We have a mass shooting problem. What are repubs going to do about it?

[peach174]

Repubs want to tighten up immigration laws.

If the USA had followed and surveyed this guy when he came back from Saudi Arabia with a new Muslim wife, but no the Dem's would be totally against this in congress.

They control congress, what have they proposed?

Where have you been?
House passes bill to block Syrian refugees, require more vetting
The House passed a bill Thursday to halt the admission of Syrian refugees into the U.S. until they undergo a more stringent vetting process — the strictest ever required for people fleeing a war-torn nation.

Ok how many Syrian refugees have committed mass shootings in the US?

It about the Jihadists using refugees to hide amongst them.
What is so wrong with wanting to make sure Jihadists are not getting into this country by having a better vetting process?

I don't see what it has to do with our mass shooting problem.

How about places not advertise that they are a gun free zone with signs?
That is an invitation for them.

 

[oreo]

When are republicans going to propose anything?

I see that the Democrats still virulently oppose the only method that has actually worked to reduce mass shootings: Letting everybody carry who wants to. Most people still wouldn't bother, but a few would.

The nutcases doing these mass shootings have the goal of racking up huge body counts, to terrorize the population and/or get lurid headlines for weeks after they're dead. And the nutcase wanting to shoot up the next school or shopping mall or post office (or French concert hall or café or soccer stadium or Calif mental institute), would know there's a probably a few armed people in the crowd he's about to attack. And he won't know which ones they are, or what direction a bullet might come from.

And most of the recent mass shooters have carefully avoided places where there might be armed people on the premises, choosing so-called "gun free zones" where the liberals' laws are in full effect. They don't want to do their crimes in an area where there's a pretty good chance someone might stop them before they achieve their desired body counts.

So, what conservatives will do, is obey the Constitution and let any law-abiding adult carry who wants to. Most still won't bother, but a few will. And that will make all the difference, as murderers realize they probably won't be able to get their large body counts any more.

Why do these leftist fanatics keep pushing their failed "solutions" after it has become obvious they don't work, and avoiding the solutions that do work?

Anyone who goes into a soft target, either domestic or foreign related is a COWARD. The last thing they want is someone shooting back at them.

A Terrorist will ALWAYS seek the least path of resistance.

 

[hadit]

Who knows what they will ATTEMPT to do, since they seem to be afraid of their own shadows. What will actually get DONE, however, is up to both a Republican legislature, which has neither a veto nor filibuster proof majority, AND a democrat president who has shown himself to be completely unable to step outside his rigid ideology and compromise to pass effective legislation. IOW, there will a lot of shouting and finger pointing, and maybe the loss of more freedoms, none of which will stop the next shooter. The best we can hope for is for more concealed carry permit holders.

We have more permit holders and the problem is getting worse...

Only if the permit holders are the ones doing the killing. Can you show that they are?

Huh? We have more permit holders and more mass shootings. I didn't say it was holders doing the shooting, but it doesn't seem to be slowing them either.

When there are more permit holders in the victim group, fewer people die, because there is someone with the means to stop the killing. Clearly, gun free zones are not the answer.

So are repubs going to end gun free zones? Will they force corporations to allow guns?

Perhaps you missed my earlier post where I explained what will happen.

 

[Brain357]

They control congress, what have they proposed?

Where have you been?
House passes bill to block Syrian refugees, require more vetting
The House passed a bill Thursday to halt the admission of Syrian refugees into the U.S. until they undergo a more stringent vetting process — the strictest ever required for people fleeing a war-torn nation.

Ok how many Syrian refugees have committed mass shootings in the US?

It about the Jihadists using refugees to hide amongst them.
What is so wrong with wanting to make sure Jihadists are not getting into this country by having a better vetting process?

I don't see what it has to do with our mass shooting problem.

How about places not advertise that they are a gun free zone with signs?
That is an invitation for them.

So eliminate gun free zones?

 

[Brain357]

We have more permit holders and the problem is getting worse...

Only if the permit holders are the ones doing the killing. Can you show that they are?

Huh? We have more permit holders and more mass shootings. I didn't say it was holders doing the shooting, but it doesn't seem to be slowing them either.

When there are more permit holders in the victim group, fewer people die, because there is someone with the means to stop the killing. Clearly, gun free zones are not the answer.

So are repubs going to end gun free zones? Will they force corporations to allow guns?

