He's recused himself, so let's see what happens. Quite frankly, perjury is really the only thing they can throw at him, because it was perfectly legit for him to meet with the ambassador and they would have to prove he colluded on the campaign, and that would be very difficult.Somewhat dumb, yes. Perjurious? Probably not.Wrong? He engaged in dirty gotcha politics by using fake news as a spring board for his dumb question. Is that wrong? Maybe not wrong, but certainly not one of the Senate's finest moments. As for Sessions, it would be very difficult to make a perjury charge stick, so good luck with that.Yes, Sessions should have laughed in Franken's face. That's what he gets for thinking that Franken was actually going to ask a serious question.
Frankenstein did nothing wrong.
Sessions did.
Then as I said, Sessions should have easily pushed it aside. Instead, he volunteered more information than was asked of him.
I've never called for perjury charges. That would require showing that he intended to lie. Nearly impossible to do.
I'll settle for the recusal right now and see where an investigation leads.