What are the odds that Kavanaugh Will Withdraw and sue?

[bodecea]

He won't withdraw and he should sue the bitch into oblivion

Suuuuuuuuure......start a GoFundMe to help him out.

 

[JGalt]

He won't back out and he won't sue. He'll just make liberal's lives a living hell for the next 30 years while he's on the bench.

 

[bodecea]

Denial of civil rights(presumption of innocence until proven guilty and right to confront their accusers and many others.)

Calumny( the legal term for character assassination)

Perjury and solicitation of perjury

Admissability of repressed memory uncovered by use of a therapist is considered suspect in all courts and is normally thrown out if corraberation is lacking. The above range from constitutional rights in all cases including the UCMJ to some degree to common law and on to general practices.

Kavanaugh knows that ripping the Ds a new one is the best way to clear his name.

Will he do it?

This wasn't a trial. This was a job interview. Making any argument of 'presumption of innocence' irrelevant. As for perjury, there's no evidence of it. Even Trump admitted that Ford was credible.

Drop out? Unlikely. Sue? Virtually nil.

Kavanaugh has no grounds, he'd lose, and he know he'd lose. Which was why Kavanaugh started up with batshit conspiracy theories about 'revenge for Clinton' rather than attacking Ford personally.

Character assassination and destroying a person's reputation, calling him a gang rapist and accusing him of running a drug/rape ring is NEVER OK UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES. Only Democrats believe all is fair if it results in what they want.

So, you are up for B. Clinton suing all here who have called him a rapist, eh?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Denial of civil rights(presumption of innocence until proven guilty and right to confront their accusers and many others.)

Calumny( the legal term for character assassination)

Perjury and solicitation of perjury

Admissability of repressed memory uncovered by use of a therapist is considered suspect in all courts and is normally thrown out if corraberation is lacking. The above range from constitutional rights in all cases including the UCMJ to some degree to common law and on to general practices.

Kavanaugh knows that ripping the Ds a new one is the best way to clear his name.

Will he do it?

This wasn't a trial. This was a job interview. Making any argument of 'presumption of innocence' irrelevant. As for perjury, there's no evidence of it. Even Trump admitted that Ford was credible.

Drop out? Unlikely. Sue? Virtually nil.

Kavanaugh has no grounds, he'd lose, and he know he'd lose. Which was why Kavanaugh started up with batshit conspiracy theories about 'revenge for Clinton' rather than attacking Ford personally.

Character assassination and destroying a person's reputation, calling him a gang rapist and accusing him of running a drug/rape ring is NEVER OK UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES. Only Democrats believe all is fair if it results in what they want.

So, you are up for B. Clinton suing all here who have called him a rapist, eh?

He should. 100%

 

[Skylar]

Denial of civil rights(presumption of innocence until proven guilty and right to confront their accusers and many others.)

Calumny( the legal term for character assassination)

Perjury and solicitation of perjury

Admissability of repressed memory uncovered by use of a therapist is considered suspect in all courts and is normally thrown out if corraberation is lacking. The above range from constitutional rights in all cases including the UCMJ to some degree to common law and on to general practices.

Kavanaugh knows that ripping the Ds a new one is the best way to clear his name.

Will he do it?

This wasn't a trial. This was a job interview. Making any argument of 'presumption of innocence' irrelevant. As for perjury, there's no evidence of it. Even Trump admitted that Ford was credible.

Drop out? Unlikely. Sue? Virtually nil.

Kavanaugh has no grounds, he'd lose, and he know he'd lose. Which was why Kavanaugh started up with batshit conspiracy theories about 'revenge for Clinton' rather than attacking Ford personally.

Character assassination and destroying a person's reputation, calling him a gang rapist and accusing him of running a drug/rape ring is NEVER OK UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES. Only Democrats believe all is fair if it results in what they want.

So, you are up for B. Clinton suing all here who have called him a rapist, eh?

How about Hillary suing for the LOCK HER UP chants at Trump's rallies. Not much 'presumption of innocence' in that one, either.

