Well ... Well ... Well...

[SAYIT]

Guess who said the following in a House Judiciary meeting on Dec 10, 1998? (hint: he was very, very fat)

The effect of impeachment is to overturn the popular will of the voters as expressed in a national election. We must not overturn an election and remove a president from office except to defend our very system of government or our constitutional liberties against a dire threat. And we must not do so without an overwhelming consensus of the American people and of their representatives in congress of the absolute necessity.

There must never be a narrowly voted impeachment or an impeachment substantially supported by one of our major political parties and largely opposed by the other. Such an impeachment would lack legitimacy, would produce divisiveness and bitterness in our politics for years to come. And will call into question the very legitimacy of our political institutions.

Transcript: Opening statement of Rep. Nadler - December 10, 1998

 

[K9Buck]

Jerry obviously didn't believe any of that.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

That was different.

 

[K9Buck]

Liberals have one standard for Republicans and no standards for Democrats.

 

[Hossfly]

Guess who said the following in a House Judiciary meeting on Dec 10, 1998? (hint: he was very, very fat)

The effect of impeachment is to overturn the popular will of the voters as expressed in a national election. We must not overturn an election and remove a president from office except to defend our very system of government or our constitutional liberties against a dire threat. And we must not do so without an overwhelming consensus of the American people and of their representatives in congress of the absolute necessity.

There must never be a narrowly voted impeachment or an impeachment substantially supported by one of our major political parties and largely opposed by the other. Such an impeachment would lack legitimacy, would produce divisiveness and bitterness in our politics for years to come. And will call into question the very legitimacy of our political institutions.

Transcript: Opening statement of Rep. Nadler - December 10, 1998

Saw that on Hannity tonight.

 

[Thunk]

Guess who said the following in a House Judiciary meeting on Dec 10, 1998? (hint: he was very, very fat)

Ummmmmm...santa?

 

[SAYIT]

Guess who said the following in a House Judiciary meeting on Dec 10, 1998? (hint: he was very, very fat)

The effect of impeachment is to overturn the popular will of the voters as expressed in a national election. We must not overturn an election and remove a president from office except to defend our very system of government or our constitutional liberties against a dire threat. And we must not do so without an overwhelming consensus of the American people and of their representatives in congress of the absolute necessity.

There must never be a narrowly voted impeachment or an impeachment substantially supported by one of our major political parties and largely opposed by the other. Such an impeachment would lack legitimacy, would produce divisiveness and bitterness in our politics for years to come. And will call into question the very legitimacy of our political institutions.

Transcript: Opening statement of Rep. Nadler - December 10, 1998

Saw that on Hannity tonight.

I read about it in the Wash Examiner.

So howya doin' Hoss?

 

[Hossfly]

Guess who said the following in a House Judiciary meeting on Dec 10, 1998? (hint: he was very, very fat)

The effect of impeachment is to overturn the popular will of the voters as expressed in a national election. We must not overturn an election and remove a president from office except to defend our very system of government or our constitutional liberties against a dire threat. And we must not do so without an overwhelming consensus of the American people and of their representatives in congress of the absolute necessity.

There must never be a narrowly voted impeachment or an impeachment substantially supported by one of our major political parties and largely opposed by the other. Such an impeachment would lack legitimacy, would produce divisiveness and bitterness in our politics for years to come. And will call into question the very legitimacy of our political institutions.

Transcript: Opening statement of Rep. Nadler - December 10, 1998

Saw that on Hannity tonight.

I read about it in the Wash Examiner.

So howya doin' Hoss?

Doin' real good.

 

[Osiris-ODS]

Guess who said the following in a House Judiciary meeting on Dec 10, 1998? (hint: he was very, very fat)

The effect of impeachment is to overturn the popular will of the voters as expressed in a national election. We must not overturn an election and remove a president from office except to defend our very system of government or our constitutional liberties against a dire threat. And we must not do so without an overwhelming consensus of the American people and of their representatives in congress of the absolute necessity.

There must never be a narrowly voted impeachment or an impeachment substantially supported by one of our major political parties and largely opposed by the other. Such an impeachment would lack legitimacy, would produce divisiveness and bitterness in our politics for years to come. And will call into question the very legitimacy of our political institutions.

Transcript: Opening statement of Rep. Nadler - December 10, 1998

Agreed, I posted this yesterday, as shown in an entertaining video on Trump's Twitter feed that includes similar statements by Biden, Pelosi, Schumer and Maxine Waters:

Pelosi/Biden/Nadler: "The effect of impeachment is to overturn the popular will of the voters"

 

[S.J.]

Where are all the chicken shit leftist fucks who want Trump out of office by any means necessary? I guess it's a different story now, huh?

