Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This might be the dumbest thing you've ever posted...and that's sayin' somethin'.Obviously you either never read or don't understand the Bill Of Rights. No where in there does it say that .gov can shut down your business, close the churches, and force you to stay home.You shouldn't speak on subjects you know nothing about.And you are exactly what the framers of the Constitution warned us about.
health-safety-and-morals
www.law.cornell.edu
The Bill of Rights is not the legal code which determines this matter. Is it?
You should read that to yourself, pause, and then apologize to the board for abject idiocy.The Bill Of Rights takes precedence over the legal code.
Empty accusations as a substitute for not being able to refute the applicable statutes in law is the hallmark of Trump cultists.And the authoritarian leftists show their true colors.
Is this stupid post day for liberals?You should read that to yourself, pause, and then apologize to the board for abject idiocy.The Bill Of Rights takes precedence over the legal code.
You probably already know that it was actually determined by the Supreme Court in 1803, Marbury v. Madison. If no one had the power to strike down unconstitutional laws and executive orders, the Constitution wouldn't mean squat, would it?Chie
The 115-year-old Supreme Court opinion that could determine rights during a pandemic
When a US appeals court ruled this week that Texas could prevent physicians from performing abortions because of the Covid-19 pandemic, the judges leaned heavily on a 1905 Supreme Court decision against a Massachusetts man who had refused vaccination during a smallpox outbreak.www.cnn.com
I'm still waiting for someone to show us where judicial review exists in Article III.
What is Everclear?What hand sanitizer?I can see a reasonable "stay home" period, especially in cities where subway rides can mean an explosion in cases.
However, as long as masks are worn, and hand sanitizer used, that should safely allow people to work.
Governors need to know that most people live week to week and no work means no money.
Try Everclear 151, 190 or Rubbing alcohol add some fragrance and it is a great and effective hand sanitizer, it drys your hands out but it works well. Might need hand cream to help the skin out a bit.
A friend of mine makes her own hand sanitizer out of aloe vera gel, hand cream and Everclear. It's moonshine. Everclear is just the commercial name. If you ever run out of rubbing alcohol use Everclear.What is Everclear?What hand sanitizer?I can see a reasonable "stay home" period, especially in cities where subway rides can mean an explosion in cases.
However, as long as masks are worn, and hand sanitizer used, that should safely allow people to work.
Governors need to know that most people live week to week and no work means no money.
Try Everclear 151, 190 or Rubbing alcohol add some fragrance and it is a great and effective hand sanitizer, it drys your hands out but it works well. Might need hand cream to help the skin out a bit.
Everclear 190 proof grain alcohol is the staple ingredient in any Jungle Juice recipe.What is Everclear?What hand sanitizer?I can see a reasonable "stay home" period, especially in cities where subway rides can mean an explosion in cases.
However, as long as masks are worn, and hand sanitizer used, that should safely allow people to work.
Governors need to know that most people live week to week and no work means no money.
Try Everclear 151, 190 or Rubbing alcohol add some fragrance and it is a great and effective hand sanitizer, it drys your hands out but it works well. Might need hand cream to help the skin out a bit.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/ar_placeholder-6681e9afa32045a78d8f2632de8b28b7.jpg)
You are ignoring the fact that millions and millions are collecting unemployment, that small businesses have been given money they won't have to pay back as long as they use the money to continue to pay their workers, that stimulus checks have already been delivered all over the country and that major banks have agreed not to foreclose on unpaid mortgages. The people are hurting, sure. Unemployment is not as much as a paycheck and the small businesses paying their staff have cut the hours they are covering.I can see a reasonable "stay home" period, especially in cities where subway rides can mean an explosion in cases.
However, as long as masks are worn, and hand sanitizer used, that should safely allow people to work.
Governors need to know that most people live week to week and no work means no money.
Yes, for the economy's sake, we need to get things going. But it is not because everyone is penniless and starving.
Have you seen the food lines? Its like the Great Depression "soup lines" but in cars.
An unemployment check doesn't buy much.
We need to start working as soon as possible.
This might be the dumbest thing you've ever posted...and that's sayin' somethin'.Obviously you either never read or don't understand the Bill Of Rights. No where in there does it say that .gov can shut down your business, close the churches, and force you to stay home.You shouldn't speak on subjects you know nothing about.And you are exactly what the framers of the Constitution warned us about.
health-safety-and-morals
The Bill of Rights is not the legal code which determines this matter. Is it?
You are ignoring the fact that millions and millions are collecting unemployment, that small businesses have been given money they won't have to pay back as long as they use the money to continue to pay their workers, that stimulus checks have already been delivered all over the country and that major banks have agreed not to foreclose on unpaid mortgages. The people are hurting, sure. Unemployment is not as much as a paycheck and the small businesses paying their staff have cut the hours they are covering.I can see a reasonable "stay home" period, especially in cities where subway rides can mean an explosion in cases.