 

[JGalt]

Denial of civil rights(presumption of innocence until proven guilty and right to confront their accusers and many others.)

Calumny( the legal term for character assassination)

Perjury and solicitation of perjury

Admissability of repressed memory uncovered by use of a therapist is considered suspect in all courts and is normally thrown out if corraberation is lacking. The above range from constitutional rights in all cases including the UCMJ to some degree to common law and on to general practices.

Kavanaugh knows that ripping the Ds a new one is the best way to clear his name.

Will he do it?

This wasn't a trial. This was a job interview. Making any argument of 'presumption of innocence' irrelevant. As for perjury, there's no evidence of it. Even Trump admitted that Ford was credible.

Drop out? Unlikely. Sue? Virtually nil.

Kavanaugh has no grounds, he'd lose, and he know he'd lose. Which was why Kavanaugh started up with batshit conspiracy theories about 'revenge for Clinton' rather than attacking Ford personally.

Character assassination and destroying a person's reputation, calling him a gang rapist and accusing him of running a drug/rape ring is NEVER OK UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES. Only Democrats believe all is fair if it results in what they want.

So, you are up for B. Clinton suing all here who have called him a rapist, eh?

He sure as hell didn't try to sue Juanita Broderick, or the other women who revealed that he raped them.

Bill Clinton is a rapist.

 

[Skylar]

Denial of civil rights(presumption of innocence until proven guilty and right to confront their accusers and many others.)

Calumny( the legal term for character assassination)

Perjury and solicitation of perjury

Admissability of repressed memory uncovered by use of a therapist is considered suspect in all courts and is normally thrown out if corraberation is lacking. The above range from constitutional rights in all cases including the UCMJ to some degree to common law and on to general practices.

Kavanaugh knows that ripping the Ds a new one is the best way to clear his name.

Will he do it?

This wasn't a trial. This was a job interview. Making any argument of 'presumption of innocence' irrelevant. As for perjury, there's no evidence of it. Even Trump admitted that Ford was credible.

Drop out? Unlikely. Sue? Virtually nil.

Kavanaugh has no grounds, he'd lose, and he know he'd lose. Which was why Kavanaugh started up with batshit conspiracy theories about 'revenge for Clinton' rather than attacking Ford personally.

Character assassination and destroying a person's reputation, calling him a gang rapist and accusing him of running a drug/rape ring is NEVER OK UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES. Only Democrats believe all is fair if it results in what they want.

So, you are up for B. Clinton suing all here who have called him a rapist, eh?

He should. 100%

He won't. 0%.

The republicans don't have the votes. They're hoping for something to change the equation on Kavanaugh in the FBI investigation.

Good luck with that. So far, more information on Kavanaugh has not endeared him with the public. The man is one of the least popular judicial nominees in recent history.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Denial of civil rights(presumption of innocence until proven guilty and right to confront their accusers and many others.)

Calumny( the legal term for character assassination)

Perjury and solicitation of perjury

Admissability of repressed memory uncovered by use of a therapist is considered suspect in all courts and is normally thrown out if corraberation is lacking. The above range from constitutional rights in all cases including the UCMJ to some degree to common law and on to general practices.

Kavanaugh knows that ripping the Ds a new one is the best way to clear his name.

Will he do it?

This wasn't a trial. This was a job interview. Making any argument of 'presumption of innocence' irrelevant. As for perjury, there's no evidence of it. Even Trump admitted that Ford was credible.

Drop out? Unlikely. Sue? Virtually nil.

Kavanaugh has no grounds, he'd lose, and he know he'd lose. Which was why Kavanaugh started up with batshit conspiracy theories about 'revenge for Clinton' rather than attacking Ford personally.

Character assassination and destroying a person's reputation, calling him a gang rapist and accusing him of running a drug/rape ring is NEVER OK UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES. Only Democrats believe all is fair if it results in what they want.

So, you are up for B. Clinton suing all here who have called him a rapist, eh?

