops disrespect for family and friends at public school and university alike.

It's likely that considering how people are being brainwashed to hate political rivals, some young people will learn to hate their kindly parents who sheltered them for 18 years from danger, hunger, and poverty. Disrespect is destroying a lot of people and breeding criminal conduct.
 
Last edited:
So, a red flag law would not have worked here.

This is a few incidents niw where the Military knows a bunch about the fruitcake…..”hearing voices”. “High powered hearing Aid” WTH? But they do nothing? They know it had guns. They know he was losing it. They should hold em, disarm them, alert authorities?

I suppoe they are too busy holding Tranny seminars or discipline hearings for not calling a Male General in a dress and red pumps…..yes Maam?
 
Last edited:
Drug Screening for Illegal Drugs & SSRIs with every 4473 and no soup for you if your seeing two Shrinks & a Psychologist and you have had 1 51/50
 
I sure wish you stupid mother fuckers would educate yourself before running your mouths,,

if nothing else it would just save time,,

 
The OP's question reflects a disturbing level of obliviousness regarding gun violence.

"Mass killings" are not a problem in the U.S., statistically speaking. The U.S. had about 26 thousand homicides, 21 thousand were apparently gun related. There were 647 deaths attributable to "mass shootings." That's about three percent.

Sooooooooo, should "we" focus on some measures to to reduce the 647 or the 21 thousand?
Mass killings are not a problem?

Ya can’t send your kid to school or church or the movies or a concert or a bowling alley without wondering if they’ll be the next victim of that “no problem”
 
This is a few incidents niw where the Military knows a bunch about the fruitcake…..”hearing voices”. “High powered hearing Aid” WTH? But they do nothing? They know it had guns. They know he was losing it. They should hold em, disarm them, alert authorities?

I suppoe they are too busy holding Tranny seminars or discipline hearings for not calling a Male General in a dress and red pumps…..yes Maam?
Sure, just look away from his maga radicalization via fucker carlson.
 
useing it as a basis to discuss important issues is TDS at its finest,,

Using the leader of the Republican parties gun control idea in a discussion about mass shootings is TDS?

so how about we have a rational discussion on the problem???
We can't because everytime you are challenged you pull out the typical republican tropes when asked to defend your position.

Pretending you want rational discussion is hilarious.
 

Forum List

Back
Top