We Finally Know the Case Against Trump, and It Is Strong

We'll have to see, however you can bet Bragg will be bringing the following to help fill the bag:
  • Personal testimony by Allen Weissenberg (Sp?) Chief Financial Officer for the Trump Organization
  • Personal testimony by David Pecker (AMI Media?) owner of the National Enquirer involved in the "catch-n-kill" process
  • Personal testimony by Michael Cohen Trump personal attorney at the time
  • Probably testimony by others involved (staff, assistants, accountants, etc.)
  • Audio recordings that Cohen made of Trump
  • Texts
  • Emails
  • Travel documents
  • Phone records
  • Invoices
  • Checks
  • Business ledger entries
  • Contemporaneous notes
  • etc.
WW
So. Nothing. Check.
 
There are these things called “elements” to that alleged crime. Where, as here, those “elements” are missing, well what you’ve got is a big empty bag of nothing. 👍

Those "elements" are not required under the indictment at this point. I'm sure those elements will be part of the FDOTUS Team's motion to dismiss, the DA's team will then file a rebuttal, and then it will be up to the Judge.

It is possible, unlikely though, that the Judge will rule the connection from Business Record felony to Cohen's conviction of campaign finance violation to be tenuous and rule in favor or Trump.

WW
 
It has to be an actual crime, moron.

1681055501672.png


Falsification of business records is an actual crime. And when used to air in or conceal another crime that is a felony.

WW
 
Trump wasn't charged with federal campaign law violations, that is outside Bragg's jurisdiction. Trump was indicted under State business record law.

WW
Bragg is accusing him of violating federal campaing finance law, you fucking moron.
 

Forum List

Back
Top