 

[Care4all]

except to defend our very system of government or our constitutional liberties against a dire threat.


He's 100% correct, and that's why there is the impeachment inquiry in to Trump... he is lawless and a very threat to our system of govt and constitution.



what's the issue?

 

[K9Buck]

...he is lawless and a very threat to our system of govt and constitution.

You're a good parrot.

 

[toobfreak]

Guess who said the following in a House Judiciary meeting on Dec 10, 1998? (hint: he was very, very fat)
The effect of impeachment is to overturn the popular will of the voters as expressed in a national election. We must not overturn an election and remove a president from office except to defend our very system of government or our constitutional liberties against a dire threat. And we must not do so without an overwhelming consensus of the American people and of their representatives in congress of the absolute necessity.
There must never be a narrowly voted impeachment or an impeachment substantially supported by one of our major political parties and largely opposed by the other. Such an impeachment would lack legitimacy, would produce divisiveness and bitterness in our politics for years to come. And will call into question the very legitimacy of our political institutions.
Transcript: Opening statement of Rep. Nadler - December 10, 1998

Sooo . . . . . like . . . . . we're supposed to be surprised that once again the Democrats prove themselves total LIARS, FRAUDS, and HYPOCRITES?

 

[22lcidw]

except to defend our very system of government or our constitutional liberties against a dire threat.


He's 100% correct, and that's why there is the impeachment inquiry in to Trump... he is lawless and a very threat to our system of govt and constitution.



what's the issue?

Its issues. You want to take everything from people. And in the end when we are eating plant meat and laboratory meat and meat from decayed humans while the Prog elites are eating everything we are used to because they are "better" you will finally realize it.

 

[Care4all]

...he is lawless and a very threat to our system of govt and constitution.

You're a good parrot.

ty! But I actually do my own thinking, and my own talking.... I don't need to parrot anyone! I'm one of a kind!

 

[peach174]

except to defend our very system of government or our constitutional liberties against a dire threat.


He's 100% correct, and that's why there is the impeachment inquiry in to Trump... he is lawless and a very threat to our system of govt and constitution.



what's the issue?

One sided.

 

[Care4all]

except to defend our very system of government or our constitutional liberties against a dire threat.


He's 100% correct, and that's why there is the impeachment inquiry in to Trump... he is lawless and a very threat to our system of govt and constitution.



what's the issue?

Its issues. You want to take everything from people. And in the end when we are eating plant meat and laboratory meat and meat from decayed humans while the Prog elites are eating everything we are used to because they are "better" you will finally realize it.

You know what? That's just hogwash... (you lived thru Clinton 8 years, and Obama's 8 years)

the R's in the GOP need you to believe that, in order for them to be elected...

They have no solutions, they don't even need to have any that will help you or most of their constituents...

they just need you, to hate us... they need a boogeyman... an enemy...

And they will hold their seats and power, 4 ever! While they rob you blind, and point their finger, at us....

it's all a game

the game of politics, and sadly, we are simply the pawns in it...!!

 

[Sun Devil 92]

except to defend our very system of government or our constitutional liberties against a dire threat.


He's 100% correct, and that's why there is the impeachment inquiry in to Trump... he is lawless and a very threat to our system of govt and constitution.



what's the issue?

It's so cut and dried that the house won't vote on a proceeding.

You are really full of shit.

 

[Care4all]

except to defend our very system of government or our constitutional liberties against a dire threat.


He's 100% correct, and that's why there is the impeachment inquiry in to Trump... he is lawless and a very threat to our system of govt and constitution.



what's the issue?

It's so cut and dried that the house won't vote on a proceeding.

You are really full of shit.

What if they decided to just censure him for wrong doings, after they gather the facts, and not impeach? Why rush to impeach him?

Or do we need an Independent prosecutor.... how about Kenneth Star?

The president needs to stop stonewalling, and simply turn over the subpoena stuff and allow people to answer questions.

HE acts like he is afraid of what they will find? it's just pure lawlessness,

 

[Sun Devil 92]

except to defend our very system of government or our constitutional liberties against a dire threat.


He's 100% correct, and that's why there is the impeachment inquiry in to Trump... he is lawless and a very threat to our system of govt and constitution.



what's the issue?

It's so cut and dried that the house won't vote on a proceeding.

You are really full of shit.

What if they decided to just censure him for wrong doings, after they gather the facts, and not impeach? Why rush to impeach him?

Or do we need an Independent prosecutor.... how about Kenneth Star?

The president needs to stop stonewalling, and simply turn over the subpoena stuff and allow people to answer questions.

HE acts like he is afraid of what they will find? it's just pure lawlessness,

What if ?

The president needs to act like a president...but he never will.

He's a jerk and when you behave the way the left has, it will only get worse.