However, as long as masks are worn, and hand sanitizer used, that should safely allow people to work.
Governors need to know that most people live week to week and no work means no money.
Yes, for the economy's sake, we need to get things going. But it is not because everyone is penniless and starving.
Have you seen the food lines? Its like the Great Depression "soup lines" but in cars.
An unemployment check doesn't buy much.
We need to start working as soon as possible.
Actually unemployment is paying pretty well, so well I'm afraid a lot of people are not going to want to return to work.
If you made an average wage in my state, you'll get in the area of 400 bucks a week. The feds are contributing another 600 bucks a week on top of that. When you consider taxation you're not going to pay (SS,FICA, Medicare) that's about what somebody makes working for 60K a year.
That's why we still have, and always will keep, guns.Clever memes regurgitated by nitwits in no way changes the constitutional authority of governments to regulate behavior during national emergencies.My liberty does NOT end where your fear begins.
But don't let that stop you from stamping your feet and waving your banners. We all can use a little amusement right about now.
Your RWNJ "media" sources are gonna kill you or your loved ones.If you're afraid of getting sick, stay home. But you can't tell me what to do.
Life is a risk. Freedom means you get to choose.
Oh THAT!Everclear 190 proof grain alcohol is the staple ingredient in any Jungle Juice recipe.
Driving a car on State-Owned roads is not a right. Terrible analogy.You're wrong. Just as society has the right to impose restrictions on behavior that imperils the public's health..............like smoking in public places or driving 100 mph................we have the right to impose rules for behavior during a pandemic.If you're afraid of getting sick, stay home. But you can't tell me what to do.
People like you need to be fined and or thrown in jail. You're a menace to society.
You do NOT have the right to "impose rules for behavior" that directly infringe on individual liberty just because you're scared, jackass.
My liberty does NOT end where your fear begins.
.
You might want to read
HENNING JACOBSON, Plff. in Err., v. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS.
Let me introduce you to my friends, Smith...Driving a car on State-Owned roads is not a right. Terrible analogy.You're wrong. Just as society has the right to impose restrictions on behavior that imperils the public's health..............like smoking in public places or driving 100 mph................we have the right to impose rules for behavior during a pandemic.If you're afraid of getting sick, stay home. But you can't tell me what to do.
People like you need to be fined and or thrown in jail. You're a menace to society.
You do NOT have the right to "impose rules for behavior" that directly infringe on individual liberty just because you're scared, jackass.
My liberty does NOT end where your fear begins.
.
You might want to read
HENNING JACOBSON, Plff. in Err., v. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS.
You are right to a certain extent. People are not at this minute starving but if we continue with the lockdown that will change in very short order. Banks can not continue to forgive, rental owners can not continue to forgive, the government can not continue to place Trillions on its credit card. There has to be a point when no matter what we have to open.You are ignoring the fact that millions and millions are collecting unemployment, that small businesses have been given money they won't have to pay back as long as they use the money to continue to pay their workers, that stimulus checks have already been delivered all over the country and that major banks have agreed not to foreclose on unpaid mortgages. The people are hurting, sure. Unemployment is not as much as a paycheck and the small businesses paying their staff have cut the hours they are covering.I can see a reasonable "stay home" period, especially in cities where subway rides can mean an explosion in cases.
However, as long as masks are worn, and hand sanitizer used, that should safely allow people to work.
Governors need to know that most people live week to week and no work means no money.
Yes, for the economy's sake, we need to get things going. But it is not because everyone is penniless and starving.
People take a chance just from living, heart attack etc. you take a chance from getting in a car, from getting in a plane. People need to decide for themselves when the risk of loosing everything they have is worth the risk of going back to work.
Some even see the suspension of the bill of rights and the constitution as grounds for ending the lockdown.
They cannot violate the Constitution. A stay at home order violates the Constitution.This might be the dumbest thing you've ever posted...and that's sayin' somethin'.Obviously you either never read or don't understand the Bill Of Rights. No where in there does it say that .gov can shut down your business, close the churches, and force you to stay home.You shouldn't speak on subjects you know nothing about.And you are exactly what the framers of the Constitution warned us about.
health-safety-and-morals
The Bill of Rights is not the legal code which determines this matter. Is it?
Yeah? All laws which you must adhere to are in the BOR?
Wanna go with that stupid comment?
You are ignoring the fact that millions and millions are collecting unemployment, that small businesses have been given money they won't have to pay back as long as they use the money to continue to pay their workers, that stimulus checks have already been delivered all over the country and that major banks have agreed not to foreclose on unpaid mortgages. The people are hurting, sure. Unemployment is not as much as a paycheck and the small businesses paying their staff have cut the hours they are covering.
Yes, for the economy's sake, we need to get things going. But it is not because everyone is penniless and starving.
So, no laws are required to pass constitutional muster?The Bill of Rights is not the legal code which determines this matter. Is it?
