What a Second American Civil War Could Look Like

[multivita-man]

The left doesn't want Trump off the ballot, Democrats do.

The Democrats are the Left.

 

[Godboy]

But the truth is, that there would be dead republicans as well...A second civil war would destroy America. But, none the less, I think that is where we are headed...

Thats not where we are headed. We are headed for secession. If Texas secedes from the US, other red states will immediately follow and form a coaliton of red states, thereby ending the United States of America.

 

[SeaMajor7]

The demented LEFT are hell-bent on pushing through their neo-Marxist revolution in this country, but they seem to forget that EVERY retarded Marxist revolution in the 20th century REQUIRED MASS-MURDER to come to be, before ultimately FAILING.

Lawfare is where they are now, but if that doesn't work (it won't), then what's next......?

 

[Mac-7]

It was the contributing issue. Every other contributing issue comes back to the slavery question. The Southern economy and the whole of Southern society were established on the foundation of a slave-based economy and slave-based aristocracy.

No it doesent

How much tariff to charge on imported goods from England and France has nothing to do with slavery

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

sure sure and you need to now say that ANTIFA / BLM are all part of the Vast Right Wing conspiracy while the FBI funded leftist Fascists expand the police state.
Your Village Idiot Biden is building a New SECRET POLICE COMPOUND FOR THE FBI that is bigger than the Pentagon.

It's Trump that wants to do that.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

No it doesent

How much tariff to charge on imported goods from England and France has nothing to do with slavery

Of course it does. Those goods included cotton imports.

Slavery was the root cause of the Civil War.

 

[Mac-7]

Of course it does. Those goods included cotton imports.

Slavery was the root cause of the Civil War.

You mean cotton exports

The southern states wanted to buy products from England instead higher priced northern goods

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

All cotton in the South was estimated to be 90% of the regional wealth.

Cotton means slavery, slavery means Civil War.

Mac-7, cotton means slavery, which all leads to the Civil War.

 

[multivita-man]

No it doesent

How much tariff to charge on imported goods from England and France has nothing to do with slavery

Looks like someone needs to crack open a history book because slavery was the issue. South Carolina got bent over tariffs a time or two but that is not why all of the Southern states left the Union.

 

[Mac-7]

Looks like someone needs to crack open a history book because slavery was the issue. South Carolina got bent over tariffs a time or two but that is not why all of the Southern states left the Union.

It was not the only issue

 

[Soupnazi630]

Nah, the north had a history of white and Black slaves also.
The war was over the south wanting to trade with England instead of the north.

Wrong

Having a history of it is irrelvant. The abololitionist movement was in the north

The war was over slavery

 

[AsherN]

.Right now, the left is trying harder than ever to keep Trump off the ballot.

The suit in Colorado was brought up by Republicans...

 

[AsherN]

Dude, the vice president has the ability to certify the election correct

The States certify the elections. The VP makes the count official.

 

[DBA]

Cotton means slavery, slavery means Civil War.

And both were seen as a state right. Glad we cleared that up.

 

[multivita-man]

It was not the only issue

But the most important one by far. Tariffs and so forth were just more salt in the gaping wound, but the future of slavery was the gaping, infected wound. It is correct to point out that the Union didn't necessarily fight to end slavery immediately - they knew that wasn't realistic and they didn't want to piss off the South. They hoped that they could contain the growth of slave-holding territory and thus the growth of their political power by ending slavery's expansion, but the South knew what they would mean in terms of the political balance of power and weren't havin it. And Northern radicals weren't havin that.

 

[otto105]

It was one of the contributing issues

It was the issue.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

And both were seen as a state right. Glad we cleared that up.

Nothing new there. States right, cotton, export, taxation, etc., all stemmed from slavery, Slavery was the cause.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Of course it does. Those goods included cotton imports.

Slavery was the root cause of the Civil War.

Why would the South import cotten? They were swimming in it

 

[Vastator]

Nothing new there. States right, cotton, export, taxation, etc., all stemmed from slavery, Slavery was the cause.

Won't matter going forward. This ain't 1860.

 

[Mac-7]

But the most important one by far. Tariffs and so forth were just more salt in the gaping wound, but the future of slavery was the gaping, infected wound. It is correct to point out that the Union didn't necessarily fight to end slavery immediately - they knew that wasn't realistic and they didn't want to piss off the South. They hoped that they could contain the growth of slave-holding territory and thus the growth of their political power by ending slavery's expansion, but the South knew what they would mean in terms of the political balance of power and weren't havin it. And Northern radicals weren't havin that.

Slavery was the leading issue for some people but was not the only issue

Libs turn their noses up at the the idea of states rights, but it predated the problem of slavery

People in South Carolina did not want to be told what to do by strangers in Boston or New York

Tariffs, slavery, the gold standard were all pieces of the puzzle