He should. 100%

He won't. 0%.

The republicans don't have the votes. They're hoping for something to change the equation on Kavanaugh in the FBI investigation.

Good luck with that. So far, more information on Kavanaugh has not endeared him with the public. The man is one of the least popular judicial nominees in recent history.

0%?

If he gets confirmed do you pledge to leave these boards forever? You proclaim 0% so no risk to you.
Deal?

 

[bodecea]

He won't back out and he won't sue. He'll just make liberal's lives a living hell for the next 30 years while he's on the bench.

So...you are admitting that the purpose is not to be a Justice in our Judicial System, but to stick it to Liberals......like the liberals who founded this country....like the liberals who freed the slaves...like the liberals who finally gave women the right to vote...like the liberals who passed the Civil Rights Act...like the liberals who fought to end Child Labor Laws....like the liberals who founded our unions........

 

[my2¢]

0%.

He tried to screw her all those years ago and now her attempt to screw him will likewise be unsuccessful.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

He won't withdraw and he should sue the bitch into oblivion

Suuuuuuuuure......start a GoFundMe to help him out.

It's Plywood with it's usual nonsense.

Oh and Kavanagh doesn't need a GoFund me, he's an actual attorney and can sue the old lying bat himself

Now go pretend the plywood must get through!!!!!! Fcking dunce

 

[JGalt]

Denial of civil rights(presumption of innocence until proven guilty and right to confront their accusers and many others.)

Calumny( the legal term for character assassination)

Perjury and solicitation of perjury

Admissability of repressed memory uncovered by use of a therapist is considered suspect in all courts and is normally thrown out if corraberation is lacking. The above range from constitutional rights in all cases including the UCMJ to some degree to common law and on to general practices.

Kavanaugh knows that ripping the Ds a new one is the best way to clear his name.

Will he do it?

This wasn't a trial. This was a job interview. Making any argument of 'presumption of innocence' irrelevant. As for perjury, there's no evidence of it. Even Trump admitted that Ford was credible.

Drop out? Unlikely. Sue? Virtually nil.

Kavanaugh has no grounds, he'd lose, and he know he'd lose. Which was why Kavanaugh started up with batshit conspiracy theories about 'revenge for Clinton' rather than attacking Ford personally.

Character assassination and destroying a person's reputation, calling him a gang rapist and accusing him of running a drug/rape ring is NEVER OK UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES. Only Democrats believe all is fair if it results in what they want.

So, you are up for B. Clinton suing all here who have called him a rapist, eh?

How about Hillary suing for the LOCK HER UP chants at Trump's rallies. Not much 'presumption of innocence' in that one, either.

In case you've forgotten, even the FBI admitted that she broke numerous laws. They just neglected to prosecute her because they were 100% sure that she was going to win.

But she lost.

Here's The Law FBI Director ADMITS Hillary Broke!

 

[bodecea]

Denial of civil rights(presumption of innocence until proven guilty and right to confront their accusers and many others.)

Calumny( the legal term for character assassination)

Perjury and solicitation of perjury

Admissability of repressed memory uncovered by use of a therapist is considered suspect in all courts and is normally thrown out if corraberation is lacking. The above range from constitutional rights in all cases including the UCMJ to some degree to common law and on to general practices.

Kavanaugh knows that ripping the Ds a new one is the best way to clear his name.

Will he do it?

This wasn't a trial. This was a job interview. Making any argument of 'presumption of innocence' irrelevant. As for perjury, there's no evidence of it. Even Trump admitted that Ford was credible.

Drop out? Unlikely. Sue? Virtually nil.

Kavanaugh has no grounds, he'd lose, and he know he'd lose. Which was why Kavanaugh started up with batshit conspiracy theories about 'revenge for Clinton' rather than attacking Ford personally.

Character assassination and destroying a person's reputation, calling him a gang rapist and accusing him of running a drug/rape ring is NEVER OK UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES. Only Democrats believe all is fair if it results in what they want.