Perhaps you missed my earlier post where I explained what will happen.

They will do nothing.

 

[Vigilante]

First, the members of the RELIGION OF PEACE are not allowed to have an guns.... we go from there!

 

[Brain357]

When are republicans going to propose anything?

I see that the Democrats still virulently oppose the only method that has actually worked to reduce mass shootings: Letting everybody carry who wants to. Most people still wouldn't bother, but a few would.

The nutcases doing these mass shootings have the goal of racking up huge body counts, to terrorize the population and/or get lurid headlines for weeks after they're dead. And the nutcase wanting to shoot up the next school or shopping mall or post office (or French concert hall or café or soccer stadium or Calif mental institute), would know there's a probably a few armed people in the crowd he's about to attack. And he won't know which ones they are, or what direction a bullet might come from.

And most of the recent mass shooters have carefully avoided places where there might be armed people on the premises, choosing so-called "gun free zones" where the liberals' laws are in full effect. They don't want to do their crimes in an area where there's a pretty good chance someone might stop them before they achieve their desired body counts.

So, what conservatives will do, is obey the Constitution and let any law-abiding adult carry who wants to. Most still won't bother, but a few will. And that will make all the difference, as murderers realize they probably won't be able to get their large body counts any more.

Why do these leftist fanatics keep pushing their failed "solutions" after it has become obvious they don't work, and avoiding the solutions that do work?

Anyone who goes into a soft target, either domestic or foreign related is a COWARD. The last thing they want is someone shooting back at them.

A Terrorist will ALWAYS seek the least path of resistance.

Like when they attack police stations and military bases in other countries?

 

[Brain357]

First, the members of the RELIGION OF PEACE are not allowed to have an guns.... we go from there!

They arent any significant number of our mass shootings...

 

[rightwinger]

Then what is the republican answer? They control congress.

What do YOU propose be done? I'm guessing total gun ban? It will never happen, it's a leftist pipe dream

I'm not proposing anything. I want to known what republicans are going to do.

Nothing...everybody will point fingers, scream and yell and in a few days life will go on, until the next time and then it will repeat like it has for years

Democrats want guns gone....
No guns for anyone other then military and law enforcement....
They just don't have the balls to come out and say it but it's what they want.
Of course it will not happen but it's their desire....

That's the Dems solution.

Repubs seem to lack the balls to do anything.

Exactly

Prayer is all they can offer

 

[hadit]

Only if the permit holders are the ones doing the killing. Can you show that they are?

Huh? We have more permit holders and more mass shootings. I didn't say it was holders doing the shooting, but it doesn't seem to be slowing them either.

When there are more permit holders in the victim group, fewer people die, because there is someone with the means to stop the killing. Clearly, gun free zones are not the answer.

So are repubs going to end gun free zones? Will they force corporations to allow guns?

Perhaps you missed my earlier post where I explained what will happen.

They will do nothing.

Ah, you went back and read it. Good.

 

[Vigilante]

First, the members of the RELIGION OF PEACE are not allowed to have an guns.... we go from there!

They arent any significant number of our mass shootings...

There will be NOW...perhaps you should investigate ARAB SOCIAL MEDIA from around the world, to eeven REMOTELY get an idea of what we can NOW EXPECT.... I recommend it to anyone that thinks these people are NOT NOW EMBOLDENED because of what these 2 scum muslim's did to America!

 

[Little-Acorn]

I see that the Democrats still virulently oppose the only method that has actually worked to reduce mass shootings: Letting everybody carry who wants to. Most people still wouldn't bother, but a few would.

Why doesn't the Republican congress propose that?

Propose what? It's already law. The highest law of the land, in fact.

It's not up to Republicans to propose that all law-abiding adults be allowed to carry.

We need Democrats to stop violating the law that mandates that.

Perhaps you should be asking, "What can we do to get Democrats such as myself to stop blocking the law that will reduce mass shootings?"

But of course you will never ask that, will you.

Your goal is not to reduce mass shootings.

Your goal is to scream at Republicans and try to destroy them.

 

[Brain357]

I see that the Democrats still virulently oppose the only method that has actually worked to reduce mass shootings: Letting everybody carry who wants to. Most people still wouldn't bother, but a few would.

Why doesn't the Republican congress propose that?

Propose what? It's already law. The highest law of the land, in fact.

It's not up to Republicans to propose that all law-abiding adults be allowed to carry.

