Tramp and his cronies, colluded with Russia , he got hired due to Russia's help. Now he twice colluded with a foreign country. Lord knows what else he has done.
We do not trust the tramp admin, we know better.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Tramp and his cronies, colluded with Russia , he got hired due to Russia's help. Now he twice colluded with a foreign country. Lord knows what else he has done.
We do not trust the tramp admin, we know better.
These tards step on rake after rake.the whistle blower wasn't on the call. too fking funny. can't get any better than that.
They are the equivalent of 'Steele' / a 'leaker' of 2nd-hand info........are they still a whistleblower if they got the info 2nd hand and never heard it for themselves??
So you're saying you don't trust our intelligence community? Aren't you douchebags always attacking Trump for that?report. They can make up a transcript of the call, so lets see the report that was sent to the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community (IC IG) who determined it was creditable and urgent for the security of the US.
Also the name of the whistleblower should be given under classified info to the House Intelligence Committee.
Your statement is a lie.Tramp and his cronies, colluded with Russia...
How about the transcript for when Obama called Putin?I agree! We need the transcript when Biden threatened the Ukrianians
Your statement is a lie.Tramp and his cronies, colluded with Russia...
Trumpybear and his cronies' conniving (collusion) with our enemy was not against the law they say.
For example it was not against the law when trumpybear asked "Russia, if you're listen......"
It wasn't illegal for him to pump up Wikileaks, urge and encourage his supporter to view the e-mails and DNC material stolen by Russia.
But the only way you are correct is that they didn't find enough evident to charge him with a criminal conspiracy (collustion).
report. They can make up a transcript of the call, so lets see the report that was sent to the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community (IC IG) who determined it was creditable and urgent for the security of the US.
Also the name of the whistleblower should be given under classified info to the House Intelligence Committee.
you agree that 2nd hand knowlege of a call is evidence to something? did you just write that?report. They can make up a transcript of the call, so lets see the report that was sent to the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community (IC IG) who determined it was creditable and urgent for the security of the US.
Also the name of the whistleblower should be given under classified info to the House Intelligence Committee.
I totally agree!
Who received a lot of money from Russia and Foreign Countries? Biden and The Clintons. The Clintons alone between Russia and Saudi Arabia received almost a Quarter of a BILLION.Why do you want Trump's tax returns?Why do you want Former President Obama's college transcripts?we want HRC's 10,000 deleted emails, not redacted.
we want Obama's college transcripts
Why does he not want to give them, he said he would. What is he hiding,
the fact he flew into the WH on fumes.
He has received a lot of money from Russia.
He has not paid taxes since 2005.
The world will see what a crook he really is, and how he screwed the US taxpayers out of money.
and indebted to foreign countries.
Your statement is a lie.Tramp and his cronies, colluded with Russia...
Trumpybear and his cronies' conniving (collusion) with our enemy was not against the law they say.
For example it was not against the law when trumpybear asked "Russia, if you're listen......"
It wasn't illegal for him to pump up Wikileaks, urge and encourage his supporter to view the e-mails and DNC material stolen by Russia.
But the only way you are correct is that they didn't find enough evident to charge him with a criminal conspiracy (collustion).
No enough evidence means "innocent." That's the standard argument when you douchebags make accusations that you can't support.
It's a variation on Mueller's position that people are guilty until proven innocent.
For example it was not against the law when trumpybear asked "Russia, if you're listen......"Your statement is a lie.Tramp and his cronies, colluded with Russia...
Trumpybear and his cronies' conniving (collusion) with our enemy was not against the law they say.
For example it was not against the law when trumpybear asked "Russia, if you're listen......"
It wasn't illegal for him to pump up Wikileaks, urge and encourage his supporter to view the e-mails and DNC material stolen by Russia.
But the only way you are correct is that they didn't find enough evident to charge him with a criminal conspiracy (collusion).
I agree! We need the transcript when Biden threatened the Ukrianians
First we want Bush's deleted emails and Trump's tax returns.we want HRC's 10,000 deleted emails, not redacted.
we want Obama's college transcripts
Mueller agreed.Trumpybear and his cronies' conniving (collusion) with our enemy was not against the law they say.Your statement is a lie.Tramp and his cronies, colluded with Russia...
For example it was not against the law when trumpybear asked "Russia, if you're listen......"
Mueller agreed.It wasn't illegal for him to pump up Wikileaks, urge and encourage his supporter to view the e-mails and DNC material stolen by Russia.
Obviously not.But the only way you are correct is that they didn't find enough evident to charge him with a criminal conspiracy (collusion).
Your statement is a lie.Tramp and his cronies, colluded with Russia...
Trumpybear and his cronies' conniving (collusion) with our enemy was not against the law they say.
For example it was not against the law when trumpybear asked "Russia, if you're listen......"
It wasn't illegal for him to pump up Wikileaks, urge and encourage his supporter to view the e-mails and DNC material stolen by Russia.
But the only way you are correct is that they didn't find enough evident to charge him with a criminal conspiracy (collustion).
No enough evidence means "innocent." That's the standard argument when you douchebags make accusations that you can't support.
It's a variation on Mueller's position that people are guilty until proven innocent.For example it was not against the law when trumpybear asked "Russia, if you're listen......"Your statement is a lie.Tramp and his cronies, colluded with Russia...
Trumpybear and his cronies' conniving (collusion) with our enemy was not against the law they say.
For example it was not against the law when trumpybear asked "Russia, if you're listen......"
It wasn't illegal for him to pump up Wikileaks, urge and encourage his supporter to view the e-mails and DNC material stolen by Russia.
But the only way you are correct is that they didn't find enough evident to charge him with a criminal conspiracy (collusion).
nope, it wasn't against the law, hitlery's emails were already stolen prior to the comment, and trump merely asked they give them back. how is it that against the law exactly?
![]()
Hey, BTW, maybe if her server was protected on government grounds, no one would be able to get to it. It was seth rich anyway, cause one can't dump that data off a remote position, files are too large. bandwidth would come into play and nothing would be moved. but, hey, what the fk do you know.
report. They can make up a transcript of the call, so lets see the report that was sent to the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community (IC IG) who determined it was creditable and urgent for the security of the US.
Also the name of the whistleblower should be given under classified info to the House Intelligence Committee.
No one cares what you want.First we want Bush's deleted emails and Trump's tax returns.we want HRC's 10,000 deleted emails, not redacted.
we want Obama's college transcripts
are they still a whistleblower if they got the info 2nd hand and never heard it for themselves??report. They can make up a transcript of the call, so lets see the report that was sent to the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community (IC IG) who determined it was creditable and urgent for the security of the US.
Also the name of the whistleblower should be given under classified info to the House Intelligence Committee.
Yup. That's what I've been reading. The "whistleblower" didn't actually know anything. He just repeated something he was told.
More of a gossip than a whistleblower. LOL