So, you are up for B. Clinton suing all here who have called him a rapist, eh?

He should. 100%

He won't. 0%.

The republicans don't have the votes. They're hoping for something to change the equation on Kavanaugh in the FBI investigation.

Good luck with that. So far, more information on Kavanaugh has not endeared him with the public. The man is one of the least popular judicial nominees in recent history.

It's funny to watch Flake make his condition for voting yes.....I could hear the RW deflation from here in California.....We have a RW radio host here I sometimes listen to on my way home from work that was screaming.....SCREAMING into his mike this afternoon. Made me smile.

 

[Skylar]

This wasn't a trial. This was a job interview. Making any argument of 'presumption of innocence' irrelevant. As for perjury, there's no evidence of it. Even Trump admitted that Ford was credible.

Drop out? Unlikely. Sue? Virtually nil.

Kavanaugh has no grounds, he'd lose, and he know he'd lose. Which was why Kavanaugh started up with batshit conspiracy theories about 'revenge for Clinton' rather than attacking Ford personally.

Character assassination and destroying a person's reputation, calling him a gang rapist and accusing him of running a drug/rape ring is NEVER OK UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES. Only Democrats believe all is fair if it results in what they want.

So, you are up for B. Clinton suing all here who have called him a rapist, eh?

He should. 100%

He won't. 0%.

The republicans don't have the votes. They're hoping for something to change the equation on Kavanaugh in the FBI investigation.

Good luck with that. So far, more information on Kavanaugh has not endeared him with the public. The man is one of the least popular judicial nominees in recent history.

0%?

If he gets confirmed do you pledge to leave these boards forever? You proclaim 0% so no risk to you.
Deal?

I said there's zero chance that Kavanaugh will sue.

As for leaving the board, feel free to. I'm gonna stick around.

 

[hazlnut]

He won't withdraw and he should sue the bitch into oblivion

Becoming a SCOTUS justice will be the best revenge, then he can screw over the Dem's for decades.

Wouldn't that be judicial activism?

And so much for his objectivity. I guess you knew he was phony but didn't care.

...which makes you a phony.

 

[Skylar]

Denial of civil rights(presumption of innocence until proven guilty and right to confront their accusers and many others.)

Calumny( the legal term for character assassination)

Perjury and solicitation of perjury

Admissability of repressed memory uncovered by use of a therapist is considered suspect in all courts and is normally thrown out if corraberation is lacking. The above range from constitutional rights in all cases including the UCMJ to some degree to common law and on to general practices.

Kavanaugh knows that ripping the Ds a new one is the best way to clear his name.

Will he do it?

This wasn't a trial. This was a job interview. Making any argument of 'presumption of innocence' irrelevant. As for perjury, there's no evidence of it. Even Trump admitted that Ford was credible.

Drop out? Unlikely. Sue? Virtually nil.

Kavanaugh has no grounds, he'd lose, and he know he'd lose. Which was why Kavanaugh started up with batshit conspiracy theories about 'revenge for Clinton' rather than attacking Ford personally.

Character assassination and destroying a person's reputation, calling him a gang rapist and accusing him of running a drug/rape ring is NEVER OK UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES. Only Democrats believe all is fair if it results in what they want.

So, you are up for B. Clinton suing all here who have called him a rapist, eh?

How about Hillary suing for the LOCK HER UP chants at Trump's rallies. Not much 'presumption of innocence' in that one, either.

In case you've forgotten, even the FBI admitted that she broke numerous laws. They just neglected to prosecute her because they were 100% sure that she was going to win.

But she lost.

Here's The Law FBI Director ADMITS Hillary Broke!

The FBI concluded that no prosecutor would charge Hillary with any crime.

With the IG finding that the FBI's conclusions were reasonable and based on law and precedent.

And if some supposed violation of the 'presumption of innocence' is a tortable offense, then Trump's LOCK HER UP chant would certainly qualify. Alas, that's not the way our law works.

