C_Clayton_Jones
Diamond Member
- Apr 28, 2011
- 77,284
- 37,277
Only one rightist thus far to condemn this thread, sad.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
NO. As a father I'm sure he would have rather gone his entire presidnecy without the insane killing of those school children. Only an asshole partisan POS would even consider such a debasing idea that this event made him(or any sane person) happy.
leftie motto....never let a good crisis go to waste.....
so you can kill me when you dont win elections
leftie motto....never let a good crisis go to waste.....
Like 9/11?
leftie motto....never let a good crisis go to waste.....
Like 9/11?
Yeah because Lefties didn't participate or do anything post 9/11 to radically change laws.
Like 9/11?
Yeah because Lefties didn't participate or do anything post 9/11 to radically change laws.
You're right, as I recall it was Bill Clinton who ordered the invasion of Iraq.
NO. As a father I'm sure he would have rather gone his entire presidnecy without the insane killing of those school children. Only an asshole partisan POS would even consider such a debasing idea that this event made him(or any sane person) happy.
yet he bombs and kills innocent children in multiple countries on the regular.
NO. As a father I'm sure he would have rather gone his entire presidnecy without the insane killing of those school children. Only an asshole partisan POS would even consider such a debasing idea that this event made him(or any sane person) happy.
yet he bombs and kills innocent children in multiple countries on the regular.
But the question is, do you think this type of collateral damage makes him happy? Would it be better to send in an invasion force of troops to kill our enemies there? Carpet bombing?
Yeah because Lefties didn't participate or do anything post 9/11 to radically change laws.
You're right, as I recall it was Bill Clinton who ordered the invasion of Iraq.
I forgot Iraq was the only result. My bad. No Democrats voted to go to Iraq, the TSA, Patriot Act, NDAA, etc etc.
Remember Obama is bombing and has troops in more places than Bush did.
You're right, as I recall it was Bill Clinton who ordered the invasion of Iraq.
I forgot Iraq was the only result. My bad. No Democrats voted to go to Iraq, the TSA, Patriot Act, NDAA, etc etc.
Congress authorized Bush to invade Iraq for the purposes of disarming him of real WMD - not for the purpose of disarming him of fake made up WMD.
Remember Obama is bombing and has troops in more places than Bush did.
Oh, right, I forget the libertarian's strict adherence to the Goldie Locks policy. Doesn't matter who we bomb or why or even how many American servicemen are killed - it matters what the number of places is that we have troops deployed.
yet he bombs and kills innocent children in multiple countries on the regular.
But the question is, do you think this type of collateral damage makes him happy? Would it be better to send in an invasion force of troops to kill our enemies there? Carpet bombing?
What enemies? I must have missed the memo that children are attacking us.
But the question is, do you think this type of collateral damage makes him happy? Would it be better to send in an invasion force of troops to kill our enemies there? Carpet bombing?
What enemies? I must have missed the memo that children are attacking us.
I see, so perhaps you think for some reason the President is intentionally targeting Pakistani and Yemeni children? Why?
You're right, as I recall it was Bill Clinton who ordered the invasion of Iraq.
I forgot Iraq was the only result. My bad. No Democrats voted to go to Iraq, the TSA, Patriot Act, NDAA, etc etc.
Congress authorized Bush to invade Iraq for the purposes of disarming him of real WMD - not for the purpose of disarming him of fake made up WMD.
Remember Obama is bombing and has troops in more places than Bush did.
Oh, right, I forget the libertarian's strict adherence to the Goldie Locks policy. Doesn't matter who we bomb or why or even how many American servicemen are killed - it matters what the number of places is that we have troops deployed.
But the question is, do you think this type of collateral damage makes him happy? Would it be better to send in an invasion force of troops to kill our enemies there? Carpet bombing?
What enemies? I must have missed the memo that children are attacking us.
I see, so perhaps you think for some reason the President is intentionally targeting Pakistani and Yemeni children? Why?
What enemies? I must have missed the memo that children are attacking us.
I see, so perhaps you think for some reason the President is intentionally targeting Pakistani and Yemeni children? Why?
Of course he is not intentionally targeting children, they are merely collateral damage. Are you OK with that?
Oh wait, they did kill a 16 year old boy intentionally and he was American.
Was Obama as a gun-banner happy to see Newtown killings???