We need Democrats to stop violating the law that mandates that.

Perhaps you should be asking, "What can we do to get Democrats such as myself to stop blocking the law that will reduce mass shootings?"

But of course you will never ask that, will you.

Republicans control congress...

 

[Brain357]

First, the members of the RELIGION OF PEACE are not allowed to have an guns.... we go from there!

They arent any significant number of our mass shootings...

There will be NOW...perhaps you should investigate ARAB SOCIAL MEDIA from around the world, to eeven REMOTELY get an idea of what we can NOW EXPECT.... I recommend it to anyone that thinks these people are NOT NOW EMBOLDENED because of what these 2 scum muslim's did to America!

So what does that have to do with our current mass shooting problem? Most are white males.

 

[candycorn]

I see that the Democrats still virulently oppose the only method that has actually worked to reduce mass shootings: Letting everybody carry who wants to. Most people still wouldn't bother, but a few would.

Why doesn't the Republican congress propose that?

Propose what? It's already law. The highest law of the land, in fact.

It's not up to Republicans to propose that all law-abiding adults be allowed to carry.

We need Democrats to stop violating the law that mandates that.

Perhaps you should be asking, "What can we do to get Democrats such as myself to stop blocking the law that will reduce mass shootings?"

But of course you will never ask that, will you.

Republicans control congress...

Did anyone see anything out of Paul Ryan's office concerning the massacre yesterday?

 

[oreo]

They control congress, what have they proposed?

Where have you been?
House passes bill to block Syrian refugees, require more vetting
The House passed a bill Thursday to halt the admission of Syrian refugees into the U.S. until they undergo a more stringent vetting process — the strictest ever required for people fleeing a war-torn nation.

Ok how many Syrian refugees have committed mass shootings in the US?

It about the Jihadists using refugees to hide amongst them.
What is so wrong with wanting to make sure Jihadists are not getting into this country by having a better vetting process?

I don't see what it has to do with our mass shooting problem.

How about places not advertise that they are a gun free zone with signs?
That is an invitation for them.

100% agreed--"that is a come in and get me statement" to crazies and foreign terrorists looking for mass slaughter. I still think we should have a lot more undercover (either teachers/staff/security) at our public schools--colleges & universities that are trained and armed.

If these COWARDS know they're there--they won't even walk through the door.
.

 

[candycorn]

I saw the video calling for more mental health laws keeping unstable from buying guns:

 

[Brain357]

Where have you been?
House passes bill to block Syrian refugees, require more vetting
The House passed a bill Thursday to halt the admission of Syrian refugees into the U.S. until they undergo a more stringent vetting process — the strictest ever required for people fleeing a war-torn nation.

Ok how many Syrian refugees have committed mass shootings in the US?

It about the Jihadists using refugees to hide amongst them.
What is so wrong with wanting to make sure Jihadists are not getting into this country by having a better vetting process?

I don't see what it has to do with our mass shooting problem.

How about places not advertise that they are a gun free zone with signs?
That is an invitation for them.

100% agreed--"that is a come in and get me statement" to crazies and foreign terrorists looking for mass slaughter. I still think we should have a lot more undercover (either teachers/staff/security) at our public schools--colleges & universities that are trained and armed.

If these COWARDS know they're there--they won't even walk through the door.
.

You realize most these shooter types are suicidal?

 

[Vigilante]

First, the members of the RELIGION OF PEACE are not allowed to have an guns.... we go from there!

They arent any significant number of our mass shootings...

There will be NOW...perhaps you should investigate ARAB SOCIAL MEDIA from around the world, to eeven REMOTELY get an idea of what we can NOW EXPECT.... I recommend it to anyone that thinks these people are NOT NOW EMBOLDENED because of what these 2 scum muslim's did to America!

So what does that have to do with our current mass shooting problem? Most are white males.

What percentage are white males, and provide the ethnicity for that assumption...shall we start with the ALMOST 3000 killed during 9/11 by muslim's?

 

[Little-Acorn]

Perhaps you should be asking, "What can we do to get Democrats such as myself to stop blocking the law that will reduce mass shootings?"
But of course you will never ask that, will you.

Republicans control congress...

Folks, do you begin to see the brain-dead nature of these liberals pretending they want to reduce mass shootings?

No coherent thoughts, no examination of the truth. They simply repeat their useless mantra over and over.