 

[JGalt]

He won't back out and he won't sue. He'll just make liberal's lives a living hell for the next 30 years while he's on the bench.

So...you are admitting that the purpose is not to be a Justice in our Judicial System, but to stick it to Liberals......like the liberals who founded this country....like the liberals who freed the slaves...like the liberals who finally gave women the right to vote...like the liberals who passed the Civil Rights Act...like the liberals who fought to end Child Labor Laws....like the liberals who founded our unions........

I'm not admitting anything. But the way you people treated him opened up a very large can of worms for you. Hopefully he's a magnanimous person who won't hold it against you, but I sorta doubt it.

Roe vs. Wade? Gone.

Gun laws? Gone.

 

[Lumpy 1]

Denial of civil rights(presumption of innocence until proven guilty and right to confront their accusers and many others.)

Calumny( the legal term for character assassination)

Perjury and solicitation of perjury

Admissability of repressed memory uncovered by use of a therapist is considered suspect in all courts and is normally thrown out if corraberation is lacking. The above range from constitutional rights in all cases including the UCMJ to some degree to common law and on to general practices.

Kavanaugh knows that ripping the Ds a new one is the best way to clear his name.

Will he do it?

This wasn't a trial. This was a job interview. Making any argument of 'presumption of innocence' irrelevant. As for perjury, there's no evidence of it. Even Trump admitted that Ford was credible.

Drop out? Unlikely. Sue? Virtually nil.

Kavanaugh has no grounds, he'd lose, and he know he'd lose. Which was why Kavanaugh started up with batshit conspiracy theories about 'revenge for Clinton' rather than attacking Ford personally.

Character assassination and destroying a person's reputation, calling him a gang rapist and accusing him of running a drug/rape ring is NEVER OK UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES. Only Democrats believe all is fair if it results in what they want.

So, you are up for B. Clinton suing all here who have called him a rapist, eh?

How about Hillary suing for the LOCK HER UP chants at Trump's rallies. Not much 'presumption of innocence' in that one, either.

You deny that Hillary got a free pass from the fully corrupted Obama Administration?

 

[Skylar]

This wasn't a trial. This was a job interview. Making any argument of 'presumption of innocence' irrelevant. As for perjury, there's no evidence of it. Even Trump admitted that Ford was credible.

Drop out? Unlikely. Sue? Virtually nil.

Kavanaugh has no grounds, he'd lose, and he know he'd lose. Which was why Kavanaugh started up with batshit conspiracy theories about 'revenge for Clinton' rather than attacking Ford personally.

Character assassination and destroying a person's reputation, calling him a gang rapist and accusing him of running a drug/rape ring is NEVER OK UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES. Only Democrats believe all is fair if it results in what they want.

So, you are up for B. Clinton suing all here who have called him a rapist, eh?

He should. 100%

He won't. 0%.

The republicans don't have the votes. They're hoping for something to change the equation on Kavanaugh in the FBI investigation.

Good luck with that. So far, more information on Kavanaugh has not endeared him with the public. The man is one of the least popular judicial nominees in recent history.

It's funny to watch Flake make his condition for voting yes.....I could hear the RW deflation from here in California.....We have a RW radio host here I sometimes listen to on my way home from work that was screaming.....SCREAMING into his mike this afternoon. Made me smile.

Yeah, they're all slowly morphing into Alex Jones. Even Kavanaugh doubled down on batshit conspiracies and trying to yell his way out of this.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

He won't withdraw and he should sue the bitch into oblivion

Suuuuuuuuure......start a GoFundMe to help him out.

It's Plywood with it's usual nonsense.

Oh and Kavanagh doesn't need a GoFund me, he's an actual attorney and can sue the old lying bat himself

Now go pretend the plywood must get through!!!!!! Fcking dunce

Look at you, Mal! Supposedly married to a lawyer and yet you don't know the FIRST THING about law, that a lawyer should never represent themself. Your catfishing is showing.......oopsie.

Kavanaugh should sue...

I put in content, you failed. Reported, Plywood